Background

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a common type of clinical lung cancer, which accounts for about about 40% of the total number of lung cancers [1, 2]. Local radiotherapy treatment is an important treatment of NSCLC, and radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) is a common complication of thoracic radiation therapy. Once RILI occurs, it is often irreversible and significant [3]. Therefore, the early prevention and treatment of RILI are crucial to improve the prognosis of patients.

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) refers to multiple beam irradiation technology that uses a series of different weights, different field shapes, and sizes to irradiate the target area from different directions [4,5,6]. A conformal lead that is consistent with the shape of the lesion is used to make the high-dose area consistent with the shape of the target area in three-dimensional space and at the same time reduce the dose of normal tissues around the target area [7, 8]. RILI is one of the main side effects of thoracic cancer radiotherapy. The clinical incidence of RILI is reported in previous studies to be 5.12 to 36.07%, which can significantly affect the treatment and prognosis of patients [9,10,11]. Although 3D-CRT can reduce radiation damage to normal tissues through precise quantitative control of cancer radiation dose, the occurrence of RILI with clinical symptoms is still very common [12]. RILI patients have a series of non-specific respiratory symptoms due to severe lung injury, which will seriously affect the patient’s quality of life [13,14,15]. How to predict and prevent the occurrence of RILI has become an urgent problem to be solved in radiotherapy [16]. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the risk factors of RILI in NSCLC patients, to provide insights into the clinical prevention and treatment of RILI.

Methods

Ethical considerations

In this study, all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. This present study had been checked and approved by the ethical committee of our hospital (approval number: DE180042), all the participants had been well-informed, and written informed consents had been obtained from all the included patients.

Patients

This study selected NSCLC patients who underwent 3D-CRT in our hospital from June 1, 2018, to June 30, 2020, as study populations. The inclusion criteria of the patients were as follows: (1) patients were diagnosed with pathological examination as NSCLC [17, 18]; (2) age< 70 years old, (3) Karnofsky score ≥ 70 points, (4) patients received 3D-CRT, and (5) the follow-up period after radiotherapy was ≥ 6 months. The exclusion criteria for patients were as follows: (1) distant metastasis occurred during radiotherapy, (2) there were interruptions during radiotherapy > 1 week, (3) surgery treatment was performed during radiotherapy, and (4) patients were unwilling to participant in this present study.

3D-CRT

Gamma MEDx 100 (German) was used for the 3D-CRT. The patient was fixed with hydrolyzed plastic forming technology, and the arms are raised and crossed on the top of the forehead. The patient kept breathing calmly and performed a spiral CT scan, ranging from the midline of the neck to 3 cm below the diaphragm, including the whole lung tissue, with a thickness of 3 mm. The positioning image was obtained, the Z line value was approved, and the X, Y, and Z coordinates of the marked points on the patient’s body surface. For the parameters and repeated positioning readings, we used bony markers that are not easy to move as the marking points on the body surface and transmitting the positioning images obtained from the positioning scan to the Curer 8.0 treatment planning system via the network. Target area delineation: we delineated the gross tumor volume (GTV) layer by layer under the lung window of the CT image after the 3D reconstruction, and the clinical target volume (CTV) was obtained by placing 6 mm of squamous cell carcinoma GTV. For adenocarcinoma, GTV was placed 8 mm to obtain CTV, and CTV was expanded by 5 mm to obtain the planned target volume (PTV). If the patient’s lung function was poor or the CTV is large, the CTV should be manually modified according to the patient’s lung function status and breathing amplitude. We appropriately increased the scope of the patient’s upper and lower PTV extension up to 10~15 mm outside the CTV. The radiation therapy dose was 46~70 Gy (the median dose is 60 Gy), 5 times per week, 1.8~2.0 Gy per time. Normal tissue dose limits: spinal cord Dmax ≤ 45 Gy, esophagus Dmax ≤ 60 Gy, lung V5 ≤ 65%, lung V20 ≤ 25%, lung V30 ≤ 20%.

Chemotherapy

The chemotherapy regimen used in our study was as follows: paclitaxel (Xinwei, Shanghai, S0190335) or docetaxel (Gynesier, German, C901241511) + cisplatin (Minhua, Shenzhen, W291101) or carboplatin (Huangchen, Zhengzhou, 1910418). The first-line regimen of intravenous infusion of paclitaxel (135~175 mg m−2) (day 1), docetaxel (65~75 mg m−2) (day 1), cisplatin (80–100 mg m−2) (days 2 and 3), and carboplatin (300–350 mg m−2) (day 2). At 21–28 days for 1 cycle, a total of 2 to 6 cycles were completed.

Diagnostic criteria of RILI

RILI toxicity was assessed with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0, which was divided into 0 to 5 levels: grade 0—no obvious symptoms or signs change before and after treatment; grade 1—mild cough or shortness of breath after radiotherapy; grade 2—cough was persistent and requires medicine to relieve it and asthma after exercise; grade 3: severe cough, asthma, and shortness of breath were presented in the resting state, which could not be relieved by drugs, and the imaging examination revealed radiation pneumonia. Glucocorticoid therapy was effective; grade 4—dyspnea, oxygen, or assisted ventilation; and grade 5—patient death due to ventilatory failure and lung failure.

Data collection

Two authors collected the following personal characteristics and treatment data of patients: gender, age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pathological type, concurrent chemotherapy, Karnofsky percent score (KPS), tumor staging, cancer size, radiotherapy dose (Gy), V5, V10, V20, V30, MLD, GTV, and PTV.

