Gene and protein expression and cellular localisation of cytochrome P450 enzymes of the 1A, 2A, 2C, 2D and 2E subfamilies in equine intestine and liver
- 1.3k Downloads
Among the cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP), families 1-3 constitute almost half of total CYPs in mammals and play a central role in metabolism of a wide range of pharmaceuticals. This study investigated gene and protein expression and cellular localisation of CYP1A, CYP2A, CYP2C, CYP2D and CYP2E in equine intestine and liver. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to analyse gene expression, western blot to examine protein expression and immunohistochemical analyses to investigate cellular localisation.
CYP1A and CYP2C were the CYPs with the highest gene expression in the intestine and also showed considerable gene expression in the liver. CYP2E and CYP2A showed the highest gene expression in the liver. CYP2E showed moderate intestinal gene expression, whereas that of CYP2A was very low or undetectable. For CYP2D, rather low gene expression levels were found in both intestine and the liver. In the intestine, CYP gene expression levels, except for CYP2E, exhibited patterns resembling those of the proteins, indicating that intestinal protein expression of these CYPs is regulated at the transcriptional level. For CYP2E, the results showed that the intestinal gene expression did not correlate to any visible protein expression, indicating that intestinal protein expression of this CYP is regulated at the post-transcriptional level. Immunostaining of intestine tissue samples showed preferential CYP staining in enterocytes at the tips of intestinal villi in the small intestine. In the liver, all CYPs showed preferential localisation in the centrilobular hepatocytes.
Overall, different gene expression profiles were displayed by the CYPs examined in equine intestine and liver. The CYPs present in the intestine may act in concert with those in the liver to affect the oral bioavailability and therapeutic efficiency of substrate drugs. In addition, they may play a role in first-pass metabolism of feed constituents and of herbal supplements used in equine practice.
KeywordsCYP Horse Gene expression Protein expression Cellular localisation Liver Intestine
Among the cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP), families 1-3 constitute almost half of total CYPs in mammals. These are generally designated xenobiotic-metabolising enzymes and play a central role in metabolism of a wide range of xenobiotics . The xenobiotic-metabolising CYPs are mainly expressed in the liver, but several are also expressed in extrahepatic tissues, particularly in organs in direct contact with xenobiotics, such as the intestines and the respiratory tissues ,. Studies in different species have shown that each tissue may have its unique CYP expression pattern ,.
To date, three equine CYPs within families 1-3 have been cloned and functionally characterised. These are CYP2D50 , CYP2C92  and CYP3A96 . A substantial difference has been reported in the metabolic capacity of these equine CYPs compared with the human orthologs. For example, the metabolic capacity of CYP2D50, CYP2C92 and CYP3A96 is about 20- to 180-fold lower with regard to dextromethon-O-demethylation, diclofenac-oxidation and testosterone-6β-hydroxylation, respectively, than that of the human orthologs, CYP2D6, CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 -.
There has been a continual increase in the volume of sales of drugs used in equine practice  and many drugs used in equine therapy are substrates for CYPs. There is also an increasing retail market for herbal supplements for horses . However, little is known about drug-drug interactions and drug-herb interactions in the horse. Due to differences in expression level and substrate specificity of the CYP enzymes, it is difficult to extrapolate findings on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs between species ,. Thus there is clearly a need for increased knowledge of the expression pattern and metabolic capacity of xenobiotic-metabolising CYP enzymes in the horse.
Previous studies by our group have examined expression of isoenzymes belonging to the CYP3A subfamily in the equine intestine and liver ,. In the intestinal mucosa, CYP3A is considered to play an important role for the oral availability of substrate drugs and other xenobiotics, by sequential CYP3A-mediated metabolism in the intestine and liver ,. However, studies in man and rodents have shown that, in addition to the CYP3A subfamily, other CYP subfamilies are also present in the intestinal mucosa and may play a role in modulating drug and xenobiotic bioavailability ,.
In the present study, we examined gene and protein expression and cellular localisation of CYPs of the 1A, 2A, 2C, 2D and 2E subfamilies in the intestine and liver of the horse. Gene expression was examined using quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain rraction (RT-qPCR). For the subfamilies CYP2C and CYP2D primers were designed based on conserved gene regions, thus enabling amplification of all isoenzymes belonging to these subfamilies. For the subfamilies CYP1A, CYP2A and CYP2E, primers were designed based on a single sequence. The reason for this was that these were the only sequences identified for these equine subfamilies at the time when this study was performed. Protein expression was examined by western blot. Immunohistochemical analysis was used to examine the cellular localisation of the CYPs in the intestine and liver of the horse.
