Abstract
Background
To examine trends in weight change patterns from young adulthood through midlife to late adulthood and their sex and racial/ethnic disparities among US adults from 1988 to 2018.
Methods
A total of 48,969 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988–1994 and 2001–2018 were included.
Results
The age-adjusted prevalence of stable non-obesity between young adulthood and midlife declined significantly from 84.1% (95 CI, 82.9-85.3%) in 1988–1994 to 68.7% (67.1-70.2%) in 2013–2018, and between midlife and late adulthood from 71.2% (69.2-73.1%) to 52.4% (50.5-54.2%). The magnitude of increase in the prevalence of weight gain from young adulthood to midlife (from 10.8% [9.9-11.6%] in 1988–1994 to 21.2% [20-22.3%] in 2013–2018; P < 0.001 for trend) was greater than that from midlife to late adulthood (from 14.1% [12.9-15.3%] to 17.2% [16.2-18.1%]; P = 0.002 for trend). The magnitude of increase in the prevalence of stable obesity from young adulthood to midlife (from 3.9% [3.1-4.8%] in 1988–1994 to 9.2% [8.2-10.3%] in 2013–2018; P < 0.001 for trend) was smaller than that from midlife to late adulthood (from 11.2% [10.1-12.2%] to 24.8% [23.3-26.3%]; P < 0.001 for trend). The declining trends in the prevalence of stable non-obesity and increasing trends in the prevalence of weight gain and stable obesity from young adulthood through midlife to late adulthood were also observed for all sex and race/ethnicity subgroups. The magnitude of decrease in the prevalence of stable non-obesity, and the magnitude of increase in the prevalence of weight gain from young adulthood through midlife to late adulthood were greater in men than in women (all P for interaction < 0.01). Weight gain patterns for those aged ≥ 65 years were substantially different from the younger age groups.
Conclusions
More young people born in later years are encountering obesity and accumulate greater obesity exposure across their lives than young people born in earlier years.
Similar content being viewed by others
Background
The obesity epidemic is a major global public health concern. Many studies have examined trends in obesity to provide evidence to inform policy efforts and prevention programs [1,2,3]. However, most of these prior studies ignored the patterns of weight change across the life course. Emerging prospective cohort studies are now focusing on the effects of weight change over the life course on cardiometabolic risk [4,5,6,7,8,9]. It has been shown that weight change patterns in different life periods are important factors contributing to the variation observed in cardiometabolic risk [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Specifically, weight gain during earlier adulthood (i.e. between 25 and 40 years of age) has been associated with a higher risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), CVD mortality, and certain types of cancer than weight gain in later life (i.e. between 40 and 55 years of age) [4,5,6,7]. Weight change is common during an individual’s adulthood since adults are more likely to cumulate their excessive adiposity and thus accumulate weight rapidly from young adulthood to midlife, whereas weight begins to stabilize or even decrease across midlife to late adulthood [14]. The peak of obesity rates is trending increasingly towards younger ages [15], indicating that later-born generations accumulate greater exposure to obesity throughout their lives. Therefore, it is crucial to track how weight has changed from young adulthood through midlife to late adulthood over time. This important topic is not well studied but has clinical and public health ramifications.
The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) have routinely asked questions about participants’ weight histories (weight at age 25 [young adulthood] and weight at 10 years before their age at survey time [midlife]), and measured weight at the time of survey (late adulthood). Therefore, data from these surveys can be used to examine trends in weight change patterns across life course and their sex and racial/ethnic disparities among US adults.
Methods
Study design and population
Data for this study were drawn from the NHANES, which used a complex stratified, multistage probability cluster sampling design to ensure that the sample is nationally representative of the civilian, noninstitutionalized US population. Full details of the survey have been described elsewhere [16]. Briefly, NHANES was conducted periodically before 1999 and on a continuous basis thereafter in 2-year cycles. Participants were interviewed at home for basic sociodemographic and health-related information. After the in-home interview, participants are invited to attend a mobile examination center, where they underwent a set of standardized physical examinations and laboratory measurements. The survey procedures were reviewed and approved by the National Center for Health Statistics ethics review board (this is a full name of ethics committee) in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
In the present study, we used data from the NHANES III (1988–1994) and nine 2-year NHANES cycles (between 2001 and 2002 and 2017 to 2018). The examination response rate for adults during these cycles ranges from 77.6% in NHANES III to 47.7% in 2017–2018. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has evaluated the data and conducted enhanced weighting adjustment for the decreased response rate in recent years to minimize potential nonresponse bias.
