Erratum

The original version of this article [1] unfortunately contained a mistake. The presentation of Tables two and three (Tables 1 and 2 here) were incorrect in the PDF and HTML versions of this article. The corrected Tables two and three (Tables 1 and 2 here) are given below.

Table 1 Genetic diversity and neutrality tests for each population and with all populations of M. simplex together
Table 2 - Φ ST values for pairwise comparisons between population of M. simplex (lower left) and p values (upper right)

The original article has been updated to reflect this change.