Abstract
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a pathological condition characterized by persistent inflammation in the upper respiratory tract and paranasal sinuses. The epithelium serves as the first line of defense against potential threats and protects the nasal mucosa. The fundamental mechanical barrier is formed by the cell-cell contact and mucociliary clearance (MCC) systems. The physical-mechanical barrier is comprised of many cellular structures, including adhesion junctions and tight junctions (TJs). To this end, different factors, such as the dysfunction of MCC, destruction of epithelial barriers, and tissue remodeling, are related to the onset and development of CRS. Recently published studies reported the critical role of different microorganisms, such as Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, in the induction of the mentioned factors. Bacteria could result in diminished ciliary stimulation capacity, and enhance the chance of CRS by reducing basal ciliary beat frequency. Additionally, bacterial exoproteins have been demonstrated to disrupt the epithelial barrier and induce downregulation of transmembrane proteins such as occludin, claudin, and tricellulin. Moreover, bacteria exert an influence on TJ proteins, leading to an increase in the permeability of polarized epithelial cells. Noteworthy, it is evident that the activation of TLR2 by staphylococcal enterotoxin can potentially undermine the structural integrity of TJs and the epithelial barrier through the induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The purpose of this article is an attempt to investigate the possible role of the most important microorganisms associated with CRS and their pathogenic mechanisms against mucosal surfaces and epithelial barriers in the paranasal sinuses.
Video Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a disease that causes inflammation in the upper airways and sinuses and lasts for at least 12 weeks. Depending on whether nasal polyps (NPs) are present, CRS can be classified into two phenotypes: CRS without NPs (CRSsNP) and CRS with NPs (CRSwNP). Type 1 inflammation and type 2 inflammation characterize CRSsNP and CRSwNP, respectively [1, 2]. Due to CRS’s great degree of heterogeneity, its pathophysiology is still unclear. Different factors, such as racial and geographical factors, the dysfunction of mucociliary clearance (MCC), destruction of epithelial barriers, disrupted immune response, biofilm community of microorganisms, and dysbiosis of sinus microbiota, be related to the onset and development of CRS [3, 4].
The mentioned factors can stimulate nasal epithelial cells to produce epithelial-derived cytokines. Eosinophilic infiltration and a T-helper 2 (Th2)-based cytokine profile were found in nearly 80% of CRSwNP. However, the CRSsNP was more strongly connected with categories 1 and 3 of inflammation, which are characterized by elevated levels of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-17 [5]. The prevalence of microorganisms like fungi, bacteria, and viruses within the nose and paranasal sinuses in CRS patients has been widely established, although the precise cause of the inflammation associated with this chronic illness condition is still unknown [6, 7].
Recently published studies have reported that bacterial infections are linked to both acute and CRS. To this end, the most prevalent respiratory infections found in patients with acute sinusitis are Staphylococcus aureus, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae [8]. With a higher prevalence of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CONS), S. aureus, Gram-negative bacteria, and anaerobic bacteria, CRS has a different microbiological pattern than acute sinusitis [6]. Patients who have had prior sinus surgery have also been demonstrated to have greater Pseudomonas aeruginosa prevalence rates [9, 10]. Collectively, the possibility exists that the colonization of these bacteria by the nose or paranasal sinuses could result in CRS, prolong the illness, or exacerbate a noninfectious inflammatory process [6].
So, it is thought that bacteria may contribute directly or indirectly to the development or persistence of CRS and clinical practice guidelines for its treatment show that most medical professionals agree that the presence of bacteria is a major factor in the pathogenesis and cause of many CRS cases. In actuality, doctors frequently recommend antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of CRS in a variety of ways [6, 11].
Therefore, as mentioned, CRS is a multifactorial disease, and microorganisms could play a critical role in the progression of this disease. In this regard, the possible role of the microorganism has been reported in previous research. For instance, S. aureus is a common human bacterium that is often found in the usual microbiota of the noses of healthy people. S. aureus enterotoxin B (SEB) was linked to CRS and nasal polyps as a risk factor. Chronic inflammation and damage to the inside of the nose caused by SEB are the main causes of CRS. In this way, an earlier study found that S. aureus was present in the noses of 67% of CRSwNP patients [12]. This bacterium can colonize the nasal mucosa under specific circumstances, which may facilitate its invasion into the subepithelial areas [13]. The functions of eosinophils and mast cells are improved by SEB, and the production of Th2 cytokines is increased. In addition, SEB can induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) and endoplasmic reticulum stress in the epithelial cells of patients with CRSwNP [14, 15].
P. aeruginosa is an additional prevalent bacterial species observed in non-cystic fibrosis CRS patients, and its existence is linked to the manifestation of severe and persistent CRS [16]. P. aeruginosa infections and the biofilm community of this bacterium have been implicated in recalcitrant CRS that contribute to inflammation [17]. Moreover, there exists a correlation between fungal allergens and dysregulation of the immune response, malfunction of the epithelial barrier, intensification of local inflammatory reactions, and CRS [18]. One of the most commonly found fungus species in nasal discharge is Alternaria alternata. This particular species has been observed to exhibit strong immunologic activity in nasal epithelial cells, suggesting its potential significance in the development of chronic CRS. Furthermore, the interplay between this fungal organism and the host’s innate and adaptive immune responses gives rise to the onset and progression of persistent inflammation. The resulting inflammation may subsequently initiate CRS and the development of nasal polyps [19]. The inhibition of surfactant protein synthesis or intracellular reserves and the excessive production of mucus could impede the elimination of Alternaria from the sinuses and perhaps contribute to the colonization and re-infection by airborne fungi [20].
Therefore, the interactions between microorganisms and the immune system could lead to CRS. Furthermore, the destruction of mucosal barriers, epithelial remodeling, and impaired mucociliary clearance are other possible pathogenic mechanisms of microorganisms in CRS. To this end, the present review paper is an attempt to investigate the possible role of the most important microorganisms associated with CRS and their pathogenic mechanisms against mucosal surfaces and epithelial barriers in the paranasal sinuses.
Mucosal barriers and mucociliary clearance activities against microorganisms
The sinonasal tract serves as a location where the external world interacts with the body. This interaction involves the encounter and subsequent removal of foreign antigens through mechanisms such as MCC, as well as specific and generic immune responses [21]. The nasal mucosa is protected by the epithelium, which serves as the initial barrier against potential threats. The fundamental mechanical barrier is formed by cell-cell contact and the MCC system [3].
The MCC system consists of three fundamental functional components: mucin production, cilia activity, and the airway surface liquid layer. The primary role of ciliated epithelial cells is to facilitate the removal of diverse microorganisms and inhaled irritants that become entrapped within the airway surface fluids and mucus. Several previous investigations have documented a relationship between CRS and a decline in MCC, with the extent of this decline being positively associated with the severity of CRS [22].
The nasal mucosa is constantly exposed to a variety of microorganisms such as bacteria (in the form of biofilm and superantigens), viruses, fungi, and non-living foreign proteins [23]. It is worth mentioning that individuals diagnosed with CRS frequently have a localized infection within the nasal and paranasal cavities. Various microorganisms, including S. aureus, H. influenzae, Aspergillus fumigatus, S. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa, have been seen to secrete diverse toxins that possess the ability to efficiently eradicate ciliated epithelial cells [24]. Mucociliary dysfunction has been identified as a contributing element to the pathogenesis of CRS. This dysfunction compromises the protective capabilities of the nasal mucosa, making it more susceptible to bacterial attachment and biofilm formation. These findings highlight the significance of mucociliary dysfunction in the pathogenesis of CRS [3].