We combined the nine 2-year NHANES cycles into three 6-year periods (2001–2006, 2007–2012, and 2013–2018) to produce estimates with greater statistical reliability and smaller sampling error. We included participants aged 35 or over at the time of survey. We excluded pregnant women and individuals with missing observations for BMI at the time of survey. We also excluded individuals missing self-reported weight at age 25 or 10 years before the survey time. Ultimately, a sample size of 48,969 participants (1988–1994 [n = 11,773], 2001–2006 [n = 11,077], 2007–2012 [n = 13,290], and 2013–2018 [n = 12,829]) remained for analysis.
Assessments of weight and weight history
Respondents were asked to recall their weight at age 25 and 10 years before the survey time during the home interview. Weight and height at the time of survey were measured by trained staff following standardized protocols. Body mass index (BMI) at age 25 years (BMIage25, early adulthood), at 10 years before the survey time (BMI10prior, midlife), and at the time of survey (BMIsurvey, late adulthood) were calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. To account for the possibility of height decline with age, self-reported height at age 25 was used to calculate BMIage25 for participants who were 50 years or older at the time of survey. In other cases, measured height was used to calculate BMI. BMI values at each time were categorized into normal weight (18.5–24.9), overweight (25.0-29.9), and obesity (≥ 30.0) according to clinical guidelines [17].
Outcomes
The primary outcomes were BMI change patterns. BMI change patterns were generated to capture weight change from young adulthood through midlife to late adulthood of an individual. Specifically, BMI changes between BMIage25 and BMI10prior captured weight change from early adulthood to midlife; BMI changes between BMI10prior and BMIsurvey captured weight change from midlife to late adulthood; BMI changes between BMIage25 and BMIsurvey captured weight change across the whole adulthood.
For each life stage, we defined four BMI change groups based on BMI (kg/m2) at two time points (eTable 1) following a recent study by Stokes et al. [6]: stable non-obesity (BMI < 30.0 at both times), weight loss (BMI ≥ 30.0 at younger age and < 30.0 later), weight gain (BMI < 30.0 at younger age and ≥ 30.0 later), and stable obesity (BMI ≥ 30.0 at both times).
Reports suggested that rates of weight change vary with age and can accelerate the development of diabetes and CVD [18]. We also examined rates of weight change. For each time interval, we calculated the rate of weight change by dividing the weight change (defined as weight at later age minus weight at younger age) by the time difference in years between the time intervals.
Other variables
For all surveys, all participants were asked to complete a standardized questionnaire which collected information on age, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking habits, and histories of current and previous illness.
Self-reported race/ethnicity was categorized as Mexican American, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, and other. Self-reported smoking status was categorized as never-smokers, former smokers, and current smokers. Never smokers were defined as smoke less than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime.
Data analysis
Complex survey procedures in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina) were performed for all analyses. According to the NHANES analytic guidelines, sample weights, which adjusted for the unequal selection probabilities due to the sample design, nonresponse, and noncoverage were incorporated to produce nationally representative estimates. Both NHANES III and the continuous NHANES target the civilian noninstitutionalized U.S. population. Like other reports [19,20,21], weighting was conducted separately within each survey period (NHANES III and NHANES continuous) to make population in each survey period to be nationally representative. To maximize the comparability between surveys, means, and percentages for participants aged 35 years or older were age-adjusted by the direct method to the 2000 US Census population data using the age categories of 35–49 years, 50–64 years, and ≥ 65 years. In 2000, the proportion of adults aged 35–49 years, 50–64 years, and ≥ 65 years or older were 0.459, 0.294, and 0.247, respectively. Continuous variables were expressed as means (95% confidence intervals [CI]). Categorical variables were expressed as percentages (95% CI). Standard errors of the means and percentages used to calculate 95% CI were estimated by Taylor Series Linearization. For sensitivity analysis, we also calculated the unadjusted values and trends. We assessed linear trends using survey-weighted logistic (weight change patterns), or linear (rates of weight change) regression models with survey as a continuous independent variable. Age, sex, and race/ethnicity were adjusted in these models except when used as a stratified variable. To assess statistical heterogeneity of trends by subgroups, a survey-weighted Wald test was used to test for an interaction term between survey and categorical variables.
