Peer review reports
From: The perceived relevance, utility and retention of basic sciences in general practice
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
10 Apr 2024 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
22 Apr 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
23 Apr 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Valerie Minogue |
29 Apr 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ameya Ashok Hasamnis |
29 Apr 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amber Heck |
14 Jun 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Bunmi S. Malau-Aduli |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
14 Jun 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
21 Jun 2024 | Author responded | Author comments - Bunmi S. Malau-Aduli |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
21 Jun 2024 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
28 Jun 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Valerie Minogue |
5 Jul 2024 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Publishing | ||
8 Jul 2024 | Editorially accepted | |
29 Jul 2024 | Article published | 10.1186/s12909-024-05750-2 |