The physical-mechanical barrier is comprised of many cellular structures, including adherence junctions, gap junctions, tight junctions (TJs), desmosomes, and hemidesmosomes. The aforementioned components play a crucial role in promoting robust cell-cell adhesion, creating a highly selective barrier, establishing cellular polarity, and effectively modulating the movement of various molecules and ions [25]. TJs are composed of many proteins, including zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1), claudins, junctional adhesion molecule 1 (JAM-1), and occludin. Adherens junctions are comprised of transmembrane proteins, namely nectin and E-cadherin, as well as intracellular proteins α- and β-catenin. Desmosomal attachments are formed through the heterotypic binding of desmoglein molecules [26, 27].
When the integrity of the epithelial barrier in the sinuses is compromised, there is a significant transformation in its structure and function. It transitions from being a passive physical barrier to becoming an active organ with the ability to secrete various bioactive substances, including cytokines and complement proteins. This transformation enables the recruitment and regulation of diverse immune cells [28, 29]. In this regard, the sinonasal epithelium is known to have a significant impact on both innate and adaptive immunity. Hence, the atypical functionality of the epithelium can exert a substantial influence on the initiation and progression of CRS [3].
In the normal individual, the mucosal immune system exhibits a response to stimulation by serving as an initial barrier against invading pathogens, thereby mitigating the occurrence of excessive tissue damage and inflammation as observed in CRS [30]. The destruction of the epithelium results in an increase in epithelial permeability. The introduction of external irritants can consequently stimulate the activation of immune cells, thereby initiating an immunological response [31]. There have been two separate but interconnected responses identified in the context of microbial pathogens and foreign proteins, namely innate and acquired immunity. The respiratory epithelium, which constitutes a physical barrier with TJs, serves as the initial line of defense and is a significant constituent of the innate immune system within the nasal cavity. Additionally, enzymes and peptide antibiotics are excreted inside mucus, exerting direct antibacterial action [32].
The subsequent line of defense is comprised of neutrophils and macrophages, which engage in the process of phagocytosis against microbial invaders. The presence of barrier abnormalities and diminished local innate immunity can potentially trigger the immunological and inflammatory reactions observed in CRS [23, 33]. Recent investigations have delineated three distinct endotypes of CRS based on the increased levels of classical T-cell cytokines in this pathological state. Type 1 is primarily linked to an elevation in Th1 cytokines, specifically TNF-α and IFN-γ. Type 2 is characterized by an upregulation of Th2 cytokines, namely IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13. Type 3 is associated with the Th17 cytokines. Upon exposure to exogenous irritants, nasal epithelial cells have been seen to release a diverse array of inflammatory cytokines, including but not limited to TNF-α, IL-25, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), IL-33, and IL-6. There is a prevailing consensus that CRSsNP mostly encompasses Th1-type inflammation and has elevated levels of IFN-γ expression [34].
Epithelial-derived cytokines, namely IL-25, IL-33, and TSLP, play a crucial role in promoting the Th2 response during the formation of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs). These cytokines also stimulate the production of Th2 cytokines, including IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13, which in turn contribute to the amplification of type 2 inflammation [35]. IL-6 is responsible for promoting the differentiation of naive T-cells into Th17 cells and facilitating the production of IL-17, a type 3 cytokine that plays a crucial role in type 3 inflammation. [3]. Epithelial barrier impairments can be caused by the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ and IL-4. These cytokines can break TJs between epithelial cells and thus decrease the resistance of the epithelial barrier to the movement of substances across it [36].
There is evidence suggesting that neutrophils may have a detrimental effect on epithelial barrier function. This effect is thought to be mediated by the release of oncostatin M, a cytokine known to alter the integrity of the epithelial barrier [37]. The excessive production of mucus is a characteristic feature of CRS. The upregulation of Th2-mediated pendrin expression could potentially play a role in the augmentation of mucus production and the reduction of mucociliary clearance in patients with CRSwNP [38]. Noteworthy, transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) serves as an indication that reflects the functionality of the epithelial barrier [39]. Patients diagnosed with CRSwNP display a decrease in TER, which may potentially be linked to impairment of the epithelial barrier [36].
Finally, in the airway, the presence of impaired epithelial tissue is a significant factor in initiating the process of tissue remodeling [40, 41]. Tissue remodeling refers to the anomalous repair or restitution of injured tissue in response to inflammation or mechanical injury, which can manifest in any organ. Remodeling, a prominent characteristic of CRS, encompasses many layers of sinonasal tissues, namely the epithelium, sub-epithelium, and underlying bone [41]. Within the context of CRS, studies have documented many forms of tissue remodeling, such as basement membrane thickening, mucosal hypertrophy, angiogenesis, fibrosis, collagen deposition, and osteitis [42]. Mucosal remodeling has been observed in both CRSwNP and CRSsNP. Additionally, it has been noted that eosinophilic CRS is correlated with significant eosinophilic infiltration in the nasal mucosa [43, 44]. The available evidence indicates a potential correlation between eosinophil activation and eosinophilia and CRS remodeling and mucosal damage [45].
Furthermore, an in vitro study has discovered that the release of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin from eosinophils, which are stimulated by IL5, can significantly enhance the production of matrix metalloproteinase 9 by the nasal epithelium. This process has the potential to impact the regeneration of the epithelial tissue and the degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM), ultimately resulting in nasal remodeling [46]. ECM proteins have a crucial role in the preservation of structural support, maintenance of physiological balance, and modulation of inflammatory processes inside the airway mucosa. The expression of periostin, an ECM protein, is upregulated by IL-4 and IL-13, leading to its secretion by airway epithelial cells [42, 47].
It is noteworthy that research investigations focusing on nasal mucosal biopsies of CRS have revealed that periosteal proteins can induce eosinophilic infiltration and facilitate fibrosis, thereby playing a role in the process of mucosal remodeling [48]. Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) is a growth factor with pleiotropic and multifunctional properties, capable of stimulating fibroblast proliferation, differentiation, and the development of fibrotic traits. Furthermore, it can induce the synthesis of tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1), thereby impeding the enzymatic degradation of ECM [49]. According to the available reports, a notable disparity has been seen between CRSsNP and CRSwNP regarding the levels of TGF-β. It has been found that CRSsNP exhibits elevated TGF-β levels, accompanied by the presence of denser collagen fibers in the ECM. Consequently, this molecular milieu contributes to an exaggerated tissue healing response and the development of fibrotic tissue. In contrast, the presence of TGF-β is lacking in CRSwNP, resulting in poor tissue repair. This is evidenced by the occurrence of loose connective tissue and the production of edema in the significantly inflamed tissues [50].
Nevertheless, the precise pathomechanism responsible for tissue remodeling remains unclear and is currently the subject of ongoing research efforts. Collectively, as mentioned, mucosal barrier disruption, inhibition of mucociliary function, and mucosal remodeling are important factors in CRS. To this end, in the next sections, we will discuss the possible role of microorganisms in the production of the mentioned factors.
