Correction to: BMC Cardiovasc Disord (2019) 19:28

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1010-x

Following the publication of the original article [1], the author reported several figures have the wrong number related to them. Figure 2 should be 3, figure 5 should be 2, figure 3 should be 5.

It has been corrected in the original article as well.

The publisher apologizes for any inconvenience caused by this error.