Skip to main content

Primary hepatic lymphoma diagnosed using endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a case report

Abstract

Background

Because of the rarity of primary hepatic lymphomas, diagnosis of this disease entity may often be difficult, and performing a liver biopsy is the only way to establish a definitive diagnosis. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy has emerged as a safe technique for obtaining liver tissue. However, there is no report on the use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy for diagnosing primary hepatic lymphomas.

Case presentation

An 85-year-old Asian man was admitted to our hospital because of multiple liver lesions without any identifiable primary tumor or extrahepatic lymphadenopathy. Serum tumor markers, including alpha-fetoprotein, were in the normal range. We provisionally diagnosed the patient with a cancer of unknown primary origin with liver metastases. An endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle liver biopsy of the tumor in the left lobe of the liver was performed using a transgastric approach, and histology revealed a primary hepatic lymphoma of a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma type.

Conclusions

Primary hepatic lymphomas are quite rare, and diagnosis is often difficult without performing a biopsy. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy is a useful diagnostic modality even in such cases.

Peer Review reports

Background

A primary hepatic lymphoma (PHL) is defined as a liver-confined lymphoma without involvement of the spleen, lymph nodes, bone marrow, or other lymphoid structures [1]. PHL is a very rare malignancy and because of the rarity of this disease entity and the wide range of imaging manifestations, the diagnosis of PHL remains a challenge. Although histopathological examination is crucial, the diagnostic accuracy of traditional percutaneous liver biopsies has not always been high. Diagnosis of PHLs is often achieved only through a surgical biopsy [2,3,4]. Therefore, more appropriate liver biopsies may be required to obtain a diagnosis. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) has emerged as a safe technique for obtaining liver tissue [5]. However, to date there has been no report on the use of EUS-LB in diagnosing a PHL. Here, we present a case of a PHL diagnosed using EUS-LB.

Case presentation

An 85-year-old Asian man presented with complaints of anorexia for the few days prior to being examined. The doctor, who had previously treated the patient, confirmed hepatic and renal disorders and administered intravenous fluids, and gave a possible diagnosis of dehydration. The rest of the physical examination was otherwise unremarkable. Past medical history and family history were insignificant. He had not previously been treated with antiviral therapies, he was not jaundiced or febrile, and he had stable vital signs. His superficial lymph nodes were not palpable.

Blood tests revealed anemia with a hemoglobin level of 10.7 g/dL and a slight thrombocytopenia of 10.5 × 104/µL, with a normal total and differential white blood cell count. The serum albumin level was low, at 3.4 g/dL, and the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level was high, at 822 IU/L. Liver function test results were abnormal, with elevated levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (120 IU/L), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (139 IU/L), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (354 IU/L), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP) (79 IU/L), and total bilirubin (0.87 mg/dL). Renal function test results were abnormal, with elevated levels of creatinine (2.23 mg/dL) and blood urea nitrogen (32.0 mg/dL). A serological test for the hepatitis C virus (HCV) was positive, but serological tests for the hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) were negative.

An abdominal ultrasound (US) revealed multiple well-defined hypoechoic lesions in both lobes of the liver as well as splenomegaly (Fig. 1). Non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans of the abdomen and pelvis showed that the liver lesions were hypodense (Fig. 2). Because of renal dysfunction, the patient was unable to undergo a contrast-enhanced CT. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hepatic lesions showed hyperintense signals on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and marked signal restriction on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) (Fig. 3). Although the patient had splenomegaly, there were no lesions within the splenic parenchyma visible upon US, CT, or MRI. The mesenteric, para-aortic, and retroperitoneal lymph nodes were not enlarged. The image was suggestive of metastatic liver tumors with liver cirrhosis without any identifiable primary tumor or extrahepatic lymphadenopathy.

Fig. 1
figure1

Ultrasound findings. a Multiple well-defined hypoechoic hepatic nodules, b splenomegaly without focal lesions

Fig. 2
figure2

Computed tomography findings. Multiple hypoattenuating hepatic nodules without a dominant mass (red arrows). Splenomegaly was also seen

Fig. 3
figure3

Magnetic resonance imaging findings. a Hepatic lesions were hyperintense on T2-weighted images, b marked signal restricted on diffusion-weighted images. Splenomegaly without focal lesions was also seen

Further workups were carried out to exclude a possible primary origin. Levels of tumor markers alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) antigen, pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (Pro-GRP), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were within the normal range. The upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and total colonoscopy reveal no abnormality. CT scans of the chest and neck were negative for primary pulmonary lesions, and the hilar, mediastinal, and cervical lymph nodes were not enlarged. Based on these findings, we provisionally diagnosed the patient as having a cancer of unknown primary origin with liver metastases.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) revealed a 17.4 × 16.9-mm almost hypoechoic nodule in the left lobe (Fig. 4a). A 19-gauge fine needle biopsy (FNB) was performed one time on the tumor in the left lobe of the liver using a transgastric approach (Fig. 4b). The needle, with suction applied using a 20-mL syringe, was moved through the entire diameter of the tumor lesion for ten strokes, and the needle was then withdrawn from the lesion. The apparatus used was a convex-type EUS gastrovideoscope (model GF-UCT260; OLYMPUS Co., Ltd., Tokyo., Japan) and a EUS processor (EU-ME2; (OLYMPUS Co., Ltd.) at a frequency of 7.5 MHz. The needle used for the EUS-LB was a disposable 19-gauge needle (Acquire; Boston Scientific Co., Natick, MA, USA). Histological analysis showed diffuse proliferation of large atypical lymphoid cells (Fig. 5). Immunohistochemistry revealed that the atypical lymphoid cells were largely positive for CD20 and Bcl-2 and negative for CD3 (Fig. 6a, b). The results of additional staining of these cells for CD56, synaptophysin, and chromogranin A were negative (Fig. 6c–e). We could therefore exclude the possibility of a small cell carcinoma.

