Author Correction: Genome Biol 24, 187 (2023)

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-023-03023-7

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported errors in Fig. 5 and Figure S1. The blue geometric symbols for Illumina Canine HD BeadChip and Axiom Canine HD Array were swapped in the figure keys. The colors of the lines and symbols in the plots are correct. The corrected Fig. 5 is given below. The updated additional file 2 is published in this correction article.

Fig. 5
figure 1

Genotype imputation accuracy of the Dog10K reference panel. a NRC rates of imputed genotypes across autosomes and the PAR segment of chromosome X. Variant sites are filtered according to GLIMPSE and IMPUTE5 imputation quality scores (INFO > 0.9). b NRC rates of imputed genotypes across the non-PAR segment of chromosome X. Variants are not filtered by imputation quality score, as imputation software does not provide scores for haploid genotypes. c NRC rates of imputed genotypes across autosomes and the PAR segment of chromosome X prior to filtering on imputation quality. d NRC rates and total number of imputed sites for each platform. Sites were filtered according to imputation quality score > 0.9 and reference MAF > 1%. e NRC rates for downsampled and full chromosome 38 reference panels for sites with reference MAF > 1%. Results show both quality and non-quality filtered sites. Data points show NRC rates for a single downsampled reference panel. Horizontal bars indicate mean NRC rates for each reference panel population size. f Number of imputed variants for downsampled and full chromosome 38 reference panels for sites with reference MAF > 1%. Results show both quality and non-quality filtered sites. Data points show the number of imputed variants for a single downsampled reference panel. Horizontal bars indicate the mean number of variants for each reference panel population size

These errors do not affect the main results and conclusions of the paper. The original article [1] has been updated.