Background

Sandstone, laterite and bricks were the major construction materials used by the Khmer people in their temples, including the Angkor monuments in Cambodia during the ninth to fifteenth centuries [1, 2]. With the passage of time, the surfaces of these materials have blackened. Most of this discoloring is caused by blue-green algae (cyanobacteria), which gradually damage the bas-relief carvings on these temples [3]. In addition, black areas with more luster than the blue-green algae are frequently observed on the surface of the construction materials in the Khmer temples. Similar blackening has been also observed on the surface of Mesopotamian clay tablets, and analysis indicated that this was caused by manganese oxide precipitates [4]. This is similar to desert varnish, which contains manganese and iron oxides and is found on stone surfaces in the desert [57]. To date, no study has been conducted to investigate if the blackening on the Khmer temples is caused by manganese oxide precipitates. Although this black material does not seem to damage the construction materials, it has changed the color of the temples so they no longer appear as they did in their original condition. To prevent further blackening, this study aimed to determine if the blackening on the surface of construction materials in the Khmer temples is caused by precipitation of manganese oxides, and also to elucidate the precipitation mechanism.

A non-destructive on-site investigation was carried out using a portable X-ray fluorescence analyzer (pXRF). In addition, samples were taken from the buildings and analyzed using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD) and a scanning electron microscope with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (SEM-EDX), and examined using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM).

Methods

Sample site

The investigation was carried out at the Angkor, Koh Ker and Sambor Prei Kuk monuments in Cambodia, which were selected as sites that were representative of the Khmer monuments (Fig. 1). The Angkor monuments are located 250 km northwest of Phnom Penh, the capital of Cambodia. They were constructed during the ninth to fifteenth centuries. The Koh Ker monuments are located 85 km northeast of the Angkor monuments. This site was the capital of the Khmer empire from 921 to 944 AD. The Sambor Prei Kuk monuments are located 140 km southeast of the Angkor monuments, and construction at this site occurred in the pre-Angkorian period. The Sambor Prei Kuk monuments were the capital in the seventh century.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map showing the locations of the Angkor, Koh Ker, and Sambor Prei Kuk monuments in Cambodia

Blackening, suspected to be from manganese oxide precipitates, is observed on the surface of all types of construction materials used in the Khmer temples, including sandstone (feldspathic sandstone and siliceous sandstone), laterite, and bricks. This discoloration is extensive on the surface of laterite at the Koh Ker monuments, especially on the Neang Khmau (Fig. 2a), Chrap (Fig. 2b), and Banteay Pir Chan (Fig. 2c, d) temples. Blackening is also evident on the surfaces of bricks and sandstone used in the southern brick towers situated on the eastern side of the Pre Rup temple at the Angkor monuments (Fig. 2e, f). Also at the Angkor monuments, there is blackening on the east side of the north face of the inner gallery of the Bayon temple (Fig. 2g). At the Sambor Prei Kuk monuments, there are black areas on the walls of the towers C1 (Fig. 2h) and S1 (Fig. 2i). Black areas are observed on both the inner and outer surfaces of the buildings (Fig. 2d, f). In addition to these sites, blackening is frequently observed at other Khmer architectural sites.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Photographs showing blackening suspected to be from manganese oxide precipitates on the surfaces of construction materials in the Khmer temples at the following sites: a Neang Khmau, b Chrap, c Banteay Pir Chan, d Banteay Pir Chan (inner wall), e Pre Rup, f Pre Rup (inner wall), g Bayon (inner gallery), h the tower C1 at the Sambor Prei Kuk monuments, and i the tower S1 at the Sambor Prei Kuk monuments

Analytical methods

The black materials, which were thought to be manganese oxide precipitates, were analyzed non-destructively on-site using a pXRF analyzer (Delta Premium, Innov-X Systems, Waltham, MA, USA) with an X-ray tube with a Rh target (4 W). The analysis was conducted in a soil mode for 60 s at each point. Before analysis, the pXRF analyzer was calibrated for Mn, Ni, V, Zn, K, Pb, Cr, Sr, Cu, Ti, Rb, Ca, Fe and Zr using 10 rock standards obtained from the Geological Survey of Japan [8]. However the analysis for the black materials may be semi-quantitative because the black materials are as thin as less than 0.2 mm and X-ray penetrates into the under layer such as sandstone, laterite and bricks. Analyses were conducted on the blackened areas of the construction materials and also on non-blackened areas of the construction materials as controls. Five points were analyzed at each building, and the average values were calculated.

Construction materials covered with black materials were also taken from the buildings (sample nos. 3401–3414 in Table 1). The samples were taken from different places, which were analyzed using the pXRF analyzer. The black materials on the surface of the samples were removed using a drill. The samples of the black materials were analyzed using an XRD (RINT-RAPID, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) with an X-ray tube with a Cu target. The current and voltage were 30 mA and 40 kV, respectively. Each scan was conducted from 2θ = 2°–60° with a scan speed of 1°/min.