P. aeruginosa
Infections caused by P. aeruginosa have a significant death rate due to their high antibiotic resistance. This bacterium induces significant tissue damage through a range of virulence factors, and its ability to produce biofilms leads to the development of persistent infections that are resistant to antibiotics [51]. The findings of recent research have demonstrated that individuals diagnosed with CRS exhibit a greater abundance of this bacterium as compared to people without CRS. The observed variation in bacterial characteristics could potentially be linked to the progression of diseases or the ability to resist routinely employed antibiotics through mechanisms of resistance and the production of biofilms [52]. To this end, finding the exact role of P. aeruginosa in the initiation or progression of the CRS has been considered by researchers in recent years.
As mentioned in the previous parts, CRS is a complex condition characterized by a multifactorial etiology, which leads to a pronounced inflammatory reaction in the affected area and compromised functionality of the MCC mechanism. Noteworthy, the functioning of cilia plays a crucial role in the defense mechanism of the upper airways, where dysfunction is observed in chronic conditions [53]. In this concept, Shen et al., for the assessment of sinonasal ciliary function, administered bacteria supernatant, including S. aureus, H. influenza, P. aeruginosa, and S. pneumoniae, to the murine primary sinonasal cultures that were established in an air-liquid interface (ALI). All of the bacteria supernatants decreased basal ciliary beat frequency (CBF); however, P. aeruginosa and S. pneumoniae caused a remarkable decrease in CBF. Furthermore, P. aeruginosa led to a reduction in the ciliary stimulation capacity [9]. Therefore, P. aeruginosa could enhance the chance of CRS by reducing basal CBF; however, the exact role of this bacterium in this process is unknown, and further studies are required in the field.
In addition to CBF inhibition, one potential mechanism by which P. aeruginosa may contribute to CRS is the disruption of the mucosal barrier via the release of secreted compounds that contribute to the inflammatory response. Disruption of TJs has been observed in various chronic illnesses, such as CRS. In nasal polyp epithelial cell cultures, a diminished expression of TJ and adhesion junction proteins, including occludin, ZO-1, claudin-1, and E-cadherin, has been seen in comparison to healthy mucosa [17, 54, 55]. The failure of the nasal barrier has the potential to cause an elevation in permeability to allergens such as house dust mites. This, in turn, can contribute to the development of allergic sensitization and subsequent mast cell degranulation. The release of cytokines and pro-inflammatory factors, including histamine, INF-γ, and IL-4, in response to infection or inflammation can lead to barrier dysfunction. This dysfunction can potentially exacerbate the involvement of P. aeruginosa in asthma or CRS through indirect mechanisms [56, 57].
In this regard, in a recently published study, the authors applied P. aeruginosa exoprotein to the ALI cultures of primary human nasal epithelial cells (HNECs-ALI). Different methods, such as immunofluorescence of TJ proteins, the passage of FITC-dextrans, and transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER), were used for the evaluation of mucosal barrier integrity. The P. aeruginosa exoprotein remarkably increased the production of IL-6 and led to the disruption and relocalization of the TJ proteins. Moreover, the enhanced permeability of FITC-dextrans and the decreased TEER provided further evidence of barrier rupture. Interestingly, the detrimental impact exhibited a reversible nature and was effectively counteracted with the application of proteinase K [17].
In line with these results, Kao et al. also reported that serine proteases originating from P. aeruginosa and neutrophils have adverse impacts on the integrity of the mucosal barrier. This leads to heightened permeability, which in turn facilitates the possibility of bacterial invasion [53]. In addition to serine proteases, the findings of another investigation indicated a significant correlation between P. aeruginosa elastase activity and mucosal barrier disruption, as evidenced by increased permeability of FITC-dextrans and decreased TEER [58].
This supports the finding by Nomura et al., who reported that the elastase of P. aeruginosa leads to the transient disruption of TJ and downregulation of protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) in human nasal epithelial cells. It’s noteworthy to mention that PARs have extensive cellular expression inside several bodily structures, including connective tissue, blood vessels, leukocytes, epithelium, and numerous airway cells. Furthermore, the activation of PAR-2 has been observed to have an impact on the integrity of the airway epithelial barrier. The results of this study showed that the elastase destroyed the epithelial barrier and reduced the transmembrane proteins tricellulin, occludin, and claudin-1 and − 4. On the other hand, this bacterial enzyme did not show a significant effect on the scaffold PDZ-expression proteins ZO-1 and − 2 and adherence junction proteins β-catenin and E-cadherin. Moreover, P. aeruginosa elastase reduced the expression of PAR-2, which also regulated the expression of the TJ proteins [59].
The disruptive effect of elastase on the mucosal barrier has been evidenced by its ability to cause the reorganization of TJ proteins. Moreover, elastase possesses the capacity to impede pro-inflammatory reactions by cleaving thrombin and liberating C-terminal-derived peptides. The release from this peptide binds to pathogen-associated lipopolysaccharide, hence inhibiting cellular activation and subsequent proinflammatory reactions [59, 60].
The aforementioned virulence pathways potentially play a role in the persistent and recalcitrant nature of P. aeruginosa infections in CRS. Hence, as previously said, the exoproteins of this bacterium, particularly elastase and serine protease, have been demonstrated to disrupt the epithelial barrier and induce downregulation of transmembrane proteins such as occludin, claudin-1, claudin-4, and tricellulin. Moreover, P. aeruginosa exerts an influence on TJ proteins, leading to an increase in the permeability of polarized epithelial cells. Therefore, although further investigation is required to elucidate the precise mechanistic impacts of P. aeruginosa exoproteins on the integrity of the epithelial barrier, the exoproteins of this bacterium could play a critical role in the pathophysiology of CRS by significantly disrupting ciliary functions and both the cytoskeleton and apical junctional complex proteins. Additionally, these exoproteins should be considered as potentially important therapeutic targets for inhibition and management of CRS (Fig. 1).
Possible pathogenic mechanisms of bacteria in CRS. A bacteria produce exoproteins and play a critical role in the pathophysiology of CRS through B severe disruption of ciliary functions and C both the cytoskeleton and apical junctional complex proteins. D Reactive oxygen species generated by bacterial toxins have the potential to disrupt the normal functioning of epithelial cells and lead to alterations in their morphology. Moreover, E the bacterial toxin could activate TLR2 and lead to the production of inflammatory cytokines, thereby decreasing epithelial integrity. F Finally, colonization or exposure by bacteria in the airway could increase tissue remodeling
S. aureus
According to recent investigations, it has been observed that nasal colonization of S. aureus was identified in 67% of patients diagnosed with CRSwNP. Additionally, it has been shown that nearly 50% of nasal tissue homogenates obtained from nasal polyps contain specific IgE antibodies against S. aureus enterotoxins [5]. Therefore, previous studies have brought attention to the significance of staphylococcal virulence factors in the development of CRSwNP. One of the main pathogenic mechanisms associated with S. aureus in CRSwNP is the disruption of mucosal integrity. In this regard, in this section, we will discuss the possible role of S. aureus in CRS via epithelial cell integrity disruption and enhancing their permeability.