Statistical analysis

We used the SPSS 24.0 statistical software for statistical analysis. Enumeration data was expressed as cases and percentages, and the chi-square test was used for comparison between the groups; measurement data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and the t test was used for comparison between the groups. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the risk factors of RILI in patients with NSCLC. P < 0.05 indicates that the difference was statistically significant.

Results

The characteristics of included patients

A total of 126 NSCLC patients were included, of whom 45 patients had RILI; the incidence of RILI in NSCLC patients was 35.71%. As presented in Table 1, there were significant differences in diabetes, smoke, COPD, concurrent chemotherapy, radiotherapy dose, and PTV between the RILI group and non-RILI group (all P < 0.05). But no significant differences in gender, age, BMI, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, pathological type, KPS, tumor staging, cancer size, V5, V10, V20, V30, MLD, and GTV between the RILI group and the non-RILI group were found (all P > 0.05).

Table 1 The characteristics of included patients

Logistic regression analysis on the risk factors of RILI in patients with NSCLC

The variable assignments of multivariate logistic regression were presented in Table 2. As indicated in Table 3, diabetes (OR 3.076, 95%CI 1.442~5.304), smoke (OR 2.745, 95%CI 1.288~4.613), COPD (OR 3.949, 95%CI 1.067~5.733), concurrent chemotherapy (OR 2.072, 95%CI 1.121~3.498), radiotherapy dose ≥ 60 Gy (OR 3.841, 95%CI 1.932~5.362), and PTV ≥ 396 (OR 1.247, 95%CI 1.107~1.746) were the independent risk factors of RILI in patients with NSCLC (all P < 0.05).

Table 2 The variable assignment of multivariate logistic regression
Table 3 The logistic regression analysis on the risk factors of RILI in patients with NSCLC

Discussions

RILI is one of the important toxic reactions of radiotherapy in the treatment of thoracic tumors. RILI often appears during radiotherapy to 3 months after radiotherapy [19, 20]. It usually manifests as dry cough, fever, shortness of breath, etc. In severe cases, severe breathing difficulties, respiratory failure, and even death can occur. Numerous studies [21,22,23,24] have shown that clinical factors, therapeutic factors, metrological factors, and biological factors are closely related to the occurrence of RILI. The results of this study have shown that diabetes, smoke, COPD, concurrent chemotherapy, radiotherapy dose ≥ 60 Gy, and PTV ≥ 396 were the independent risk factors of RILI in patients with NSCLC; special attentions and early interventions are needed for NSCLC patients with those risk factors.

In this study, the incidence of RILI in NSCLC patients that received 3D-CRT was 35.71%, which is consistent with several previous studies [25, 26]. It has been found that the incidence of RILI in patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy is 63.17%, while the incidence of RILI in patients who did not undergo chemotherapy is only 16%, and the incidence of RILI is higher in patients who received paclitaxel + carboplatin [27,28,29,30]. We have found that whether to receive concurrent chemotherapy is significantly related to the incidence of RILI, which may be associated with the fact that patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment are prone to lower immune levels and higher organ sensitivity. It has been found that MLD and the percentage of the total lung volume (lung V5, V10, V20, V30, V40, V50, and V60) of the lung volume that received more than a certain dose of irradiation are independent risk factors for RP after 3D-CRT treatment of NSCLC [31,32,33]. Besides, it has been reported that MLD, V20, V30, V40, and V50 have predictive significance for RILI in NSCLC patients treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy [34].

Diabetes, smoking, and COPD are risk factors related to RILI. This study shows that smoking is a risk factor for RILI. Some studies [14, 35, 36] have shown that smoking is an independent protective factor for RP. It is considered that the hypoxia and immunosuppression caused by smoking may be related to the increased lung tolerance of smoking patients [37]. Studies [30, 38] have pointed out that factors such as smoking, COPD, and ventilatory dysfunction can increase the risk of RILI. It is recommended that lung diffusion function be tested before radiotherapy to evaluate lung function status [39]. Therefore, in radiotherapy, attention should be paid to the exposure volume and exposure dose [40]. At the same time, if the patient has diabetes, smoking, COPD, concurrent chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, the total dose should be optimized and preventive measures should be taken to reduce the occurrence of RILI [41]. Previous studies [42, 43] have shown that complications such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and ventilatory dysfunction caused by smoking can increase the risk of lung injury. It is recommended that the lung diffusion function be tested before radiotherapy to evaluate the status of lung function.

This study also has certain shortcomings that must be considered. Firstly, the sample size of this study, especially the number of cases in the RILI group, was small, so the statistical efficiency might be underpowered to detect the potential difference. Secondly, given the limited data, we could not do further subgroup analysis on the severity of RILI. Thirdly, radiation-induced lung injuries can also appear after 3 months, limited by collected data; we only analyzed the radiation-induced lung injuries within 3 months; future studies with longer follow-up are needed. Besides, there may be certain differences in radiotherapy doses and schedules in various hospitals, and future large-sample multi-center studies are needed to further analyze and explore related influencing factors of RILI in NSCLC patients.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have found that the incidence of RILI in NSCLC patients is 35.71%, and for patients with diabetes, smoke, COPD, concurrent chemotherapy, radiotherapy dose≥60Gy, and PTV ≥ 396, they may have higher risk factors of RILI; early alert and preventative measures are needed for those patients. At present, the prevention and treatment of RILI are still a difficult problem to solve, and its occurrence is related to many factors. It must be noted that our cohort may be exceedingly small heterogenous that cannot be applied to a larger cohort limited by the small sample size. The clinical value of the observation indicators in this study needs to be further verified in future studies. Moreover, the mechanism of RILI and related influencing factors also needs to be explored in the future.