Fig. 4
figure4

Endoscopic ultrasound findings. a Hypoechoic nodule of the left hepatic lobe (17.4 × 16.9 mm), b endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy was performed using a 19-gauge needle (red arrow)

Fig. 5
figure5

Hematoxylin and eosin stain of the tumor tissue at biopsy, revealing diffuse proliferation of large neoplastic lymphoid cells. Magnification: a ×100, b ×400

Fig. 6
figure6

Immunohistochemical staining of the tumor tissue. a, b Positive reactivity to Bcl-2 and CD 20, c negative reactivity to CD56, d negative reactivity to synaptophysin, e negative reactivity to chromogranin A. Magnification ae ×400

Histopathology of the liver tissue was consistent with a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) level was extremely high at 25,700 U/mL after the biopsy. Finally, we diagnosed a PHL. Although we recommended that the patient consult with a hematologist, he chose best supportive care but refused hospice care. He received regular visits from palliative care doctors and daily nursing care. He died of the disease at his home 26 days after being discharged from our hospital.

Discussion

Our case highlights the potential utility of EUS-LB in the diagnosis of a PHL. A PHL is a very rare malignancy that constitutes about 0.016% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) [6]. The usual histological type is a DLBCL [7]. In general, typical abnormalities revealed by laboratory test results associated with PHLs include anemia, neutropenia, hypercalcemia, and variably elevated serum LDH and bilirubin levels, as well as elevated ALP and aminotransferase activities. Tumor markers such as AFP and CEA are usually within the normal range [8,9,10]. Normal levels of serum tumor markers are useful in distinguishing PHLs from hepatocellular carcinomas and metastatic liver cancer.

The imaging features of hepatic lymphomas are non-specific, and PHLs can appear as solitary discrete lesions (60%) or as multiple lesions (35–40%). On US images, hepatic lymphoma lesions are usually well defined and appear markedly hypoechoic or anechoic. On MRI, the lesion tends to show hyperintense signals on T2WI and a signal restriction on DWI [11]. Retrospectively, our case was largely in line with laboratory and radiological findings described in the literature. The exact cause of PHLs is poorly understood. Several recent etiological studies have shown that there is a strong association between HCV infection and PHLs, especially in B-cell NHL. Page et al. [12] described 23 cases of primary hepatic DLBCLs and one case of a mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, with six of the ten cases of DLBCL (60%) having HCV infections. Kikuma et al. [13] reported 20 cases of primary hepatic B-cell lymphoma, of which eight of 12 the DLBCL cases (66.7%) and two of eight MALT lymphoma cases (25%) had serum anti-HCV antibodies and HCV RNA. Our patient was HCV-positive, and this viral infection could be a probable risk factor for PHL.

A liver biopsy is the only way to establish a definitive diagnosis of a PHL. Because of the presence of a large area of necrosis, results from traditional percutaneous liver biopsies for PHLs have not always been accurate [2]. Recently, EUS-LB has emerged as an alternative technique to obtain liver tissue with a low adverse event profile and to provide adequate tissue yields for evaluation of liver disease [5]. During the procedure, tissue sampling is performed under real-time sonographic imaging, thereby avoiding the risk of puncturing large vessels or other organs. Other potential benefits include patient comfort, with sedation provided during the procedure. The most common adverse event of percutaneous liver biopsies is pain, which can be located at the biopsy sight or radiate to the right shoulder [14]. We offered several biopsy options, including a US- or CT-guided percutaneous liver biopsy, and the patient always preferred the least painless procedure. Moreover, it is known that the left hepatic lobe can be relatively easily visualized using EUS because the left hepatic lobe lies close to the stomach. In our case, one of these liver tumors was found in the left hepatic lobe on pre-procedural evaluation. Thus, we took into consideration all of the various factors, including the patient’s condition, and decided to perform the less invasive EUS-LB. Ching-Companioni et al. [15] determined that use of the 19-gauge FNB needle was an improvement over the traditional 19-gauge fine needle aspiration (FNA) needle used in EUS-LB. In this case, biopsy samples obtained with the 19-gauge FNB needle were adequate for histological assessment, and there were no technical failures or procedure-related adverse events. By a combination of rapid on-site cytologic evaluation, we were able to determine the quantity and quality of the tissue samples in real time, resulting in fewer required punctures and reduced total procedure time, which was 22 min.

