Background

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) are the leading cause of death in most parts of the world [1, 2], with coronary heart disease (CHD) and ischemic stroke (IS) accounting for 42% and 35% of global cardiovascular mortality, respectively [2]. Statins are first-line evidence-based drugs for the management of dyslipidemia and for secondary prevention of ASCVD events across age groups [3, 4]. A number of studies have demonstrated that in addition to its cholesterol lowering effect, statins also show pleiotropic effects such as modulating immune responses, and inhibiting subclinical inflammation and oxidative stresses [5, 6]. In addition, the benefits of statins for primary prevention in subjects under 75 years old have been well established based on multiple randomized clinical trials (RCTs), except for those over 75 years of age [7,8,9,10].

The advantage of statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular events and mortality in patients over 75 years old remains controversial, mainly because there is significantly less evidence for this age group and the risk for statin-related harms increases with age, which could potentially offset their positive effects [11,12,13,14,15]. Most of the available evidence regarding statin use for primary prevention of ASCVD in these patients is derived from subgroup analyses of RCTs. However, the US Preventive Services Task Force concluded in a recent review that older people are underrepresented in trials and there is insufficient evidence to draw a robust conclusion about the balance between benefits and harms of statins for primary prevention in this age group [11, 12]. Recently, it was revealed by an individual participant data meta-analysis including 28 RCTs that statin therapy resulted in a significant reduction of major vascular events irrespective of age, but there is less evidence of benefit among participants older than 75 years without previous vascular diseases (primary prevention) [15]. Consistently, two recently published real-world retrospective studies also found that use of statins was not associated with a lower risk of outcomes including all-cause death in the primary prevention among individuals without diabetes or other modifiable risk factors [13, 14].

It was well known that patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have a similar risk of ASCVD to those with a history of cardiovascular disease [16]. Interestingly, statin use was significantly associated with reduced incident ASCVD and all cause mortality in diabetic patients without clinically recognized ASCVD in Spanish population [13]. Against this background, we undertook this study to investigate whether there is an association between statin therapy and mortality in patients with T2DM over the age of 75 years in Chinese population.

Methods

Patients

The present study was conducted using the data taken from the Staged Diabetes Targeting Management (SDTM) Study [17, 18], which was started since 2005 as a continuous structured diabetes care program in Jiangsu Province Official Hospital. All patients were managed according to the Staged Diabetes Management protocol adopted from International Diabetes Center (Minneapolis, US) [19], and the information of each visit was recorded online (www.chinasdtm.com). The study protocol conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by the Ethical Committee, Jiangsu Province Official Hospital, Nanjing. Informed consent was obtained from all patients at the time of first assessment to allow use of their data for research purposes.

Clinical and laboratory data

The information recorded in the SDTM study has been described [20, 21]. Briefly, body weight, height and blood pressure were measured by the diabetic specialist nurses according to standard protocols. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the ratio of the weight (kg) to squared height (m2). Details on personal information, history of disease and current use of medications were also obtained from all patients through interviews by the nurses. Blood tests were carried out after an overnight fasting for glucose, lipid profiles, uric acid (UA), renal/liver functions and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Glucose, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and serum creatinine (Scr) were measured using Hitach 7060 automated analyzer (Hitachi Koki Co. Ltd., Hitachinaka City, Japan). HbA1c was measured by Bio-rad Diamat high-performance liquid chromatography analyzer (Bio-Rad Labs., Brea, CA, USA). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the CKD-EPI equation [22].

Outcomes

The incident endpoint events of all-cause mortality and the causes of death including ischemic cardiovascular diseases (CHD and IS), cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease (CCVD) (including IS, CHD and hemorrhagic stroke (HS)), cancer, respiratory system disease and renal failure were collected from the SDTM database. In addition, telephone-interviews were performed by diabetic specialist nurses to confirm the status of 518 participants in January 2018. Finally, all the mortality data were further verified through the resident database from local centers for disease control system as well.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using the SPSS (version 20.0) software. Variables were assessed for the full cohort and stratified by statin use. All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range) or percentage, where appropriate. Unpaired student’s t-test was used to compare differences between two groups. Rates were compared using the χ 2 test. The effect of statins on all-cause mortality, and deaths caused by ischemic cardiovascular disease, HS, cancer, respiratory system disease and renal failure were analyzed and in subgroups stratified by the presence or absence of prior CHD. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by Cox regression were used to estimate the association between statins and specific death of T2DM. Variables those were significant in univariable analyses and had biological plausibility were entered into multivariate Cox regression models.

Results

Characteristics of study population

A total of 4285 diabetic patients were enrolled in the SDTM study until January 2018. After excluding those who younger than 75 years at baseline (N = 3524), loss to follow-up (N = 195), had a history of type 1 diabetes, glutamic acid decarboxylase positive or impaired glucose regulation at baseline (N = 19), missing data for key variables (N = 29), we had the complete data of 518 patients with T2DM for the final analysis (Fig. 1). Characteristics of participants included in and excluded from the study were shown in Table S1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of participants included and excluded in the analyses

Of the 518 participants, there were 307 (59.27%) men and 211 (40.73%) women, with a mean age of 79.82 ± 3.50 years. The clinical and metabolic characteristics of the subjects grouped by the use of statins were shown in Table 1. Generally, the subjects using statins have higher levels of BMI, systolic blood pressure (SBP), fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial blood glucose (PBG), HbA1c levels, and lower hemoglobin (Hb) levels (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study population according to using of statins

Furthermore, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) model by key variables at baseline, including sex, age, BMI, SBP, Hb, HbA1c, HDL-C, CHD, HT, calcium channel blocker, angiotensin receptor blocker, sulfonylureas, insulin, metformin, beta blockers. After PSM, 116 pairs of participants were included. There were no difference of variables between groups (Table 1).

