Abstract
Bariatric surgery confers potential advantages for obese patients, but also risks for pregnancy. Perinatal outcomes may be varying between surgical procedures. This topic was recently addressed by a systematic review in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. This commentary will discuss the scientific background and implications for future research.
Background
Maternal obesity is a major health care issue, associated with several comorbidities in women at childbearing age, including infertility and a higher degree of insulin resistance. In pregnancy, obesity is associated with preeclampsia, pregnancy loss and the development of large for gestational age (LGA) infants. While obesity is closely related to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or pregestational diabetes, there is emerging evidence that fetal overgrowth can also occur independently of maternal hyperglycaemia [1]. Consequently, the importance of adequate balanced nutrition increases further, and deviation from optimal nutrition leads to additional complications related to obesity.
Bariatric surgery is an established treatment for severe obesity, especially in the presence of metabolic co-morbidities [2]. For example, weight loss surgery was shown to be markedly more effective than intensive medical therapy alone to decrease and in some cases even to resolve hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes, whereby gastric bypass (as a malabsorptive and restrictive procedure) and sleeve gastrectomy (as a restrictive procedure) showed durable weight loss and glycaemic improvements [3]. In younger women, weight loss after surgery improved periconception health, such as menstrual cycle irregularities and thus reduced obesity related subfertility [4]. As a consequence, the number of post bariatric surgery pregnancies and deliveries is increasing over the past decades [5].
In general, pregnancy after weight loss surgery is most probably safer than pregnancy in obese condition, however, it also poses a number of challenges and risks that need to be addressed [6]: Previous studies, including our own research, indicated intrauterine growth delay associated with history of bariatric surgery and especially with malabsorptive techniques [7, 8]. This type of “abnormal” (i.e. not genetically determined) development of small for gestational age (SGA) infants is most probably a consequence of nutritional deficiencies, as comparable findings were reported in offspring of mothers with anorexia nervosa, but this also occurs in developing countries in which a vast proportion of pregnant patients are undernourished [9]. Despite a reduction in GDM incidence, glucometabolic alterations are still present in mothers after gastric bypass, who showed high glycaemic variability with early postprandial hyperglycaemia followed by hypoglycaemic episodes at two to three hours after glucose ingestion [10, 11]. The increased glycaemic variability may be associated with fetal development, especially decreased fetal growth, as indicated by a recent study using continuous glucose monitoring in mothers after Roux-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) [12]. However, comparisons of different surgical procedures with focus on fertility and pregnancy outcomes are of major importance for recommending and choosing the best surgical approach in reproductive aged obese women.
Discussion of the paper
This topic was recently addressed by Kistner et al., who published a systematic review of adverse perinatal outcomes after RYGB vs. sleeve gastrectomy, aiming to assess the incidence of pregnancy associated complications such as delivery of SGA or LGA infants [13]. Thereby, the authors specifically focused on studies with mean time to conception of less than four years and found a trend towards a higher incidence of both LGA and SGA infants in mothers after sleeve gastrectomy as compared to those with history of RYGB. This is in contrast to another systematic review with less stringent inclusion criteria, which indicated a markedly increased risk of SGA in mothers of RYGB and biliopancreatic diversion (another malabsorptive procedure), whereas this was not observed in mothers who underwent restrictive surgical procedures [8]. Likewise, the risk of LGA was notably reduced in mothers following RYGB (or biolopancreatic diversion), whereas only a tendency towards a lower risk for LGA was observed for women after laparoscopic gastric banding or sleeve gastrectomy in this study [8]. Comparable findings were observed by another recent network meta-analysis, indicating that RYGB resulted in a greater decrease in LGA but increased SGA infants as compared to sleeve gastrectomy [14]. The observed discrepancy between the systematic reviews may be explained by the stringent inclusion criteria used by the systematic review of Kistner et al., especially the rather short surgery to conception interval of four years. This was necessary as this study primarily focused on perinatal outcomes in the few years after weight loss surgery. Timing of pregnancy is indeed an important issue and it is generally recommended to avoid pregnancy for 12 to 18 months after surgery, when weight loss and nutritional status may become more stable [15]. Of note, women after sleeve gastrectomy showed a shorter surgery to conception interval in the recent publication by Kistner et al., what may be the reason for the (unexpected) high prevalence of SGA reported in the included studies.
