Skip to main content
Log in

Ethnic Disparities in Breast Cancer Management Among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders

  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Little is known about breast cancer management among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (AAPI).

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 2030 women (935 Japanese, 144 Chinese, 235 Filipino, 293 Hawaiian, and 423 white; mean age ± SD, 59 ± 13 years) with a diagnosis of early breast cancer (stages I, II, and IIIA) in Hawaii from 1995 to 2001. We linked data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program’s Hawaii Tumor Registry to administrative health care claims. We evaluated (1) breast-conserving surgery (BCS); (2) radiotherapy after BCS; and (3) chemotherapy for node-positive disease. We used logistic regression to examine the association between AAPI ethnicity and treatment, adjusting for age, year, rural residence, tumor size, grade, nodal status, receptor status, prior cancer, comorbidity index, health plan type, and income.

Results

Overall, 60.3% of women had stage I disease, 36.8% had stage II, and 2.9% had stage IIIA. Only 55.6% received BCS, and 85.1% of these women also received radiation. Of those with nodal involvement (n = 521), 82.7% received chemotherapy. Japanese and Filipino women were significantly less likely than white women to undergo BCS (for Japanese: adjusted odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.48–0.80; for Filipinos: adjusted odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.66). Filipinos tended to be less likely than white women to receive radiation after BCS (adjusted odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.42–1.49). AAPI women were as likely as white women to receive adjuvant chemotherapy for nodal spread.

Conclusions

We found disparities in the management of early-stage breast cancer among AAPI women, particularly among Japanese and Filipinos. Further study is needed to determine the reasons for the observed disparities and to understand their effect on health outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2005. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2005

  2. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic, or immune therapy. 133 randomised trials involving 31,000 recurrences and 24,000 deaths among 75,000 women. Lancet 1992;339:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  3. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Effects of radiotherapy and surgery in early breast cancer. An overview of the randomized trials. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1444–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer. NIH Consensus Statement 1990 Jun 18–21; 8:1–19. Available: http://www.consensus.nih.gov/1990/1990EarlyBreastCancer081html.htm [accessed April 5, 2006]

  5. Adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. NIH Consensus Statement 2000 November 1–3; 17(4):1–35. Available: http://www.consensus.nih.gov/2000/2000AdjuvantTherapyBreastCancer114html.htm [accessed April 5, 2006]

  6. Mandelblatt JS, Berg CD, Meropol NJ, et al. Measuring and predicting surgeons’ practice styles for breast cancer treatment in older women. Med Care 2001;39:228–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Morrow M, White J, Moughan J, et al. Factors predicting the use of breast-conserving therapy in stage I and II breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:2254–62

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Albain KS, Green SR, Lichter AS, et al. Influence of patient characteristics, socioeconomic factors, geography, and systemic risk on the use of breast-sparing treatment in women enrolled in adjuvant breast cancer studies: an analysis of two intergroup trials. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:3009–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Potosky AL, Merrill RM, Riley GF, et al. Breast cancer survival and treatment in health maintenance organization and fee-for-service settings. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:1683–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Joslyn SA. Racial differences in treatment and survival from early-stage breast carcinoma. Cancer 2002;95:1759–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li CI, Malone KE, Daling JR. Differences in breast cancer stage, treatment, and survival by race and ethnicity. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:49–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zippin C, Lum D, Hankey BF. Completeness of hospital cancer case reporting from the SEER Program of the National Cancer Institute. Cancer 1995;76:2343–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fritz A, Ries L. The SEER Program Code Manual. 3rd ed. US Department of Health and Human Services: National Cancer Institute, 1998

  14. Percey C, Van Holten V, Muir C, (eds). International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  15. National Cancer Institute. Breast Cancer Physician Data Query. Available: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/breast/HealthProfessional [accessed April 5, 2006]

  16. Krieger N. Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. Am J Public Health 1992;82:703–10

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:613–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Klabunde CN, Warren JL, Legler JM. Assessing comorbidity using claims data: an overview. Med Care 2002;40(8 Suppl):IV26–35

    Google Scholar 

  20. Malin JL, Kahn KL, Adams J, Kwan L, Laouri M, Ganz PA. Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:835–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Malin JL, Schuster MA, Kahn KA, Brook RH. Quality of breast cancer care: what do we know? J Clin Oncol 2002;20:4381–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Du XL, Key CR, Osborne C, Mahnken JD, Goodwin JS. Discrepancy between consensus recommendations and actual community use of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:90–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Maskarinec G, Dhakal S, Yamashiro G, Issell BF. The use of breast conserving surgery: linking insurance claims with tumor registry data. BMC Cancer 2002;2:3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Morris CR, Cohen R, Schlag R, Wright WE. Increasing trends in the use of breast-conserving surgery in California. Am J Public Health 2000;90:281–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Prehn AW, Topol B, Stewart S, Glaser SL, O’Connor L, West DW. Differences in treatment patterns for localized breast carcinoma among Asian/Pacific Islander women. Cancer 2002;95:2268–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Goel MS, Burns RB, Phillips RS, Davis RB, Ngo-Metzger Q, McCarthy EP. Trends in breast conserving surgery among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, 1992-2000. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:604–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Potosky AL, Riley GF, Lubitz JD, Mentnech RM, Kessler LG. Potential for cancer related health services research using a linked Medicare-tumor registry database. Med Care 1993;31:732–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Institute of Medicine. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2002

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported by grant R24 HS11627 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca P. Gelber MD, MPH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gelber, R.P., McCarthy, E.P., Davis, J.W. et al. Ethnic Disparities in Breast Cancer Management Among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders. Ann Surg Oncol 13, 977–984 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.08.036

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.08.036

Keywords

Navigation