Panchatcharam et al. reported that S. aureus biofilm exoproteins are toxic and disrupt the mucosal barrier structure in a time- and dose-dependent manner [61]. Another study also reported that S. aureus strain 13,565-secreted products could damage the airway epithelium by disrupting the TJs between primary HNECs-ALI [62]. In line with these results, S. aureus strain 13,565 was also used in another investigation, and the authors suppose that S. aureus is responsible for TJ disruption in HNEC-ALI cultures as either a protein-macromolecule or a combination of secreted factors [63, 64]. Noteworthy, S. aureus strain 13,565 which severely compromised the TJ structure is known to produce enterotoxin A24 and hemolysin B [63]. Finally, Murphy et al. investigated the impact of the purified S. aureus V8 protease, a 29 kDa serine protease, on airway epithelial integrity. The results showed that the application of V8 protease to the sinonasal cell layer results in a notable impact on the TJ barrier. This is characterized by a decrease in the protein ZO-1, while the protein claudin-1 experiences relatively minor changes. The paracellular permeability is significantly altered, and there is a fragmentation of protein localization. Noteworthy, the alterations seen in ZO-1 may be attributed to either protein redistribution or degradation. This phenomenon could be a result of proteolytic degradation or an indirect mechanism [55]. Hence, the mentioned virulence factors may be associated with mucosal barrier dysfunction; however, more confirmatory research should be conducted.
Noteworthy, the recently published study investigated the role of staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) in the pathogenesis of CRS. To this end, in their study, Martens et al. utilized SEB to treat the nasal polyp epithelial cells of patients with CRSwNP. The findings of their investigation revealed that SEB administration led to an increase in FD4 permeability and a decrease in TEER, with the effects being dependent on the dosage of SEB. In general, the presence of SEB leads to the disruption of the integrity of epithelial cells, as well as the inhibition of the expression of occludin and ZO-1 proteins. Additionally, the activation of TLR2 by SEB resulted in the synthesis of IL-6 and IL-8. The application of these cytokines to an air-liquid interface culture resulted in a reduction in epithelial integrity. Significantly, the prevention of SEB-induced barrier disruption was shown through the reduction of TLR2 signaling. The outcomes of the animal model study further validate these results. To this end, the researchers administered 50 µl of SEB (Endonasal) to the nasal cavity of the control mice and afterward noticed that SEB had a detrimental effect on the integrity of the barrier function. Additionally, the expression of occludin and ZO-1 mRNA was shown to be reduced. However, the aforementioned parameters exhibited no changes in mice lacking the TLR2 gene [62].
Additionally, the interaction of SEB and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response was also considered a possible mechanism of CRS. Disturbances in the maintenance of ER homeostasis, such as increased protein synthesis, impaired ER redox balance, and the accumulation of misfolded proteins, have the potential to induce the ER stress response. In addition, it should be noted that inflammation plays a significant role in the generation of ROS, the induction of ER stress, and the progression of nasal polyposis [65]. In this concept, the findings of a study indicated that membrane-derived vesicles have the potential to transport SEB into the cytoplasm of epithelial cells, potentially leading to the activation of the ER stress response mediated by SEB [66]. SEB is recognized as a crucial mediator of inflammation in human nasal epithelial cells. As previously stated, a correlation exists between inflammation and the ER stress response, which leads to either tissue healing or the regulation of tissue damage. Nevertheless, the ultimate effect of inflammation generated by ER stress can be either deleterious or protective [67, 68].
Hence, the authors postulated that the induction of ER stress by SEB could potentially be associated with the advancement of nasal polyposis. Furthermore, it has been observed that SEB stimulates the generation of ROS in both eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic polyps, in contrast to the unaffected healthy mucosa. The present discovery indicates that ROS generated by SEB could potentially play a role in ER stress responses [66]. Notably, certain allergens and environmental pollutants can induce the ER stress response and the generation of ROS, which can ultimately lead to mitochondrial dysfunction in airway epithelial cells [69].
Noteworthy, ROS are molecular entities that possess the ability to exist autonomously, characterized by the presence of at least one oxygen atom and one or more unpaired electrons. ROS were initially identified as deleterious byproducts generated during the process of aerobic metabolism. Under normal physiological circumstances, minimal amounts of ROS are generated during cellular activities, such as aerobic respiration or inflammatory responses, primarily within hepatocytes and macrophages. ROS serve as key signaling molecules and are also involved in muscular contractions, the regulation of vascular tone, as well as the determination of bactericidal and bacteriostatic activity. The elevation in the generation of free radicals can be attributed to excessive exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation, prolonged periods of stress, rigorous physical activity, inadequate dietary habits, and the consumption of stimulant substances. Under normal physiological circumstances, there exists a state of equilibrium wherein the production and elimination of free radicals within the human body are balanced [70, 71].
Mitochondrial failure and increased levels of ROS have been documented in a diverse range of allergy conditions, including atopy, asthma, allergic rhinitis, and tissue damage observed in asthma. This includes detrimental effects such as epithelial cell impairment, shedding of cells, and heightened airway hyperresponsiveness [72]. The presence of environmental contaminants and allergens has been observed to result in mitochondrial dysfunction in airway epithelial cells through the stimulation of ROS generation and the ER stress response. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) are generated as a consequence of oxidative phosphorylation occurring inside the mitochondrial electron transport chain. Mitochondria has the capacity to regulate ROS through the action of manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase (Mn-SOD), an enzyme that acts as a scavenger of mitochondrial ROS (mtROS). Nevertheless, the functionality of Mn-SOD can be impeded by a range of conditions, such as diverse infections and the inhalation of cigarette smoke, resulting in the generation of ROS [15, 72, 73]. Collectively, the process of oxidative phosphorylation within the electron transport chain of mitochondria leads to the generation of mtROS. The regulation of mtROS is carried out by mitochondria through the utilization of Mn-SOD. However, the activity of Mn-SOD is reduced and the formation of ROS is increased by cigarette smoke and exogenous infections [74, 75].
In this respect, Yoon et al. observed an elevation in mtROS levels in a human nasal epithelial cell line following exposure to SEB, which was found to be associated with the development of nasal polyps [76]. Actually, mtROS have the potential to modulate both the structure and function of mitochondria, leading to the disruption of normal cellular processes and the development of pathological conditions [77]. Collectively, it is evident that the activation of TLR2 by SEB can potentially undermine the structural integrity of TJs and the epithelial barrier through the induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This event leads to the loss of epithelial cell integrity and increases their permeability. In this context, the potential therapeutic strategy of targeting the TLR2 signaling pathway presents itself as a promising avenue for mitigating the pathophysiological effects of SEB on inflammation in CRSwNP.
Additionally, the administration of SEB has been seen to stimulate the production of ROS and trigger ER stress-induced inflammation. These processes have the potential to disrupt the normal functioning of epithelial cells and lead to alterations in their morphology. However, additional animal and clinical investigations are required to precisely ascertain these mechanisms. Hence, the exoproteins produced by S. aureus have the potential to induce dysfunction in the sinonasal epithelium’s barrier, disrupt mucus secretion thereby compromising the innate barrier, enhance exposure to antigens, and commence infection in the subepithelial region. Exoproteins are responsible for the manifestation of staphylococcal virulence and the initiation of inflammation. It should be noted that this phenomenon is not limited to the impact of a solitary toxin. In this context, it is postulated that a collection of proteins, including enterotoxins, hemolysins, and proteases, may be involved in the observed inflammation. However, it is important to note that only a subset of these proteins is likely to be responsible for the actual breakdown of the barrier [61].