For sensitivity analyses, we repeated our trend analyses when participants aged 45 or older at the time of survey were included to avoid the issue that middle and late adulthood being either the same or very close together for some participants. Furthermore, we investigated trends in weight change patterns from 1988 to 1994 to 2013–2018 among participants aged between 45 and 65 years at the time of survey and among participants aged ≥ 65 years at the time of survey, since there are known differences in weight change patterns with older age.
Two-sided P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Participant characteristics
Table 1 presented the characteristics of the sample from each survey. From 1988 to 2018, the proportion of younger adults and respondents from non-Hispanic White individuals declined, while the proportion of other races/ethnicities increased notably; The estimated prevalence of obesity at age 25, at 10 years before the survey time, and at the time of survey increased significantly (P < 0.001 for all trends). BMIage25, BMI10prior, and BMIsurvey increased from 1988 to 1994 to 2013–2018 (P < 0.001 for all trends). Differences between BMIage25 and BMI10prior or between BMIage25 and BMIsurvey presented in earlier surveys were larger than that in later surveys.
Trends in weight change patterns across life course
Trends in weight change patterns were shown in Fig. 1 (overall) and eTable 2 (by race/ethnicity). The age-adjusted prevalence of stable non-obesity between young adulthood and midlife declined from 84.1% (82.9-85.3%) in 1988–1994 to 68.7% (67.1-70.2%) in 2013–2018 (P < 0.001 for trend), and between midlife and late adulthood from 71.2% (69.2-73.1%) to 52.4% (50.5-54.2%) (P < 0.001 for trend) (Fig. 1). The age-adjusted prevalence of weight gain between young adulthood and midlife increased from 10.8% (9.9-11.6%) in 1988–1994 to 21.2% (20-22.3%) in 2013–2018 (P < 0.001 for trend), and between midlife and late adulthood from 14.1% (12.9-15.3%) to 17.2% (6.2-18.1%) (P = 0.002 for trend). Of note, the magnitude of increase in the percentage of weight gain from young adulthood to midlife (10.4-percentage point increase) was much greater than that from midlife to late adulthood (3.1-percentage point increase) (P for interaction < 0.001). The age-adjusted prevalence of stable obesity between young adulthood and midlife increased from 3.9% (3.1-4.8%) in 1988–1994 to 9.2% (8.2-10.3%) in 2013–2018 (P < 0.001 for trend), and between midlife and late adulthood from 11.2% (10.1-12.2%) to 24.8% (23.3-26.3%) (P < 0.001 for trend). The increase in the prevalence of stable obesity from midlife to late adulthood (13.7-percentage point increase) was greater than that from young adulthood to midlife (5.3-percentage point increase) (P for interaction < 0.001) (Fig. 1). The prevalence of stable non-obesity declined and the prevalence of stable obesity increased over time from midlife to late adulthood in all race/ethnicity subgroups (P < 0.01 for trend). (eTable 2). The prevalence of weight gain increased over time from midlife to late adulthood in all race/ethnicity subgroups except for Mexican American individuals (eTable 2).
The age-adjusted prevalence of weight loss from young adulthood to midlife did not change significantly, while it slightly increased from midlife to late adulthood (3.6% [3.1-4.1%] in 1988–1994 versus 5.6% [5.0-6.3%] in 2013–2018; P < 0.001 for linear trend).
Trends in weight change patterns across the whole adulthood were extremely similar to those from young adulthood to midlife (Fig. 1 and eTable 2).
