Correction to: BMC Psychiatry. 20, 22 (2020)

http://orcid.org/0.1186/s12888-020-2436-5

Following the publication of the original article [1], the authors identified errors in Figs. 1 and 2 and Table 2. The correct figures and table are given below.

Fig. 1
figure 1

(Panel A: H1 and H2) Conceptual framework of the Potential Mediating Effect of resilience and depression on the Relationship between hope and QOL. (Panel B: H3) Model of the potential moderating effects on the paths. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001 QOL: quality of life; H: hypothesis

Fig. 2
figure 2

The conceptual (panel A) and statistical (panel B) forms of the conditional process model (moderated mediation). *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001 QOL: quality of life. In this model, the indirect effect of hope on QOL through depression and resilience and the direct effect of hope on QOL are supposed to be moderated by sex

Table 2 Analysis of Simple Effects

The original article [1] has been corrected.