Erratum
After the publication of the original article [1], it came to the author’s attention that an error affecting Figures 2 and 3, and the Additional files, has occurred.
During the author proofing stage, an instruction was made to move Figs. 2 and 3 to the Additional files. The instruction was misinterpreted by the Production team, resulting in the files being retained as Figs. 2 and 3, and the Additional files being subsequently incorrect.
The original article has now been updated to rectify this error.
Reference
Smuk M, Carpenter JR, Morris TP. What impact do assumptions about missing data have on conclusions? A practical sensitivity analysis for a cancer survival registry. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;6:21. doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0301-0.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0301-0.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Smuk, M., Carpenter, J.R. & Morris, T.P. Erratum to: What impact do assumptions about missing data have on conclusions? a practical sensitivity analysis for a cancer survival registry. BMC Med Res Methodol 17, 51 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0323-7
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0323-7