Abstract
Health concerns about the toxicity of arsenic compounds have therefore encouraged the development of new analytical tools for quick monitoring of arsenic in real samples with improved sensitivity, selectivity, and reliability. An overview of advanced optical colorimetric sensor techniques for real-time monitoring of inorganic arsenic species in the environment is given in this review paper. Herein, several advanced optical colorimetric sensor techniques for arsenite (As+3) and arsenate (As+5) based on doping chromogenic dyes/reagents, biomolecule-modified nanomaterials, and arsenic-binding ligand tethered nanomaterials are introduced and discussed. This review also highlights the benefits and limitations of the colorimetric sensor for arsenic species. Finally, prospects and future developments of an optical colorimetric sensor for arsenic species are also proposed. For future study in this sector, particularly for field application, authors recommend this review paper will be helpful for readers to understand the design principles and their corresponding sensing mechanisms of various arsenic optical colorimetric sensors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Every year, anthropogenic activities and natural processes emit more than 10 million metric tons of harmful contaminants into the environment [1, 2]. As a result, these toxic contaminants pose a significant risk to human, animal, and environmental safety, which has emerged as a big challenge for the entire world.
Arsenic (As) is a toxic methalloid element widely distributed and is the 20th most abundant element in the Earth's crust, with an average concentration of 2 mg Kg−1 [3, 4] Since ancient times, arsenic had been known as one of the most common chemical contaminants in the environment. Millions of individuals are exposed directly, indirectly, or both to this extremely lethal Group-A carcinogen through drinking water and/or other sources [5]. Thus, the main burden on the supply of drinking water is the poisoning of groundwater with toxic compounds, including arsenic species [6]. Arsenic is frequently found in aquatic environments in its many oxidation forms, primarily arsenite (AsIII) and arsenate (AsV), under a wide range of conditions [7]. Due to its aqueous solubility and unique interaction with sulfhydryl-containing enzymes, arsenite is almost 60 times more hazardous than arsenate [8]. Over the past years, It has been reported that long-term exposure to arsenic contamination in humans is associated with many health issues, including skin lesions [9], cardiovascular disease [10, 11], and a high risk of malignancies [12,13,14]. Moreover, the accumulation of arsenic species in the soils not only results in contamination of the food chain but also inhibits crop plant growth, which causes losses in crop production [15]. Considering these concerns over arsenic exposure and its widespread occurrence in aquatic environments, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have set the maximum level of total arsenic concentration in drinking and irrigation water as low as 10 and 100 ppb, respectively [16,17,18]. Therefore, it is crucial to have an analytical method that is precise, quick, and sensitive for on-site and real-time monitoring of arsenic in drinking water as low as 10 ppb.
Over the past years, several analytical technologies have developed for the detection of arsenic in biological and environmental samples, including blood and urine [19,20,21,22]. However, such technologies required either time-consuming sample preparation, expensive equipment, and/or a skilled operator, making them unsuitable for field applications involving real-time monitoring of arsenic species. With the rapid development of nanotechnology, nanomaterial-based signal amplification has great potential for improving the advancement of analytical technologies [23, 24]. The sensitivity and selectivity of the analytical procedures were also further enhanced by the incorporation of nanomaterials and specific-recognition ligands. In fact, significant attention has been drawn to the fabrication of nanomaterial-based optical sensors for the detection of arsenic species by utilizing different recognized ligands such as enzymes, aptamers, and polymers, which are employed directly to bind and react with the target analyte of interest [25, 26]. Specifically, the nano-based colorimetric sensors which require relatively simple designed instruments, on-site application, naked-eye detection, and excellently sensitive recognition made them an effective alternative analytical tool for the detection of arsenic [27,28,29,30]. The specific interaction of nanomaterial with arsenic-recognition ligands produces colorimeter signal shifts that enable the accurate detection of arsenic species for visual quantification.
For a better understanding of this novel research field, this review focuses on the recent advancement of an advanced arsenic optical colorimetric platforms based on the inherent redox-chemistry of arsenic, biomolecule-modified nanomaterials, arsenic-binding ligand-modified nanomaterials, and a paper-based microfluidics assay (Fig. 1), which provides comprehensive coverage of the status of arsenic detection. Hopefully, this review could inspire further research in developing novel optical colorimetric sensors for the on-site detection of arsenic in the future and also give some insights on the perspectives and challenges of the nanomaterial modified optical colorimetric sensors design and application for the analysis of arsenic.
2 Chemistry and toxicity of arsenic
Due to its enormous health risk, arsenic, a prevalent metalloid pollutant in the aquatic environment, has drawn a lot of attention [31,32,33,34]. On this account, several million people are affected by arsenic-contaminated food and drinking water in many countries, such as West Bengal, Bangladesh, the United States, and others [35,36,37]. In practice, over 200 arsenic-bearing minerals, including elemental, arsenite, arsenate, sulfide, oxide, and arsenide, are identified as the most significant sources of arsenic [38]. In addition to these minerals, arsenic has also been released into the environment from a variety of sources, such as the burning of fossil fuels, volcanic eruptions, arsenic-based insecticides, and industrial activities [39, 40]. These sources could have a significant impact on the pollution of aquatic environments.
Arsenic is an element with the electron configuration [Ar] 3d10 4s2 4p3 that is found in four common oxidation states: -3 (e.g., AsH3), 0 (e.g., elemental As), +3 (e.g., As2O3) and +5 (e.g., As2O5) [41]. These variable redox states indicated that it can react with oxygen, sulfur, nitrogen, and/or carbon to form covalent compounds and generate large numbers of arsenic species [42]. The oxidation potential of elemental arsenic is larger than that of nitrogen and phosphorus, which increases the cationic nature of arsenic and allows it to readily show trivalent and pentavalent oxidation states. For instance, the pentavalent arsenate (As(V) as AsO4−3) species is the most stable form in oxygenation environments, whereas the trivalent arsenite (As(III) as AsO3−3) is the dominant form under reducing conditions [43, 44]. The most common arsenite compounds are sodium arsenite, arsenic trioxide, and arsenic trichloride, whereas the most stable pentavalent forms of inorganic arsenic compounds include metal arsenate (e.g., sodium, lead, and calcium arsenate), arsenic acid, and arsenic pentaoxide [45]. Additionally, arsenic is also found in organic form in the environment, and the most common are arsanilic acid, monomethylarsenic acid (MMA), dimethylarsenic acid (DMA), arsenocholine, sodium dimethylarsinate, dithioarsenate, and arsenobetaine [12, 46].
The biochemical, environmental, and toxicological characteristics of arsenic compounds largely depend on the oxidation state, solubility, redox potential, and the group or molecule attached to the arsenic [47]. The acute toxicity of arsenic in humans can range from non-hazardous (e.g., arsenosugars) to excessively hazardous (e.g., arsine gas). For instance, arsenite is a very toxic substance that is approximately 60 times more dangerous than arsenate due to its reaction with sulfhydryl-containing enzymes [48, 49]. Organoarsenic compounds are usually considered less hazardous than inorganic arsenics, which are also related to the degree of accumulation in tissues and their rates of absorption and elimination. In sum, the arsenic toxicity pattern is shown in Fig. 2.
The chemistry of arsenic has been involved in many enzyme inhibition processes [50, 51]. As(III), for instance, binding to an enzyme that contains a sulfhydryl group results in inhibiting the enzymatic process as well as other biocellular functions [52, 53]. Because of the structural similarities between As(V) and phosphate, As(V) produces toxicity by mimicking a phosphate group in adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and resulting in interference with the ATP production in mitochondria and destruction of essential metabolic processes. The chronic toxicity of arsenic is associated with a variety of adverse health effects, such as carcinogenesis [54], respiratory problem [55], cardiovascular disease [56], kidney damage [57], and many others [58]. Therefore, it is crucial to detect arsenic early and remove it from drinking water.