Tissue sample collection
Sampling sites along the intestinal tract of the horse
Immediately aboralaboral to the pyloric sphincter (Pars prima duodeni)
0.5 m aboral to the pyloric sphincter (Pars secunda duodeni)
1 m aboral to the pyloric sphincter (Pars tertia duodeni)
2.5 m aboral to the pyloric sphincter
5.5 m aboral to the pyloric sphincter
8.5 m aboral to the pyloric sphincter
13.5 m aboral to the pyloric sphincter
immediately anterior to the ileo-caecal orifice
Mid-part of the parietal surface of the Corpus caeci
At the origin of the small colon, aboral to the right dorsal colon
Isolation of RNA
Total RNA was prepared using the NucleoSpin RNA II kit containing deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I) (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purity and integrity of the RNA were checked as described previously . In brief, prior to real-time RT-PCR analysis the integrity of RNA was verified by examining ribosomal RNA 28 S and 18 S on 1% agarose gel containing 18% formaldehyde. Only RNA samples with a 260/280 nm ratio exceeding 1.8 were selected for real-time PCR. The exact amount of RNA was quantified using the RNA-specific Quant-iT RiboGreen protocol (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) and a microplate reader (Wallac 1420 VICTOR2TM, software version 2.0, Turku, Finland).
CYP gene expression
Nucleotide sequences of primers
Fragment length (bp)
XM_001501993.1;XM_001502030.1 XM_001502107.2; XM_001502162.1 XM_001502179.2; XM_001500745.1 XM_001502230.1; XM_001502256.2 NM_001101652.1
XM_001502900.2; XM_001502807.2 XM_001917460.1; EU190996.1
CYP protein expression
Polyclonal antibodies used in immunohistochemical (IHC) and western blot (WB) analyses
Polyclonal rabbit-anti-rat (AB1247) CYP1A1
Chemicon International, Temecula, CA, USA
Polyclonal rabbit-anti-human (CR3260) CP2A6
Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY, USA
IHC 1: 1000
Polyclonal sheep-anti-human/rat (CR3285) CYP2C8; 2C9; 2C19; rat 2C12
Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY, USA
Polyclonal rabbit-anti-rat (CR3210) CYP2D1
Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY, USA
Polyclonal rabbit-anti-human/rat (CR3271) CYP2E1
BIOMOL International, LP, USA
Pieces of intestine and liver tissue were fixed in formaldehyde, dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. From these, 5 μm tissue sections were taken and deparaffinised, hydrated and rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The rinsing procedure, involving two rinsing intervals in PBS for 10 min, was repeated after each of the steps described below. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 1.6% H2O2 in PBS, followed by incubation for 1 hour in PBS with 10% normal goat serum (for CYP1A, CYP 2A, CYP 2D and CYP 2E) or normal rabbit serum (for CYP2C). Endogenous avidin and biotin were blocked using the Avidin/Biotin Blocking kit (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA). Thereafter, the tissue sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with the primary antibodies diluted in PBS as shown in Table 3. The secondary antibodies (goat-anti-rabbit or rabbit-anti-sheep; Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA) were used at 1:200 dilution and applied for 1 h at room temperature. The antigen-antibody complex was conjugated with avidin-biotin peroxidase using the ABC Vectastatin kit and then visualised with DAB staining, according to the supplier’s recommendations (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Finally, the sections were counterstained with haematoxylin (VWR International AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Negative controls were run in parallel with non-immune rabbit (CYP1A, 2A, 2E, 2D) or sheep (CYP2C) IgG (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) in amounts equivalent to those used for the antibodies against the CYP enzymes.
All statistical analyses were performed using Minitab® software, version 15 (Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA). Levene’s test was used to test whether the data followed a normal distribution. A paired t-test or a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to test for differences between groups. Dunnett’s test was used as a post hoc test in combination with ANOVA. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
CYP gene expression
Gene expression of CYP subfamilies in equine intestine and liver*
630 ± 130
4 ± 2
1360 ± 690
20 ± 20
40 ± 20
1100 ± 240
5 ± 4
2270 ± 1150
30 ± 20
90 ± 100
730 ± 130
3 ± 1
2200 ± 1290
30 ± 20
140 ± 170
6600 ± 70
3 ± 2
2010 ± 1330
30 ± 20
130 ± 120
1000 ± 10
2 ± 1
1680 ± 110
40 ± 20
190 ± 150
1070 ± 20
2 ± 3
1380 ± 860
40 ± 20
160 ± 160
660 ± 100
2 ± 1
1240 ± 510
30 ± 20
120 ± 130
600 ± 110
2 ± 1
810 ± 580
10 ± 8
140 ± 130
20 ± 20
1 ± 2
190 ± 170
1 ± 2
10 ± 20
60 ± 70
2 ± 2
100 ± 50
1 ± 2
30 ± 40
1400 ± 950
13400 ± 8600
3200 ± 200
130 ± 60
11400 ± 8100
Statistical analysis of the differences between the hepatic and small intestinal gene expression levels revealed that CYP2A and CYP2E had significantly higher hepatic than intestinal gene expression (P < 0.05). For CYP1A, CYP2C and CYP2D, there were no statistical differences between gene expression levels in the small intestine and liver.
