Correction to: Eye Vis (2019) 6:2
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-018-0128-8
In the original publication of this article [1] the algorithm of the OCTA (Nidek RS-3000) was described incorrectly as OMAG (Optical micro angiography). However, the system uses CODAA(Complex OCT signal difference angiography). Thus, ‘OMAG’ in the article should be replaced with ‘CODAA’, and ‘Optical micro angiography’ should be replaced with ‘Complex OCT signal difference angiography’!
Reference
Devarajan, et al. Vessel density and En-face segmentation of optical coherence tomography angiography to analyse corneal vascularisation in an animal model. Eye Vis. 2019;6(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-018-0128-8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Devarajan, K., Di Lee, W., Ong, H.S. et al. Correction to: Vessel density and En-face segmentation of optical coherence tomography angiography to analyse corneal vascularisation in an animal model. Eye and Vis 6, 7 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-019-0132-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-019-0132-7