3 Advanced optical colorimetric strategy for arsenic sensing
The development of optical nanosensors using various functional nanomaterials has shown great potential for the detection of various analytes, including heavy metals [59], pesticides [60], and other chemical toxins [61]. An optical sensor typically has translator components that serve as optical signal indicators and recognition elements that can interact precisely with the target analyte [62, 63]. Due to their high sensitivity, low cost, simple construction, and quick and easy detection with the naked eye, colorimetric approaches are currently attracting a lot of attention among these high-end optical nanosensors [64, 65]. As real-time and on-site monitoring become increasingly crucial, several advanced optical colorimetric sensors have been reported for the detection of arsenic in various sample matrices. In those assays, the molecular and chemical interactions between arsenic compounds and the surrounding materials are the key principle for optical colorimetric sensing mechanisms (Fig. 3). The specific interaction of arsenic with the redox dyes and/or surface-modified nanomaterials results in a color shift in the assay solution that can be seen with the naked-eye without any other sophisticated instruments or with the help of simple equipment such as UV–Vis spectrophotometry [66,67,68]. The three main categories of the present, well-proven colorimetric-based arsenic sensing strategies are doping redox chromogenic dyes, biomolecule-modified nanomaterials, and arsenic-specific ligand-tethered nanomaterials. In this article, we present a critical review of the application of advanced Optical colorimetric sensing methods for the detection of arsenic ions (As+3 and As+5) in the environment.
3.1 Sensors based on redox dye chemistry
Inorganic arsenic species (As+3 and As+5) have certain inherent redox characteristics (E0As(V)/As(III) = 0.56 V) and they can undergo spontaneous redox reactions with a few redox chromogenic reagents [69]. This inherent redox property is used today as the most common colorimetric sensing principle of arsenic for field applications [70,71,72]. As illustrated in Fig. 4a, there are several commercial colorimetric test kits available for the detection of arsenic based on the Gutzeit reaction [73]. The Gutzeit method has been widely used as a colorimetric field kit technology to test for arsenic in groundwater since 100 years ago [74]. This technique relies on the reduction of arsenic compounds in the sample under acidic conditions with the addition of zinc powder to produce arsine gas (AsH3). In order to produce a brightly colored complex that can be measured for quantification, the produced arsine gas was trapped on paper impregnated with different substances, such as mercuric bromide (HgBr2) [75], silver diethylthiocarbamate [76], or polyvinyl alcohol/KI [77]. These assays, however, produce extremely toxic by-products that pose a hazard to the analyst and the environment. Additionally, sulfur-containing compounds, like hydrogen sulfide, are found to have potential interference with such colorimetric assay and may require an additional separation or purification step in the procedure.
The development of innovative arsenic colorimetric methods that match or exceed the sensitivity of the Gutzeit method while enhancing selectivity, accuracy, safety, and reproducibility has been the focus of several scientific groups despite these potential drawbacks [78,79,80,81]. One possible approach is to use polyoxomolybdate chemistry that reacts directly with arsenic to form a highly colored complex (Fig. 4b) [82]. In this method, first the arsenite (As+3) present in the sample effectively oxidizes into arsenate (As+5) ions to form an arsenate-polyoxomolybdate complex, which is subsequently reduced to an arsenomolybdate complex, producing a bright blue color solution that can be easily measured using spectrophotometry. For example, Lenoble et al. reported an arsenic-molybdenum complex protocol for measuring low arsenic concentrations in drinking water up to 20 ppb detection limit [83]. This method is relatively fast and safe, and there is no major interference from silicate and sulfate up to 10–30 ppm concentrations, while iron and phosphate still cause a significant amount of interference. To minimize the above concerns, several research groups have developed a pre-treatment step using ion chromatography and an ion-exchange column to concentrate and isolate arsenic from the rest of the sample prior to the arsenate-molybdate complex formation [84]. Both methods employ the chromatography method either before and/or after all of the sample's arsenic compounds have been converted to arsenate. After eluted from the column, the arsenate ion interacts with molybdenum oxide to produce the arsenate-molybdate complex, which is subsequently analyzed and quantified. Thus, the separation technologies could improve the sensitivity and achieve a lower than 8 ppb detection limit for the total arsenic.
In recent years, Das and Sarkar developed a ploymer hydrogel-based, cost-effective colorimetric strip sensor for arsenate detection based on the reduction reaction between the arsenate ion and ammonium molybdate [85]. The strip was fabricated by encapsulating ammonium molybdate in a polymer hydrogel made of polyvinyl alcohol, glutaraldehyde, and acrylamide. This assay was constructed on the formation of a blue-colored arsenomolybdate complex under reductive conditions, which can be seen by the naked eye down to the 10 ppb detection limit [85]. This technique is easy to use and precise, and it thus may be used to analyze arsenic in real environmental samples. Furthermore, many research groups have explored the quantitative analysis of arsenic ions by forming the arsenomolbdate complex using a simple spectrophotometer [86].
However, in order to minimize potential interference from iron and phosphate, the majority of the complex arsenomolbdate techniques required complicated separation procedures. To address the above limitations, some research groups aimed to concentrate on dye-based chemistry to demonstrate superior performance for the determination of arsenic [91, 92]. In this case, arsenic compounds directly bind to or interact with dye molecules in order to induce structural and colorimetric variations that can be easily measured and quantified. For example, Bhattacharya et al. fabricated a norborene derived rhodamine monomer (Nor-Rh) sensor based on redox chemistry for selective and sensitive detection of arsenite in the presence of iodate in an acidic solution [87]. Arsenite and iodate can spontaneously undergo a redox process in which iodate is reduced to iodine and arsenite is oxidized to produce arsenate (Fig. 5A). This redox reaction is very specific to the arsenite ion. The norbornene-I2 adduct can be formed by interacting the product iodine with the norbornene-Rh dye. The formation of halogen bonding between the carbonyl oxygen of rhodamine and the adduct norbornene-I2 resulted in a unique optical property change. This approach is able to sense arsenite at the ppb level selectively when it is passed through a column backed by Nor-Th polymers. By observing these colorimetric and fluorescence features, arsenite (As+3) can thus be detected in the sample.
A Schematic representation of Norbornene polymer-based arsenic detection, adapted from Ref. [87]. B Schematic representation of a B (RhB)-based sensor for arsenic sensing before (a) and after (b) the addition of AsO2−, adapted from Ref. [88]. C Schematic representation for benzothiazole Schiff-based probe for arsenic As(III)/As(V) detection, adapted from Ref. [89]. D A schematic diagram illustrates the Fenton-like mechanism involved in the colorimetric detection of As (V) by Fe3O4 nanoparticles, adapted from Ref. [90]
Similarly, Xu et al. (2018) reported ultrasensitive colorimetric nanoprobes for on-site testing of arsenic using an unmodified gold nanoparticle (Au NP) and Rhodamine-B (RhB) as a color signal reporter (Fig. 5B) [88]. This assay is based on the inhibition of the Au NP catalytic-redox reaction between RhB and sodium borohydride by AsO2- ion, which results in a color and absorption peak change. This assay exhibits great selectivity against other interfering ions and high sensitivity, with a limit of detection of 0.64 ppb, which is below the WHO-recommended level for arsenic in drinking water.
Another promising benzothiazol-based Schiff base probe was also reported for on-site detection of arsenite and arsenate at low concentrations in aqueous media [89, 93]. A microwave-based condensation reaction was used to synthesize the benzothiazole-based Schiff base in one-step (Fig. 5C). The proposed colorimetric probe results in a rapid visible color change from pale-yellow to dark orange due to the bis-coordination of As+3 or As+5 to the N, S chelate of the benzothiazole-based Schiff base probe. This colorimetric assay provides several advantages over the classical Gutzeit approach, including simplicity, low cost, high sensitivity, excellent selectivity, and specificity. Toluidine Blue [94], Malachite Green [95] and other dye-based colorimetric techniques were also investigated for the detection of arsenic. More significantly, because of the quick reaction time, Fenton-like catalytic reactions have been widely used in colorimetric sensors, and thus they can be used for arsenic sensing platforms. Using methylene blue (MB) as a color signal indicator, for instance, Christus and his group developed a novel sensitive colorimetric sensor for the analysis of arsenate in a water sample based on the Fenton-like reaction of Fe3O4 nanoparticles [90]. Due to the production of a hydroxyl radical via a Fenton-like reaction, the produced Fe3O4 nanoparticle catalyzed the oxidation of MB dye into a colorless solution (Fig. 5D). Moreover, the addition of arsenate can be bound on the active site of Fe3O4 NP, where it inhibits the catalytic activity of Fe3O4 NP and restores the blue color. The method shows a good detection limit value of 0.358 nM in natural water. All of these dye-based colorimetric assays are limited to detecting organoarsenic species such as MMA and DMA.
