Correction to: Plant Methods (2019) 15:112https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0497-6
Unfortunately, the original version of the article [1] contained an error in Figure 7. The names of species Ulmus minor and Acer campestre were interchanged. The corrected Fig. 7 is given here.
Groups of leaves samples using for testing the method. The image shows the selected species from the TreeMew and ImageClef datasets. The species with the most quantity of samples were selected. The leaves groups were organized in the following way, Top: Tree leaf database MEW 2010, middle: Clef30a and bottom: Clef30b
Reference
Victorino J, Gómez F. Contour analysis for interpretable leaf shape category discovery. Plant Methods. 2019;15(1):112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0497-6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Victorino, J., Gómez, F. Correction to: Contour analysis for interpretable leaf shape category discovery. Plant Methods 15, 132 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0516-7
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0516-7