Skip to main content
Log in

First Development, Optimization, and Stability Control of a Pediatric Oral Atenolol Formulation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 16 April 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Liquid formulations can be used in children of different ages by varying the volume of the administered dose in order to ensure an exact dosage. The aim of this work was to develop and to optimize a safe liquid atenolol formulation and to carry out the corresponding chemical and microbiological stability studies. A Plackett-Burman design was used to determine the factors that could be critical in the development of the formulations, and a central composite design was used to determine the optimal working conditions. As a result of these analyses, three formulations were selected and their stability studied in three storage conditions, 4, 25, and 40°C. After 6 months of stability testing, the optimal systems showed no pH change or atenolol loss; however, only glycerin-based formulations showed no microbial development. These systems, employing excipients in a range that the EMA has recommended, showed chemical and microbiological stability for at least 6 months even at the worst storage conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 16 April 2018

    In the INTRODUCTION section, Atenolol is defined in parenthesis as (ATN, Fig. 1.) The correct definition is (ATN). Fig 1 corresponds to the RESULTS section.

References

  1. Vrignaud S, Briot T, Launay A, Kempf M, Lagarce F. Design and stability study of a paediatric oral solution of methotrexate 2 mg/ml. Int J Pharm. 2015;487(1):270–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Olski TM, Lampus SF, Gherarducci G, Saint Raymond A. Three years of paediatric regulation in the European Union. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;67(3):245–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tuleu C. Better medicines for children: are we there yet? J Pharm Pharmacol. 2017;69(4):349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rocchi F, Tomasi P. The development of medicines for children: part of a series on Pediatric Pharmacology, guest edited by Gianvincenzo Zuccotti, Emilio Clementi, and Massimo Molteni. Pharmacol Res. 2011;64(3):169–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. EMA/PDCO/246339/2013. Inventory of paediatric therapeutic needs. Cardiovascular therapeutic area. Hum Med Dev Eval. 2013;1–6. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Other/2013/04/WC500142474.pdf.

  6. Poirier L, Lacourcière Y. The evolving role of β-adrenergic receptor blockers in managing hypertension. Can J Cardiol. 2012;28(3):334–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rousseau MF, Pouleur H, Cocco G, Wolff AA. Comparative efficacy of ranolazine versus atenolol for chronic angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95(3):311–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Havaldar V, Kulkarni A, Dias R, Aloorkar N, Mali K. Floating matrix tablets of atenolol: formulation and in vitro evaluation. Asian J Pharm (AJP). 2014;3(4):286–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh B, Chakkal SK, Ahuja N. Formulation and optimization of controlled release mucoadhesive tablets of atenolol using response surface methodology. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2006;7(1):E19–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Srivastava A, Wadhwa S, Ridhurkar D, Mishra B. Oral sustained delivery of atenolol from floating matrix tablets—formulation and in vitro evaluation. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2005;31(4–5):367–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kadam PB, Dias RJ, Mali KK, Havaldar VD, Mahajan NS. Formulation and evaluation of buccoadhesive tablets of atenolol. J Pharm Res. 2008;1(2):34–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Adhikari SNR, Nayak BS, Nayak AK, Mohanty B. Formulation and evaluation of buccal patches for delivery of atenolol. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2010;11(3):1038–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jug M, Bećirević-Laćan M, Bengez S. Novel cyclodextrin-based film formulation intended for buccal delivery of atenolol. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2009;35(7):796–807.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moneghini M, Carcano A, Perissutti B, Rubessa F. Formulation design studies of atenolol tablets. Pharm Dev Technol. 2000;5(2):297–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shirwaikar A, Ramesh A. Fast disintegrating tablets of atenolol by dry granulation method. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2004;66(4):422.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Garrido VR, Carbajosa GR, Fernández-Polo A, Bautista SC. Microbiological quality of pediatric oral liquid formulations. Comunicación Breve. 2016;40(5):427–35.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zaid AN, Malkieh N, Kharoaf M, Abu GA, Al-Ramahi R. Formulation and stability evaluation of extemporaneously prepared atenolol capsules from crushed atenolol tablets. Int J Pharm Compd. 2011;16(4):342–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Foppa T, Murakami F, Silva M. Development validation and stability study of pediatric atenolol syrup. Pharmazie. 2007;62(7):519–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Standing JF, Tuleu C. Paediatric formulations—getting to the heart of the problem. Int J Pharm. 2005;300(1–2):56–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brown D, Ford J, Nunn A, Rowe P. An assessment of dose-uniformity of samples delivered from paediatric oral droppers. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2004;29(6):521–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fabiano V, Mameli C, Zuccotti GV. Paediatric pharmacology: remember the excipients. Pharmacol Res. 2011;63(5):362–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Walsh J, Cram A, Woertz K, Breitkreutz J, Winzenburg G, Turner R, et al. Playing hide and seek with poorly tasting paediatric medicines: do not forget the excipients. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;73:14–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Santoveña A, Hernández-Paiz Z, Fariña J. Design of a pediatric oral formulation with a low proportion of hydrochlorothiazide. Int J Pharm. 2012;423(2):360–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Leonardi D, Lamas MC, Olivieri AC. Multiresponse optimization of the properties of albendazole–chitosan microparticles. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2008;48(3):802–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. EMA/CHMP/SWP/272921/2012. Reflection paper on the use of methyl- and propylparaben as excipients in human medicinal products for oral use Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). 2015;1–13. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2015/11/WC500196733.pdf.