3.2 Biomolecule-modified nanosensors
3.2.1 Sensor-based on enzyme mediated reaction
Many arsenic compounds, like other toxic pollutants, block or inhibit some natural enzyme activities that are important in toxicology and pharmacology, including laccase, acid phosphatase, peroxidase, and others [96,97,98]. Arsenic poisoning is caused by either the inhibition of sulfur-containing enzymes or the inhibition of phosphorylation activity [99]. The concentrations of arsenic are often measured by quantifying the percentage of enzyme activity inhibition before and after exposure to the arsenic species (inhibitor) [97]. By integrating the enzyme-mediated inhibition principle with nanomaterials as a signal reporter, therefore, it is now possible to construct and develop new optical colorimetric tests for detecting arsenic by assessing enzyme activity inhibition [100]. In principle, the appropriate substrate can be hydrolyzed into products in the presence of enzymes, resulting in a change in the analytical signal indicator. When an additional arsenic compound is added, the catalytic activity of the enzyme is inhibited or blocked, resulting in the recovery of the analytical signal indicator by increasing the concentration of arsenic.
So far, only a few contributions have been made to the colorimetric detection of arsenic species based on enzyme inhibitory effects rather than other optical or electrochemical biosensors. For example, Zhang et al. constructed a plasmonic light-up colorimetric biosensor for arsenate detection in groundwater by aggregating gold nanoparticles (Au NP) based on the inhibitory effect of arsenate on acid phosphatase (AcP) bioactivity [101]. The substrate for AcP in this approach was adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP). The AcP catalyzes the hydrolysis of negatively charged AMP to uncharged adenosine, resulting in significant aggregation of Au NPs and a shift in the color of the solution from red to blue. Arsenate can efficiently reduce AcP enzymatic activity by competitive inhibition, which causes a slowdown of the catalytic hydrolysis process. This is confirmed by the color change from blue to red with increasing concentrations of arsenate. Similarly, Wang et al. proposed a self-powered biosensor for arsenite and arsenate detection based on reversible inhibition of laccase activity [102]. Laccases are Cu-containing enzymes that have been shown to be capable of both mediated and direct electron transfer [103]. Enzymatic inhibition of laccase has been demonstrated using a colorimetric assay with 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid). Laccase was then linked with FAD-dependent glucose dehydrogenase in a series of chemical modifications to create laccase-based bioelectrodes that can use as a self-powered biosensor for both arsenic species detections. This method achieved a detection limit of 13 µmol/L for arsenite and 132 µmol/L for arsenate. Despite the benefits of these enzyme-based sensors, significant issues emerge when they are applied to environmental samples.
Nanosized materials with intrinsic enzyme-like activity, defined as nanozyme, exhibit superiorities in excellent stability, low cost, adjustable catalytic activity, and ease of large-scale production [104,105,106]. Several nanozymes have been shown in recent years to have enzyme-mimicking catalytic properties similar to natural bio-enzymes, such as peroxidase and oxidase-like activities [107]. This technology is innovative in that it integrates numerous technologies to construct an arsenic colorimetric nanosensor based on enzyme-mimicking activity inhibition [106, 108]. Several nanozyme materials made of noble metals, transition metals, and their derivatives have shown promise in the optical detection of harmful contaminants [109]. However, there are few reports about peroxidase-like nanozyme-based colorimetric probes for the detection of arsenic in the environment [110, 111].
Wen et al. reported that cobalt oxyhydroxide (CoOOH) nanoflakes possessed peroxidase-like activity with 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for arsenate detection [110]. Interestingly, CoOOH nanoflakes can catalyze the conversion of ABTS substrate into green oxidized ABTS product in the presence of H2O2. In this work, arsenate can specifically bind with CoOOH nanoflakes via AS-O bond interaction and electrostatic attraction (Fig. 6A), which inhibit the peroxidase-mimic activity of CoOOH. Thus, a simple colorimetric probe was developed based on arsenate-specific inhibition of the CoOOH nanozyme toward ABTS catalysis with a detection limit of 3.72 ppb. Furthermore, the CoOOH nanozyme-ABST chromogenic substrate system was employed for very sensitive electrochemical sensing of arsenate in ambient samples, with a detection limit of 56.1 ppb. Similarly, Zhong et al. developed a dual colorimetric and electrochemical test for arsenate detection by utilizing the peroxidase-like activity of iron oxyhydroxide (FeOOH) nanorods with ABTS as a chromogenic agent [111]. The FeOOH nanorods were produced using a hydrothermal technique and have outstanding peroxidase-like activity, allowing them to rapidly oxidize the colorless ABTS substrate into a dark green product (ABTSox) in the presence of H2O2 (Fig. 6B). Arsenate can be adsorbed on the surface of FeOOH nanorods, establishing a strong As-O link and inhibiting the peroxidase-like activity of the produced nanorods, resulting in a decrease in green product oxidation. This method was also used to successfully identify arsenate in environmental water samples, with detection limits of 0.1 ppb and 12 ppb for colorimetric and electrochemical assays, respectively. However, these approaches have significant drawbacks, such as the possibility of phosphate ion interference. However, these approaches have significant drawbacks, such as the possibility of phosphate ion interference. Furthermore, the presence of H2O2 as a substrate for peroxidase-like activity can result in the production of oxygen free radicals as by-products, affecting the stability and accuracy of measurements.
Since oxidase-like nanozyme materials do not require H2O2, they are a more attractive material for sensor design technology than peroxidase-mimicking activities. To overcome this limitation, Fe-Co-hydroxide nanozymes [112], iron alkoxide [113], Pd nanozymes [114], and Mn2O3 nanoparticles [115] have been exploited recently based on oxidase-mimicking activity inhibition for the development of ultrasensitive colorimetric detection of arsenic. For example, Xu et al. published a colorimetric test for the selective detection of arsenite based on the dual-masking of the active site and interlayer channel of the oxidase-like activity of Fe-Co-layered double hydroxide (Fe-Co-LDH) with the help of 3-mercaptopropinic acid. (3-MPA). The Fe-Co-LDH nanozyme was developed to work as an oxidase-mimetic catalytic activity, promoting the oxidation of colorless 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) to its blue product (TMBox). More importantly, the sulfhydryl and carboxyl groups in 3-MPA can assist As(III) in being anchored onto the oxidase-like Fe-Co-LDH through the formation of the sulfur-stable Fe-As(III)-3-MPA-As(III)-Fe structure (Fig. 7A), which results in not only chemically masking the Fe* catalytic active site but also blocking the interlayer channel of Fe-Co-LDH for TMB substrate access. Because of the selective dual masking of Fe-Co-LDH nanozyme, the oxidase-like chromogenic reaction of TMB is blocked, and nearly no color change occurs. The method was applied to detect arsenic in water samples with a limit of detection of 35 ppb.
Schematic demonstration of Oxidase-like activity based colorimetric assay for arsenic detection. A Illustration of the dual-masking of the active site and interlayer channel of the oxidase-mimicking Fe-Co-LDH by arsenite with the assist of 3-MPA, adapted from Ref. [112]. B Three-dimensional flower-like iron alkoxide based nanozymes for colorimetric detection of As(V), adapted from Ref. [117]. C Illustration of the reassembly-induced oxidase-mimicking activity inhibition of Pd-DTT for colorimetric analysis of arsenite, adapted from Ref. [114]. D Schematic illustration of the colorimetric sensor for arsenic detection based on adsorption enhanced catalytic activity of the octahedral Mn3O4 NPs, adapted from Ref. [115]
Similarly, Fe-based nanozymes such as Fe3O4, Fe2O3, and iron alkoxide have been used to explore many biomedical applications based on their enzyme-mimicking activity [116]. Among them, iron alkoxide nanoparticles were proved to possess oxidase-like catalytic performance for the colorimetric detection of arsenic by utilizing TMB as a chromogenic substrate [113]. Three-dimensional flower-like iron alkoxide-based nanozymes for colorimetric detection of As(V) were illustrated in Fig. 7B with a 1.57 µg/L visual detection limit for As(V). Furthermore, a dithiothreitol-capped palladium nanoparticle (Pd-DTT) was designed based on the reassembly-induced oxidase-like activity for very sensitive colorimetric detection of arsenite [114]. The Pd-DTT nanozyme has strong oxidase-like catalytic activity in the presence of dissolved oxygen, causing the oxidation of colorless TMB to generate the oxidized blue product TMBox. When the arsenite (As + 3) ion is added, it can strongly chelate with the sulfdryl group in DTT, resulting in the reassembly of Pd-DTT nanozymes and, as a result, a considerable reduction of the TMB chromogenic process (Fig. 7C). Based on this strategy, Pd-DTT nanozyme achieved highly sensitive detection of the As+3 ion with an ultralow detection limit of 35 ng/L and a wide linear range from 33 ng/L to 333.3 µg/L.
