Erratum
After publication of this research article [1], we noted an error in Table 2. The values reported under Patient Age had been erroneously inverted, meaning age range “0-21” displayed the value for “57+” and vice versa, and “22-40” displayed the value for “41-56” and vice-versa. This error has been corrected (please see the revised version of Table 2 below). We apologise for any inconvenience.
Reference
Liddy C, Singh J, Kelly R, Dahrouge S, Taljaard M, Younger J. What is the impact of primary care model type on specialist referral rates? A cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/1471-2296-15-22.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Liddy, C., Singh, J., Kelly, R. et al. Erratum: What is the impact of primary care model type on specialist referral rates? A cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract 16, 65 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0260-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0260-7