miR-148b-3p inhibits gastric cancer metastasis by inhibiting the Dock6/Rac1/Cdc42 axis
- 795 Downloads
Our previous work showed that some Rho GTPases, including Rho, Rac1 and Cdc42, play critical roles in gastric cancer (GC); however, how they are regulated in GC remains largely unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate the roles and molecular mechanisms of Dock6, an atypical Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), in GC metastasis.
The expression levels of Dock6 and miR-148b-3p in GC tissues and paired nontumor tissues were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH), respectively. The correlation between Dock6/miR-148b-3p expression and the overall survival of GC patients was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The roles of Dock6 and miR-148b-3p in GC were investigated by in vitro and in vivo functional studies. Rac1 and Cdc42 activation was investigated by GST pull-down assays. The inhibition of Dock6 transcription by miR-148b-3p was determined by luciferase reporter assays.
A significant increase in Dock6 expression was found in GC tissues compared with nontumor tissues, and its positive expression was associated with lymph node metastasis and a higher TNM stage. Patients with positive Dock6 expression exhibited shorter overall survival periods than patients with negative Dock6 expression. Dock6 promoted GC migration and invasion by increasing the activation of Rac1 and Cdc42. miR-148b-3p expression was negatively correlated with Dock6 expression in GC, and it decreased the motility of GC cells by inhibiting the Dock6/Rac1/Cdc42 axis.
Dock6 was over-expressed in GC tissues, and its positive expression was associated with GC metastasis and indicated poor prognosis of GC patients. Targeting of Dock6 by miR-148b-3p could activate Rac1 and Cdc42, directly affecting the motility of GC cells. Targeting the Dock6-Rac1/Cdc42 axis could serve as a new therapeutic strategy for GC treatment.
KeywordsRho GTPase GEFs Dock6 Gastric cancer Metastasis
GTPase activating proteins
Guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors
Guanine nucleotide exchange factors
Gastric epithelial cells
Hematoxylin and eosin
In situ hybridization
Multiple drug resistance
Vascular smooth muscle cell
Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide [1, 2]. Most GC-associated deaths can be attributed to cancer recurrence and metastasis, but the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown [3, 4].
In humans, the Rho GTPase family comprises 20 Rho small G-proteins that can be categorized into the Cdc42 subgroup (Cdc42, RhoJ and RhoQ), the Rac subgroup (Rac1, Rac2, Rac3 and RhoG), the Rho subgroup (RhoA, RhoB and RhoC) and other less characterized subgroups [5, 6]. They play critical roles in cell proliferation, cell motility, tumor cell malignant transformation, and cancer metastasis and invasion . Rho GTPases have a GTP-bound active state and a GDP-bound inactive state . Rho GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) inactivate Rho GTPases by stimulating the hydrolysis of GTP, guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) “turn on” Rho GTPases by promoting the exchange of GDP for GTP, and Rho guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs) sequester Rho GTPases in the inactive state by inhibiting the dissociation of inactive guanine nucleotides . Our previous work showed that Rho, Rac1 and Cdc42 are important effectors of GC malignant transformation and metastasis [10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. However, the regulation of Rho GTPases in GC is not yet fully understood.
Rho GEFs include Dbl-related classical GEFs and Dock family atypical Rho GEFs. Since the first GEF-Dbl/MCF2 was reported in 1984, approximately 81 GEFs have been identified, and they have been reported to be involved in various cancers and pathologies [15, 16]. Dock family proteins contain 11 GEFs and are divided into four subfamilies [17, 18]. The Dock-A subfamily consists of Dock1/Dock180, Dock2 and Dock5 [19, 20]. The Dock-B subfamily contains Dock3 and Dock4 [15, 21]. The Dock-C subfamily includes Dock6, Dock7 and Dock8 [16, 17, 18, 22]. The Dock-D subfamily is composed of Dock9, Dock10 and Dock11 [15, 23, 24]. As members of the Dock-C family, Dock7 was reported to promote the metastasis of tumors including GBM tumor cells, Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC) and glioblastoma [25, 26, 27]; Dock6 has been reported to be involved in polarized axon growth; and Dock8 can increase the motility of immune cells [28, 29]; however, the expression profile and the role of Dock6 and Dock8 in tumors remains unknown.
