Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing pivotal and REML-based confidence intervals for heritability

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heritability quantifies the extent to which a physical characteristic is passed from one generation to the next. From a statistical perspective, heritability is the proportion of the phenotypic variance attributable to (additive) genetic effects and is equal to a function of variance components in linear mixed models. Relying on normal distribution assumptions, one can compute exact confidence intervals for heritability using a pivotal quantity procedure. Alternatively, large-sample properties of the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimator can be used to construct asymptotic confidence intervals for heritability. Exact and asymptotic intervals are compared loineye muscle area measurements and balanced one-way random effects models having groups of correlated responses. In some cases the two interval methods yield vastly different results and the REML-based confidence interval does not maintain the nomiral coverate value even for seemingly large sample sizes. For finite sample size applications, the validity of the REML-based procedure depends on the correlation structure of the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burch, B. D., and Harris, I. R. (2001), “Closed-Form Approximations to the REML Estimator of a Variance Ratio (or Heritability) in a Mixed Linear Model,” Biometrics, 57, 1148–1156.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Burch, B. D., and Iyer, H. K. (1997), “Exact Confidence Intervals for a Variance Ratio (or Heritability) in a Mixed Linear Model,” Biometrics, 53, 1318–1333.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Burdick, R. K., Borror, C. M., and Montgomery, D. C. (2003), “A Review of Methods for Measurement Systems Capability Analysis,” Journal of Quality Technology, 35, 342–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charif, H. A. (2003), “Confidence Intervals for the Variance Ratio in Mixed Linear Models,” Advances and Applications in Statistics, 3, 229–241.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. L., Golden, B. L., Bailey, D. R. C., Gilbert, R. P., and Green, R. D., (1995), “Genetic Parameter Estimates of Ultrasound Measures of Backfat Thickness, Loineye Muscle Area, and Gray Shading Score in Red Angus Cattle,” Proceedings, Western Section, American Society of Animal Science, 46, 202–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D. S., and Mackay, T. F. C. (1996), Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, Essex, England: Longman Scientific & Technical.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianola, D. (2000), “Statistics in Animal Breeding,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 296–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harville, D. A., and Fenech, F. A. (1985), “Confidence Intervals for a Variance Ratio, or for Heritability, in an Unbalanced Mixed Linear Model,” Biometrics, 41, 137–152.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, C. R. (1976), “A Simple Method for Computing the Inverse of a Numerator Relationship Matrix used in Prediction of Breeding Values,” Biometrics, 32, 69–83.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, H. K., Wang, C. M. J., and Mathew, T. (2004), “Models and Confidence Intervals for True Values in Interlaboratory Trials,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99, 1060–1071.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, J. (1996), “REML Estimation: Asymptotic Behavior and Related Topics,” The Annals of Statistics, 24, 255–286.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P. A. P. (1971), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Non-standard Conditions,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 70, 441–450.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, S. E., and Welsh, A. H. (2000), “Likelihood Inference for Small Variance Components,” The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 28, 517–532.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Westfall, P. H. (1987), “A Comparison of Variance Component Estimates for Arbitrary Underlying Distributions,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 866–874.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brent D. Burch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burch, B.D. Comparing pivotal and REML-based confidence intervals for heritability. JABES 12, 470–484 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1198/108571107X250526

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/108571107X250526

Key Words

Navigation