Introduction

Hip fracture in the elderly has attracted extensive attention due to its epidemiological characteristics. Its incidence is high. Even studies in China and South Korea showed an upward trend [1, 2]. A study from China reported that the incidence of hip fractures over 60 years of age increased from 2007 (63.57%) to 2018 (74.05%) [1]. The high mortality rate associated with hip fractures has been well documented in studies and surveys in the United States and Europe [3,4,5]. It was reported that the one-year mortality was 30% rate after hip surgery [4]. Finally, it impairs patients’ long-term quality of life and increases the economic burden on families and even the whole society [6, 7].

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common complication of fracture. It can have many adverse effects, such as pulmonary embolism, edema of the injured limb, superficial varicose veins, and secondary ulceration or necrosis. Among patients with hip fractures, elderly patients were more likely to develop DVT, with incidence rates ranging from 16.3–66.7%[8,9,10,11]. Recently, many risk factors have been confirmed to be closely related to DVT after hip fracture. For example, Song et al. showed that long immobilization duration and increased D-dimer levels were associated with preoperative DVT independently [11]. Another study identified risk factors including age, female sex, time waiting for surgery, and time from injury to admission, in addition to confirming the previous study [10]. Other factors included kidney failure, recent surgery, smoking, clinical signs, and coronary heart disease (CHD) [8, 9, 12].

Serum albumin is a protein synthesized by the liver. Albumin could increase blood volume, maintain plasma colloid osmotic pressure, and combine with many insoluble small molecules in the body to form soluble substances for transport and detoxification. Furthermore, it stabilized globulin and could be used as a nutrient to participate in various reactions. When the human body has severe protein malnutrition or malabsorption, the liver cannot obtain raw materials to synthesize albumin, and its content in the human body decreases. Therefore, albumin could be used as an indicator to reflect low nutritional status. Serum albumin was the strongest clinical predictor of cost [13]. Several studies have jointly demonstrated that low serum albumin level increases mortality and postoperative complications after hip fracture surgery in the elderly [14,15,16]. Similarly, other studies have shown that serum albumin level was positively correlated with the progression of bony healing, which could be used as an early predictor [17]. Furthermore, studies have shown that serum albumin levels on admission to the emergency department could predict in-hospital complications in elderly trauma patients [18]. Meanwhile, several recent studies have reported the correlation between albumin and DVT after hip fracture. By multivariate analysis, Zuo found that decreased albumin (< 31.7 g/L) was an independent risk factor associated with DVT in bilateral lower extremities after intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly [19]. Zhao also agreed that hypoproteinemia was a risk factor for DVT in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures, although the standard for albumin was less than 35 g/L [20]. Through extensive data analysis, Wang found that patients with albumin < 35 g/ L were associated with an excess risk of DVT after hip fractures [21].

However, the detailed relationship between albumin and DVT after hip fracture was not known, nor was it clear whether there was a nonlinear relationship between them. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the association between albumin and DVT after hip fracture.

Materials and methods

Study design

In this retrospective cohort study, we recruited older adults who had a hip fracture from 1 to 2015 to 30 Sep 2019 at the largest trauma center in Northwest China.

This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xi’an Honghui Hospital (No. 202201009). All patients provided informed consent. All human-related procedures followed the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The study has been reported according to the STROCSS 2021 guidelines [22].

Participants

Demographic and clinical data of the patients were obtained from their original medical records. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age ≥ 65 years; (2) X-ray or computed tomography diagnosis of the femoral neck, intertrochanteric, or subtrochanteric fracture; (3) patients who were receiving surgical or conservative treatment in the hospital; (4) availability of clinical data when in the hospital [23]. The exclusion criteria: patients did not receive the anticoagulation treatment.

Hospital treatment

Patients were examined using blood tests to prepare for surgery. Prophylaxis for DVT was initiated at admission. Mechanical thromboprophylaxis (foot intermittent pneumatic compression sleeve, 20 min twice daily) was used to prevent DVT. For patients without contraindications, low molecular weight heparin (Fraxiparine; Glaxo Wellcome Production, GlaxoSmithKline) was injected subcutaneously to prevent DVT [24]. We used Doppler ultrasonography to diagnose the DVT. The diagnostic criteria are the presence of a constant intraluminal filling defect shown in Fig. 1. Patients were examined preoperatively. All patients underwent ultrasonography of bilateral lower extremities on the day before the scheduled surgery [24].

Fig. 1
figure 1

DVT in Doppler ultrasonography (Yellow arrow)

Endpoint events

The endpoint event in this study was DVT before operation.