MicroRNAs are a class of small non-coding RNAs that bind to the 3’-UTR of target genes and post-transcriptionally regulate target mRNAs, resulting in changes in the expression of the target genes . MiR-148b can inhibit the metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma , lung cancer , hepatocellular carcinoma , and pancreatic cancer . miR-148b has been reported to be down-regulated in GC and to inhibit its proliferation [35, 36, 37]; however, whether it plays a role in GC metastasis remains unclear.
In this study, we showed that Dock6 was highly expressed in GC tissues and that its over-expression was positively correlated with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis. As a Rho GEF, Dock6 promoted GC migration and invasion by increasing the activation of Rac1 and Cdc42. miR-148b-3p expression was low in GC tissues, and it inhibited GC metastasis by inhibiting the Dock6/Rac1/Cdc42 signaling pathway. The Dock6-Rac1/Cdc42 axis might be a promising target for GC treatment.
The human normal gastric epithelial cell line GES-1 and the GC cell lines AGS, HGC-27, MGC-803, SGC-7901 and BGC-823 were purchased from Genechem (Shanghai, China). GC cell lines with high metastatic potential (MKN-28 M and SGC-7901 M) and corresponding cell lines with low metastatic potential (MKN-28NM and SGC-7901NM) were constructed from the human GC cell lines MKN28 and SGC-7901, respectively, as described previously [3, 4]. All cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (GIBCO, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin sodium and 100 μg/ml streptomycin at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator.
This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Xijing Hospital (Xi’an, China). Thirty pairs of primary GC tissues and adjacent nontumor tissues were obtained from patients who underwent surgery at Xijing Hospital between 2015 and 2016. All tissues used were verified clinically and pathologically by the Department of Pathology at Xijing Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all patients involved. Upon removal from the patients, the tissues were frozen in liquid nitrogen and used for total RNA extraction.
RNA extraction and real-time PCR
Total RNA was extracted with a Takara MiniBEST Universal RNA Extraction Kit (Takara, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcription and real-time PCR analysis were performed with a Takara PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit and Takara SYBR Green PCR Kit. PCR primers for Dock6, ACTIN, miR-148b-3p and U6 were designed and synthesized by Takara. The primer sequences are listed in Additional file 1: Table S6. The real-time PCR protocol was described previously [38, 39]. GAPDH and the small nuclear RNA U6 were used as internal controls for the mRNA and microRNA analyses, respectively. All reactions were performed in triplicate.
IHC and ISH of GC tissue microarrays
All tissue microarrays used in this study were purchased from Shanghai Outdo Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The HStm-Ade180Sur-03 GC tissue microarrays contained 90 pairs of primary GC tissues and paired nontumor tissues and were used for Dock6 (Sigma, HPA049423) and miR-148b-3p staining. The HStm-Ade120lym-01 GC tissue microarray contained 32 pairs of nontumor tissues, paired primary GC tissues and lymph node metastases, and this microarray was used for Dock6 staining. The miR-148b-3p probe was purchased from Exiqon, and the probe (50 nM) was detected with a digoxigenin antibody (Roche, 11,093,274, 1:1000). The IHC and ISH assays were performed as previously described . The IHC and ISH results were analyzed independently by two pathologists who were blinded to the study. The results were scored based on the intensity and the extent of staining. Staining intensity was scored as 0 (negative staining), 1 (weak staining), 2 (moderate staining) and 3 (strong staining). The staining extent was scored based on the percentage of positive cells and was graded as 0 (negative), 1 (0.01–25%), 2 (25.01–50%), 3 (50.01–75%), and 4 (75.01–100%). The histologic score (H score) for each section was calculated with the following formula: histologic score = proportion score×intensity score. Thus, the total score could be 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, or 12, and the staining could be classified as negative (0, 1, 2, 3, 4) or positive (6, 8, 9, 12).
