Correction to: Genet Sel Evol (2021) 53: 77 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-021-00673-8

After the publication of the original article [1], the authors noticed that there was an error.

In the first paragraph of page 5, where we compare ACCLR and ACCT, the accuracy symbols have been swapped. The right sentences are: “ACCT were on average lower than ACCLR (Table 3) and more variable (Fig. 1b). This resulted in a much higher coefficient of variation for ACCT (Fig. 1c), particularly for ADG (41.06 vs. 7.79%) and OSS (37.07 vs. 10.24%).”

The related Table 3, Fig. 1 and the discussion around those results are correct.