Trends in cycling pants
Figure 2a shows the review frequency for cycling pants by month and year from 2017 to 2020. It showed 1119 cases in 2017, 1,882 cases in 2018, and 2154 cases in 2019, and an annual average increase of 39% for three years, and the frequency of the first half of 2020 especially increased very rapidly. According to the monthly trends, there were fewer than 50 reviews during the winter from December to February, and it began to increase in March and showed the highest number of reviews for cycling pants since July. In particular, in 2020, the number of reviews increased rapidly from February to June, showing a different pattern from the previous one.
To analyze this in more detail, the total number of reviews from January to June, both 2019 and 2020, is shown in Fig. 2b. The number of consumer reviews was 1024 cases in the first half of 2019 and 2,086 cases in the first half of 2020 so that that of 2020 this year were doubled over compared to the same period last year. It means to indicate a sharp increase in demand for them. As this, online shopping reviews are written by consumers after purchasing products; therefore, by analyzing the frequency of reviews of products, it is possible to infer purchase trends by year and month, like as reported that the increase in the frequency of product keywords online showed a correlation with the increase in sales (Vosen & Schmidt, 2011).
As a result of analyzing the change of people’s interest in bib shorts through Google trend analysis (Fig. 3), it was found that a similar pattern was repeated every year from 2017 to 2019, while the frequency of bib shorts was increased sharply since March 2020. By showing the same result as the trend of the cycling pants review above, it could be confirmed once again that interest in cycling pants leads to purchase. The main factor of these results is believed to be closely related to the increase in bicycle sales because it was preferred bicycle instead of public transportation as short-distance transportation due to the influence of COVID-19 (Jung & Yang, 2020).
Satisfaction according to types of cycling pants
As for the number of the reviews (Table 2), bib shorts accounted for 4182 cases, 56% of the total number, shorts 1527 cases, 22%, tights 1409 cases, 19%, and bib tights 123 cases accounting for 1%. Among these, bib shorts accounted for more than 50% of them are showing the most purchased.
Table 2 Differences of the rating of reviews on cycling pants A one-way analysis of variance was performed to find out whether there was a difference in the rating according to the cycling pants (Table 2), and it was found a significant difference (F = 14.63, p < 0.001). As a result of Scheffe’s post-hoc test, the number of reviews of bib shorts showed statistically significant differences compared to bib tights, shorts, and tights, but there were no significant differences among others. Although online bicycle cafes had shown more frequency of shorts and tights than that of bib shorts and bib tights (Kim & Yi, 2018), but these days, as sports apparel products have become more specialized and consumers’ awareness has increased, bib shorts have become more preferred.
Figure 4 shows the rating for each type of cycling pants as a percentage. The star rating for bib shorts was 82% for 5 points, 12% for 4 points, 5% for 3 points, 1% for 2 points, and 0% for 1 point, indicating that 80% or more were very satisfied. Bib tights showed 68% of 5 points, 12% of 4 points, 7% of 3 points, 0% of 2 points, and 1% of 1 point, indicating that 60% and more were very satisfied. The shorts were 5 points 76%, 4 points 18%, 3 points 5%, 2 points 1%, and 1 point 1%, and the tights were 5 points 74%, 4 points 19%, 3 points 6%, 2 points 1%, 1 point was 0%, and it was evaluated that shorts and tights were also very satisfied with more than 70%.
As described above, most of the cycling pants were evaluated as satisfactory, and among them, bib shorts were found to be the most satisfied. However, consumers tend to rate more than 4 out of 5 when evaluating by star rating, and it is necessary to analyze reviews written by consumers themselves.
Online reviews on cycling pants
Positive and negative keywords of the reviews
The online reviews for cycling pants were divided into positive and negative reviews based on their rating. Positive reviews were 6797 documents rated at 4 and 5 points, and negative reviews were 446 documents at 1, 2, and 3. After extracting nouns, adjectives, and verbs by morpheme analysis using KoLNP, the frequencies of occurrence were calculated, and 15 top keywords of the positive and negative are shown in Table 3.