The clinical information of GC patients in the Kaplan-Meier plotter database
The correlation between Dock6, Dock7 or Dock8 expression and the overall or recurrence-free survival of GC patients was analyzed with data extracted from the Kaplan-Meier plotter database . Gene expression data and relapse-free and overall survival information from the Kaplan-Meier plotter database were downloaded from GEO (Affymetrix microarrays only), EGA and TCGA. The Kaplan-Meier plotter gastric cancer database includes the clinical information of the GSE29272 (n = 268), GSE14210 (n = 146), GSE22377 (n = 43), GSE15459 (n = 200), GSE51105 (n = 94) and GSE62254 (n = 300) data sets. The database is handled by a PostgreSQL server, which integrates gene expression and clinical data simultaneously. To analyze the prognostic value of a particular gene, the patient samples were split into two groups according to the median survival of the patients.
Plasmid construction and transfection
Lentiviruses for Dock6 over-expression and down-regulation, lentivirus for miR-148b-3p over-expression and control lentiviruses were purchased from Genechem (Shanghai, China). SiRNA for Dock6 and the microRNA mimic and inhibitor for miR-148b-3p were purchased from Ribo Bio (Guangzhou, China). To generate stable Dock6-knock-down cells, SGC-7901 M cells were infected with lenti-Cas9 virus (MOI = 50) and cultured with 2.5 μg/ml puromycin for 2 weeks. Then, the SGC-7901-LV-Cas9 cells were infected with lenti-Dock6-sgRNAs (MOI = 50) or lenti-sgcontrol (MOI = 50). The infection efficiency was confirmed, and the SGC-7901-LV-Cas9-sgDock6 (SGC-7901 M-Dock6-KD) cells or SGC-7901-LV-Cas9-sgcontrol (SGC-7901 M-control) cells were selected by flow cytometry (FCM). To generate Dock6-over-expressing and miR-148b-3p-over-expressing cells, cells were infected with lenti-Dock6 (MOI = 100) or lenti-miR-148b-3p (MOI = 50) or the corresponding lenti-control lentivirus, and stable cells were selected with 2.5 μg/ml puromycin treatment for 2 weeks. The siRNA for Dock6 was used at a final concentration of 100 nM. The microRNA mimic and inhibitor were added to the cells at a final concentration of 150 nM and 300 nM, respectively. Forty-eight hours after transfection with siRNA or microRNA mimic or inhibitor, total RNA and protein were extracted from cells for further study.
GST pull-down assay and western blot assay
GST pull-down assays were performed with an Active Rac1 Pull-Down and Detection Kit (Thermo Scientific, USA, 16118) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Western blot assays were performed as described previously . The primary antibodies used were anti-Dock6 (Sigma, HPA049423, 1:1000), anti-β-actin (Proteintech, 60,008–1, 1:2000), anti-Cdc42 (CST, 2462S, 1:1000) and anti-Rac1 (Millipore, 05–389, clone 23A8, 1:200).
For migration assays, 5 × 104 cells in 200 μl of RPMI-1640 medium (containing 1% FBS) were seeded into the upper Boyden chambers (Corning, NY, USA). For invasion assay, the chambers were coated with 60 μl of Matrigel (200 mg/ml) and dried overnight under sterile conditions, and 1 × 105 cells in 200 μl of RPMI-1640 medium (containing 1% FBS) were seeded into the chambers. The lower chambers were filled with RPMI-1640 medium (containing 20% FBS), and the cells were incubated for 24 h. Then, the cells remaining on the upper side of the membrane were removed, and the cells adhering to the lower side of the membrane were fixed and stained with 0.5% crystal violet. To evaluate the motility of the cells, cells in 5 random fields (20×) were counted and analyzed. Each assay was performed in triplicate.
In vivo studies
BALB/C nude mice (6 weeks old) were used for in vivo studies. The mice were housed in the Experimental Animal Center of the Fourth Military Medical University according to the institutional guidelines for animal care. All animal experiments were approved by the Fourth Military Medical University Animal Care Committee. In the tail vein metastatic model, 3 × 106 cells were injected into the tail veins of the nude mice. In the liver metastatic model, 3 × 106 cells were injected into the spleens of the nude mice. Ten weeks after the injection, the mice were injected intraperitoneally with D-luciferin (Xenogen, Hopkinton, MA, 150 mg/kg), and bioluminescence images were taken with an IVIS 100 Imaging System (Xenogen). Then, the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, and the lungs or livers were removed and prepared for histological examination (hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining).