Conclusions
Bariatric surgery and its implications for pregnancy and childbirth is gaining increasing importance in the field of obstetrics and feto-maternal medicine. However, there are still a number of open questions. Further studies are required to clarify the best surgical technique and optimal time to conception interval for younger women at reproductive age. Fetal outcomes and especially long-term implications for the offspring including metabolic and neurological development need to be addressed. In any case, bariatric surgery in women at childbearing age requires careful planning of pregnancy and management by experienced obstetricians to offer optimal preconceptional and prenatal care. Future research is required targeting specific nutritional programs for patients to optimize maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Data Availability
N/A.
Abbreviations
- GDM:
-
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
- LGA:
-
Large for Gestational Age Offspring
- RYGB:
-
Roux-Y Gastric Bypass
- SGA:
-
Small for Gestational Age Offspring
References
Black MH, Sacks DA, Xiang AH, Lawrence JM. The relative contribution of prepregnancy overweight and obesity, gestational weight gain, and IADPSG-defined gestational diabetes mellitus to fetal overgrowth. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:56–62.
Eisenberg D, Shikora SA, Aarts E, Aminian A, Angrisani L, Cohen RV, et al. 2022 american society of metabolic and bariatric surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the surgery of obesity and metabolic Disorders (IFSO) indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2023;33:3–14.
Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, Wolski K, Aminian A, Brethauer SA, et al. Bariatric surgery versus Intensive Medical Therapy for diabetes – 5-Year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:641–51.
Snoek KM, Steegers-Theunissen RPM, Hazebroek EJ, Willemsen SP, Galjaard S, Laven JSE, et al. The effects of bariatric surgery on periconception maternal health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2021;27:1030–55.
Roos N, Neovius M, Cnattingius S, Trolle Lagerros Y, Sääf M, Granath F, et al. Perinatal outcomes after bariatric surgery: nationwide population based matched cohort study. BMJ. 2013;347:f6460.
Falcone V, Stopp T, Feichtinger M, Kiss H, Eppel W, Husslein PW, et al. Pregnancy after bariatric surgery: a narrative literature review and discussion of impact on pregnancy management and outcome. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:507.
Feichtinger M, Falcone V, Schoenleitner T, Stopp T, Husslein PW, Eppel W et al. Intrauterine fetal growth Delay during late pregnancy after maternal gastric bypass surgery. Ultraschall Med Stuttg Ger 1980. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0651-0424.
Akhter Z, Rankin J, Ceulemans D, Ngongalah L, Ackroyd R, Devlieger R, et al. Pregnancy after bariatric surgery and adverse perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2019;16:e1002866.
Feferkorn I, Badeghiesh A, Baghlaf H, Dahan MH. Pregnancy outcomes in women with anorexia nervosa: a population-based study and analysis of a matched cohort. Reprod Biomed Online. 2023;46:588–96.
Göbl CS, Bozkurt L, Tura A, Leutner M, Andrei L, Fahr L, et al. Assessment of glucose regulation in pregnancy after gastric bypass surgery. Diabetologia. 2017;60:2504–13.
Feichtinger M, Stopp T, Hofmann S, Springer S, Pils S, Kautzky-Willer A, et al. Altered glucose profiles and risk for hypoglycaemia during oral glucose tolerance testing in pregnancies after gastric bypass surgery. Diabetologia. 2017;60:153–7.
Stentebjerg LL, Madsen LR, Støving RK, Andersen LLT, Vinter CA, Juhl CB, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass increases glycemic excursions during pregnancy and Postpartum: a prospective cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2023;46:502–10.
Kistner A, Werner A, Zaigham M. Adverse perinatal outcomes after Rouxen-Y Gastric Bypass vs. Sleeve Gastrectomy: a systematic review. 2023. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05515-7.
Mustafa HJ, Javinani A, Seif K, Aghajani F, Makar EJ, Selhorst S, et al. Prepregnancy Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023;5:100914.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 105: bariatric surgery and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:1405–13.
Acknowledgements
N/A.
Funding
No Funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CSG drafted the first version of the manuscript. MF and WH contributed to the discussion, read and approved the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
N/A.
Consent for publication
N/A.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Göbl, C.S., Feichtinger, M. & Henrich, W. Comment: pregnancy after bariatric surgery – achievements and open questions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 23, 558 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05858-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05858-1