Correction: BMC Med 20, 398 (2022)

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02595-8

The original article [1] contained two errors in Fig. 4:

  1. 1)

    The labels of the two groups – response vs. non-response – were mistakenly switched.

  2. 2)

    The HR in panel A was incorrectly stated as 0.38 instead of 0.308.

The figure has been updated in the original article to reflect these amendments.