Recently, the affinity of manganese oxide (Mn3O4) nanoparticles towards arsenic was also investigated based on the adsorption-enhanced oxidase-mimicking catalytic activity of Mn3O4 NPs [115]. The octahedral Mn3O4 NPs possess oxidase-like catalytic activity and can catalyze the reduction of oxygen into free radicals. The free radicals can further oxidize the colorless TMB substrate into a blue-green product (Fig. 7D). Upon addition of arsenic solution, interestingly, the surface morphology of Mn3O4 NPs has been changed by the adsorption of arsenic, which enhances their oxidase-like catalytic activity. Consequently, the solution changes to yellow and displays excellent sensitivity and selectivity against other metal ions. The colorimetric chemosensor can visually detect arsenic with a limit of detection of 1.32 µg/L. Compared to natural enzyme based biosensors, these nanozyme-based colorimetric sensors have advantages that include portability, specificity, sensitivity, and cost-effectiveness. They are also applicable for reliable assessment of total arsenic in complex environmental monitoring.
3.2.2 Colorimetric sensor-based on aptamer
Oligonucleotides, defined as aptamers, have emerged as bio-recognition elements via the systematic evolution of ligands by experimental enrichment (SELEX) technology to form a sequence library [118, 119]. Aptamer-based optical biosensors have drawn notable attention for the detection of toxic pollutants, specifically metal ions, because many metal ions exhibit a high affinity for single-stranded DNA and RNA [104, 120]. Regarding the detection of arsenic, Kim and co-workers, who used it for the removal of arsenic from ground water in Vietnam in 2009, had successfully screened an arsenic-binding DNA aptamer, and named Ars-3 aptamer [121]. Based on this, many aptamer-based biosensors have been developed using the Ars-3 aptamer for arsenic detection in environmental monitoring [120, 122]. Like the "lock-and-key" model, aptamers usually undergo molecular and structural shape complementarities, which result in some analytical signal changes, providing an interesting sensing strategy for real-time and on-site detection of arsenic in real samples.
Among the optical aptasensors, the AuNPs-based colorimetric method is a new and powerful strategy because of its easy and convenient fabrication, distinct size-dependent color formation, and high extinction coefficients [123, 124]. For the first time, Zhou and co-workers reported an aptamer-based colorimetric assay for detecting trace levels of As (III) in aqueous solution [125,126,127,128]. A sensitive and selective colorimetric aptasensor was developed by modulating the aggregation of AuNPs with Ars-3 aptamer and cationic polymers (poly(diallyldimethylammonium), PDDA) for the detection of As (III) in aqueous solution [125]. Without As(III), the PDDA can bind with the Ars-3 aptamer to form a "duplex" structure via electrostatic interaction, and thus the subsequent AuNPs cannot aggregate without color change (Fig. 8A). On the addition of As(III), some of the base of the Ars-3 aptamer will react with As(III) to form an aptamer-arsenic complex, leading to aptamer conformation evolution. Thus, the free PDDA can mediate the aggregation of AuNPs with color and absorption spectra changes.
Using the same strategy, they also reported another aptamer-based colorimetric sensor for arsenic detection by replacing PDDA with another surfactant (hexadecetyltrimethyl-ammonium bromide, CTAB) in the same year [126]. Compared to the PDDA agent, CTAB causes the formation of an orderly arranged aptamer molecular bilayer on the surface of AuNPs, which offers very high specific interactions between the aptamer and the As(III) ion with a high degree (Fig. 8B). It also exhibited rapid response and high selectivity over other metal ions, with excellent recovery in a real water sample. The replacement of PDDA by a CTAB binding agent leads to a further improvement in the limit of detection, from 5.6 ppb to 0.6 ppb for color analysis. Similarly, a synergistic molecular assembly of aptamers and CTAB induced AuNPs aggregation based on an aptamer colorimetric biosensor for arsenite detection was also reported by another research group using the same surfactant-induced aggregation of AuNPs [129]. Despite the advantages of this naked eye detection of arsenic, the design of competitive binding of PDDA/CTAB ligands made the sensing system very complex when applied to the biological samples. Furthermore, salt-induced aggregation of a bare AuNPs-based colorimetric aptasensor for arsenic detection was also reported by Zhou's group in 2014 [127]. In this study, an Ars-3 aptamer was employed as a sensing probe and AuNPs as a colorimetric reporter. Without the As(III) ion, the unmodified AuNPs were wrapped by the random-coil Ars-3 aptamer through DNA base-Au interactions that maintain the AuNPs dispersion in the solution even at higher NaCl concentrations, resulting in a red-colored solution (Fig. 9A). In the presence of As(III), the As (III) binds to the Ars-3 aptamers to form an As-aptamer complex. Under this condition, there is no free Ars-3 aptamer that can be adsorbed onto the surface of bare AuNPs. This process fully induces the aggregation of AuNPs in NaCl solution and forms aggregates, accompanied by a change in color from red to blue. By monitoring the color variation, a very rapid classical aptamer-based AuNPs colorimetric method for As(III) was demonstrated with a 1.26 µg/L limit of detection for a dynamic range from 1.26 to 200 µg/L. However, a bare AuNPs-based biosensor was dependent on salt-induced aggregation, which seems to make them more susceptible to potential interference during environmental sample analysis. Additionally, the use of full-length, 100-nt arsenic-binding aptamers in these assays leads to a total increase in the detection costs.
A Schematic demonstration of the colorimetric assay for trace arsenic(III) detection in aqueous solution based on arsenic aptamer and gold nanoparticles, adapted from Ref. [127]. B G-/T-rich ssDNA Au-NP-based colorimetric strategy for arsenite detection, adapted from Ref. [130]. C. Mechanism of the colorimetric determination of As(III) based on short ssDNA and AuNPs, adapted from Ref. [131]. D Schematic description of the colorimetric detection of As(III) based on the inhibition of hemin peroxidase activity by arsenic-binding aptamers adapted from Ref [128]
Similarly, label-free arsenic colorimetric assays were also developed based on salt-induced aggregation of AuNPs By using G-/T-rich ssDNA [130] and truncated short ssDNA [131] as sensing element. Liang et al. developed a more economic and much simpler label-free colorimetric method for As(III) detection based on the different adsorption on AuNPs between uncoiled G-/T-rich ssDNA and folded DNA [130]. Due to the coordination between Au and nitrogen atoms of bases in DNA, in this assay, the adsorption of uncoiled G-/T-rich ssDNA on AuNPs can prevent the NaCl-induced aggregation of AuNPs and result in maintaining the red color of the colloid AuNPs solution (Fig. 9B). As(III) can particularly form hydrogen bonds with the bases in G-/T-ssDNA. The desorption of DNA from the surface of AuNPs caused the aggregation of AuNPs and a distinct visible color change from red to blue in the presence of salt. This was caused by the conformation evolution of ssDNA from an uncoiled structure to a folded compact structure. The detection of As(III) by using this approach is sensitive, selective, and cost-effective, which compares favourably with previously reported colorimetric methods.
However, this method has also limitations, such as irreversible salt-induced aggregation and slow kinetics between As(III) and G-/T-rich ssDNA. Moreover, Zhang and co-workers developed an unlabeled colorimetric sensing system for As (III) detection based on truncated short ssDNA (Apt-21) from the parent As (III)-aptamer [131]. In this work, Apt-21 functioned as a trace-level assay for As(III) recognition and control of AuNP dispersion by surface attachment, while AuNPs served as a colorimetric signal indicator (Fig. 9C). Another route was reported based on the regulation of hemi-peroxidase catalytic activity by arsenic-binding DNA aptamers. Wu et al. reported a novel colorimetric aptasensor for As(III) determination based on the oxidation of TMB by the hemi-peroxidase-H2O2 system [128]. In the absence of As (III) ions, Ars-3 aptamer binds to the pyrrol ring of hemin via π-π stacking interaction, resulting in temporary inhibition of the catalytic activity of the hemin-H2O2 system and oxidation of TMB into a blue product of a radical cation. But on As(III) addition, Ars-3 aptamer forms an As(III)-aptamer complex. Thus, hemin regains its catalytic activity and oxidizes TMB to yield the yellow-colored product diimine (Fig. 9D). Through this approach, a detection limit of 6 ppb was achieved with high selectivity against other metal ions. Although these nanosensors displayed high sensitivity to the environment, their disadvantage could not be neglected, as they are highly dependent on the nanoparticle’s aggregation mechanism.
