Correction to: Cancer Cell Int 19:109 (2019)https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-019-0821-2

Following the publication of the original article [1], we were notified of a misalignment in Fig. 10a.

The corrected Fig. 10 (Fig. 10) is presented in this erratum.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Target relationship between miR-103a and BDNF. a Online prediction software predicted the targeting relationship between miR-103a and BDNF. b Experiment of luciferase activity to verify the targeting relationship between miR-103a and BDNF. The t test or the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparison. After ANOVA analysis, the Fisher’s least significant difference t test (LSD-t) was used for pairwise comparison. Repetitions = 3; * <  0.05 vs. the mimics NC group