Correction to: Surg Case Rep (2020) 6:157 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-020-00924-8

Following the publication of the original article [1], an error was identified in the “Case presentation” section. The patient’s age in the first sentence is currently 69-year-old, however, it should be 51-year-old.

The original article has been corrected.