Table 1 List of the samples of black materials taken from the Khmer temples

The black materials were also analyzed using a SEM-EDX (JSM6360, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan equipped with Inca Energy, Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK). The SEM-EDX analysis was conducted on a polished cross section of each sample. Samples for the SEM-EDX were first embedded in an epoxy resin (EpoFix, Struers, Ballerup, Denmark), and then polished with waterproof SiC paper (#180, #800, #1200, and #2400 μm, Struers) and diamond paste (3 μm, Struers). Finally, the samples were coated with carbon. The accelerating voltage was 15 kV, and the beam current was adjusted so that the X-ray count was 2000 count/s on the Co surface. The measurement time was 60 s.

In addition, the surface of each black material sample was examined using a FE-SEM (4500S, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The accelerating voltage was 15 kV, and the sample surface was coated with platinum-palladium (Pt80Pd20).

Results and discussion

pXRF analysis

Because the pXRF analysis was conducted in the air and in a soil mode, light elements such as Na, Mg, Al and Si which are major components of rocks, could not be analyzed. The pXRF results for the average chemical compositions at each building are summarized in Table 2. The ratio of each element in the black area to that in the non-black area is shown in Fig. 3. This shows that Mn was highly concentrated in the black areas (22,700–247,000 mg/kg) compared to the non-black areas. In addition, Ni, V, Zn, Y, K, Cl, S, Pb, and Cr were also concentrated in the black areas compared with the non-black areas. The average V content range was 1000–10,800 mg/kg, except for the tower C1 (sandstone) at the Sambor Prei Kuk monuments. The Ni content was high at the Koh Ker monuments (1400–2800 mg/kg). The Zn and Cr contents were high at the tower S1 at the Sambor Prei Kuk monuments, with concentrations of 2400 mg/kg (Zn) and 6000 mg/kg (Cr) recorded on bricks and 850 mg/kg (Zn) and 3600 mg/kg (Cr) on sandstone. The Fe content in the black areas was similar to that in the non-black areas. The Mn content is generally less than 0.3 % in sandstone, laterite, and bricks [1, 2]. However, laterite at the Koh Ker monuments contains more Mn (0.3–2.4 %) [9]. This may be one of the reasons why precipitation of manganese oxides is remarkable on the surface of laterite at the Koh Ker monuments.

Table 2 pXRF results for the black materials on the surface of the construction materials used in the Khmer temples
Fig. 3
figure 3

pXRF results expressed as ratios for the concentrations of the elements in the black area to those in the non-black area on the surface of construction materials in the Khmer temples

The enrichment of Mn, Ni, V, Zn, Y, Pb, and Cr in ferromanganese crusts against seawater was reported by Hein et al. [10]. In addition, the enrichment of K, Ni, Zn and Pb in rock varnish was reported by Dorn et al. [11]. The enrichment of Cl and S in the manganese oxides on the surface of the construction materials in the Khmer monuments may be attributable to bat guano [12].

SEM-EDX analysis

The black materials obtained from the different sites were less than 0.2 mm thick, but in some cases as thick as 0.5 mm (Fig. 4). The results from chemical analyses of these samples by the SEM-EDX are summarized in Table 3. In addition, SEM and X-ray images in the cross section of sample no. 3405 from the inner wall of East Mebon were shown in Fig. 4. The dominant element in the black areas was Mn, with a range of 4–48 %. Compared with the non-black areas, Mn was 10–390 times more concentrated in the black areas. The Al, Si, and Fe content ranges in the black areas were 3–19, 3–34, and 2–52 %, respectively. These elements could be attributed to the construction materials. P is distributed just on the surface of construction materials and is covered by black materials (Fig. 4). P is considered to have been derived from bat excrement. Trace elements detected by the pXRF such as Ni, V, Zn, Y, Pb, and Cr were not detected by the SEM-EDX because these elements were contained in the black materials under the detection limit of the SEM-EDX.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Cross section of sample no. 3405 (laterite) from the inner wall of East Mebon covered with black precipitates, and SEM and X-ray images. The analyzed area was surrounded by a white frame

Table 3 SEM-EDX results for the black materials on the surface of the construction materials used in the Khmer temples

The concentration ratio of each element in the black area to that in the non-black area is shown in Fig. 5. This figure shows that Mn was considerably concentrated in the black area. In addition, slightly higher levels of Mg, Ca, and K were found in the black areas than those in the non-black areas (Fig. 4).

Fig. 5
figure 5

SEM-EDX results expressed as concentration ratios for elements in the black areas to those in the non-black areas on the surfaces of construction materials used in the Khmer temples

XRD analysis

The results of the XRD analysis are shown in Table 4.