CYP protein expression
This study showed that gene expression levels in equine intestine and liver usually display particular patterns for the different CYP isoforms. In the intestine, gene expression was high for CYP2C and CYP1A, low for CYP2E and CYP2D and almost undetectable for CYP2A. In the liver, gene expression was high for CYP2A and CYP2E, moderate for CYP2C and CYP1A and low for CYP2D. The intestinal gene expression of the CYPs examined in the present study was higher in the small intestine than in the large intestine. This was also observed for CYP3A in our previous studies in the horse ,. Similar distribution patterns in gene expression of CYPs along the gastrointesinal tract have been observed in other species ,,.
The present study demonstrated high levels of gene expression for CYP1A and CYP2C in the equine small intestine. As mentioned, our previous studies have shown that CYP3A is also highly expressed in equine intestine ,. CYP3A and CYP2C represent the major CYPs expressed in human intestinal mucosa, but this is not generally the case for CYP1A ,. It has been shown that CYP1A1 expression in the human intestine is highly inducible, whereas there is consitutive expression of CYP3A and CYP2C . The high expression of CYP1A observed here in the equine intestine can be related to the presence of CYP1A-inducing components in the diet of the horse. These differences in CYP isoform expression in the intestine must be considered when extrapolating data between species.
The CYP2D gene and protein expression was found to be low in both the liver and intestine of the horse. Yasukoch & Satta  examined the evolution of the CYP2D gene cluster and found that the number of members within the CYP2D subfamily varies between species. For example, primates have two to three CYP2D genes, whereas rodents, rabbits and horses have seven, five and six CYP2D genes, respectively. It has been suggested that the expansion of members within the CYP2D subfamily in herbivores might be related to the fact that several plant toxins are substrates for the CYP2D enzyme ,. It is interesting that the expansion of the CYP2D subfamily in the equine genome was not accompanied by prominent gene or protein expression in the equine liver and intestine in the present study. The human CYP2D6 is known to be a polymorphic CYP isoenzyme with highly variable gene expression .
CYP2A and CYP2E were highly expressed in the equine liver, but both had very low gene expression levels in the intestine. This is consistent with reported levels in humans, where CYP2E1 is highly expressed in the liver, but only weakly expressed in the intestine for review see . Bièche et al. have shown high hepatic gene expression and very low intestinal gene expression for the three members of the human CYP2A subfamily.
Our present and prevous studies have shown that the gene expression levels of CYP1A, CYP2C and CYP3A in the equine small intestine were comparable to those in the liver. These results differ from observations in humans and dogs, in which the CYP expression levels in the liver are generally much higher compared than those in the small intestine ,. It is possible that the high levels of CYPs in the equine intestine relate to the fact that the horse is a herbivorous species, which means that the diet may contain various CYP-inducing substrates, including phytonutrients and phytotoxicants. Consequently, during their evolution horses may have developed a more effective intestinal CYP system than omnivores or carnivores such as humans and dogs.
In the equine intestine and the liver, the CYP gene expression levels, except for CYP2E, exhibited expression patterns resembling those of the proteins, as shown by western blot analysis (Figure 1). This confirms findings in other species indicating that CYPs in general are regulated at the transcriptional level ,. As regards CYP2E, our results showed that the intestinal gene expression detected in the PCRs did not correlate to any clearly detectable CYP2E protein expression in the western blots. This indicates that the protein expression of CYP2E is regulated at the post-transcriptional level. Similarly, studies with human liver biopsies have shown that the mRNA levels for CYP2E1 do not correlate to the CYP2E1 protein levels . In addition, studies by Rodriguez-Antona et al. have shown that there is no significant correlation between CYP2E mRNA expression and CYP2E-related metabolic activity in human liver samples.
Our immunohistochemical analyses showed that for the CYPs for which intestinal immunostaining was observed (CYP1A, CYP2C and CYP2D), there was preferential localisation of the staining in the enterocytes at the tips of the villi in the small intestine. We have previously shown that this staining pattern also applies for CYP3A in the equine intestine . Similar findings have been made in other species ,. In the liver, marked immunostaining was seen for all CYPs, with the strongest staining in hepatocytes in central parts of the hepatic lobuli. These results also corroborate those in other species (for review see ).
