Unfortunately, the original version of this article [1] contained an error. The acknowledgements was included incorrectly. The correct acknowledgements can be found below.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding of this research provided by the Ministry of Health and Consumers’ Affairs - –Spain (FIS Exp. PI13/01340 and FEDER funds) and the CHIR- Quebec Training Network in Perinatal Research (QTNPR). The study funders had no role in the study design, data analysis, data collection, data interpretation or the writing of the report. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily of the funding bodies.
Reference
Bermúdez-Tamayo C, Johri M, Perez-Ramos FJ, Maroto-Navarro G, Caño-Aguilar A, Garcia-Mochon L, et al. Evaluation of quality improvement for cesarean sections programmes through mixed methods. Implement Sci. 2014;9:182.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0182-0.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Bermúdez-Tamayo, C., Johri, M., Perez-Ramos, F.J. et al. Erratum to: ‘Evaluation of quality improvement for cesarean sections programmes through mixed methods’. Implementation Sci 11, 37 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0402-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0402-x