Variables

The dependent variable was preoperative DVT, and the independent variable was the albumin level. Other variables were potentially confounding factors.

Statistics analysis

Continuous variables are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD)(Gaussian distribution) or median (min, max)(Skewed distribution), and categorical variables are given as frequencies and percentages. We used χ2 (categorical variables), the One-way ANOVA test (normal distribution), or the Kruskal-Whallis H test (skewed distribution) to test for differences among different albumin (quartile). We divided the patients into four groups to describe demographic and clinical characteristics according to albumin level. We used univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression models to test the connection between albumin and preoperative DVT with three distinct models [24].

All analyses were performed using statistical software packages R (http://www.R-project.org, R Foundation) and EmpowerStats (http://www.empowerstats.com, X&Y Solutions Inc., Boston, MA, USA). Odds ratios (OR) and 95%CI were calculated. A P-value < 0.05 (two-sided) was considered to represent statistical significance.

Results

Patient characteristics

We enrolled 1819 participants who met the study criteria. The average age was 79.37 ± 6.88 years. There were 550 males and 1269 females. The preoperative albumin was 38.19 ± 4.07 g/L. There were 580 (31.89%) preoperative DVTs, and eight patients were pulmonary embolism. There were two deaths after the operation. There were 12 patients with DVT in proximal veins (femoral and iliac veins), 565 in distal veins (calf muscle, fibular, anterior/posterior tibial, and popliteal veins), and 3 in proximal and distal veins.

Table 1 lists the demographic and clinical characteristics of all 1819 patients and including comorbidities, factors associated with injuries, and treatment strategies.

Table 1 The Demographic and clinical characteristics

Univariate analysis of the association between variates and DVT

We performed univariate analysis to identify potential confounding factors and the relationship between variables and DVT (Table 2). According to the criteria of P < 0.1, the following variables were considered in the multivariate binary logistic regression model: sex, fracture classification, multiple injuries, dementia, time to operation, and hemoglobin.

Table 2 Effects of factors on DVT measured by univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis between preoperative albumin and DVT

We used three models (Table 3) to correlate preoperative albumin levels and DVT. When albumin concentration was a continuous variable, linear regression was observed. The fully adjusted model showed a DVT risk decrease of 7% (OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.90–0.96), P < 0.0001) when albumin concentration increased by one g/L after controlling for confounding factors. When albumin concentration was used as a categorical variable, we found statistically significant differences in the albumin concentration groups of the three models (P < 0.0001). In addition, the P for trend also showed a linear correlation in the three models (P < 0.0001).

Table 3 Univariate and multivariate results by linear regression

However, we found that the changing interval was slowed down in the Q4 subgroup of albumin concentration (Table 3). This instability indicated the possibility of a nonlinear correlation.

Curve fitting and analysis of threshold effect

As shown in Fig. 2, there was a linear association between preoperative albumin level and DVT after adjusting for confounding factors. We compared two fitting models to explain this association (Table 4), and we did not observe an inflection point in the model.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Curve fitting between preoperative albumin and DVT. Adjusted for sex, fracture classification, multiple injuries, dementia, time to operation, hemoglobin, D-dimer

Table 4 Nonlinearity of preoperative albumin and DVT

Propensity score matching (PSM)

To test the robustness of our results, we performed sensitivity analysis using PSM, as shown in Figure S1 and Table S1-S3.

There were 1060 patients (58.27%) successfully matched (Figure S1; Table S1-S3). Some variables did not match the two groups (Table S2), including sex, fracture classification, hypertension, ischemic stroke, dementia, gastritis, time to operation, and hemoglobin. We found that the results were stable in the multivariate linear regression results under the PSM and PSM-adjusted models (Table S3).

Discussion

We found a linear association between the serum albumin level and preoperative DVT in geriatric patients with hip fractures. The higher the albumin level, the lower incidence of preoperative DVT. This detailed result showed a DVT risk decrease of 6% (OR = 0.94) when albumin concentration increased by one g/L after controlling for confounding factors. Compared to the Q1 level, Q2, Q3, and Q4 groups could decrease the DVT risk by 29%, 31%, and 45% (OR = 0.71, 0.69, 0.55, respectively). In clinical practice, preoperative albumin concentrations are a predictor of DVT risk.