In addition to AuNPs-based colorimetric sensors, other important nanozyme materials exist, such as silver nanoparticles [132], Titanium Dioxide [133] and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [134], have also been employed for the detection of trace arsenic in drinking water.In particularly, Divsar et al. fabricated an AgNPs-based colorimetric aptasensor (Apt-AgNPs) for colorimetric sensing of arsenic in aqueous solutions [132]. The sensing principle is based on the aggregation of Apt-AgNPs by arsenite ions. As(III) could selectively bind with its aptamer to form the As(III)-Apt-AgNPs complex and result in a clear decrease in absorption intensity (λmax = 403 nm), which can be in direct proportion to the arsenite concentration present in the solution. Further, a central composite design method combined with response surface methodology was employed for optimizing the colorimetric efficiency of As(III) analysis. The method demonstrated a linear range of the As(III) concentration from 50 to 750 mg/L with a detection limit of 6 mg/L. The combination of carbon nanotube and Chistosan-Nafion (Chit-Naf) composite has also been studied for rapid monitoring of arsenic in the environment.
For instance, Salehi et al. modified a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) with Chit-Naf to achieve high electron transfer kinetics and a large immobilization site for the arsenic-binding aptamer, which promise great potential for the fabrication of biosensing assays [134]. The five steps of aptasensor fabrication were demonstrated, as shown in Fig. 10A. In this study, Chit-Naf composite was used as an excellent conductive surface platform, and a novel CNT-based signal amplification process was developed to design a label-free impedimetric aptasensor for As(III) detection with high sensitivity. In the presence of As (III), As (III) induced the dissociation of the aptamer molecule from the sensing interface to form the aptamer-As(III)-complex (Fig. 10B). The high affinity of an As(III)-specific aptamer as the recognition layer for As(III) resulted in a highly selective aptasensor for the detection of As(III) in environmental samples with high accuracy. For As(III) signal amplification, a CNTCOOH-BSA conjugate based on bovine serum albumin (BSA) and CNT was employed as signal amplification (Fig. 10C). The detection limit of this aptasensor for As(III) detection was obtained to be 100 Ω nM−1. Although these strategies have high selectivity and sensitivity for As(III), they also suffer from many shortcomings, such as being highly costly, time-consuming, having low stability in harsh environments, and requiring an interference-eliminating process.
A Schematic representation of the aptasensor fabrication steps; B Schematic representation of the impedimetric analysis of As(III) by the present aptasensor; and C Schematic representation of the various amplification steps of the aptasensor in the presence of CNTCOOH-BSA hybrid system, reproduced from Ref .[132]
3.2.3 Sensor-based on other biomolecule-modified nanomaterials
Recently, a protein-based sensing approach has also been employed for developing optical sensors for detecting metal ions. Metal ions can specifically interact with sequenced short peptides that can induce or prevent the aggregation of gold nanomaterials [135]. The complexation of As(III) with a phytochelatine-like peptide is reported to bind arsenic to form a label-free colorimetric assay based on the prevention of thiol-induced aggregation of unmodified AuNPs upon the addition of arsenite solution. This phytochelatine-based As(III) sensor showed simplicity and high sensitivity. However, this assay also responded to As(V) because thiol-rich proteins can reduce As(V) to As(III). Similarly, Chen et al. (2017) reported a highly selective colorimetric sensor for detecting As(III) using a highly binding peptide sequence (T-Q-S-Y-K-H-G) as the As(II) specific-recognition moiety [136]. The rational design of the T-Q-S-K-H-G-Cysteine peptide sequence induces the aggregation of unmodified AuNPs, whereas it prevents the peptide-induced aggregation of unmodified AuNPs upon the addition of arsenic solution. This assay shows high selectivity over other metal ions with a LOD of 54 nM for As(III) and was applied for the analysis of As(III) in environmental water samples. This sensing system is much more simple compared with previous reported methods and also features a high selectivity of As(III) over As(V), offering a potential for the speciation of arsenic.
3.3 Sensor-based on specific interactions with ligand-tethered nanomaterials
The surface modified nanomaterials have also been widely applied for colorimetric sensing based on the specific interaction between detecting analyte and the modified ligands [137, 138]. The attachment of ligand molecules to the surface of nanomaterial can be carried out either by non-covalent interaction or covalent bound conjugation [139]. The desired properties of these nanomaterial-based colorimetric sensors for metal-ion detection, including arsenic, can be obtained by doing appropriate surface modifications in their synthesis methods because their properties are size and shape dependent [140, 141]. The chelation chemistry of arsenic with inorganic/organic ligands has been materialized for developing arsenic colorimetric sensor by simply modifying the surface of the nanomaterial with these specific ligands [142, 143]. With this interaction, the formation of the As-O, As-S or As-O-P bond results in colorimetric and catalytic properties change of these nanomaterials, which improves the sensitivity and specificity of detection performance. Different types of arsenic-binding ligands that have high supermolecular chemistry on the surface of nanomaterial are reported for the design of nanomaterial-based arsenic nanosensors. The most common surface-modified ligands used for arsenic determination are summarized in Fig. 11.
Among the various functionalized nanomaterials, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are the most extensively studied, and widely used for colorimetric detection [144,145,146]. These nanoparticles present interesting and unique optical properties due to their strong surface plasmon resonance (SPR) absorption in the visible region and their ease of operation, fabrication, and stability. Therefore, any changes in the optical properties may lead to SPR absorption and colorimetric changes. The use of surface-modified AuNPs as optical nanoprobes greatly improves the sensitivity of colorimetric sensors for arsenic monitoring due to their high extinction coefficient compared with organic dyes [123]. Various AuNPs-based arsenic colorimetric methods were reported with excellent limits of detection and good selectivity [147,148,149]. These optical sensors generally depend on the arsenic-induced aggregation or disaggregation of AuNPs, which results in a color change and a variation in the absorbance peak in the visible region.
Thiol-gold chemistry is the most common colorimetric method used for arsenic detection [150]. Therefore, many thiol (SH)-rich ligands were frequently incorporated in AuNP-based colorimetric methods for on-site detection of arsenic due to their strong bonding between sulfur and arsenic. For instance, Kalluri et al. demonstrated a colorimetric response of glutathione (GSH), cysteine (Cys), and a dithiothreitol (DTT)-modified AuNP based dynamic light scattering (DLS) assay for the selective detection of arsenic [147]. In their study, the specific interaction of the As(III) ion with DTT, GSH, and Cys conjugated AuNPs results in nanoparticle aggregations with stability constants of 37.8, 32.0, and 29.84 logK, respectively, and good selectivity over other heavy metals. DLS analysis was further stated to improve the limit of detection down to 10 ppt. Comparatively, a minimum detection limit (5 ppb) was obtained in the case of DTT-capped AuNP due to the strong binding of the As(III) ion via the As-S bond, while in the other two cases, GSH and Cys-modified AuNPs, the As (III) ion binds through the As-O linkage due to the lack of free SH groups available for chelating (Fig. 12).
Schematic demonstration of Thiol-AuNPs based arsenic detection. a DTT-functionalized AuNPs, b Cys-functionalized AuNPs, and c GSH-functionalized AuNPs. This figure was obtained with permission from Ref. [147]
Similarly, citrate-based AuNPs functionalized with GSH-DTT-Cys have been reported for As (III) detection in the presence of 2,6-pyridinedicarboxilic acid (PDCA) as a chelating agent [148]. Additionally, a dithiothreitol-modified gold nanorod (DTT-AuNRs) has also been developed as a selective colorimetric probe for the detection of arsenic (III) in aqueous solutions [151]. The developed dithiothreitol-capped AuNRs show high sensitivity for As (III) detection with a low detection limit of 38 nM, and have been applied for As (III) sensing in environmental water samples. Interestingly, Shrivas and coworkers proposed another colorimetric sensing strategy for As (III) based on lauryl sulfate (LS)-functionalized AuNPs by utilizing the competitive interaction between AuNPs, LS, and arsenite [152]. In the presence of As2O3, As(III) would replace the LS modifying ligands from the surface of AuNPs, resulting in aggregation and the color change due to the instability of AuNPs. This colorimetric method was successfully applied for the detection of arsenite in natural water with a 2 ppb detection limit. Other than gold-thiol based reactions, different functionalized ligands, such as phosphonium ionic liguid [153], S-layer-protein [154], calix[n]arene-based supramolecule [155] and polyethylene glycol [156] have also been incorporated into AuNPs-based colorimetric sensor design for arsenic determination in real environmental samples.