Since accumulating evidence has shown sex disparities in obesity as well as the epidemiology, progression, and outcomes of chronic disease such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease [22, 23], we stratified the data by sex (Table 2). The prevalence of stable non-obesity declined and the prevalence of weight gain as well as stable obesity from young adulthood through midlife to late adulthood increased over time for both men and women. Of note, the magnitude of decrease in the percentage of stable non-obesity, and the magnitude of increase in the percentage of weight gain from young adulthood through midlife to late adulthood was greater in men than in women (all P for interaction < 0.01). The age-adjusted prevalence of weight loss from young adulthood to midlife did not change in men (from 1.7 [1.1-2.2%] in 1988–1994 to 0.9% [0.5-1.2%] in 2013–2018; P = 0.003 for trend), while it slightly increased in women (P = 0.03 for trend).
The unadjusted prevalence and trends in weight change patterns were shown in eTable 3–4.
The characteristics of participants presenting with weight loss from young adulthood to midlife were shown in eTable 5. From 1988 to 2018, the proportion of men showing weight loss declined. BMIage25, BMI10prior, and BMIsurvey for participants showing weight loss increased from 1988 to 1994 to 2013–2018 (P < 0 0.05 for all trends).
Trends in the rates of weight change across life course
The rate of weight gain from young adulthood to midlife increased from 0.53 kg/year (0.48–0.58 kg/year) in 1988–1994 to 0.69 kg/year (0.64–0.74 kg/year) in 2013–2018 (P < 0.001 for trend) (Table 3). Conversely, the rate of weight gain increased slower from midlife to late adulthood (from 0.14 kg/year [0.12–0.15 kg/year] to 0.13 kg/year [0.12–0.14 kg/year]; P = 0.061). The rate of weight gain across the whole adulthood increased from 0.51 kg/year (0.48–0.53 kg/year) in 1988–1994 to 0.59 kg/year (0.57–0.62 kg/year) in 2013–2018 (P < 0.001 for trend). The faster rate of weight gain from young adulthood to midlife than that from midlife to late adulthood was also noted in women, Mexican Americans, and non-Hispanic Whites.
The unadjusted means and trends in the rates of weight change were shown in eTable 6.
The rate of weight gain or loss since age 25 could potentially be different despite similar absolute weight changes. We repeated our trend analyses stratified by age at the time of the survey. Results were essentially the same in each age group (eTable 7). Weight gain patterns for those over 65 years were substantially different from the younger age groups. For example, values of the rate of weight gain in the younger age groups are generally greater than 0.60 kg/year, while in older adults, values are generally less than 0.30 kg/year.
Sensitivity analyses
We repeated our trend analyses when limiting our sample size to participants aged 45 or older at the time of survey, results were essentially the same (eTable 8–9). Moreover, to avoid the effect of older age on weight change, we investigated trends in weight change patterns among participants aged between 45 and 65 years at the time of survey, results were also remarkably the same (eTable 10–11). We also repeated our trend analyses when limiting our sample size to participants aged ≥ 65 years at the time of survey, results were essentially the same (eTable 12).
Discussion
This study used the NHANES survey data to examine trends in weight change patterns and their sex or racial/ethnic disparities among US adults from 1988 to 1994 to 2013–2018. We found that from young adulthood through midlife to late adulthood, the age-adjusted prevalence of stable non-obesity decreased, whereas the prevalence of weight gain, as well as stable obesity increased over time, with little variation among sex or racial/ethnic groups. To our knowledge, our novel findings represent the most comprehensive evaluation of trends in how the process of obesity development across adulthood has changed among US adults.
Our findings that the prevalence of weight gain from young adulthood through middle to late adulthood increased significantly from 1988 to 1994 to 2013–2018, with greater increases from young adulthood to midlife than from midlife to late adulthood. Our study also showed that the prevalence of stable obesity from young adulthood through middle adulthood to late adulthood increased significantly from 1988 to 1994 to 2013–2018, with smaller increases from young adulthood to midlife than from midlife to late adulthood. These findings are in agreement with ①other secular trend studies showing an increasing BMI in younger individuals over time [15, 24], and ②other studies showing that people in young adulthood having obesity are likely to have obesity or gain more weight in later life [12, 25,26,27]. Our results suggest that the number of individuals with obesity in young adulthood was much greater than the number of young people born in earlier years and, if the observed trends continue, the majority of people are likely to develop obesity at younger ages and thus younger individuals born more recently are accumulating greater exposure to obesity throughout their lives. Studies showed that young adulthood represents a time period in which obesity, and its cumulative exposure lay an important foundation for a wide range of cardiometabolic disease in later life [12, 28, 29]. Therefore, it is obviously important to develop policies and programs aimed at preventing early obesity onset, and thus reducing lifetime obesity exposure to reduce future cardiometabolic disease burden.
