Correction to: Military Med Res 7, 2 (2020)

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-0231-8

Correction

Following publication of the original article [1], the editor identified the Tables 5 and 6 are incorrect. The correct Tables 5 and 6 are as below.

Table 5 Simple (unadjusted) and multiple (adjusted) stepwise regression models for best corrected distance visual acuity logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), best corrected distance visual acuity manifest spherical equivalent (MSE), 25% mesopic contrast, super vision test LogMAR and logarithm of the contrast sensitivity (logCS), and total higher order aberrations (HOA) as predictors of average detection distance of IEDs (n = 29)
Table 6 Simple (unadjusted) and multiple (adjusted) stepwise regression models for best corrected distance visual acuity logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), best corrected distance visual acuity manifest spherical equivalent (MSE), 25% mesopic contrast, super vision test LogMAR and logarithm of the contrast sensitivity (logCS), and total higher order aberrations (HOA) as predictors of average identification distance of IEDs (n = 29)