Characteristics of population with different outcomes

The median follow-up period was 6.09 years (interquartile range 3.94–8.81 years). During the follow-up, 111 patients died, including 23 caused by ischemic cardiovascular disease, 27 by CCVD, 21 by cancer, 15 by respiratory system disease, 6 by renal failure and 19 by other conditions. As shown in Table 2, age, microalbuminuria, PBG, and UA showed higher levels in the group of patients who died, while HDL-C and eGFR showed lower levels.

Table 2 Baseline characteristics of the study population according to death

Association of statin use and all-cause mortality and specific mortality

There was no statistical association between statin use and all-cause mortality (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.47, 1.19) and CCVD (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.18, 1.32) after adjustment for all potential confounders including baseline age, sex, BMI, Hb, HbA1c, medical history and medications. Statin use was associated with reduced ischemic cardiovascular disease mortality (HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.10, 0.97). However, after PSM, Cox regression analyses showed that statin use was not associated with all-caused mortality, ischemic cardiovascular disease mortality and CCVD mortality (Table 3).

Table 3 Association analysis of statins and all-cause mortality and specific causes of death

Subgroup analysis indicated that statins had no association with the all-caused mortality or mortality caused by ischemic cardiovascular disease in T2DM patients without CHD, HRs (95% CIs) were 0.59 (0.33, 1.03) and 0.31 (0.09, 1.06), respectively.In T2DM patients with CHD, statins had no association with all-caused mortality [1.79 (0.62, 5.20)], neither (Table 4). Similar results were also shown by cox regression analyses in matched pairs.

Table 4 Stratification association analysis of statins and death by CHD disease history

Discussions

Our findings explored issues that have remained controversial and insufficiently studied to date. In our cohort study of 518 T2DM patients over 75 years old, the results indicated a nonsignificant association of reduced all-caused mortality and ischemic cardiovascular disease with the statin use. To our knowledge, this is the first time to raise the possibility of statins associated with a reduction in mortality in elderly individuals in the Chinese population.

The potential benefits of statins for primary prevention of mortality in the elderly remain controversial. A subanalysis of the JUPITER study found no benefits of statins in reducing mortality for individuals aged > 70 years [23]. Similarly, in the PROSPER study that focused on primary prevention in elderly individuals, pravastatin was found to have no benefits for all-cause mortality [24]. Meta-analyses also suggested that statins do not have a protective effect against all-cause mortality for individuals aged over 65 years old in the setting of primary prevention [25, 26]. However, a nonsignificant direction toward increased all-cause mortality with pravastatin was observed among adults 75 years and older in the ALLHAT-LLT study [27].

In contrast, statins are associated with reduced mortality in aged 75 and older population in some other studies. In the US veterans study with patients 75 years and older and free of ASCVD at baseline, prescription of statins for the first time was significantly associated with a lower risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality [28]. The SCOPE-75 study suggested a remarkable reduction in the relative risk of all-cause death among statin users aged over 75 years for primary prevention [29]. The Reykjavik Study, which enrolled subjects with a mean age of 77 years, reported a greater benefit of statins in the subgroup of diabetic subjects [30]. Moreover, in a large-scale retrospective cohort study with 46, 864 people aged 75 years or more without cardiovascular diseases, Rafel Ramos and colleagues also revealed that statin use was significantly associated with reduced all-cause mortality in diabetic patients for primary prevention [13]. In fact, Rafel et al. found that the protective effect of statins against all-cause mortality in participants with diabetes became weaker as age increased and began to lose statistical significance at age 82 years [13].

Our findings appear to be consistent with these studies in elderly T2DM patients. In our population, statin use showed a reduction association with ischemic cardiovascular disease mortality, although it does not reach statistical significance after PSM. Age should be considered as an important factor affecting the protective effects of statins. It is worth noting that the average age in our study is about 80 years. Meanwhile, relatively small sample size may also responsible for the lack of effect observed.

The majority of published data suggest that statin usage does not affect the incidence of most cancers [31]. Our present study, in accordance with previous studies, demonstrates that the associations between statin use and cancer-related outcomes were not statistically significant. Similarly, non-vascular death, deaths caused by respiratory system disease and renal failure were not affected by statin use in the present study or in most previous studies.

There are several limitations in this study. It was carried out in a cohort that only comprised Chinese T2DM patients managed at a single outpatient clinic in Nanjing with a relative small sample size. There may be potential bias between different groups due to the observational study design, although we conducted PSM. More studies, especially prospective studies with large sample size and RCTs, are needed to confirm our finding. In addition, the proportion of patients who used low- or high-intensity statins was too small to investigate the possibility of different clinical outcomes between these groups. Despite these limitations, these real-world data recorded most of potential confounding factors, which might strengthen the findings of the present study. Moreover, the relatively long follow-up period (about 6.09 years) may provide a more accurate view of the effects of statin use on long-term mortality.

In conclusion, our findings suggest that statin use showed a possible reduction in all-cause mortality and ischemic cardiovascular disease mortality, although it does not reach statistical significance. More evidence is needed to support the use of statins in the elderly T2DM patients.