Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Advanced Gastric Cancer with Early Cancer Macroscopic Appearance: Is It Worthy of D2 Lymphadenectomy?

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Previous studies report that 5.9–22.2% of patients with preoperatively diagnosed early gastric cancers were eventually proven to have advanced gastric cancers by postoperative pathological examination. Such misdiagnosed cases commonly had cancers with macroscopic appearance like early gastric cancer and consequently can be recognized as a subgroup of cancer, namely advanced gastric cancer with early cancer macroscopic appearance (eAGC). Theoretically eAGCs might require D2 lymphadenectomy, but frequently undergo limited lymphadenectomy. However, the validity of the limited surgery is still unclear.

Methods

Clinicopathologic features of 134 patients with eAGC were retrospectively reviewed and compared with those of patients with early gastric cancers and advanced gastric cancers, respectively.

Results

Clinicopathologic features of eAGCs were similar to those of submucosa cancers, but significantly different from those of mucosa cancers and other muscularis propria cancers. Tumor size, lymphatic and/or blood vessels invasion (LBVI), and depth of invasion were identified as independent factors predicting lymph node metastasis; however, postoperative stage was not. All patients with eAGCs were proven to have lymph node metastasis restricted to the perigastric lymph nodes and lymph nodes at stations 7, 8a, and 9. Age, LBVI, and depth of invasion were independent prognostic factors for patients with preoperatively diagnosed early gastric cancers; however, the misdiagnosis of early cancer and the option of lymphadenectomy (D2 or not D2) had no impact on patient survival. The incidence of recurrence of eAGCs was similar to that of submucosa cancers, but significantly different from that of mucosa cancers and other muscularis propria cancers.

Conclusions

Modified gastrectomy B (dissection of perigastric lymph nodes and nodes at stations 7, 8a, and 9) might be recommended for patients with eAGCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goggins WB, Wong GK. Poor survival for US Pacific Islander cancer patients: evidence from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database: 1991 to 2004. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5738–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Crew KD, Neugut AI. Epidemiology of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:354–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Katai H, Sano T. Early gastric cancer: concepts, diagnosis, and management. Int J Clin Oncol. 2005;10:375–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee SE, Lee JH, Ryu KW, et al. Sentinel node mapping and skip metastases in patients with early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:603–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kwee RM, Kwee TC. Predicting lymph node status in early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2008;11:134–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lo SS, Wu CW, Chen JH, et al. Surgical results of early gastric cancer and proposing a treatment strategy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:340–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakajima T. Gastric cancer treatment guidelines in Japan. Gastric Cancer. 2002;5:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sano T, Okuyama Y, Kobori O, et al. Early gastric cancer. Endoscopic diagnosis of depth of invasion. Dig Dis Sci. 1990;35:1340–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kwee RM, Kwee TC. Imaging in local staging of gastric cancer: A systematic review. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:2107–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Namieno T, Koito K, Hiigashi T, et al. Endoscopic prediction of tumor depth of gastric carcinoma for assessing the indication of its limited resection. Oncol Rep. 2000;7:57–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saito N, Takeshita K, Habu H, et al. The use of endoscopic ultrasound in determining the depth of cancer invasion in patients with gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 1991;5:14–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ganpathi IS, So JB, Ho KY. Endoscopic ultrasonography for gastric cancer: Does it influence treatment? Surg Endosc. 2006;20:559–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shimizu K, Ito K, Matsunaga N, et al. Diagnosis of gastric cancer with MDCT using the water-filling method and multiplanar reconstruction: CT-histologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:1152–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cristallini EG, Paganelli C, Ascani S, et al. Endoscopic and histological criteria for preoperative evaluation of the depth of infiltration of gastric carcinoma. Surg Endosc. 1994;8:1305–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Seto Y, Shimoyama S, Kitayama J, et al. Lymph node metastasis and preoperative diagnosis of depth of invasion in early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2001;4:34–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwarz RE, Zagala-Nevarez K. Recurrence patterns after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: prognostic factors and implications for postoperative adjuvant therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9(4):394–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. D’Angelica M, Gonen M, Brennan MF, et al. Patterns of initial recurrence in completely resected gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2004;240(5):808–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sarela AI, Turnbull AD, Coit DG, et al. Accurate lymph node staging is of greater prognostic importance than subclassification of the T2 category for gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:783–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, Kurioka H, et al. Prognostic and clinical evaluation of patients with T2 gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005;52:965–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Okuno K, Shigeoka H, Tanaka A, et al. Clinicopathological evaluation of T2-gastric cancer among age groups. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;47:1180–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Isozaki H, Fujii K, Nomura E, et al. Prognostic factors of advanced gastric carci-noma without serosal invasion (pT2 gastric carcinoma). Hepatogastroenterology. 1999;46:2669–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Park do J, Kong SH, Lee HJ, et al. Subclassification of pT2 gastric adenocarcinoma according to depth of invasion (pT2a vs. pT2b) and lymph node status (pN). Surgery. 2007;141:757–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nitti D, Marchet A, Mocellin S, et al. Prognostic value of subclassification of T2 tumours in patients with gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96:398–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamashita K, Sakuramoto S, Kikuchi S, Katada N, Kobayashi N, Watanabe M. Validation of staging systems for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2008;11(2):111–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun Z, Zhu GL, Lu C, et al. A novel subclassification of pT2 gastric cancers according to the depth of muscularis propria invasion: superficial muscularis propria versus deep muscularis propria/subserosa. Ann Surg. 2009;249:768–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1810–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nakajima T, Nashimoto A, Kitamura M, et al. Adjuvant mitomycin and fluorouracil followed by oral uracil plus tegafur in serosa-negative gastric cancer: a randomized trial. Gastric Cancer Surgical Study Group. Lancet. 1999;354:273–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nashimoto A, Nakajima T, Furukawa H, et al. Randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with mitomycin, fluorouracil, and cytosine arabinoside followed by oral fluorouracil in serosa-negative gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group 9206-1. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2282–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 30901419).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui-mian Xu MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, Z., Wang, Zn., Zhu, Gl. et al. Advanced Gastric Cancer with Early Cancer Macroscopic Appearance: Is It Worthy of D2 Lymphadenectomy?. Ann Surg Oncol 17, 1278–1290 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0890-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0890-x

Keywords

Navigation