S. aureus superantigens, specifically SEA and SEB, can enhance chronic inflammation in CRSwNP by stimulating a significant population of T cells. The activation of TLR2 by SEB leads to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Additionally, SEB stimulates the generation of ROS and inflammation caused by ER stress. These processes have the potential to disturb the integrity of epithelial cells and increase their permeability [5].
Additionally, lipoteichoic acid (LTA) is a major component of the Gram-positive cell wall, which is composed of polymers consisting of repeated phosphodiester-linked polyols located in the outer plasma membrane [78]. The adhesion molecule LTA functions by binding to both TLR2 and the CD14 receptor, leading to the subsequent release of proinflammatory cytokines, reactive nitrogen, and oxygen species, as well as antimicrobial peptides [79]. To this end, the activation of TLR2 by LTA in lung endothelial cells is responsible for the induction of an elevated permeability of the cellular barrier. This effect is achieved by the production of ROS and reactive nitrogen species [64].
Finally, the soluble secreted protein known as alpha-hemolysin (Hla) engages in interactions with eukaryotic cell membranes. The monomeric form of Hla exhibits binding affinity towards the plasma membrane, leading to the formation of a heptameric transmembrane pore. There have been reports indicating a decrease in ciliary activity and the presence of ultrastructural alterations in nasal airway cells in vitro [64, 80]. Collectively, different exoproteins of S. aureus could lead to disruption of the mucosal barriers and increase the chance of CRS. Noteworthy, the interactions of S. aureus with mucosal barriers were also shown in an animal model [81]; however, data in this field is not complete and additional studies are required to definitively exclude any contribution to barrier dysfunction.
In the end, it is noteworthy to mention that S. aureus, in addition to disrupting barrier integrity, could lead to epithelial-mediated remodeling of allergic airways. Tissue remodeling occurs in the airway tissue of individuals with respiratory diseases and is characterized by augmented collagen deposition, hyperplasia of smooth muscle and submucosal glands, as well as fibrosis [82]. One of the significant discoveries in the advanced remodeling tissue of asthma patients is the presence of an imbalance between matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) at the molecular level.
To this end, Homma et al. conducted an experiment including the stimulation of normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells with transforming growth factor (TGF)-α and S. aureus. The bacteria elicited the production of both mRNA and protein for TGF-α and MMP 1 from NHBE cells through a TLR2-dependent pathway [83]. In summary, S. aureus can activate TLR2, resulting in the significant induction of MMP-1 expression in primary airway epithelial cells. Therefore, the presence or colonization of this bacterium in the respiratory tract may contribute to tissue remodeling by inducing the production of MMP-1 through a TGF-α-dependent mechanism. This process could potentially contribute to the development of airway illnesses, such as asthma and CRS. Nonetheless, we could not find confirmatory data on this subject; therefore, more confirmatory studies are needed.
It should be noted that, in addition to P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, other microorganisms such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Alternaria alternata, rhinoviruses, Aspergillus, and Haemophilus influenza could also disrupt the mucosal barrier and increase the chance of CRS. The data about the mentioned microorganism is limited; however, the funded article is presented in Table 1.
Therapeutic approaches
As mentioned, the combined effect of P. aeruginosa exoprotein on enhancing mucosal permeability and degrading innate immune defense mechanisms may result in a persistent, yet inadequate, immune response. This inadequate response is a contributing factor to the development of severe inflammation and the production of polyps in individuals with P. aeruginosa-associated CRS. In this concept, understanding the interactions of microorganisms with mucosal surfaces and epithelial barriers in the paranasal sinuses can facilitate developing preventive and treatment approaches against CRSwNP. To this end, recently published studies used different approaches for inhibiting the destructive effects of microorganisms on mucosal surfaces and epithelial barriers in the paranasal sinuses.
Lim et al. used ciprofloxacin and azithromycin sinus stent (CASS) on human sinonasal epithelial cells (HSNECs) that had been stimulated by LPS from P. aeruginosa. Noteworthy, the CASS was specifically engineered to facilitate the controlled release of azithromycin and ciprofloxacin. This release is achieved through the utilization of two separate layers inside the system: an inner layer composed of hydrophilic ciprofloxacin and an outer layer composed of hydrophobic azithromycin. The administration of CASS therapy resulted in a notable reduction in the inflammatory response (IL-8) caused by LPS in HSNECs. This reduction was observed without any harmful effects on the cells and maintained the integrity and functionality of the epithelial layer. Actually, the administration of CASS did not result in any significant alterations in TEER, CBF, or paracellular permeability. These findings suggest that cellular integrity and functionality were preserved following treatment with CASS. Hence, the authors propose that the utilization of an antibiotic-eluting sinus stent for the continuous release of ciprofloxacin and azithromycin is a promising therapy approach with significant potential for enhancing clinical outcomes in CRS [92].
Additionally, the results of another study also indicated that Rhinosectan®, a medical device containing xyloglucan, contributed to the preservation of TJ, as demonstrated by an increase in TEER values across time. Noteworthy, Rhinosectan® did not alter the paracellular flux, even after treatment with LPS from P. aeruginosa. The findings of this study suggest that xyloglucan has the ability to inhibit P. aeruginosa-induced changes in TJ permeability [93]. To this end, the authors postulated that the existence of xyloglucan is believed to prevent the interaction between epithelial cells and aeroallergens, such as pollen, as well as the released cytokines, hence mitigating the allergic reaction. Furthermore, it is believed that preventing the interaction between bacterial LPS and the monolayers can reduce the inflammation of nasal epithelial cells caused by LPS. Consequently, this can mitigate the inflammatory response triggered by LPS derived from Gram-negative bacteria [93, 94].
Therefore, as mentioned, after recognizing bacterial interactions with mucosal surfaces and epithelial barriers in the paranasal sinuses, we can use a protective physical barrier on nasal epithelial cells and different agents to interfere with microbial invasion of the mucosal barriers. However, data in this field is very limited, and further studies are needed. In the end, it is noteworthy to mention that the mitigation of chronic inflammation in the sinonasal mucosa is a significant obstacle in the management of individuals diagnosed with CRS. The control of inflammation presents a potential avenue for the re-epithelialization of the lining of the sinonasal cavity as well as the restoration of functional cilia activity. In this concept, the presence of microbial-induced pro-inflammatory cytokines in the sinonasal mucosa is a significant contributing element to the degradation of mucosal barriers, hence increasing the susceptibility of individuals to CRSwNP. Anti-inflammatory agents such as bee venom, chitosan-dextran gel, prostaglandin E2, dexamethasone, and calcium channel blockers have been shown to inhibit microbial-induced pro-inflammatory cytokines. Therefore, future studies can consider these agents for inhibition of microbial destructive effects on mucosal surfaces and epithelial barriers in the paranasal sinuses [5, 95].
