Erratum to: BMC Research Notes (2015) 8:153 DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1079-y
Unfortunately, the original version of this article [1] contained an error. In both the Abstract and the Results section the number of HTA reports containing the name of the website, (n = 54) should have read (n = 83).
This also affects the data in Figure 3 (Fig. 1 here), where “Website name” should also have read 83 on the chart rather than 54. A correct version of Figure 3 can be seen below.
Details reported about web searching using websites (2)
Reference
Briscoe S. Web searching for systematic reviews: a case study of reporting standards in the UK Health Technology Assessment programme. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:153.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1079-y.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Briscoe, S. Erratum to: Web searching for systematic reviews: a case study of reporting standards in the UK Health Technology Assessment programme. BMC Res Notes 9, 169 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1971-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1971-0