Table 3 Word frequency of reviews on cycling pants from 2017 to 2020 In positive reviews, ‘size’ accounted for 1130 cases (16.63%), ‘cost-effective’ with 1011 cases (14.88%), ‘satisfaction’ with 758 cases (11.16%), and ‘price’ with 749 cases (11.02%). In addition, ‘pad,’ ‘quality,’ ‘comfortable,’ and ‘wearing sensation’ appeared. In such positive reviews, the price factor-related price such as ‘cost-effective’ and ‘price’ showed more than 35% of the total positive reviews, so that it is considered to be the biggest important factor in positively evaluating the cycling pants.
In negative reviews, ‘pad’ was 65 cases with 14.57%, ‘size’ with 64 cases (14.35%), ‘price’ with 40 cases (8.97%), ‘cost-effective’ with 33 cases (7.40%), and ‘hip’ with 32 (7.17%). In addition, there were also ‘tight’, ‘quality’, ‘bad’, ‘painful’, and ‘thick’. In negative reviews, ‘pad’ and ‘size’ were extracted as the most important keyword because of accounting for about 30% of negative reviews. Especially, the ‘size’ was derived as the most important keywords not only in negative reviews but also in positive reviews.
In addition, the result of visualizing in a word cloud for positive and negative reviews is shown Fig. 5. Just as research on analyzing Internet bicycle cafes (Kim & Yi, 2018), ‘price,’ ‘size,’ and ‘saddle pain’ appeared as the main keywords, the major keywords that affected consumers’ sensibility and post-purchase evaluation of cycling pants were ‘size,’ ‘cost-effective,’ and ‘pad’.
The results of the chi-square test (χ2) are shown in Table 4 to determine whether there are differences between bib style (bib shorts and bib tights) and tight style (shorts and tights) in positive or negative reviews. In the bib style, 4061 cases were positive reviews, 56.1%, and 244 cases were negative reviews, 3.4%. In tights style, 2734 cases were positive, 37.8%, and 202 cases were negative reviews, 2.7%. As such, over 90% of all cycling pants were evaluated positively. It was found that there was a difference between positive and negative evaluations depending on whether the shoulder strap was attached (χ2 = 4.44, p < 0.05). The bib shorts and bib tights in the suspender style were evaluated more positively than the shorts or tights.
Table 4 Differences of the rating of reviews on cycling pants Co-occurrence network in positive and negative reviews
Co-occurrence analysis calculates the frequency at which pairs of words appear simultaneously in a document and analyzes them based on the similarity relationship between them (Lee, 2012). The top 300 words in the term-document matrix on positive and negative reviews on cycling pants were converted to a co-occurrence matrix, and the number of simultaneous occurrences between words up to the top 25 among them is shown in Tables 5 and 6.
Table 5 Co-occurrence matrix of term matrix in the corpus of positive reviews on cycling pants from 2017 to 2020 Table 6 Co-occurrence matrix of term matrix in the corpus of negative reviews on cycling pants from 2017 to 2020 In positive reviews, ‘cost-effective’ was found to have a high frequency of simultaneous occurrences with ‘size,’ ‘pad,’ ‘price,’ ‘satisfaction,’ and ‘comfort.’ ‘Size’ frequently appeared at the same time as ‘pad,’ ‘tight,’ ‘one size,’ and ‘satisfaction.’ ‘Satisfaction’ also showed at the same time with ‘price,’ ‘cost-effective,’ ‘size,’ ‘pad,’ and ‘quality.’ ‘Satisfaction’ also showed at the same time with ‘price,’ ‘cost-effective,’ ‘size,’ ‘pad,’ and ‘quality,’ and ‘price’ occurred with ‘satisfaction’ and ‘reasonable,’ and ‘price’ with ‘satisfaction’ and ‘reasonable.’ As such, it was found that they were satisfied in terms of cost-effectiveness and generally comfortable to wear. Specific examples of positive are so followed.