  26. Pharmacopoeia B. British pharmacopoeia. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Denyer S, Hodges N, Gorman S. Introduction to Pharmaceutical Microbiology, in Hugo and Russell's: Pharmaceutical Microbiology. 7th edn. (eds S. P. Denyer, N. A. Hodges and S. P. Gorman), Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd; 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470988329.ch1.

  28. Bonthu MG, Neelima MS, Raju VB, Sumanth KS, Mounika P, Srinivas K, et al. Development and validation of stability indicating reverse phase high-perfomance liquid chromatography method for simultaneous estimation of atenolol, hydrochlorothiazide and losartan in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form. Dev. 2016;9(2):118–24.

  29. Calvo NL, Maggio RM, Kaufman TS. Characterization of pharmaceutically relevant materials at the solid state employing chemometrics methods. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2018;147:538–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chow SC. Statistical design and analysis of stability studies. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Provenza N, Calpena A, Mallandrich M, Halbaut L, Clares B. Design and physicochemical stability studies of paediatric oral formulations of sildenafil. Int J Pharm. 2014;460(1):234–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Banerjee S. Hypertension in children. Clin Queries: Nephrol. 2013;2(2):78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Thalgahagoda S, Shenoy M. Physiology and treatment of hypertension. Paediatr Child Health. 2013;23(2):53–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hatem A, Marton S, Csóka G, Rácz I. Preformulation studies of atenolol in oral liquid dosage form. I. Effect of pH and temperature. Acta Pharm Hung. 1996;66(4):177–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Plummer DT. Introducció a la bioquímica pràctica. ES: Edicions Universitat Barcelona; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mousavi SJ, Parvini M, Ghorbani M. Experimental design data for the zinc ions adsorption based on mesoporous modified chitosan using central composite design method. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;188:197–212.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Naveršnik K. Humidity-corrected Arrhenius equation: the reference condition approach. Int J Pharm. 2016;500(1–2):360–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Teng F, Yang H, Li G, Lin X, Zhang Y, Tang X. Parenteral formulation of larotaxel lipid microsphere tackling poor solubility and chemical instability. Int J Pharm. 2014;460(1):212–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. USP C. 61. Microbiological examination of nonsterile products: microbial enumeration tests. U S Pharmacopeia. 2015;32:71–5.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Owen SC. Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff from the English Department (Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, UNR) for the language correction of the manuscript and Cecilia Cassabone for the microbiological assays.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Universidad Nacional de Rosario Argentina and CONICET Argentina for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Darío Leonardi or Silvana Vignaduzzo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morri, M., Castellano, P., Leonardi, D. et al. First Development, Optimization, and Stability Control of a Pediatric Oral Atenolol Formulation. AAPS PharmSciTech 19, 1781–1788 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-018-0992-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-018-0992-5

KEY WORDS

Navigation