Conclusion
The objective of this study was to examine the pathogenic mechanisms of common microorganisms in CRS and their involvement in the degradation of mucosal barriers, remodeling of epithelial tissue, and impairment of MCC. Bacteria, fungi, and viruses can exert a significant influence on the pathogenesis and advancement of CRS through the modulation of both innate and adaptive immune reactions. The role of epithelial disorder is crucial in the development or cause of CRS. The disruption of the epithelium barrier and failure of MCC are the primary mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of CRS. The analysis of research findings has revealed that microbial-produced substances disrupt an essential element of mucociliary clearance. However, given the significance of various microorganisms in the etiology and exacerbation of this disease, as well as its profound implications for individuals’ well-being, further extensive investigation is imperative to substantiate the involvement of microorganisms in the destruction and disruption of epithelial barriers within the paranasal sinuses.
Availability of data and materials
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study is available within the article.
References
Kato A. Immunopathology of chronic rhinosinusitis. Allergology International: Official Journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology. 2015;64(2):121–30.
Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, Bachert C, Alobid I, Baroody F, Cohen N, Cervin A, Douglas R, Gevaert P, et al. European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2012. Rhinology Supplement. 2012;23:3 preceding table of contents, 1-298.
He Y, Fu Y, Wu Y, Zhu T, Li H. Pathogenesis and treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis from the perspective of sinonasal epithelial dysfunction. Front Med. 2023;10:1139240.
Jiao J, Wang C, Zhang L. Epithelial physical barrier defects in chronic rhinosinusitis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2019;15(6):679–88.
Chegini Z, Didehdar M, Khoshbayan A, Karami J, Yousefimashouf M, Shariati A. The role of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Cell Communication and Signaling: CCS. 2022;20(1):29.
Benninger MS, Ferguson BJ, Hadley JA, Hamilos DL, Jacobs M, Kennedy DW, Lanza DC, Marple BF, Osguthorpe JD, Stankiewicz JA, et al. Adult chronic rhinosinusitis: definitions, diagnosis, epidemiology, and pathophysiology. Otolaryngology–head and neck Surgery: Official Journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2003;129(3 Suppl):1–32.
Biel MA, Brown CA, Levinson RM, Garvis GE, Paisner HM, Sigel ME, Tedford TM. Evaluation of the microbiology of chronic maxillary sinusitis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1998;107(11 Pt 1):942–5.
Brook I. Microbiology and antimicrobial management of sinusitis. J Laryngol Otol. 2005;119(4):251–8.
Shen JC, Cope E, Chen B, Leid JG, Cohen NA. Regulation of murine sinonasal cilia function by microbial secreted factors. Int Forum Allergy Rhinology. 2012;2(2):104–10.
Nadel DM, Lanza DC, Kennedy DW. Endoscopically guided cultures in chronic sinusitis. Am J Rhinol. 1998;12(4):233–41.
Bhattacharyya N, Kepnes LJ. The microbiology of recurrent rhinosinusitis after endoscopic sinus surgery. Archives of otolaryngology–head & neck Surgery. 1999;125(10):1117–20.
Van Zele T, Gevaert P, Watelet JB, Claeys G, Holtappels G, Claeys C, van Cauwenberge P, Bachert C. Staphylococcus aureus colonization and IgE antibody formation to enterotoxins is increased in nasal polyposis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114(4):981–3.
Fraser JD, Proft T. The bacterial superantigen and superantigen-like proteins. Immunol Rev. 2008;225:226–43.
Teufelberger AR, Bröker BM, Krysko DV, Bachert C, Krysko O. Staphylococcus aureus orchestrates type 2 Airway Diseases. Trends Mol Med. 2019;25(8):696–707.
Yoon YH, Yeon SH, Choi MR, Jang YS, Kim JA, Oh HW, Jun X, Park SK, Heo JY, Rha KS, et al. Altered mitochondrial functions and morphologies in epithelial cells are Associated with Pathogenesis of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2020;12(4):653–68.
Cleland EJ, Bassiouni A, Vreugde S, Wormald PJ. The bacterial microbiome in chronic rhinosinusitis: richness, diversity, postoperative changes, and patient outcomes. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2016;30(1):37–43.
Tuli JF, Ramezanpour M, Cooksley C, Psaltis AJ, Wormald PJ, Vreugde S. Association between mucosal barrier disruption by Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoproteins and asthma in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Allergy. 2021;76(11):3459–69.
Chakrabarti A, Kaur H. Allergic Aspergillus Rhinosinusitis. J Fungi (Basel). 2016;2(4):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof2040032.
Shin SH, Ye MK, Kim YH, Kim JK. Role of TLRs in the production of chemical mediators in nasal polyp fibroblasts by fungi. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2016;43(2):166–70.
Didehdar M, Khoshbayan A, Vesal S, Darban-Sarokhalil D, Razavi S, Chegini Z, Shariati A. An overview of possible pathogenesis mechanisms of Alternaria alternata in chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis. Microb Pathog. 2021;155:104905.
Kern RC, Conley DB, Walsh W, Chandra R, Kato A, Tripathi-Peters A, Grammer LC, Schleimer RP. Perspectives on the etiology of chronic rhinosinusitis: an immune barrier hypothesis. Am J Rhinol. 2008;22(6):549–59.
Whitsett JA. Airway Epithelial differentiation and Mucociliary Clearance. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2018;15(Suppl 3):143–s148.
Seiberling KA, Grammer L, Kern RC. Chronic rhinosinusitis and superantigens. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2005;38(6):1215–36. ix.
Kuek LE, Lee RJ. First contact: the role of respiratory cilia in host-pathogen interactions in the airways. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2020;319(4):L603–l619.
Tharakan A, Halderman AA, Lane AP, Biswal S, Ramanathan M Jr. Reversal of cigarette smoke extract-induced sinonasal epithelial cell barrier dysfunction through Nrf2 activation. Int Forum Allergy Rhinology. 2016;6(11):1145–50.
Hartsock A, Nelson WJ. Adherens and tight junctions: structure, function and connections to the actin cytoskeleton. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1778(3):660–9.
Kasperkiewicz M, Ellebrecht CT, Takahashi H, Yamagami J, Zillikens D, Payne AS. Amagai M: Pemphigus. Nat Reviews Disease Primers. 2017;3:17026.
Gohy S, Hupin C, Ladjemi MZ, Hox V, Pilette C. Key role of the epithelium in chronic upper airways diseases. Clin Experimental Allergy: J Br Soc Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;50(2):135–46.
Tsukita K, Yano T, Tamura A, Tsukita S. Reciprocal Association between the Apical Junctional Complex and AMPK: A Promising Therapeutic Target for Epithelial/Endothelial Barrier Function?. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(23):6012. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20236012.
Kiyono H, Fukuyama S. NALT- versus Peyer’s-patch-mediated mucosal immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4(9):699–710.
Gon Y, Hashimoto S. Role of airway epithelial barrier dysfunction in pathogenesis of asthma. Allergology International: Official Journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology. 2018;67(1):12–7.
Ganz T. Antimicrobial polypeptides. J Leukoc Biol. 2004;75(1):34–8.
Cao PP, Wang ZC, Schleimer RP, Liu Z. Pathophysiologic mechanisms of chronic rhinosinusitis and their roles in emerging disease endotypes. Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology: Official Publication of the American College of Allergy Asthma & Immunology. 2019;122(1):33–40.
Kim DK, Jin HR, Eun KM, Mutusamy S, Cho SH, Oh S, Kim DW. Non-eosinophilic nasal polyps shows increased epithelial proliferation and localized Disease Pattern in the early stage. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(10):e0139945.