In the present study, our results that weight gain patterns in older adults were substantially different from that in younger adults and that declining trends in the age-adjusted prevalence of stable non-obesity from young adulthood through middle adulthood to late adulthood from 1988 to 1994 to 2013–2018 might be due to the faster rates of weight gain from young adulthood to midlife, which is likely linked to an earlier development of obesity and thus induce an increasing number of young people suffering from weight gain.
The low prevalence of weight loss which remained essentially unchanged, and the declining trend in the prevalence of stable non-obesity, and statistically increasing trend in the prevalence of weight gain from young adulthood to midlife over time as well as the dramatic increasing trend in the prevalence of stable obesity from midlife to late adulthood observed in our study may explain the continuously high obesity prevalence (more than one-third of the population) [1, 3] and increasing trends in obesity over time [3].
In the present study, we identified significant sex differences in weight change patterns: ①Men had a greater magnitude of decrease in the prevalence of stable non-obesity, and greater magnitude of increase in the percentage of weight gain from young adulthood through midlife to late adulthood than women; ②less number of men showing weight loss in recent surveys. There is a well-recognized diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk disparity by sex, with lower risk in women than in men [22, 23]. Our findings may indicate that men tended to put on more weight in their early life and thus inducing a worse cardiovascular risk profiles and greater diabetes and cardiovascular incidence.
In the present study, we also noted racial/ethnicity differences in weight change patterns. Evidence has shown racial/ethnicity disparities in the epidemiology, progression, and outcomes of diabetes and cardiovascular disease [30, 31]. Our findings may offer new insights into the risk disparity in diabetes and cardiovascular disease by race/ethnicity.
The prevalence of weight gain and stable obesity from young adulthood through midlife to late adulthood increased significantly in almost all subgroups, suggesting an obesogenic environment and broad behavioral, sociocultural, and economic causes [32,33,34,35,36,37]. For example, environmental endocrine disruptors, changes in food environment and food systems that increase availability, accessibility, and affordability of energy-dense foods, increasingly mechanized transportation and labor that promote inactivity, insufficient sleep, and occupational status (stress, and shift work) have been considered as major drivers [32,33,34,35,36,37].
The main strength of this study is the use of data from NHANES, which collected weight information from young adulthood through midlife to late adulthood, and thus facilitating evaluation of the dynamic aspects of weight progression across age and time. We were able to comprehensively evaluate trends in how the process of weight change from young adulthood through midlife to late adulthood has happened. By the inclusion of more recently survey, the present study further demonstrates how the later-born individuals have changed their weight (compared to earlier-born individuals) because of earlier exposure to the obesogenic environment. Since weight gain from young adulthood to midlife reflects mainly fat mass accumulation, while weight loss from midlife to late adulthood usually reflects a decrease in lean mass [38], assessment of weight change patterns in different life periods can reflect individual differences in lean mass, fat, as well as other aspects of body composition including bone mass, muscle loss, etc. In addition, a large sample size allows us to examine the potential differences by sociodemographic subgroups.
This study has several limitations. Firstly, we relied on historic, self-reported weight measures, which may introduce classification error. Several validation studies evidenced a relatively high level of agreement between self-reported weight and measured weight [39]. The recalled weight in early life can be used as a valid measure in life course epidemiological analysis [40]. However, several reports noted that self-reporting tends to overestimate height and underestimate weight, and thus BMI and the obesity prevalence will be underestimated [41, 42]. An underestimation of weight and an overestimation of height causes a multiplication of errors and, thus, may contribute to incorrect indication of body fat distribution as well as diagnostic decisions. Secondly, for adults aged 35 years and slightly older at the time of the survey, their middle adulthood and late adulthood weight would be either the same or very close together. However, we did a sensitivity analysis by including participants aged 45 or older at the time of survey, and the results were essentially the same. Thirdly, weight change patterns were assessed by BMI status and not by measurements of body fatness. Body fatness at a given BMI or weight may vary by sex and race/ethnicity [43,44,45]. However, evidence showed that BMI and body fatness are highly correlated [44].
