Background

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare autoimmune disease with a clinically significant bleeding diathesis, resulting from circulating autoantibodies inhibiting coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). The incidence is estimated to be 1–1.5 cases per 1 million population, and AHA is most often encountered in elderly patients. Half of AHA cases are associated with an underlying disorder, such as autoimmune diseases, cancer, use of certain drugs, or occur during pregnancy, and in the postpartum period. In the other half, no underlying cause is identified (idiopathic AHA). Typically, bleeding is located in the skin, mucosa, or soft tissues, and, in contrast to congenital hemophilia, joint bleeding is rare. Mortality in AHA is increased, particularly in elderly patients and in patients with underlying malignancies. Despite frequent bleeding complications and complications of immunosuppressive therapy, the primary cause of death in AHA is the underlying disease [1].

Management of AHA is based on four pillars: (1) avoidance of procedures that may induce bleeding, (2) control of bleeding, (3) inhibitor eradication, and (4) treatment of the underlying disease. The mainstays of bleeding management are bypassing agents, such as activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCCs) and recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). More recently, recombinant porcine FVIII, which lacks complete sequence homology with human FVIII, has become available. Different strategies, such as immunosuppression with steroids alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide, immunoglobulins, rituximab, plasma exchange, and immunoadsorption, are in use for inhibitor elimination and eradication and, with that, restoration of FVIII clotting activity [1].

Hematological malignancies may be associated with or may be the underlying cause of AHA. Among these malignancies, lymphoproliferative disorders are most common. An association of AHA with plasma cell neoplasm (PCN) seems to be extremely rare and to represent only 14% of AHA cases associated with a hematological malignancy [2]. We describe a case of a 77-year-old man who presented with AHA and smoldering multiple myeloma as an underlying cause.

Case presentation

A 77-year-old Swiss Caucasian man was admitted to a peripheral hospital due to a compartment syndrome of his left calf following a minor trauma (Fig. 1a). A large (13 × 8 × 0.6 cm) isolated calf hematoma was documented on ultrasound, but the patient’s further physical evaluation was unremarkable. At admission, anticoagulant therapy with apixaban, prescribed for atrial fibrillation, was interrupted. The patient’s family and personal history were negative for hematological diseases. Two months earlier, the patient had undergone an uneventful colonoscopy with polypectomy initiated because of melena. No coagulation tests were available from that time. Despite two surgical interventions, the bleeding into the calf persisted. Six days after initial admission, AHA was suspected, and the patient was transferred to our hospital.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Findings in our patient. a Presentation of compartment syndrome following surgery. b Plasma cells on bone marrow aspirate

The results of the patient’s laboratory evaluation revealed a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT; 119 s; reference range 25.0–36.0 s), and FVIII:C of 2% in the presence of a high-titer FVIII inhibitor of 102 Bethesda units (BU)/ml confirmed the diagnosis of AHA. Additional diagnostic workup revealed an IgG kappa paraprotein of 9.2 g/L as well as a slightly reduced hemoglobin of 106 g/L. The patient’s albumin corrected serum calcium was 2.38 mmol/L, serum creatinine 103 μmol/L, β2-microglobulin 3.0 mg/L, lactate dehydrogenase 301 U/L, free light chains kappa 41.1 mg/L and lambda 10.9 mg/L, and free light chain ratio of 3.77. Magnetic resonance imaging excluded multiple myeloma defining focal bone lesions. A subsequent bone marrow biopsy showed infiltration of clonal plasma cells of 15% (Fig. 1b). Conventional cytogenetic analysis was not performed; however, microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization revealed hyperdiploidy with trisomy 3, 4, 5, 9, 11, and 21, whereas the result of fluorescence in situ hybridization was negative for MYC, IGH rearrangement, and 17p. Apart from a smoldering myeloma, no other diseases potentially underlying the AHA were identified.

Treatment with prednisolone (1 mg/kg body weight) and cyclophosphamide (150 mg/day) was started the day of presentation at our hospital. Because of imminent compartment syndrome and potential need of further surgical interventions, immunoadsorption was started according to the modified Bonn Malmö protocol [3] to rapidly deplete the FVIII inhibitor. Altogether, we performed seven immunoadsorption sessions processing approximately two total patient plasma volumes per session over the next 13 days. Within 1 month, aPTT and FVIII:C had normalized, whereas the inhibitor titer had significantly decreased but was still detectable (1.04 BU/ml).

Insertion of a central venous catheter for immunoadsorption, as well as the bone marrow biopsy, were done under substitution with rFVIIa (NovoSeven; Novo Nordisk, Plainsboro, NJ, USA). One to three doses of 90 μg/kg body weight were applied. Wound healing at the calf was delayed, and due to skin necrosis, surgical revision became necessary. At that time, the patient’s aPTT had already normalized, and substitution with rFVIIa was not needed.

