Correction: BMC Med Res Methodol (2019) 19:129

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0754-4

In the original publication of this article [1], “=1 −  = 1 −   ≈ s” was mistakenly added after the sentence “ In this method, the unadjusted p-values pj are multiplied by the number of primary outcome” in the Methods section, and should be deleted.

The original article has been corrected.