Ryu G, Kim DW. Th2 inflammatory responses in the development of nasal polyps and chronic rhinosinusitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;20(1):1–8.
Soyka MB, Wawrzyniak P, Eiwegger T, Holzmann D, Treis A, Wanke K, Kast JI, Akdis CA. Defective epithelial barrier in chronic rhinosinusitis: the regulation of tight junctions by IFN-γ and IL-4. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130(5):1087–1096e1010.
Pothoven KL, Norton JE, Suh LA, Carter RG, Harris KE, Biyasheva A, Welch K, Shintani-Smith S, Conley DB, Liu MC, et al. Neutrophils are a major source of the epithelial barrier disrupting cytokine oncostatin M in patients with mucosal airways disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(6):1966-78.e1969.
Seshadri S, Lu X, Purkey MR, Homma T, Choi AW, Carter R, Suh L, Norton J, Harris KE, Conley DB, et al. Increased expression of the epithelial anion transporter pendrin/SLC26A4 in nasal polyps of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136(6):1548–1558e1547.
Sun X, Yang Q, Rogers CJ, Du M, Zhu MJ. AMPK improves gut epithelial differentiation and barrier function via regulating Cdx2 expression. Cell Death Differ. 2017;24(5):819–31.
Davies DE. The role of the epithelium in airway remodeling in asthma. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society. 2009;6(8):678–82.
Lee K, Tai J, Lee SH, Kim TH. Advances in the Knowledge of the Underlying Airway Remodeling Mechanisms in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Based on the Endotypes: A Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(2):910. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22020910.
Bassiouni A, Chen PG, Wormald PJ. Mucosal remodeling and reversibility in chronic rhinosinusitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;13(1):4–12.
Tipirneni KE, Zhang S, Cho DY, Grayson J, Skinner DF, Mackey C, Moore L, Cole D, Banks CG, Woodworth BA. Submucosal gland mucus strand velocity is decreased in chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinology. 2018;8(4):509–12.
Perloff JR, Gannon FH, Bolger WE, Montone KT, Orlandi R, Kennedy DW. Bone involvement in sinusitis: an apparent pathway for the spread of disease. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(12):2095–9.
Wang F, Yang Y, Wu Q, Chen H. Histopathologic analysis in chronic rhinosinusitis: impact on quality of life outcomes. Am J Otolaryngol. 2019;40(3):423–6.
Wang JH, Kwon HJ, Jang YJ. Staphylococcus aureus increases cytokine and matrix metalloproteinase expression in nasal mucosae of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010;24(6):422–7.
Watelet JB, Claeys C, Perez-Novo C, Gevaert P, Van Cauwenberge P, Bachert C. Transforming growth factor beta1 in nasal remodeling: differences between chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis. Am J Rhinol. 2004;18(5):267–72.
Watelet JB, Bachert C, Claeys C, Van Cauwenberge P. Matrix metalloproteinases MMP-7, MMP-9 and their tissue inhibitor TIMP-1: expression in chronic sinusitis vs nasal polyposis. Allergy. 2004;59(1):54–60.
Can IH, Ceylan K, Caydere M, Samim EE, Ustun H, Karasoy DS. The expression of MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-9, and TIMP-1 in chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis. Otolaryngology–head and neck Surgery: Official Journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2008;139(2):211–5.
Van Bruaene N, Derycke L, Perez-Novo CA, Gevaert P, Holtappels G, De Ruyck N, Cuvelier C, Van Cauwenberge P, Bachert C. TGF-beta signaling and collagen deposition in chronic rhinosinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124(2):253–9. 259.e251-252.
Chegini Z, Khoshbayan A, Taati Moghadam M, Farahani I, Jazireian P, Shariati A. Bacteriophage therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms: a review. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2020;19(1):45.
Chegini Z, Shariati A, Asghari A, Rajaeih S, Ghorbani M, Jalessi M, Mirshekar M, Razavi S. Molecular analysis of dominant paranasal sinus bacteria in patients with and without chronic rhinosinusitis. Arch Microbiol. 2022;204(6):327.
Kao SS, Ramezanpour M, Bassiouni A, Wormald PJ, Psaltis AJ, Vreugde S. The effect of neutrophil serine proteases on human nasal epithelial cell barrier function. Int Forum Allergy Rhinology. 2019;9(10):1220–6.
Meng J, Zhou P, Liu Y, Liu F, Yi X, Liu S, Holtappels G, Bachert C, Zhang N. The development of nasal polyp disease involves early nasal mucosal inflammation and remodelling. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12):e82373.
Murphy J, Ramezanpour M, Stach N, Dubin G, Psaltis AJ, Wormald PJ, Vreugde S. Staphylococcus Aureus V8 protease disrupts the integrity of the airway epithelial barrier and impairs IL-6 production in vitro. Laryngoscope. 2018;128(1):E8–e15.
Steelant B, Seys SF, Van Gerven L, Van Woensel M, Farré R, Wawrzyniak P, Kortekaas Krohn I, Bullens DM, Talavera K, Raap U, et al. Histamine and T helper cytokine-driven epithelial barrier dysfunction in allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141(3):951–963e958.
Kortekaas Krohn I, Seys SF, Lund G, Jonckheere AC, Dierckx de Casterlé I, Ceuppens JL, Steelant B, Hellings PW. Nasal epithelial barrier dysfunction increases sensitization and mast cell degranulation in the absence of allergic inflammation. Allergy. 2020;75(5):1155–64.
Li J, Ramezanpour M, Fong SA, Cooksley C, Murphy J, Suzuki M, Psaltis AJ, Wormald PJ, Vreugde S. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Exoprotein-Induced Barrier disruption correlates with elastase activity and Marks Chronic Rhinosinusitis Severity. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:38.
Nomura K, Obata K, Keira T, Miyata R, Hirakawa S, Takano K, Kohno T, Sawada N, Himi T, Kojima T. Pseudomonas aeruginosa elastase causes transient disruption of tight junctions and downregulation of PAR-2 in human nasal epithelial cells. Respir Res. 2014;15(1):21.
van der Plas MJ, Bhongir RK, Kjellström S, Siller H, Kasetty G, Mörgelin M, Schmidtchen A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa elastase cleaves a C-terminal peptide from human thrombin that inhibits host inflammatory responses. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11567.
Panchatcharam BS, Cooksley CM, Ramezanpour M, Vediappan RS, Bassiouni A, Wormald PJ, Psaltis AJ, Vreugde S. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm exoproteins are cytotoxic to human nasal epithelial barrier in chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinology. 2020;10(7):871–83.
Martens K, Seys SF, Alpizar YA, Schrijvers R, Bullens DMA, Breynaert C, Lebeer S, Steelant B. Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B disrupts nasal epithelial barrier integrity. Clin Experimental Allergy: J Br Soc Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;51(1):87–98.
Malik Z, Roscioli E, Murphy J, Ou J, Bassiouni A, Wormald PJ, Vreugde S. Staphylococcus aureus impairs the airway epithelial barrier in vitro. Int Forum Allergy Rhinology. 2015;5(6):551–6.
Murphy J, Ramezanpour M, Drilling A, Roscioli E, Psaltis AJ, Wormald PJ, Vreugde S. In vitro characteristics of an airway barrier-disrupting factor secreted by Staphylococcus aureus. Int Forum Allergy Rhinology. 2019;9(2):187–96.