Table 4 XRD results for the black materials on the surface of the construction materials used in the Khmer temples

Quartz, plagioclase, goethite and kaolinite were detected in many of the samples, and could be attributed to the construction materials (sandstone, laterite and bricks). Brushite (CaHPO4·2H2O) was found in the samples from the Sambor Prei Kuk monuments, and could be attributed to bat guano [12, 13]. Typical peaks for manganese minerals were not detected, which suggest the manganese precipitates exist as amorphous materials or nanoscale materials with low levels of crystallization. X-ray peaks corresponding to birnessite ((Na, Ca, K)x(Mn4+, Mn3+)2O4·1.5H2O) and 10 Å manganese oxide minerals were detected in several samples (Fig. 6). The 10 Å manganese oxide minerals could be buserite (Na4Mn14O27·21H2O) and/or todorokite ((Na, Ca, K)x(Mn4+, Mn3+)6O12·3–4.5H2O). It has been shown that buserite will convert to birnessite with dehydration on heating at 105 °C [7, 14]. Therefore, the black precipitates that showed X-ray peaks corresponding to 10 Å manganese oxide minerals were heated at 105 °C in an oven for 24 h to identify the mineral. After heating, no change in the X-ray peaks was observed. Consequently, the mineral was identified as todorokite. These findings are consistent with studies that have shown birnessite, todorokite, buserite, and vernadite are the major constituents of manganese nodules and crusts on the sea floor [1517]. Birnessite is also the main manganese mineral found in desert varnish [5].

Fig. 6
figure 6

XRD patterns for the black materials taken from the surfaces of construction materials used in the Khmer temples. a Sample no. 3401 from Bayon (inner gallery), and b sample no. 3407 from Pre Rup. Q quartz, P plagioclase, Tod todorokite, and Bir birnessite

FE-SEM analysis

Stacks of hexagonal plates ranging in size from 100 to 200 nm in diameter were common in the samples of the manganese oxide precipitates (Fig. 7). In addition, some of the precipitates showed rod-shaped structures with lengths between 100 and 300 nm. The images for several of the samples showed areas with the rod-shaped structures incorporated into and forming the hexagonal plates. The rod-shaped structures suggest that the precipitation of manganese oxides may have been initiated by the activity of manganese oxidizing microbes. Manganese oxidizing bacteria have also been found in manganese nodules and crusts on the sea floor and in desert varnish [6, 18, 19]. In addition, Hariya and Kanari [20] reported that bacteria caused precipitation of manganese oxides in a spring.

Fig. 7
figure 7

FE-SEM images of the manganese oxide precipitates on the surfaces of construction materials used in the Khmer temples. a Sample no. 3401 from Bayon, b sample no. 3402 from Neang Khmau, c sample no. 3404 from Banteay Pir Chan, d sample no. 3405 from East Mebon, e sample no. 3412 from tower S1 at the Sambor Prei Kuk monuments, and f sample no. 3413 from the tower C1 at the Sambor Prei Kuk monuments

Preliminary experiments on removal of manganese oxide precipitates

The solubility of tetravalent manganese ion is low, but that of divalent manganese ion is high. Therefore the reduction of manganese may be the best method to remove the manganese oxide precipitates on the surface of construction materials.

In this context, we carried out the preliminary experiment on removal of manganese oxide precipitates using an oxalic acid solution with a concentration of 0.1 mol/l as a reducing agent. The laterite sample from Prasat Chrap (sample no. 3615), covered with manganese oxide precipitates was immersed in the oxalic acid solution for 0, 1, 3 and 5 h. The photographs of the sample before and after the experiments are shown in Fig. 8. Almost all manganese oxides disappeared within 3 h after the immersion into the oxalic acid solution. No visible change of laterite was observed. The same result was obtained for sandstone covered with manganese oxide precipitates. Therefore the reduction using a reducing agent such as an oxalic acid is a useful method to removal of manganese oxide precipitates.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Photographs of the laterite sample from the inner wall of Prasat Chrap (sample no. 3615) covered with manganese oxide precipitates after the experiment of immersion into the oxalic acid solution of a concentration of 0.1 mol/l for 0, 1, 3 and 5 h, respectively

Conclusions

Blackening caused by something other than the growth of blue-green algae is frequently observed on the surface of construction materials used in the Khmer temples in Cambodia. The results of this study showed that the black areas are caused by precipitation of manganese oxides. In addition to Mn, the precipitates contain small amounts of Ni, V, Zn, Y, K, Cl, S, Pb, and Cr. The manganese oxides mainly exist as an amorphous phase, but some are present as birnessite and todorokite. The precipitates are mostly present as hexagonal plates ranging in size from 100 to 300 nm, but some are rod-shaped. This suggests that precipitation of manganese oxides may have been initiated by the activity of manganese oxidizing microbes.

The manganese oxide precipitates could be easily removed using a reducing agent such as an oxalic acid solution.