Lack of complete remission of AHA prompted us to initiate a VRD (bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone) regimen to treat the patient’s smoldering myeloma. After two cycles, the FVIII inhibitor had further declined to 0.31 BU/ml. The monoclonal immunoglobulin was still detectable by immune fixation but no longer quantifiable. Subsequently, treatment intensity was reduced to a VRD-lite regimen [4] because of thrombocytopenia, mild polyneuropathy, and signs of congestive heart failure. During follow-up, no further bleeding occurred. After nine cycles of induction therapy and five cycles of consolidation therapy with the VRD-lite regimen, the patient is in complete remission of his AHA and in very good partial remission of his PCN (Table 1, patient 16).

Table 1 Characteristics of patients with association of AHA and plasma cell neoplasms – a systematic review

Discussion and conclusions

To further elucidate this rare association of AHA and PCN, we reviewed the published literature in PubMed using the following search terms: “hemophilia,” “inhibitor,” “factor VIII,” “myeloma,” “plasma cell disorder” or “neoplasm,” “smoldering myeloma,” “MGUS,” “monoclonal gammopathy,” and “paraprotein.” Our search identified 15 further cases. Case descriptions, including the sequence of occurrence of AHA and PCN, treatment, evolution, and outcome, are provided in Table 1.

We found nine male and seven female patients diagnosed with AHA and PCN. Their median age at diagnosis of AHA was 61.5 (range 43–87) years. Soft tissue bleeding was the most common type of bleeding (7 of 16 patients; 43%), in line with other reports [1]. The patients’ median FVIII inhibitor titer was 18.7 BU/ml (range 1–102 BU/ml; no data available for two patients). AHA was diagnosed after excessive postintervention hemorrhage in two patients and in one patient following life-threatening pericardial bleeding and hemarthrosis. AHA with active bleeding was the presenting sign and preceded PCN diagnosis in six cases (38%) (Table 1, cases 4, 5, 6, 10, 13, and 16), whereas in the other cases, PCN was diagnosed first. In three of the latter cases, AHA was considered to have occurred secondary to multiple myeloma treatment. The implicated drugs were interferon alpha, lenalidomide, and thalidomide. Information on the type of paraprotein was available in 11 cases, but no particular immunoglobulin type or clonal light-chain was discernible.

Hemostatic treatment with bypassing agents was necessary in 11 cases. Their median FVIII inhibitor titer was 19.2 (range 1–70) BU/ml, whereas the three patients who did not need hemostatic treatment had FVIII inhibitor titers of 4.85, 10, and 102 BU/ml, respectively. This underscores the fact that FVIII inhibitor titers in AHA do not necessarily correlate with the severity of the bleeding manifestations. Our patient received rFVIIa only prophylactically before catheter insertion and bone marrow biopsy. Under immunoadsorption, a rapid increase of FVIII clotting activity reaching safe levels was observed, and further treatment with bypassing products was not necessary.

Inhibitor eradication was attempted with steroids alone (n = 4) or in combination with cyclophosphamide (n = 5), with cyclophosphamide alone (n = 1), and with rituximab (n = 3). Plasma exchange and immunoadsorption to remove FVIII antibodies were performed in two and one patient (our patient), respectively. Given the long observation period of 55 years, different therapy regimens were used to treat the underlying PCN in the 16 cases (details are given in Table 1). At the time of reporting, 13 patients were alive, whereas two of the three patients who died, died of bleeding complications. Information on the outcome of AHA and/or PCN was available for nine of 13 survivors: six had normal coagulation tests, and FVIII activity was mildly reduced in two. PCN was in complete or partial remission in seven and two cases, respectively. One patient (case 7 in Table 1) had a spontaneous remission of his FVIII inhibitor without any treatment.

In summary, our patient’s case, together with the 15 other cases described in the literature, underscores the possibility of PCN as an underlying cause of AHA. Serum and urine protein electrophoresis is not (everywhere) part of standard workup of AHA, and underreporting of this association is possible or even likely. Accordingly, physicians should consider including protein electrophoresis, immunofixation, and analysis of free light chains in laboratory diagnostics when treating a patient with AHA. The occurrence of excessive and unexplained bleeding in patients diagnosed with PCN should raise the suspicion of secondary AHA and trigger the request for coagulation tests, particularly in patients treated with immunomodulatory drugs such as thalidomide or lenalidomide. Whether PCN treatment alone can control AHA in these cases remains an open question; 11 of 16 (69%) of the reported cases received treatment for both diseases.

In our experience, early intervention with immunoadsorption can be lifesaving in cases with high FVIII inhibitor titers, especially in patients requiring a surgical intervention. The modified Bonn Malmö protocol [3] is useful to guide AHA therapy that includes immunoadsorption.