Correction: BMC Neurol 22, 195 (2022)

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02722-1

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in Fig. 1. The same error was made in Figure A, C and D in supplemental material. The context was not affected as the error was made when replotting during the revision. We apologise for the error.

The correct Fig. 1 and supplemental material are provided below.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Calibration plots of all models on 2019 temporal validation set

The original article [1] has been updated.