Tan et al. developed a colorimetric C14(C6)3P+-functionalized AuNP (P-AuNP) probe for naked-eye speciation tests of As (III) and As (V) based on the specific interaction between arsenite and phosphonium ionic ligands [153]. In this method, the selective interaction between As (III) and phosphonium ionic liguid (C14(C6)3P+) was demonstrated by extended x-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) analysis, which shows much stronger binding to As (III) than As (V). As shown in Fig. 13A, As (III) is detected directly based on the color change of the P-AuNP probe from red to blue. As (V) concentration is determined indirectly by subtracting from the total inorganic arsenic by pre-reducing As (V) into As (III) via ascorbic acid. The developed protocol was applied for a visual speciation test of arsenite and arsenate at levels below the WHO guideline for drinking water. The proposed P-AuNP probe also featured low-cost, rapidity, no requirement of equipment, and high tolerance to common potential interference ions such as phosphate ions (PO43−, 10 nM), which make the P-AuNP colorimetric probe suitable for the field test of As (III) in environmental samples. Arsenate concentration can be determined indirectly by subtracting arsenite concentration from the total inorganic arsenic. Lakatos et al. demonstrated the synthesis of an S-layer protein-functionalized AuNPs based colorimetric method for detecting anionic arsenate complexes in an aqueous medium [154]. This method exploits the aggregation of S-layer protein–functionalized spherical AuNPs in the presence of arsenic (V) species, and results in a color change from red-wine to blue for aggregated NPs. A lower detection limit of up to 24 ppb was achieved using this method (Fig. 13B). In another study, Boruah’s group developed a polyethylene glycol functionalized AuNPs-based colorimetric assay for As (III) with a detection limit of 5 ppb and a linear range of 5–20 ppb in the environmental sample [156].
A Schematic representation of the mechanism of P-AuNPs for determination of arsenic, adopted from Ref. [153]. B schematic illustrations of S-layer-modified spherical AuNPs for arsenic detection, reproduced from Ref. [154]. C Schematic representation of the MCPTH-AuNPs-based dual-modal assay for arsenic detection, reproduced from Ref. [155]. D Schematic Illustration of the Asn/DTT/GSH-AgNPs-based dual-modal assay for arsenic detection, reproduced from Ref. [157]
Very recently, Kongor et al. reported a dual colorimetric and electrochemical sensor for the detection of As (III) in aqueous solution based on the non-covalent interaction of calix[4]pyrrole tetrahydrazide (MCPTH) supramolecules on the AuNP surfaces [155].
Calix[n]arene derived platforms are 3rd generation supramolcules that have been used for the design of new innovative receptors. As illustrated in Fig. 13C, the well-dispersed solution of MCPTH-capped AuNPs gets destabilized in the presence of As(III), which then results in disruption of the non-covalent interaction between MCPTH and the AuNP surface, which has almost lost its spherical shape. This is confirmed by the remarkable visual color change from pink to blue. The proposed MCPTH-capped AuNPs have also been applied for the amperometric electrochemical sensing of As(III) with a detection limit of 1 ppb.
Compared to AuNP-based colorimetric sensors, very few surface-functionalized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and Ag-based coordination polymers are reported for the colorimetric detection of arsenic [44, 157, 159,160,161]. For example, Wen et al. fabricated a multi-ligand-functionalized AgNPs colorimetric method for arsenic determination using asparagine (Asn) as the capping agent followed by modification with DTT and GSH [157]. A naked-eye colorimetric detection of arsenite can be released based on the arsenite-triggered aggregation of GSH/DTT/Asn-AgNPs (Fig. 13D). Moreover, the colorimetric assay of the solution phase can be converted into an electrode to realize surface-accumulated electrochemical analysis of As(III) with improved sensitivity and selectivity. Similarly, Siangproh et al. developed a simple colorimetric detection of arsenic based on selectively adsorbed onto ferrihydrite-coated silica gel using silver nanoplates (AgNPls) [159].
As an alternative solution to the costly Au and Ag NPs, cerium oxide (CeO2) and copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) have received significant attention for the fabrication of highly economical arsenic colorimetric probes [162, 163]. For example, Laghari et al. developed a highly stable ranolazine-functionalized CuNPs-based colorimetric sensor for trace level detection of arsenic (III) species in groundwater samples [163]. The synthetic method for Rano-Cu NPs is cheap, rapid, and simple to follow. It demonstrated a highly selective colorimetric sensor for As (III) detection via a visual color change from brick red to darkening green with a low detection limit of 16 nM. When these colorimetric sensing concepts and techniques are combined with appropriate nanomaterials with unique optical properties, they may provide significant performance improvements for the measurement of inorganic arsenic, such as improved selectivity, increased sensitivity, cheaper cost, faster response, and naked-eye detection. This simple design, quick response time, and easy-to-interpret function are critical to the current development of sophisticated colorimetric sensor materials, particularly for real-time and on-site applications.
4 Paper-based colorimetric sensor
Paper-based microfluidic devices have been extensively investigated for their potential use in optical biosensor applications [164,165,166,167]. Because of their advantages in simplicity, portability, disposability, practicability, and visual detection, colorimetric tests should be carried out on solid-state platforms for field applications [168]. Meanwhile, the sensing principles of the paper-based colorimetric assay for arsenic detection are based on the above-mentioned colorimetric sensing strategies, and they are very simple and practical but advanced colorimetric sensors [169,170,171]. For example, Zhang and his group reported a color-multiplexing based fluorescent colorimetry test paper with a variety of dosage-response visualizations of arsenic (III) as low as 5 ppb [158]. In their study, the red quantum dots (DQs) were functionalized with GSH and DTT to obtain excellent sensitivity to As (III) (Fig. 14A). The cyan carbon dots (CDs) with spectral blue-green components were mixed with the DQs solution to produce a red fluorescence composite. The addition of As (III) into the sensory solution resulted in the fluorescent color evolving from red to cyan gradually (Fig. 14B, C). The sensory solution was printed onto a piece of filter paper to realize dosage-sensitive visualization for the detection of arsenic in tap water and lake water (Fig. 14D).
A The visualization mechanism of As(III) using GSH/DTT-QDs as fluorescent sensory probe and CDs as an internal standard probe; B proposed strategy to achieve the wide range of color variations from red to cyan by the use of dual-color probes; C the visualization of As(III) using the fluorescent test papers prepared by printing GSH/DTT-QDs/CDs ink on a piece of filter paper; D the visual detections of As(III) in tap water and lake water. This figure was obtained with permission from Ref [158]
Using similar approaches, Chanda’s group reported a paper-based nanosensor for the colorimetric detection of arsenic species using functionalized AuNPs with different capping agents such as thioguanine (TG) [172, 173], meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) [174], and 2-mercapto-4-methyl-5-thiazoleacetic acid (MMT) [175]. A simple paper-based microfluidic device for the detection of arsenic was reported using a gold-modified nanosensor [172].
