Correction to: J Exp Clin Cancer Res 41, 18 (2022)

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-021-02203-2

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified minor errors in Fig. 7, Fig. S8 and Fig. S11. Specifically:

  • Fig. 7i: plotting errors in the histogram; the histogram has been corrected

  • Fig. S8d: western blots (right hand side) replaced with correct blots

  • Fig. S11: raw western blots presented for Fig.S8d have been replaced with correct blots

Fig. 7
figure 1

HuD produces a pro-survival signal. A Viability in stress condition in presence of pan-caspase inhibitor (control or silenced HuD and/or ZDEVD) in IMR-32 cells. B Efficiency of ARL6IP1 for controlling cell viability in IMR-32 cells (control or silenced HuD and/or overexpressed ARL6IP1). C Validation for efficiency of ARL6IP1 in stress condition (control or silenced ARL6IP1) in IMR-32 cells. D Western blot analysis for apoptosis-related protein (control or silenced HuD and/or overexpressed ARL6IP1); serum deprivation was a positive control and relative quantifications shown. Full-length blots are presented in Supplementary Fig. S10. E Viability assay (control or silenced HuD and/or silenced GRB-10 and/or overexpressed ARL6IP1) in IMR-32 and SK-N-SH cells. F Proposed schematic pathway for inhibition of cell death by HuD. G and H Immunostaining of HuD and pS6K in peripheral nerve tissue (PNT) and neuroblastoma (NB) patient of different stages, corresponding stage-wise expression quantification of HuD and pS6K levels are presented. Scale bar corresponds to 200 μm. I Relative mRNA expression quantified by RT-qPCR (control or silenced ND1 and/or active mTORC1 via Rheb S16H construct and/or inactive mTOR via rapamycin-25 nM) in IMR-32 cells. J Relative mRNA expression quantified by RT-qPCR (control or miR375 mimic or miR375 inhibitor) in IMR-32 cells. K Proposed schematic pathway for inhibition of HuD by mTOR. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; t-test: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

The corrected figure is given here. The correction does not have any effect on the final conclusions of the paper. The original article has been corrected.