Wang S, Kaufman RJ. The impact of the unfolded protein response on human disease. J Cell Biol. 2012;197(7):857–67.
Kim YM, Jin J, Choi JA, Cho SN, Lim YJ, Lee JH, Seo JY, Chen HY, Rha KS, Song CH. Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress response is associated with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Clin Biochem. 2014;47(1–2):96–103.
Garg AD, Kaczmarek A, Krysko O, Vandenabeele P, Krysko DV, Agostinis P. ER stress-induced inflammation: does it aid or impede disease progression? Trends Mol Med. 2012;18(10):589–98.
Hotamisligil GS. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the inflammatory basis of metabolic disease. Cell. 2010;140(6):900–17.
Kim D-K, Jin HR, Eun KM, Mo J-H, Cho SH, Oh S, Cho D, Kim DW. The role of interleukin-33 in chronic rhinosinusitis. Thorax. 2017;72(7):635–45.
Jakubczyk K, Dec K, Kałduńska J, Kawczuga D, Kochman J, Janda K. Reactive oxygen species - sources, functions, oxidative damage. Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski: Organ Polskiego Towarzystwa Lekarskiego. 2020;48(284):124–7.
Das K, Roychoudhury A. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of antioxidants as ROS-scavengers during environmental stress in plants. Front Environ Sci. 2014;2:53.
Kim SR, Kim DI, Kim SH, Lee H, Lee KS, Cho SH, Lee YC. NLRP3 inflammasome activation by mitochondrial ROS in bronchial epithelial cells is required for allergic inflammation. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5(10):e1498.
Prakash YS, Pabelick CM, Sieck GC. Mitochondrial dysfunction in Airway Disease. Chest. 2017;152(3):618–26.
Prakash Y, Pabelick CM, Sieck GC. Mitochondrial dysfunction in airway disease. Chest. 2017;152(3):618–26.
Guo Z, Hong Z, Dong W, Deng C, Zhao R, Xu J, Zhuang G, Zhang R. PM2. 5-induced oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage in the nasal mucosa of rats. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(2):134.
Yoon YH, Yeon SH, Choi MR, Jang YS, Kim JA, Oh HW, Jun X, Park SK, Heo JY, Rha K-S. Altered mitochondrial functions and morphologies in epithelial cells are associated with pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2020;12(4):653.
Cloonan SM, Choi AM. Mitochondria in lung disease. J Clin Investig. 2016;126(3):809–20.
Lu D, Wörmann ME, Zhang X, Schneewind O, Gründling A, Freemont PS. Structure-based mechanism of lipoteichoic acid synthesis by Staphylococcus aureus LtaS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(5):1584–9.
Kang SS, Sim JR, Yun CH, Han SH. Lipoteichoic acids as a major virulence factor causing inflammatory responses via toll-like receptor 2. Arch Pharm Res. 2016;39(11):1519–29.
Bhakdi S, Tranum-Jensen J. Alpha-toxin of Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiol Rev. 1991;55(4):733–51.
Geng L, Wang S, Zhao Y, Hu H. Gene expression profile in mouse bacterial chronic rhinosinusitis. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2019;17(5):3451–8.
Johnson DC. Airway mucus function and dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(10):978. author reply 978.
Homma T, Kato A, Sakashita M, Norton JE, Suh LA, Carter RG, Schleimer RP. Involvement of toll-like receptor 2 and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in epithelial expression of airway remodeling factors. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2015;52(4):471–81.
Park SC, Kim SI, Hwang CS, Cho HJ, Yoon JH, Kim CH. Multiple airborne allergen-induced eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis murine model. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;276(8):2273–82.
Shin SH, Ye MK, Lee DW, Che MH. Alternaria-induced barrier dysfunction of nasal epithelial cells: role of serine protease and reactive oxygen species. Int Forum Allergy Rhinology. 2019;9(5):514–21.
Ahn BH, Park YH, Shin SH. Mouse model of aspergillus and Alternaria induced rhinosinusitis. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009;36(4):422–6.
Lee RJ, Workman AD, Carey RM, Chen B, Rosen PL, Doghramji L, Adappa ND, Palmer JN, Kennedy DW, Cohen NA. Fungal aflatoxins reduce respiratory mucosal ciliary function. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33221.
Boase S, Jervis-Bardy J, Cleland E, Pant H, Tan L, Wormald PJ. Bacterial-induced epithelial damage promotes fungal biofilm formation in a sheep model of sinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinology. 2013;3(5):341–8.
Tian T, Zi X, Peng Y, Wang Z, Hong H, Yan Y, Guan W, Tan KS, Liu J, Ong HH, et al. H3N2 influenza virus infection enhances oncostatin M expression in human nasal epithelium. Exp Cell Res. 2018;371(2):322–9.
Huang ZQ, Liu J, Ong HH, Yuan T, Zhou XM, Wang J, Tan KS, Chow VT, Yang QT, Shi L, et al. Interleukin-13 alters tight Junction Proteins expression thereby compromising barrier function and dampens Rhinovirus Induced Immune responses in nasal epithelium. Front cell Dev Biology. 2020;8:572749.
Shin SH, Ye MK, Kim JK. Effects of fungi and eosinophils on mucin gene expression in rhinovirus-infected nasal epithelial cells. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2014;6(2):149–55.
Lim DJ, Thompson HM, Walz CR, Ayinala S, Skinner D, Zhang S, Grayson JW, Cho DY, Woodworth BA. Azithromycin and ciprofloxacin inhibit interleukin-8 secretion without disrupting human sinonasal epithelial integrity in vitro. Int Forum Allergy Rhinology. 2021;11(2):136–43.
De Servi B, Ranzini F, Piqué N. Protective barrier properties of Rhinosectan(®) spray (containing xyloglucan) on an organotypic 3D airway tissue model (MucilAir): results of an in vitro study. Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology: Official Journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2017;13:37.
Tsou YA, Tung YT, Wu TF, Chang GR, Chen HC, Lin CD, Lai CH, Chen HL, Chen CM. Lactoferrin interacts with SPLUNC1 to attenuate lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation of human nasal epithelial cells via down-regulated MEK1/2-MAPK signaling. Biochem cell Biology = Biochimie et Biol cellulaire. 2017;95(3):394–9.
Tan L, Rogers TJ, Hatzirodos N, Baker LM, Ooi E, Wormald P-J. Immunomodulatory effect of cytosine-phosphate-guanosine (CpG)-oligonucleotides in nonasthmatic chronic rhinosinusitis: an explant model. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;23(2):123–9.
Acknowledgements
We greatly appreciate the input from BioRender team (BioRender.com) for their collaboration with us in figures design. We also acknowledge Professor Alexander Seifalian for his comments on manuscript.
Funding
No funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AS conceived and designed the study. AS, JH, and ZC contributed in comprehensive research and wrote the paper. MA, MN and AS participated in editing the manuscript. Notably, all authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Chegini, Z., Noei, M., Hemmati, J. et al. The destruction of mucosal barriers, epithelial remodeling, and impaired mucociliary clearance: possible pathogenic mechanisms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in chronic rhinosinusitis. Cell Commun Signal 21, 306 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-023-01347-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-023-01347-2