Conclusions
This study provides the trends in how weight has changed across the whole adulthood in the US. Our results demonstrate that from 1988 to 1994 to 2013–2018, the age-adjusted prevalence of stable non-obesity decreased, whereas the prevalence of weight gain as well as stable obesity increased across the whole adulthood, with little variation among sex or racial/ethnic groups. Therefore, more young people are encountering obesity and accumulate greater obesity exposure across their lives than young people born in earlier years. These findings may inform discussions on areas for greater attention and corresponding opportunities for improving weight management in the US.
Data availability
Data are available from the NHANES website (wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/default.aspx).
The manuscript’s guarantor (Du) affirms that the manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.
Abbreviations
- CVD:
-
cardiovascular disease
- NHANES:
-
the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys
- BMI:
-
body mass index
References
Liu B, Du Y, Wu Y, Snetselaar LG, Wallace RB, Bao W. Trends in obesity and adiposity measures by race or ethnicity among adults in the United States 2011-18: population based study. BMJ. 2021;372:n365.
Flegal KM, Kruszon-Moran D, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Trends in obesity among adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014. JAMA. 2016;315(21):2284–91.
Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA. 2010;303(3):235–41.
Xie W, Lundberg DJ, Collins JM, Johnston SS, Waggoner JR, Hsiao CW, Preston SH, Manson JE, Stokes AC. Association of Weight Loss between Early Adulthood and midlife with all-cause mortality risk in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(8):e2013448.
Chen C, Ye Y, Zhang Y, Pan XF, Pan A. Weight change across adulthood in relation to all cause and cause specific mortality: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2019;367:l5584.
Stokes A, Collins JM, Grant BF, Scamuffa RF, Hsiao CW, Johnston SS, Ammann EM, Manson JE, Preston SH. Obesity progression between young adulthood and midlife and incident Diabetes: a retrospective cohort study of U.S. adults. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(5):1025–31.
Zheng Y, Manson JE, Yuan C, Liang MH, Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Hu FB. Associations of Weight Gain from Early to Middle Adulthood with Major Health outcomes later in Life. JAMA. 2017;318(3):255–69.
Montonen J, Boeing H, Schleicher E, Fritsche A, Pischon T. Association of changes in body mass index during earlier adulthood and later adulthood with circulating obesity biomarker concentrations in middle-aged men and women. Diabetologia. 2011;54(7):1676–83.
Schienkiewitz A, Schulze MB, Hoffmann K, Kroke A, Boeing H. Body mass index history and risk of type 2 Diabetes: results from the European prospective investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84(2):427–33.
Norris T, Cole TJ, Bann D, Hamer M, Hardy R, Li L, Ong KK, Ploubidis GB, Viner R, Johnson W. Duration of obesity exposure between ages 10 and 40 years and its relationship with cardiometabolic Disease risk factors: a cohort study. PLoS Med. 2020;17(12):e1003387.
Arnold M, Jiang L, Stefanick ML, Johnson KC, Lane DS, LeBlanc ES, Prentice R, Rohan TE, Snively BM, Vitolins M, et al. Duration of Adulthood overweight, obesity, and Cancer Risk in the women’s Health Initiative: a longitudinal study from the United States. PLoS Med. 2016;13(8):e1002081.
Charakida M, Khan T, Johnson W, Finer N, Woodside J, Whincup PH, Sattar N, Kuh D, Hardy R, Deanfield J. Lifelong patterns of BMI and cardiovascular phenotype in individuals aged 60–64 years in the 1946 British birth cohort study: an epidemiological study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2(8):648–54.