“I purchased it because the cost-effective was good. I choose the size based on the size chart, and it was perfect for me. It’s black, so I can wear it with no pressure. The shoulder band is flexible and tighten, and the back is made of mesh, so you could enjoy a cool riding.” (Rating:5, kero****, May 9, 2020)
“I ordered one size larger, and it fits well. The cost-effective is excellent.” (Rating: 4, blue**, Jun 17, 2020)
“As expected, it’s a good for cost-effective. It’s flexible and tight, thin, and light. The pad also has a good cushioning feeling ~ ^_^” (Rating: 5, ekdv****, April 16, 2020)
“Height 174, weight 74, XL fits well. I considered a lot about the L size, but the XL was fitted for me. Delivery was fast, and the quality was better than I thought. It was cost-effective.” (Rating:5, s*a*****, June 23, 2020)
“I personally felt why people are saying “bib short, short.” I could not be more comfortable like this. I was worried because the pads were thin and barely in the front, but when I sat on the saddle, it was rather comfortable without any discomfort. The downside is that I only wore it once and rinsed it with cold water when taking a shower, and after putting it in a laundry net, it was dehydrated the washing machine for a minute, but when I wore it again a day later, the reflective tape of both outer thighs is about to fail off. I think such details are lacking a little bit. The rest are very satisfied!! 173/89, the lower body is thick, but the L size fits perfectly, so it is comfortable.” (Review: 5, jerr****, Jun 21, 2020)
In the positive reviews like above, there are reviews that size fits well, but there were also reviews that it was difficult to select a size such as “I ordered one size larger…” or “I considered a lot about the size,” even though their ratings were good. These reasons are because each brand has a different size system. Therefore, it is considered that an intuitive method for size display is required that allows consumers to select size when purchasing it online easily. In addition, ‘pad,’ ‘satisfaction,’ and ‘comfort’ were showed as keywords, indicating that they prefer cycling pants with pads that are comfortable to wear while reducing saddle pain.
In the negative reviews, ‘pad,’ which had the highest frequency of appearance, showed a high frequency of co-occurrence frequency with ‘hip,’ ‘price,’ ‘uncomfortable,’ and ‘bad.’ That indicates that there were many complaints about the pad. Specific examples of negative reviews are as follows.
“It’s not good. It was the right size for me, but it is uncomfortable because it is a little remain on the hip, too tight in my body, and flowing down the shoulder strap. It’s not recommended.” (Rating: 2, msko****, April 11, 2018)
“Um… I’ve seen a lot of reviews that the cost-effective was good, but it was just mediocre. My height and weight are 180/83. They told me to order a smaller size, so I did a size L, but it was not tight; the back of the pad on the hip is floating a little bit. I don’t know about perfect fitting because it was my first time wearing bib shorts, but it was more ordinary than I thought, and the pain relief was just like that. Still, considering the price, it is good to wear.” (Rating: 3, bulo****, Oct 26, 2017)
“Honestly, my butts hurt. It’s not cost-effective… T_T” (Rating: 2, qhrm**, Jun 2, 2020)
“My hip hurts when I ride longer than 100 km. I had a hard time because the end of the pad touched my butts and got a blister…” (Rating: 3, chul****, Oct 23, 2019)
“Even if I use it for just one month, the fibers on the buttocks are stretched, and I hate to see them. The fibers in the rubber band burst and stretched…” (Rating: 2, as86****, Jun 17, 2020)
As described above, the negative reviews were showed dissatisfaction with the size, pad, and quality, such as “a little remain on the hip,” “hips hurt,” and “the rubber bands burst and stretched.” Recently, as the result of the recent product quality test for cycling pants on the market (Bike Shorts, 2020), the washing resistance satisfied the standards of the recommended quality for textile products, but their durability and friction fastness were found to be insufficient and also most of the products had not antibacterial ability. In addition, the quality of the pad performance evaluation also differed depending on the products, and there were differences in performance between products such as pad thickness and compression hardness. All products were found to be inadequate to the labeling criteria.