The proposed nanoprobe (Au-TA-TG) was prepared by step-wise chemical conjugation of AuNPs with thioctic acid (TA), followed by thioguanine (TG) ligands in the presence of conjugating agents. This method develops a visible dark bluish-back precipitate at the interface of the microchannel due to the aggregation of nanoparticles via transverse diffusive mixing of As (III) ions with Au-TA-TG (Fig. 15A). Then, the amount of arsenic originally present in the solution is related to the amount of color that precipitated. Their rapid, sensitive Y-shaped design is specific for arsenite, and can detect arsenic at very low concentration levels (1 ppb). Similarly, a gold nanorods (GNR) paper-based colorimetric sensor, GNR-PEG-DMSA, for arsenic detection was reported using GNR by conjugations with poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether thiol (mPEG-SH), followed by DMSA [174]. As illustrated in Fig. 15B, the interaction of As (III) or As (V) ions with the free thiol group of the GNR-PEG-DMSA probe results in arsenic-induced aggregation of nanorod particles with distinct color changes from dark bluish-purple to almost colorless. The proposed assay responded to both As(III) and As(V), since arsenate can be reduced to arsenite by DMSA ligand, and thus the total arsenic in the water sample can be quantified. Moreover, this color-based response GNR-PEG-DMSA sensor is also utilized to develop a smart paper-based device that can be used for field detection of both arsenic species in real water samples with a detection limit of 1 ppb. In another study, the same group developed a GNP-MMT@Eu nanosensor for arsenic detection by modifying the AuNPs with other MMT followed by europium chloride (EuCl3) [175]. Both arsenite and arsenate can induce GNP-MMT@Eu aggregation through electrostatic attraction and covalent-type interaction between the As-OH/As-O− groups of arsenic species and the Eu-OH/Eu-OH2+ of the GNP-MMT@Eu nanoprobe (Fig. 15C). This results in a visible color change from red to blue. In another approach, the GNP-MMT@Eu nanoprobe was validated for on-site detection of total arsenic using a filter paper strip and achieved almost a 0.1 ppm detection limit of total arsenic by naked eye.
A schematic representation of paper-based microfluidic analytical device for arsenic monitoring using Au-TA-TG nanosensor A reproduced with permission from Ref. [172], B GNR-PEG-DMSA nanorods reproduced with permission from Ref. [174], C GNP-MMT@Eu nanosensor reproduced with permission from Ref. [175], and D smartphone-integrated paper device fabricated with AuNPs/Suc reproduced with permission from Ref. [176]
In a similar case, a few research groups reported the use of a smartphone-integrated colorimetric test strip for the detection of arsenic (III) in contaminated environmental samples using sucrose-modified gold nanoparticles (AuNPs/Suc) as nanoprobes [176, 177]. For example, AuNPs/Suc is fabricated by the reduction of chloroauric acid using sucrose as a capping agent [176]. The addition of As(III) to the AuNPs/Suc nanoprobe vial results in a color change from pink to blue. The color intensity of the solution was measured using spectrophotometry in the wavelength ranges of 200–800 nm, as illustrated in Fig. 15D. To develop a smartphone-integrated paper-based device, the AuNPs/Suc nanoprobe was placed on a round paper substrate, followed by the addition of different As (III) concentrations. The color intensity of the test paper zone with As (III) was measured using IMageJ software (Fig. 15D). This smartphone-integrated paper device demonstrated a linear range of 50 to 3000 µg/L with a detection limit of 20 µg/L. Another research integrates smartphone, microfluidics, and colorimetric applications for simultaneous detection of As(III) and Hg(II) ions based on the plasmon resonance properties of gold nanoparticles. The colorimetric signals originated due to the nanoparticle aggregates formation through the interaction of gold nanoparticles with DTT-10,12-pentacosadienoic acid, and lysine in the presence of As (III) and Hg (II) ions [178]. In another study, leucomalachite green (LMG) dye was integrated into a microfluidic platform to probe the colorimetric reaction between arsenic and KI and liberate iodine, which results in LMG oxidation into malachite green under acidic media, forming a strong green color on a paper-based test strip [179]. The LOD was 0.19 ppb. Similarly, Nagy and a coworker developed a portable and semi-automated colorimetric sensor device for the determination of arsenic in drinking water with a sensitivity of 1 µg/L [166]. The greatest advantages of paper-based microfluidics analytical devices are that they are biodegradable, low-cost, and do not need any sophisticated facilities or instrumentation. They also offer rapid detection by a simple color change that could be detected by the naked-eye. Due to the above advantages, this method has attracted significant attention in analytical chemistry as a powerful tool for rapid monitoring of toxic metals, especially for remote field applications.
5 Conclusion and future prospects
Contamination of drinking water by arsenic species significantly threatens human health, and the effective real-time monitoring of arsenic in the environment, however, remains a major challenge in many countries. Recently, advanced optical colorimetric sensors have emerged as a promising analytical tool for rapid monitoring of toxic pollutants, including arsenic, in both lab and field measurements due to their fast visual detection. The advantages of using simple instrumentation, portability, and ease-to-use for field application along with visual quantification have made optical sensors preferred in many areas of research as compared to the traditionally used techniques. In this review, we have discussed and reviewed the advancement of optical colorimetric sensor strategies for arsenite (As+3) and arsenate (As+5) determination in the environment. These colorimetric assays are based on chemical and molecular interactions between the surrounding materials (e.g., dye/reagent, biomolecule, polymer, and nanoparticle) and the target arsenic species, which make the overall method sensitive and specific. Furthermore, various nanomaterials with unique colorimetric and catalytic properties are discussed for sensing applications involving arsenic species. It should be noted that the development of colorimetric methods combines chemical, biological, and nanomaterials to endow them with better sensing and analytical performance. In addition, the use of paper material for point-of-care analysis greatly advanced the colorimetric sensing of arsenic for on-site field applications. The types of sensing, materials/probes, and detection limit of various high sensitive optical colorimetric sensors of inorganic species are summarized in Table 1.
Despite the above achievements, key challenges also exist in the exploration of these arsenic colorimetric sensing principles and strategies for practical or commercial application in the following aspects: (i) currently, most of the reported arsenic colorimetric optical sensors are only verified in the lab or in simple sample matrices. Thus, more validation experiments should be carried out for monitoring toxic arsenic in various real environmental samples such as soil, plants, wastewater, etc. (ii) Speciation of inorganic arsenite and arsenate. The toxicity of arsenic largely depends on its oxidation state. Typically, arsenite is more toxic than arsenate. So far, many of the reported colorimetric probes cannot directly differentiate the two arsenic species (As+3 and As+5) effectively. Hence, speciation analysis of inorganic arsenic is important for species migration and transformation analysis, as well as toxicity evaluation. Moreover, these strategies are also limited to detect organic arsenic compounds such as MMA and DMA. Thus, additional conversion and separation procedures are still important to be coupled with these advanced methods. It is believed that developing advanced nanosensing strategies with unique colorimetric properties to directly analyze different forms of arsenic species will be an important research area in the future. (iii) On-site Analysis. The development of advanced emerging analytical tools for the analysis of toxic arsenic in field applications is also another major challenge. To obtain accurate pollution-cause information, rapid monitoring of arsenic at the pollution-site is particularly important. Among the reported methods, fortunately, paper-based colorimetric sensors can make rapid detection of arsenic at pollution-site come true. In addition, it will be an important research area in the future. (iv) Interference from the environmental sample. The reported optical colorimetric sensors are not selective or specific enough to detect arsenic in complex sample matrices. The presence of iron, phosphate, and sulfur-containing compounds in the sample matrices has been found to cause potential interference in these colorimetric assays. This limits the wide use of arsenic colorimetric sensors in the analysis of real environmental samples and may require additional separation or concentration of arsenic compounds from the sample matrices before the detection step.
To overcome these obstacles, more efforts need to be dedicated to develop cost-effective colorimetric-based arsenic nanosensors for practical use or commercialization. Authors conclude that future work will continue to explore different advanced nanomaterials for on-site arsenic determination with simpler instrumentation, faster response, practicability, higher sensitivity, easy visual color detection, and better selectivity.
Data availability
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- AAS:
-
Atomic absorption spectroscopy
- ABTS:
-
2,2′-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonicacid)
- AFS:
-
Atomic fluorescence spectrometry
- ATP:
-
Adenosine triphospahate
- AgNPs:
-
Silver nanoparticles
- Au NPs:
-
Gold nanoparticles
- CNTs:
-
Carbon nanotubes
- CuNPs:
-
Copper nanoparticles
- DMA:
-
Dimethylarsenic acid
- EEA:
-
Electrophorese electrochemical assay
- EPA:
-
Environmental Protection Agency
- ICP-MS:
-
Inductive couple plasma mass spectrometry
- LOD :
-
Limit of detection
- MMA:
-
Monomethylarsenic acid
- TMB:
-
3,3′,5,5′-Tetramethylbenzidine
- WHO:
-
World Health Organization
References
Akhtar N, Syakir Ishak MI, Bhawani SA, Umar K. Various natural and anthropogenic factors responsible for water quality degradation: A review. Water. 2021;13(19):2660.
Muruganandam M, Rajamanickam S, Sivarethinamohan S, et al. Impact of climate change and anthropogenic activities on aquatic ecosystem–A review. Environ Res. 2023;238:117233.