Abdullah A, Wolfe R, Stoelwinder JU, de Courten M, Stevenson C, Walls HL, Peeters A. The number of years lived with obesity and the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40(4):985–96.
Sheehan TJ, DuBrava S, DeChello LM, Fang Z. Rates of weight change for black and white americans over a twenty year period. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27(4):498–504.
Johnson W, Li L, Kuh D, Hardy R. How has the age-related process of overweight or obesity development changed over Time? Co-ordinated Analyses of Individual Participant Data from Five United Kingdom Birth Cohorts. PLoS Med. 2015;12(5):e1001828. discussion e1001828.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). About the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/about_nhanes.htm].
Clinical guidelines on the. Identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: executive summary. Expert Panel on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight in adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;68(4):899–917.
Lim S, Choi SH, Kim KM, Choi SI, Chun EJ, Kim MJ, Park KS, Jang HC, Sattar N. The association of rate of weight gain during early adulthood with the prevalence of subclinical coronary artery Disease in recently diagnosed type 2 Diabetes: the MAXWEL-CAD study. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(9):2491–9.
Ellison-Barnes A, Johnson S, Gudzune K. Trends in obesity prevalence among adults aged 18 through 25 years, 1976–2018. JAMA. 2021;326(20):2073–4.
Antonio-Villa NE, Fernandez-Chirino L, Vargas-Vazquez A, Fermin-Martinez CA, Aguilar-Salinas CA, Bello-Chavolla OY. Prevalence trends of Diabetes subgroups in the United States: A Data-driven analysis spanning three decades from NHANES (1988–2018). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(3):735–42.
Looker AC, Melton LJ 3rd, Harris TB, Borrud LG, Shepherd JA. Prevalence and trends in low femur bone density among older US adults: NHANES 2005–2006 compared with NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(1):64–71.
Huebschmann AG, Huxley RR, Kohrt WM, Zeitler P, Regensteiner JG, Reusch JEB. Sex differences in the burden of type 2 Diabetes and cardiovascular risk across the life course. Diabetologia. 2019;62(10):1761–72.
Wang Y, O’Neil A, Jiao Y, Wang L, Huang J, Lan Y, Zhu Y, Yu C. Sex differences in the association between Diabetes and risk of Cardiovascular Disease, cancer, and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 5,162,654 participants. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):136.
Lee JM, Pilli S, Gebremariam A, Keirns CC, Davis MM, Vijan S, Freed GL, Herman WH, Gurney JG. Getting heavier, younger: trajectories of obesity over the life course. Int J Obes (Lond). 2010;34(4):614–23.
Gao M, Lv J, Yu C, Guo Y, Bian Z, Yang R, Du H, Yang L, Chen Y, Li Z, et al. Metabolically healthy obesity, transition to unhealthy metabolic status, and vascular Disease in Chinese adults: a cohort study. PLoS Med. 2020;17(10):e1003351.
Mongraw-Chaffin M, Foster MC, Anderson CAM, Burke GL, Haq N, Kalyani RR, Ouyang P, Sibley CT, Tracy R, Woodward M, et al. Metabolically Healthy Obesity, transition to metabolic syndrome, and Cardiovascular Risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(17):1857–65.
Juonala M, Magnussen CG, Berenson GS, Venn A, Burns TL, Sabin MA, Srinivasan SR, Daniels SR, Davis PH, Chen W, et al. Childhood adiposity, adult adiposity, and cardiovascular risk factors. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(20):1876–85.
Du T, Fernandez C, Barshop R, Guo Y, Krousel-Wood M, Chen W, Qi L, Harville E, Mauvais-Jarvis F, Fonseca V, et al. Sex differences in Cardiovascular Risk Profile from childhood to midlife between individuals who did and did not develop Diabetes at Follow-up: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(4):635–43.
Lai CC, Sun D, Cen R, Wang J, Li S, Fernandez-Alonso C, Chen W, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. Impact of long-term burden of excessive adiposity and elevated blood pressure from childhood on adulthood left ventricular remodeling patterns: the Bogalusa Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(15):1580–7.