As described above, it was found that the quality of the cycling pants was actually insufficient, but the ratings in online shopping malls mainly were good. This indicated that there were the large gabs between the product actual quality and their rating, so these is a problem for consumers to grasp information about the product. For this reason, the reviews are more important than their rating. In addition, consumers trusted the negative reviews more than the positive or the neutral reviews and it influenced purchase intention changes (Son & Rhee, 2007). Thus, although the negative reviews were a few for cycling pants, it seems necessary to focus on negative reviews that will have giving a more useful information of the products.
Network analysis of the reviews of the cycling pants
The results of the network analysis of the cycling pants are shown in Table 7. In network analysis, centrality is the concept of influence power, and by analyzing centrality in the cycling pants, it is possible to understand how much each keyword affects the review of the cycling pants.
Table 7 Network analysis according to co-occurrence matrix Eigenvector centrality is useful in finding the most influential central node in the network, and ‘size (1.000),’ ‘cost performance (1.000),’ and ‘pad (1.000)’ are the most influential keywords in the cycling pants. Just as ‘size,’ ‘cost-effective,’ and ‘pad’ were mentioned above as important keywords for both positive and negative, they have proven to be very influential keywords for cycling pants. Next came ‘satisfaction (0.991),’ ‘design (0.987),’ ‘price (0.985),’ ‘riding (0.982),’ ‘reasonable (0,978),’ and ‘bib Shorts (0.959).’
Closeness centrality indicates how close one node is to another node, and the smaller the sum of the connection distances from one node to other nodes in the network, the higher the closeness centrality of the node (Lee, 2012). In closeness centrality, ‘size (1.000)’, ‘cost-effective (1.000)’, and ‘pad (1.000)’ have the shortest connection distance indicating high closeness centrality. Next, ‘satisfaction (0.988)’, ‘design (0.988)’, ‘price (0.976)’, ‘reasonable (0.965)’, ‘bib shorts (0.943)’, ‘hip (0.943)’, ‘quality (0.932)’ were found to have a close connection distance.
Betweenness centrality is a concept that measures how much one node plays the role of an intermediary or bridge in building a network and is used when considering the role of an intermediary (Lee, 2012). As for the betweenness centrality between keywords for cycling pants, ‘size (54.533),’ ‘cost-effective (54.533),’ and ‘pad (53.533)’ were the largest, followed by ‘design (53.550),’ ‘satisfaction (52.490),’ ‘riding (50.361),’ and ‘price (49.118).’ Unlike the closeness centrality and the eigenvector centrality, ‘design’ showed a large value in the betweenness centrality. Keywords with high betweenness centrality can have a great influence in controlling the flow of reviews, so the design can be considered an important factor when purchasing cycling pants. As above, ‘size,’ ‘cost-effective,’ and ‘pad’ had the largest values in eigenvector centrality, closeness centrality and betweenness centrality, and were the most influential central keywords.
The visualization of the network analysis results is shown in Fig. 6. In the cycling pants, ‘size,’ ‘cost-effective,’ and ‘pad,’ which have the largest values in eigenvector centrality, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality, are in the center, indicating that they are the most important keywords. Besides, keywords related to saddle pain such as ‘price,’ ‘hip,’ ‘saddle,’ ‘painful,’ and ‘jam’ are located nearby, and properties related to a size such as ‘satisfaction,’ ‘length,’ and ‘perfect size’ were grouped. The properties of materials such as ‘quality,’ ‘textile,’ ‘flexibility,’ ‘pretty,’ and ‘brand’ are located closely, and the properties of types and finishes such as ‘bib shorts,’ ‘flow down,’ ‘silicon,’ and ‘hem’ are located nearby each other.
As described above, the most influential keywords in the network analysis for the review on cycling pants were ‘size,’ ‘cost-effective,’ and ‘pad,’ and these were also the keywords with the highest frequency of appearance, both positive and negative. Therefore, these are the most important factor that consumers consider in purchasing decisions in cycling pants.