Luciferase reporter study
Plasmids containing the wild-type (WT) Dock6–3’-UTR sequence and a mutant Dock6–3’-UTR sequence were synthesized by GeneCopoeia (Shanghai, China). Luciferase activity was detected with a Dual Luciferase Assay kit (GeneCopoeia) according to the manufacturer’s instructions as described previously .
SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. The quantitative data were compared between groups with Student’s t-test. The chi-squared test was used to determine whether there was a significant difference in the distribution of Dock6/miR-148b-positive samples between different categories. The overall survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses and the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the independent factors that influence survival based on the variables that had been selected from the univariate analyses. A P value of P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Dock6 expression is increased in GC tissues and indicates poor prognosis
To explore the potential roles of the Dock-C subgroup GEFs (Dock6, Dock7 and Dock8) in GC, we first investigated their mRNA expression in 8 GC cohorts (n > 10) from the Oncomine database (www.oncomine.org), and the results indicated that Dock6 was the most up-regulated gene (Additional file 2: Table S1). The correlation between Dock6, Dock7 and Dock8 expression and the prognosis of GC patients was then analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analyses . All three probes for Dock6 indicated that patients with high Dock6 expression had shorter overall or recurrence-free survival periods than those with low Dock6 expression, while different probes for Dock7 or Dock8 showed different correlation between high Dock7/Dock8 expression and the overall or recurrence-free survival periods (Additional file 3: Figure S1). Thus, among the Dock-C subgroup Rho GEFs, Dock6 might be an important effector of GC initiation and progression.
Dock6 promotes GC proliferation and metastasis
To determine the possible roles of Dock6 in the migration and invasion of GC cells, Dock6 expression in GC cell lines with high metastatic potential (MKN-28 M and SGC-7901 M) and corresponding cell lines with low metastatic potential (MKN-28NM and SGC-7901NM) was detected by western blot studies. Dock6 expression was much higher in MKN-28 M and SGC-7901 M cells than in MKN-28NM and SGC-7901NM cells, respectively (Fig. 2b). SGC-7901NM-Dock6-OE cells were then established by Lenti-Dock6 infection, and SGC-7901 M-Dock6-KD cells were established by infection with a lentivirus expressing Cas9 and Dock6-sgRNA, and the Dock6 protein expression levels in these cell lines were then detected by western blot (Fig. 2c). The results of transwell studies showed that Dock6 over-expression up-regulated the migration and invasion of SGC-7901NM cells, while Dock6 down-regulation decreased the motility of SGC-7901 M cells (Fig. 2d).
To investigate the roles of Dock6 in the metastasis of GC cells in vivo, in vivo tail vein and liver metastatic assays were used. In the tail vein metastatic assay, SGC-7901NM-Dock6-OE cells, SGC-7901 M-Dock6-KD cells or control cells were injected into the tail veins of nude mice (10 mice per group). Ten weeks after the injection, bioluminescence images were taken (Fig. 2e). Dock6 over-expression increased the lung metastasis of SGC-7901NM cells and reduced the overall survival time of the mice, while Dock6 down-regulation decreased the lung metastasis of SGC-7901 M cells and increased the overall survival time of the mice (Fig. 2f-g). H&E assays confirmed the incidence of lung metastasis (Fig. 2h). In the liver metastatic assay, SGC-7901NM-Dock6-OE cells, SGC-7901 M-Dock6-KD cells or control cells were injected into the spleens of nude mice (10 mice per group). Ten weeks after the intra-splenic injection, bioluminescence images were taken (Fig. 2i). Dock6 over-expression increased the liver metastasis of SGC-7901NM cells and reduced the overall survival time of the mice, while Dock6 down-regulation decreased the liver metastasis of SGC-7901 M cells and increased the overall survival time of the mice (Fig. 2j-k). H&E studies confirmed the incidence of liver metastasis (Fig. 2l). Taken together, these results show that Dock6 increased the metastasis of GC cells in vitro and in vivo.