Lopez-Neyman SM, Davis K, Zohoori N, Broughton KS, Moore CE, Miketinas D. Racial disparities and prevalence of Cardiovascular Disease risk factors, cardiometabolic risk factors, and cardiovascular health metrics among US adults: NHANES 2011–2018. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):19475.
Chatterji P, Joo H, Lahiri K. Racial/ethnic- and education-related disparities in the control of risk factors for Cardiovascular Disease among individuals with Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(2):305–12.
Shan Z, Rehm CD, Rogers G, Ruan M, Wang DD, Hu FB, Mozaffarian D, Zhang FF, Bhupathiraju SN. Trends in Dietary Carbohydrate, protein, and Fat Intake and Diet Quality among US adults, 1999–2016. JAMA. 2019;322(12):1178–87.
Rodgers J, Valuev AV, Hswen Y, Subramanian SV. Social capital and physical health: an updated review of the literature for 2007–2018. Soc Sci Med. 2019;236:112360.
Du Y, Liu B, Sun Y, Snetselaar LG, Wallace RB, Bao W. Trends in Adherence to the physical activity guidelines for americans for aerobic activity and Time Spent on sedentary behavior among US adults, 2007 to 2016. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(7):e197597.
Liu B, Lehmler HJ, Sun Y, Xu G, Liu Y, Zong G, Sun Q, Hu FB, Wallace RB, Bao W. Bisphenol a substitutes and obesity in US adults: analysis of a population-based, cross-sectional study. Lancet Planet Health. 2017;1(3):e114–22.
Fatima Y, Doi SA, Mamun AA. Sleep quality and obesity in young subjects: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2016;17(11):1154–66.
Gore AC, Chappell VA, Fenton SE, Flaws JA, Nadal A, Prins GS, Toppari J, Zoeller RT. EDC-2: the Endocrine Society’s Second Scientific Statement on endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Endocr Rev. 2015;36(6):E1–E150.
Fontana L, Hu FB. Optimal body weight for health and longevity: bridging basic, clinical, and population research. Aging Cell. 2014;13(3):391–400.
Chia YC, Ching SM, Ooi PB, Beh HC, Chew MT, Chung FFL, Kumar N, Lim HM. Measurement accuracy and reliability of self-reported versus measured weight and height among adults in Malaysia: findings from a nationwide blood pressure screening programme. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(1):e0280483.
De Rubeis V, Bayat S, Griffith LE, Smith BT, Anderson LN. Validity of self-reported recall of anthropometric measures in early life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2019;20(10):1426–40.
Connor Gorber S, Tremblay M, Moher D, Gorber B. A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2007;8(4):307–26.
Nyholm M, Gullberg B, Merlo J, Lundqvist-Persson C, Rastam L, Lindblad U. The validity of obesity based on self-reported weight and height: implications for population studies. Obes (Silver Spring). 2007;15(1):197–208.
Rahman M, Temple JR, Breitkopf CR, Berenson AB. Racial differences in body fat distribution among reproductive-aged women. Metabolism. 2009;58(9):1329–37.
Flegal KM, Shepherd JA, Looker AC, Graubard BI, Borrud LG, Ogden CL, Harris TB, Everhart JE, Schenker N. Comparisons of percentage body fat, body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-stature ratio in adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(2):500–8.
Fernandez JR, Heo M, Heymsfield SB, Pierson RN Jr., Pi-Sunyer FX, Wang ZM, Wang J, Hayes M, Allison DB, Gallagher D. Is percentage body fat differentially related to body mass index in hispanic americans, African americans, and European americans? Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77(1):71–5.
Acknowledgements
We thank the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys collected by the National Center for Health Statistics, CDC. The CDC had no role in the design and conduct of the study or in the analysis and interpretation of the data.
Funding
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant 81700762 to Dr Du.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Drs Du and Sun had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs Sun, and Du contributed to the conception and design of the study. Sun performed the data analysis, drafted the manuscript and interpretation of data. Du critically revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of the data, and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The survey procedures were reviewed and approved by the National Center for Health Statistics ethics review board. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, X., Du, T. Trends in weight change patterns across life course among US adults, 1988–2018: population-based study. BMC Public Health 23, 2168 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17137-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17137-x