Erratum

Since publication of our article [1], we have noticed an error in labelling the p-value of one of the results. The original document read:

“The direction of association of BL1 with pCR or minimal residual cancer burden (RCB) in the 2188-gene model was similar (OR = 1.91) but did not reach significance (OR = 0.14).”

This has been corrected to:

“The direction of association of BL1 with pCR or minimal residual cancer burden (RCB) in the 2188-gene model was similar (OR = 1.91) but did not reach significance (p = 0.14).”

We regret the error.