Dock6 promotes GC migration and invasion by activating Rac1 and Cdc42
Hsa-miR-148b-3p inhibits the expression of Dock6 by targeting its 3’-UTR
MicroRNAs are important effectors of cancer progression. We next investigated whether microRNAs play a role in the up-regulation of Dock6 expression in GC. The Target scan, Microcosm, miRDB and PicTar databases were used to predict the microRNAs that could target Dock6. Only Hsa-miR-148b-3p was identified by all four databases, indicating that miR-148b-3p could regulate Dock6 expression (Fig. 4c, Additional file 7: Table S4). To further investigate whether miR-148b-3p regulated the expression of Dock6 by binding to its 3’-UTR, a luciferase reporter assay was performed. The WT Dock6 3’-UTR sequence or a mutant 3’-UTR sequence was inserted into a luciferase reporter vector (Fig. 4d). Each construct was co-transfected with a miR-mimic control or a miR-148b-3p mimic, and the results showed that the miR-148b-3p mimic significantly decreased the luciferase activity in cells transfected with the WT Dock6 3’-UTR, but not in cells transfected with the mutant Dock6 3’-UTR (Fig. 4e), suggesting that miR-148b-3p could decrease Dock6 transcription by directly binding to its 3’-UTR. Real-time PCR and western blot assays were then used to validate the regulation of Dock6 expression by miR-148b-3p, and the results showed that the miR-148b-3p mimic decreased the expression of Dock6, while a miR-148b-3p inhibitor increased the expression of Dock6 (Fig. 4f-g).
Dock6 expression is negatively correlated with miR-148b-3p expression in human GC tissues
miR-148b-3p inhibits GC metastasis by inhibiting the Dock6/Rac1/Cdc42 signaling pathway
Rho GTPases play critical roles in the initiation and progression of various tumors, and our previous data showed that Rho, Rac1 and Cdc42 are important effectors of GC malignant transformation and metastasis [10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. However, the regulation of Rho GTPases in GC remains largely unknown. Through bioinformatics analyses, we found that Dock6, an atypical Rho GEF, may be involved in GC progression. Dock6 has been reported to promote axonal outgrowth and VSMC migration [28, 41, 42]. However, the role and molecular mechanism of Dock6 in GC are unknown. In this study, we provide the first evidence that Dock6 is over-expressed in GC and that its positive expression is associated with lymph node metastasis and a higher TNM stage. GC patients with positive Dock6 expression exhibited a shorter overall survival time than patients with negative Dock6 expression. In this study, we found that Dock6 could promote the proliferation of GC cells in vitro. We also found that Dock6 expression in lymph node metastases was higher than that in the primary GC tissues and that Dock6 could increase the migration and invasion abilities of GC cells in vitro and in vivo.
As a member of the Dock family of GEFs, Dock6 has been reported to promote axonal outgrowth and VSMC migration by “turning on” Rac1 and Cdc42 [41, 42]. In accordance with previous reports, our data showed that Dock6 could promote the motility of GC cells by activating Rac1 and Cdc42. Recently, a compensatory mechanism for Dock6 knock-down-mediated Rac1/Cdc42 activation inhibition was reported [45, 46]. Upon the acute knock-down of Dock6 with RNAi, the activation of Rac1 and Cdc42 was decreased, and the activation of RhoA was increased; however, when Dock6 was chronically down-regulated, ISG15 expression was inhibited, and the active states of Rac1 and Cdc42 were stabilized by IQGAP1 [47, 48]. In this study, we found that Rac1 and Cdc42 activation was affected by both chronic down-regulation and chronic up-regulation of Dock6, and therefore whether this compensatory mechanism exists in GC requires further investigation.