Several retrospective, prospective studies and systematic reviews have revealed associations between albumin concentration at admission and DVT in geriatric patients with hip fractures in screening the risk factors. A retrospective study by Song et al. reported that a lower albumin level was the independent risk factor for preoperative DVT in 266 patients [25]. Wang et al. reported that reduced albumin was associated with preoperative DVT in a risk prediction model [26]. In a meta-analysis, Wang et al. found that albumin < 35 g/L was a risk factor for preoperative DVT [21]. However, Ding et al. reported that reduced albumin was not associated with preoperative DVT in young and middle-aged patients after hip fracture [27]. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, Kobayashi et al. summarized 3123 Asian patients with hip fractures in 9 studies and found that low albumin was not associated with preoperative DVT [28]. As for this inconsistency results, it might be the age that we consider the most critical factor influencing the outcome because the albumin level varies in different age populations [29]. We have added summary evidence of Table 5 in the association between albumin and DVT. In previous studies [21, 25,26,27,28], age is a potential confounding factor and should be divided into different levels. In this study, we only included patients with age > 65 years, and age is not a potential risk factor for preoperative DVT in this study (P = 0.6281). Thus, this study included patients with high homogeneity and concluded a clear result for elderly patients ≥ 65 years. In addition, we analyzed the relationship between albumin level and DVT purely and found a stable association. The fully adjusted model showed a DVT risk decrease of 6% when albumin concentration increased by one g/L. However, previous studies only found that albumin was an independent risk factor.

Table 5 The summary evidences the association between albumin and DVT.

In addition, the previous studies showed that low serum albumin level was associated with later DVT, and the albumin concentration was divided into a different level, such as < 35 g/L and < 35 g/L [21, 26], < 31.7 g/L and > 31.7 g/L [19]. In Song’s study, they found that the effect size was OR = 0.88 (95%CI: 0.78–0.99; P = 0.039) for intertrochanteric fractures. In our study, when we divided the patients into intertrochanteric fracture, femoral neck fracture, and subtrochanteric fracture, we found that the effect size was OR = 0.94 (95%CI: 0.91–0.98; P = 0.0065); OR = 0.92 (95%CI: 0.88–0.97; P = 0.0017) and OR = 0.93 (95%CI: 0.90–0.96; P = 0.0001), respectively. The mean age is 79.37 years in our study, close to 74.5 years in Song’s study [25]. Thus, the effect size in our study is near to Song’s study [25].

Although previous studies have reported a progressive reduction in serum albumin concentration associated with aging [33,34,35], a meta-analysis showed that the average level of albumin in the community (41.13 g/L) was assessed in older people [36]. However, serum albumin concentration rapidly declined when a hip fracture occurred. In our study, the albumin concentration at admission was 38.19 ± 4.07 g/L. The reason for the acute loss of albumin remains unclear. It is possible that hidden blood loss was the main reason, as described by Liu et al., who reported that an albumin level < 30 g/L at admission was associated with a greater likelihood of more hidden blood loss [37]. According to our results, low albumin concentration was associated with increasing preoperative DVT. In the field of hip fracture, future studies were needed to conduct the randomized controlled trial, showing the effect of albumin supplementation on preoperative DVT.

During the analysis, to explore the actual relationship between albumin and DVT, we not only carried out a linear regression using different adjusted models but also changed the continuous variable of albumin to a categorical variable or performed a trend test for the result. The three models showed a linear association between albumin and preoperative DVT. Furthermore, we also used the PSM method to verify our result in the sensitivity analysis. It matched 1060 patients in PSM analysis, accounting for 58.27% of all patients in this study. Eight variables did not match between the two groups. In the binary logistic regression results under the PSM and PSM adjusted models, we found that the results are the same as those from all the patients. Thus, our results are stable. The PSM exhibited more empirical power than logistic regression [38]. Additionally, we considered confounders that were included in earlier studies, including advanced age [8, 21, 25], sex [9], time to operation [8, 21], hemoglobin [21], dementia [21]. We adjusted the factor of P < 0.1 in the univariate analysis, such multiple injuries. Therefore, we comprehensively considered the variables that needed to be adjusted. In addition, we explored the curve association and found no threshold or saturation effect, which supplements the stability of the linear association.

Acutely, this study had some limitations. First, this conclusion applies only to patients aged ≥ 65 because we only included this population in this study. The relationship between albumin and preoperative DVT is unclear for young patients with hip fractures. Second, several factors would increase hypercoagulability. As with a fracture and needing help for the loo, most people reduce their oral intake of food and water. This automatically increases hyper coagulability possibly. We could not collect all these variates because of the nature of the retrospective study, especially the factors before the admission. Thirdly, this study could not confirm the causal relationship between albumin and DVT. In addition, another major limitation of logistic regression was that there was an assumption of linearity between the preoperative DVT and the independent variables.

Conclusion

The serum albumin is associated with preoperative DVT in geriatric patients with hip fractures, and it could be considered a predictor for the risk of DVT.