Many CYPs have been shown to be metabolically active in horses and, on the whole, oxidative drug metabolism appears more extensive in horses than in man . Many drugs used in equine therapy, such as quinolones , dexamethasone , ivermectin ,, benzimidazoles ,, ketamine , meloxicam , omeprazole , phenylbutazone , praziquantel , and pyrantel , are substrates for the CYP enzymes. Several herbal supplements used in equine practice have also been reported to be CYP substrates. Examples are quercetin, the active component in devil’s claw root ; ginsengoides, the active components in ginseng ; and silymarin, the active component in meadowsweet . It is also known that CYP-inducible components, such as flavonoids , are present in the normal diet of the horse, which may indicate that the equine CYPs have been strongly subjected to positive selection. It is apparent that there is a need for further studies on the expression patterns, metabolic capacities and inducibility of CYP enzymes in the horse.
This study demonstrated differing gene and protein expression profiles of the five CYPs studied in equine intestine and liver. The CYPs present in the intestine may act in concert with those in the liver to affect the oral bioavailability and therapeutic efficiency of substrate drugs. In addition, they may play a role in first-pass metabolism of equine feed constituents and of herbal supplements used in equine practice.
ET, PL, HT participated in the design of the study, collected the materials. ET performed the laboratory analyses. PL performed the immunohistochemistry. All authors participated in interpreting the data and drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This study was finanically supported by the Swedish Foundation for Equine Research. Maria Löfgren is thanked for performing some of the gene expression analyses.
- 7.Girma K: Försäljningsutveckling av djurläkemedel 2011. [Sales development of veterinary drugs 2011].Board of Agriculture 2012, 7-10.,Google Scholar
- 18.Nelson DR: The cytochrome P450 homepage. Hum Genom. 2009, 4: 59-65.Google Scholar
- 19.Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ: Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology Humana Press Totowa 2000. Edited by: Krawetz S, Misener S. 2000, 365-386. software version 4.0.http://primer3.ut.ee/, [http://primer3.ut.ee/]Google Scholar
- 20.Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, Mueller R, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW, Shipley GL, Vandesompele J, Wittwer CT: The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem. 2009, 55: 611-622. 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Zhang Q-Y, Dunbar D, Ostrowska A, Zeisloft S, Yang J, Kaminsky LS: Characterization of human small intestinal cytochromes P-450. Drug Metab Disp. 1999, 27: 804-809.Google Scholar
- 27.Bièche I, Narjoz C, Asselah T, Vacher S, Marcellin P, Lidereau R, Beaune P, de Waziers I: Reverse transcriptase-PCR quantification of mRNA levels from cytochrome (CYP)1, CYP2 and CYP3 families in 22 different human tissues. Pharmacogenet Genom. 2007, 17: 731-742. 10.1097/FPC.0b013e32810f2e58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Sumida A, Kinoshita K, Fukada T, Matsuda H, Yamamoto I, Inaba T, Azuma J: Relationship between mRNA levels quantified by reversed transcription - competitive PCR and metabolic activity of CYP3A4 and CYP2E1 in human liver. Bichem Biophys Res Commun. 1999, 262: 499-503. 10.1006/bbrc.1999.1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Skálová L, Szotáková B, Machala M, Neca J, Soucek P, Havlasová J, Wsól V, Krídová L, Kvasnicková E, Lamka J: Effect of ivermectin on activities of cytochrome P450 isoenzymes in mouflon (Ovis musimon) and fallow deer (Dama dama). Chem Biol Interact. 2001, 137: 155-167. 10.1016/S0009-2797(01)00227-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 43.Peters LM, Demmel S, Pusch G, Buters JT, Thormann W, Zielinski J, Leeb T, Mevissen M, Schmitz A: Equine cytochrome P450 2B6 genomic identification, expression and functional characterization with ketamine. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2013, 266: 101-108. 10.1016/j.taap.2012.10.028.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45.Yang JC, Wang HL, Chern HD, Shun CT, Lin BR, Lin CJ, Wang TH: Role of omeprazole dosage and cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype in patients receiving omeprazole-amoxicillin dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Pharmacotherapy. 2011, 31: 227-238. 10.1592/phco.31.3.227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 47.Li X-Q, Björkman A, Andersson TB, Gustafsson LL, Masimirembwa C: Identification of human cytochrome P450s that metabolise anti-parasitic drugs and predictions of in vivo drug hepatic clearance from in vitro data. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003, 59: 429-442. 10.1007/s00228-003-0636-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.