Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

From Lab Formulation Development to CTM Manufacturing of KO-947 Injectable Drug Products: a Case Study and Lessons Learned

  • Research Article
  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Formulation development of KO-947-K mesylate injectable drug products was described. Solution formulations were initially attempted, and key parameters such as drug concentration, buffer, pH, complexing agent, and tonicity modifying agent were carefully evaluated in the lab setting, mainly focusing on solubility and chemical stability. A lead solution formulation was advanced to a scaleup campaign. An unexpected stability issue was encountered, and the root cause was attributed to the heterogeneous liquid freezing process of the formulated solution at −20°C, which had not been captured in the lab setting. A lyophilized product was then designed to overcome the issue and supplied to the phase I clinical trial.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chin HM, Lai DK, Falchook GS. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) inhibitors in oncology Clinical trials. J Immunother Precis Oncol. 2019;2(1):10–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sullivan RJ, Infante JR, Janku F, Wong DJL, Sosman JA, Keedy V, et al. First-in-class ERK1/2 inhibitor ulixertinib (BVD-523) in patients with MAPK mutant advanced solid tumors: results of a Phase I dose-escalation and expansion study. Cancer Discov. 2018;8(2):185–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchbinder EI, Cohen JV, Haq R, Hodi FS, Lawrence DP, Giobbie-Hurder A, et al. A phase II study of ERK inhibition by ulixertinib (BVD-523) in metastatic uveal melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15):10036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pant S, Bendell JC, Sullivan RJ, Shapiro G, Millward M, Mi G, et al. A phase I dose escalation (DE) study of ERK inhibitor, LY3214996, in advanced (adv) cancer (CA) patients (pts). J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(15_suppl):3001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li L, Wu T, Feng J, Ren P, Liu Y. Inhibitors of ERK and methods of use. US Patent No. US-9624228-B2. Available from: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US-9624228-B2.

  6. Mei B, Zhu L, Guo Y. Wu T, Ren P, Deng X. Solid form selection and process development of KO-947 drug substance. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2021; In revision.

  7. Akers MJ. Sterile drug products formulation, packaging, manufacturing, and quality. 1st ed. Essex: Informa Healthcare; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Braga SS. Cyclodextrins: Emerging medicines of the new millennium biomolecules. 2019;9(12):801–19.

  9. Loftsson T, Jarho P, Masson M, Jarvinen T. Cyclodextrins in drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2005;2(2):335–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Scavone C, Bonagura AC, Fiorentino S, Cimmaruta D, Cenami R, Torella M, et al. Efficacy and safety profile of diclofenac/cyclodextrin and progesterone/cyclodextrin formulations: A review of the literature data. Drugs R D. 2016;16(2):129–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Akers MJ. Formulation and stability of solutions. Int J Pharm Compd. 2016;20(2):137–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lam P, Morre J. Freezing, biopharmaceutical products. In: Flickinger MC, editor. Encyclopedia of industrial biotechnology. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2010. p. 2567–81.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Butreddy A, Dudhipala N, Janga KY, Gaddam RP. Lyophilization of small-molecule injectables: an industry perspective on formulation development, process optimization, scale-up challenges, and drug product quality attributes. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2020;21(7):252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Puri M, Morar-Mitrica S, Crotts G, Nesta D. Evaluating freeze–thaw processes in biopharmaceutical development – small-scale study designs. BioProcess International. 2015. https://bioprocessintl.com/manufacturing/fill-finish/evaluating-freeze-thaw-processes-biopharmaceuticaldevelopment-small-scale-study-designs/.

  15. Debenedetti PG, Stillinger FH. Supercooled liquids and the glass transition. Nature. 2001;401(6825):259–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Altieri A. Jamming and glass transitions in mean-field theories and beyond. New York: Springer; 2019. p. 9–43.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Ediger MD, Harrowell P. Perspective: supercooled liquids and glasses. J Chem Phys. 2012;137(8):080901–1100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zanotto ED, Cassar DR. The race within supercooled liquids—Relaxation versus crystallization. J Chem Phys. 2018;149(2):024503–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Mrs. Caryn Peterson and Mr. Dennis Hester for useful discussions, Dr. Antonio Gualberto and Dr. Catherine Scholz for clinical inputs, and Dr. Tiffany Montellano and Dr. Blake Tomkinson for reviewing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaohu Deng.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deng, X., Ren, P., Mai, W. et al. From Lab Formulation Development to CTM Manufacturing of KO-947 Injectable Drug Products: a Case Study and Lessons Learned. AAPS PharmSciTech 22, 168 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-021-02059-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-021-02059-x

KEY WORDS

Navigation