In neurons, AKT was found to inactivate Dock6 by increasing its phosphorylation at Ser1194, whereas PP2A increased the GEF activity of Dock6 by dephosphorylating Dock6 . miR-142-3p could inhibit the motility of VSMCs by directly targeting Dock6 and decreasing its expression . However, the mechanism of Dock6 over-expression in GC remains unclear. In this study, we reported that Dock6 mRNA expression was positively correlated with changes in its copy number. In addition to the change in copy number, other mechanisms were involved in Dock6 mRNA up-regulation. To investigate whether microRNAs were involved in the expression regulation of Dock6, we used four databases to predict microRNAs that could target Dock6 and found that miR-148b-3p may regulate Dock6 expression. Using luciferase reporter assays, we found that miR-148b-3p inhibited Dock6 transcription by targeting its 3’-UTR. Previously, miR-148b was reported to inhibit GC proliferation [36, 37]. In this study, we found that miR-148b-3p expression was low in GC tissues and that its negative expression in GC tissues indicated poor prognosis. Dock6 expression was negatively correlated with miR-148b-3p expression in GC, and patients with positive Dock6 expression but negative miR-148b-3p expression had the poorest prognosis. We also found that miR-148b-3p inhibited GC metastasis by inhibiting the activation of Rac1 and Cdc42. All these results suggested that miR-148b-3p inhibited GC metastasis by inhibiting the Dock6/Rac1/Cdc42 axis.
We demonstrated that Dock6 was over-expressed in GC and promoted GC metastasis by activating Rac1 and Cdc42. miR-148-3p decreased GC motility by inhibiting the Dock6/Rac1/Cdc42 signaling pathway. Thus, Dock6 might be a potential prognostic biomarker and a novel therapeutic target for GC.
We would like to thank members of the State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology (Jianhua Dou, Guangbo Tang, Zuhong Tian and Meirui Qian) for helpful technical support.
This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81402387, 81322037, 81572302, 81772650, 81421003, 81627807, 81773072, 31501133, 31671452, 2015BAI13b07, 2017YFC0908300), Independent Funds of the Key Laboratory (CBSKL2015Z12).
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
YLS, JL and KCW designed the experiments, supervised the study and revised the paper; XWL, MZJ, DC and BX completed the main experiments and analyzed the data; RW, ZJL and LZ helped to analyze the data; WJW and YC helped with the main experiments; YZN and DMF helped to design the study and review the data. XWL and YLS were the major contributors in writing the manuscript; All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Xijing Hospital. Animal experiments were performed with the approval of the Institutional Committee for Animal Research and in accordance with national guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals. Written informed consent was obtained from all of the patients.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
- 5.Jansen S, Gosens R, Wieland T, Schmidt M. Paving the rho in cancer metastasis: rho GTPases and beyond. Pharmacol Ther. 2018;183:1-21.Google Scholar
- 23.Ruiz-Lafuente N, Alcaraz-Garcia MJ, Garcia-Serna AM, Sebastian-Ruiz S, Moya-Quiles MR, Garcia-Alonso AM, Parrado A. Dock10, a Cdc42 and Rac1 GEF, induces loss of elongation, filopodia, and ruffles in cervical cancer epithelial HeLa cells. Biol Open. 2015;4:627–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 27.Yuan X, Wang X, Gu B, Ma Y, Liu Y, Sun M, Kong J, Sun W, Wang H, Zhou F, Gao S. Directional migration in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is epigenetically regulated by SET nuclear oncogene, a member of the inhibitor of histone Acetyltransferase complex. Neoplasia. 2017;19:868–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 37.Song YX, Yue ZY, Wang ZN, Xu YY, Luo Y, Xu HM, Zhang X, Jiang L, Xing CZ, Zhang Y. MicroRNA-148b is frequently down-regulated in gastric cancer and acts as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting cell proliferation. Mol Cancer. 2011;10(1):1-13.Google Scholar
- 38.Dong J, Wang R, Ren G, Li X, Wang J, Sun Y, Liang J, Nie Y, Wu K, Feng B, et al. HMGA2-FOXL2 Axis regulates metastases and epithelial-to-Mesenchymal transition of Chemoresistant gastric Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;;23(13):3461-73.Google Scholar
- 44.Gao JJ, Aksoy BA, Dogrusoz U, Dresdner G, Gross B, Sumer SO, Sun YC, Jacobsen A, Sinha R, Larsson E, et al. Integrative analysis of complex Cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal. 2013;6(269). https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2004088.
- 48.Cerikan B, Schiebel E. Mechanism of cell-intrinsic adaptation to Adams-Oliver syndrome gene DOCK6 disruption highlights ubiquitin-like modifier ISG15 as a regulator of RHO GTPases. Small GTPases. 2017;23:1–8.Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.