Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Success and Failure of Primary Medical, Nonoperative Management In Breast Cancer

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Nonoperative but systemic therapy as first-line management is offered to some patients with breast cancer (BC) who have assumed limited life expectancy, such as older women or those who have distant metastases at initial presentation. We evaluated rates of and predicting factors for success and failure of this therapy approach.

Methods

Seventy-five patients who were initially treated only systemically, and cases in which local control while avoiding surgery was the intended long-term therapy goal were analyzed. Additionally, two stage-dependent subgroups were distinguished (A: stage I-III, n = 31; B: stage IV, n = 44). Failure of therapy was defined as when secondary surgery had to be performed due to locoregional progression or in case of no surgery when severe locoregional clinical signs/symptoms were observed during the further course.

Results

Patients in group A were older than those in group B (81 vs. 67.5 years; P < 0.001) and showed an increased survival (5-year rates: 40.2% vs. 24.3%). In 24 patients of the entire cohort (32%), secondary surgery had to be performed; surgery was performed more often in group A (58.1% vs. 13.6%). In the cases in which no surgery was performed (n = 51), 11 women (21.6%) suffered from severe locoregional symptoms in the palliative situation (A: n = 1; B: n = 10). Although the presence of stage IV was a significant factor for therapy success (odds ratio (OR), 2.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.95–7.05; P = 0.039), skin involvement was associated with failure of therapy (OR, 3.57; 95% CI, 1.16–11.11; P = 0.031).

Conclusions

Nonoperative treatment may be offered to selected patients with BC who have assumed limited life expectancy. These women must be openly informed that this approach is not successful in nearly half of the cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fennessy M, Bates T, MacRae K, et al. Late follow-up of a randomized trial of surgery plus tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone in women aged over 70 years with operable breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2004;91:699–704.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fentiman IS, Christiaens MR, Paridaens R, et al. Treatment of operable breast cancer in the elderly: a randomised clinical trial EORTC 10851 comparing tamoxifen alone with modified radical mastectomy. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:309–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hind D, Wyld L, Beverley CB, Reed MW. Surgery versus primary endocrine therapy for operable primary breast cancer in elderly women (70 years plus). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;CD004272.

  4. Kenny F, Robertson J, Ellis I et al. Long-term follow-up of elderly patients randomized to primary tamoxifen or wedge mastectomy as initial therapy for operable breast cancer. Breast. 1998;7:335–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mustacchi G, Ceccherini R, Milani S, et al. Tamoxifen alone versus adjuvant tamoxifen for operable breast cancer of the elderly: long-term results of the phase III randomized controlled multicenter GRETA trial. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:414–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Atkin GK, Scott MA, Wiggins JE, Callam MJ. The incidence, indications and outcome for the non-operative management of breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2007;96:137–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Verkooijen HM, Fioretta GM, Rapiti E, et al. Patients’ refusal of surgery strongly impairs breast cancer survival. Ann Surg. 2005;242:276–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Babiera GV, Rao R, Feng L, et al. Effect of primary tumor extirpation in breast cancer patients who present with stage IV disease and an intact primary tumor. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:776–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bafford AC, Burstein HJ, Barkley CR, et al. Breast surgery in stage IV breast cancer: impact of staging and patient selection on overall survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;115:7–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Blanchard DK, Shetty PB, Hilsenbeck SG, Elledge RM. Association of surgery with improved survival in stage IV breast cancer patients. Ann Surg. 2008;247:732–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fields RC, Jeffe DB, Trinkaus K, et al. Surgical resection of the primary tumor is associated with increased long-term survival in patients with stage IV breast cancer after controlling for site of metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3345–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gnerlich J, Jeffe DB, Deshpande AD, et al. Surgical removal of the primary tumor increases overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer: analysis of the 1988-2003 SEER data. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2187–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Khan SA, Stewart AK, Morrow M. Does aggressive local therapy improve survival in metastatic breast cancer? Surgery. 2002;132:620–6; discussion 626–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rapiti E, Verkooijen HM, Vlastos G, et al. Complete excision of primary breast tumor improves survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer at diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2743–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Edge S, Byrd D, Compton C, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. New York: Springer; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sobin L, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C (2009) UICC TNM classification of malignant tumors Oxford. Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guth U, Jane Huang D, Holzgreve W, et al. T4 breast cancer under closer inspection: a case for revision of the TNM classification. Breast. 2007;16:625–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Holmes C, Muss H. Breast cancer in older women. In: Singletary S, Robb G, Hortobagyi G (editors). Advanced therapy of breast cancer, 2nd ed. Hamilton: Decker 2004:727–42.

  19. Rao VS, Garimella V, Hwang M, Drew PJ. Management of early breast cancer in the elderly. Int J Cancer. 2007;120:1155–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, et al. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284:2476–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yellen SB, Cella DF, Leslie WT. Age and clinical decision making in oncology patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86:1766–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Guth U, Huang DJ, Dirnhofer S, et al. Distant metastatic breast cancer as an incurable disease: a tenet with a need for revision. Cancer J. 2009;15:81–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uwe Güth MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmid, S.M., Modlasiak, A.A., Myrick, M.E. et al. Success and Failure of Primary Medical, Nonoperative Management In Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 18, 2166–2172 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1592-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1592-8

Keywords

Navigation