Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Correction to: BMC Palliat Care
Following publication of the original article [1], an error in reference 18 was reported.
Reference 18 did not include all authors. The correct reference should read: Romo RD, Lynn J. The utility and value of the “surprise question” for patients with serious illness. Can Med Assoc J. 2017;189(33):E1072–3.
Reference
White N, Oostendorp L, Vickerstaff V, Gerlach C, Engels Y, Maessen M, Tomlinson C, Wens J, Leysen B, Biasco G, Zambrano S, Eychmüller S, Avgerinou C, Chattat R, Ottoboni G, Veldhoven C, Stone P. An online international comparison of thresholds for triggering a negative response to the “Surprise Question”: a study protocol. BMC Palliat Care. 2019;18:36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
White, N., Oostendorp, L., Vickerstaff, V. et al. Correction to: An online international comparison of thresholds for triggering a negative response to the “Surprise Question”: a study protocol. BMC Palliat Care 19, 15 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-0518-2
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-0518-2