Poor prognostic features can include advanced age, constitutional symptoms, bulky disease, unfavorable histologic subtypes, elevated levels of LDH and a high proliferation rate, cirrhosis, and comorbid conditions [16,17,18]. Unfortunately, our patient fulfilled some of these features and had an extremely poor outcome. Our case is the first report of a PHL being diagnosed using EUS-LB.

Conclusion

Primary hepatic lymphomas are quite rare, and diagnosis is often difficult without a biopsy. EUS-LB is a useful diagnostic modality, even in such a rare case.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

AFP:

Alpha-fetoprotein

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

CA19-9:

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9

CEA:

Carcinoembryonic antigen

CT:

Computed tomography

DLBCL:

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

DWI:

Diffusion-weighted imaging

EUS:

Endoscopic ultrasound

EUS-LB:

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy

FNA:

Fine needle aspiration

FNB:

Fine needle biopsy

γ-GTP:

Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

HCV:

Hepatitis C virus

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency virus

LDH:

Lactate dehydrogenase

MALT:

Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

NHL:

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma

PHL:

Primary hepatic lymphoma

Pro-GRP:

Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide

PSA:

Prostate-specific antigen

SCC:

Squamous cell carcinoma

T2WI:

T2-weighted imaging

sIL-2R:

Soluble interleukin-2 receptor

US:

Ultrasound

References

  1. 1.

    Gatselis NK, Dalekos GN. Education and imaging. Hepatobilary and pancreatic: primary hepatic lymphoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26:210.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Resende V, Oliveira TS, Gomes RT, Laboissière RS, Tavares-Junior WC, Melo Couto OF. Primary hepatic lymphoma: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2013;4:1165–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Franchi R, Abbiati C, Signaroldi A, Quadrelli G, Maggioni M, Sbalzarini G. Primary lymphoma of the liver—a case-report and a review of the literature. Oncol Rep. 1995;2:1017–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Dhingra R, Winter MW, Yilmaz OH, Jaiswal S, Sterling M. An unusual presentation of primary hepatic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the liver. Cureus. 2018;10(2):e2242. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2242.

  5. 5.

    Parekh PJ, Majithia R, Diehl DL, Baron TH. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy. Endosc Ultrasound. 2015;4:85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Yang XW, Tan WF, Yu WL, Shi S, Wang Y, Zhang YL, et al. Diagnosis and surgical treatment of primary hepatic lymphoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:6016–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Noronha V, Shafi NQ, Obando JA, Kummar S. Primary non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the liver. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005;53:199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Mastoraki A, Stefanou MI, Chatzoglou E, Danias N, Kyriazi M, Arkadopoulos N, et al. Primary hepatic lymphoma: dilemmas in diagnostic approach and therapeutic management. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2014;30:150–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lei KI. Primary non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the liver. Leuk Lymphoma. 1998;29:293–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Pieri G, Theocharidou E, Burroughs AK, FMedSci. Liver in haematological disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;27:513–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Rajesh S, Bansal K, Sureka B, Patidar Y, Bihari C, Arora A. The imaging conundrum of hepatic lymphoma revisited. Insights Imaging. 2015;6:679–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Page RD, Romaguera JE, Osborne B, Medeiros LJ, Rodriguez J, North L, et al. Primary hepatic lymphoma: favorable outcome after combination chemotherapy. Cancer. 2001;92:2023–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kikuma K, Watanabe J, Oshiro Y, Shimogama T, Honda Y, Okamura S, et al. Etiological factors in primary hepatic B-cell lymphoma. Virchows Arch. 2012;460:379–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Eisenberg E, Konopniki M, Veitsman E, Kramskay R, Gaitini D, Baruch Y. Prevalence and characteristics of pain induced by percutaneous liver biopsy. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:1392–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ching-Companioni RA, Diehl DL, Johal AS, Confer BD, Khara HS. 19 G aspiration needle versus 19 G core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2019;51:1059–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ma YJ, Chen EQ, Chen XB, Wang J, Tang H. Primary hepatic diffuse large B cell lymphoma: a case report. Hepat Mon. 2011;11:203–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gomyo H, Kagami Y, Kato H, Kawase T, Ohshiro A, Oyama T, et al. Primary hepatic follicular lymphoma: a case report and discussion of chemotherapy and favorable outcomes. J Clin Exp Hematopathol. 2007;47:73–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Doi H, Horiike N, Hiraoka A, Koizumi Y, Yamamoto Y, Hasebe A, et al. Primary hepatic marginal zone B cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue type: case report and review of the literature. Int J Hematol. 2008;88:418–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Mark Abramovitz, PhD, from Edanz Group (https://en-author-services.edanz.com) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KN, ST, KF, AH, YS, MO, and SM examined the patient clinically, analyzed laboratory data and histopathology, and decided ib the treatment for this patient by medical conference. KK revealed the patient’s pathogenesis by pathological dissection. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenichiro Nishikawa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s next of kin for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nishikawa, K., Katsuta, K., Tanaka, S. et al. Primary hepatic lymphoma diagnosed using endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a case report. J Med Case Reports 15, 199 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-021-02791-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Primary hepatic lymphoma
  • Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy
  • Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
  • Case report