Erratum
In the publication of this article [1], the following percentage symbols were accidentally missed out from the ‘Results’ and ‘Discussion’ sections:
Results
2. Becoming an auxiliary midwife: the pathways
…as 89 % reported…
3. AMW: contributions of and supports to AMW
…about 9 % of the respondents…
…such as technical supervision (99 %), refresher course (99 %), replenishment of AMW kits (96 %)…
4. AMW: Intention to stay
…if they needed to change their domicile (21 %)
Discussion
…Naturally in Myanmar, 39 % of AMWs…
In addition to the above, some figures in Table 4 were misaligned. The updated Table 4 is presented below:
All the above have been updated in the original article.
Reference
Wangmo S, et al. Auxiliary midwives in hard to reach rural areas of Myanmar: filling MCH gaps. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:914. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3584-x.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3584-x.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Wangmo, S., Suphanchaimat, R., Htun, W.M.M. et al. Erratum to: Auxiliary midwives in hard to reach rural areas of Myanmar: filling MCH gaps. BMC Public Health 16, 1074 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3747-9
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3747-9