Erratum
Following the publication of this article [1] it was brought to our attention that two values in Table 4 were incorrect:
-
1.
In the Sabarkantha district, under the Deficit column, number 73 should read 37.
-
2.
In the Dahod district, under the Deficit column, number 12 should read 13.
References
Salazar M, et al. The dominance of the private sector in the provision of emergency obstetric care: studies from Gujarat, India. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:225. doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1473-8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1473-8.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Salazar, M., Vora, K. & De Costa, A. Erratum to: The dominance of the private sector in the provision of emergency obstetric care: studies from Gujarat, India. BMC Health Serv Res 16, 369 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1559-3
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1559-3