Mandal BK, Suzuki KT. Arsenic round the world: a review. Talanta. 2002;58(1):201–35.
Upadhyay MK, Shukla A, Yadav P, Srivastava S. A review of arsenic in crops, vegetables, animals and food products. Food Chem. 2019;276:608–18.
Chain EPoCitF, Schrenk D, Bignami M, et al. Update of the risk assessment of inorganic arsenic in food. EFSA J. 2024;22(1):e8488.
Tabelin CB, Igarashi T, Villacorte-Tabelin M, et al. Arsenic, selenium, boron, lead, cadmium, copper, and zinc in naturally contaminated rocks: a review of their sources, modes of enrichment, mechanisms of release, and mitigation strategies. Sci Total Environ. 2018;645:1522–53.
Knowles FC, Benson AA. The biochemistry of arsenic. Trends Biochem Sci. 1983;8(5):178–80.
Deepa A, Padmini V. Highly efficient colorimetric sensor for selective and sensitive detection of arsenite ion (III) in aqueous medium. J Fluoresc. 2019;29(4):813–8.
Melak, Ferreccio C, Kalman D, et al. Arsenic methylation and lung and bladder cancer in a case control study in northern Chile. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2014;274:225–231.
Guha M. Chronic arsenic toxicity and human health. Ind J Med Res. 2008;128:436–47.
Gong SEOB. Low-level arsenic exposure, AS3MT gene polymorphism and cardiovascular diseases in rural Texas counties. Environ Res. 2012;113:52–5.
Paul BT, Udensi UK, Isokpehi RD, Yedjou CG, Kumar S. Arsenic and cancer. In: Handbook of Arsenic Toxicology. 2010:523–555.
Hubaux B-S, Enfield KSS, et al. Molecular features in arsenic-induced lung tumors. Mol Cancer. 2013;12:20.
Hughes MF, Beck BD, Chen Y, Lewis AS, Thomas DJ. Arsenic exposure and toxicology: a historical perspective. Toxicol Sci. 2011;123:305–32.
Soumya C, Sonika Sharma, Gupta DK. Arsenic and Its Effect on Major Crop Plants: Stationary Awareness to Paradigm with Special Reference to Rice Crop. Springer Nature, Switzerland; 2017, pp. 123–144.
WHO. World Health Organization: Arsenic in drinking-water Rev/1 WHO, Geneva, (Downloaded from:http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/arse-nic.pdf; 2011.
Council NR. Arsenic in drinking water. 1999.
WHO. Arsenic in drinking-water: background document for development of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality: World Health Organization;2003.
Toda K, Ohba T, Takaki M, Karthikeyan S, Hirata S, Dasgupta PK. Speciation-capable field instrument for the measurement of arsenite and arsenate in water. Anal Chem. 2005;77(15):4765–73.
Revanasiddappa HD, Dayananda B, Kumar T. A sensitive spectrophotometric method for the determination of arsenic in environmental samples. Environ Chem Lett. 2007;5(3):151–5.
Korte NE, Fernando Q. A review of arsenic (III) in groundwater. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 1991;21(1):1–39.
Khan E. Detecting inorganic arsenic below WHO threshold limit; A comparative study of various sensors. Int J Environ Anal Chem 2021:1–24.
Satish KT, Arora D, Dilbaghi N. Nanosensors for environmental applications. Springer Nature, Switzerland AG. 2020;43.
Ondlej K, Siegel J, Hnatowicz V, ŠvorIík V. Noble metal nanostructures influence of structure and environment on their optical properties. J Nanomater. 2013;1:1–16.
Banik D, Kumar MS, Kumar MA. Recent development of chromogenic and fluorogenic chemosensors for the detection of arsenic species: environmental and biological applications. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2020;246:119047.
Devi P, Anupma T, Lai RY, Saini S, Jain R, Kumar P. Progress in the materials for optical detection of arsenic in water. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2019;110:97–115.
Aldewachi H, Chalati T, Woodroofe MN, Bricklebank N, Sharrack B, Gardiner P. Gold nanoparticle-based colorimetric biosensors. Nanoscale. 2018;10:18–33.
Abdelmonaim A, Vikrant K, Kim K-H, Ballesteros E, Rhadfi A, Malik AK. Advances in colorimetric and optical sensing for gaseous volatile organic compounds. Trends Anal Chem. 2019;118:502–16.
Zheng L, Askim JR, Suslick KS. The optoelectronic nose: colorimetric and fluorometric sensor arrays. Chem Rev. 2019;119:231–92.
Khansili N. Advances in material for colorimetric and fluorescent detection of arsenic. Biosens Bioelectron X. 2023;15:100410.
Melamed D. Monitoring arsenic in the environment: a review of science and technologies with the potential for field measurements. Anal Chim Acta. 2005;532(1):1–13.
Hu S, Lu J, Jing C. A novel colorimetric method for field arsenic speciation analysis. J Environ Sci. 2012;24(7):1341–6.
Das D, Chatterjee A, Mandal BK, Samanta G, Chakraborti D, Chanda B. Arsenic in ground water in six districts of West Bengal, India: the biggest arsenic calamity in the world. Part 2. Arsenic concentration in drinking water, hair, nails, urine, skin-scale and liver tissue (biopsy) of the affected people. Analyst. 1995;120(3):917–24.
Thakkar S, Liu J, Dumée LF, Singh BR, Shukla S, Yang W. Arsenic ion assisted core–satellites nano-assembly of gold nanoparticles for its colorimetric determination in water. J Water Process Eng. 2022;48:102833.
Dey TK, Banerjee P, Bakshi M, Kar A, Ghosh S. Groundwater arsenic contamination in West Bengal: current scenario, effects and probable ways of mitigation. Int Lett Nat Sci. 2014;13:45–58.
Flanagan SV, Johnston RB, Zheng Y. Arsenic in tube well water in Bangladesh: health and economic impacts and implications for arsenic mitigation. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90:839–46.
Ryker SJ. Arsenic in ground water used for drinking water in the United States. Arsenic Ground Water Geochem Occurr. 2003:165–178.
Sharma SM. Aquatic arsenic: toxicity, speciation, transformations, and remediation. Environ Int. 2009;35(4):743–59.
Genchi G, Lauria G, Catalano A, Carocci A, Sinicropi MS. Arsenic: a review on a great health issue worldwide. Appl Sci. 2022;12(12):6184.
Flora SJ. Arsenic: chemistry, occurrence, and exposure. In: Handbook of arsenic toxicology. Elsevier: New York; 2015. p. 1–49.
Thomas DJ, Li J, Waters SB, et al. Arsenic (+ 3 oxidation state) methyltransferase and the methylation of arsenicals. Exp Biol Med. 2007;232(1):3–13.
O’Day PA. Chemistry and mineralogy of arsenic. Elements. 2006;2(2):77–83.
Swaran F. Arsenic: chemistry, occurrence, and exposure. In: Handbook of arsenic toxicology. 2020:1–49.
Litter MI. Chemistry and occurrence of arsenic in water; 2022.
Kalia K, Khambholja DB. Arsenic in the marine environment—Contents, speciation, and its biotransformation. In: Handbook of Arsenic Toxicology. New York: Elsevier; 2023. p. 761–89.
Flora SJS. Arsenic chemistry, occurrence, and exposure. In: Handbook of arsenic toxicology. 2010:1–49.
Wang Z, Rossman TG. The carcinogenicity of arsenic. In: Toxicology of metals, vol. I. CRC Press: Cambridge; 2023. p. 221–9.
Gorby MS. Arsenic poisoning. West J Med. 1988;149(3):308.
Thomas DJ, Styblo M, Lin S. The cellular metabolism and systemic toxicity of arsenic. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2001;176(2):127–44.
Abernathy C, Chakraborti D, Edmonds JS, Gibb H, Hoet P, Hopenhayn-Rich C. Environmental health criteria for arsenic and arsenic compounds. Environ Health Criteria. 2001;224:1–521.
Das S, Jean J-S, Kar S, Chakraborty S. Effect of arsenic contamination on bacterial and fungal biomass and enzyme activities in tropical arsenic-contaminated soils. Biol Fertil Soils. 2013;49:757–65.
Vahter M, Concha G. Role of metabolism in arsenic toxicity. Pharmacol Toxicol MiniReview. 2001;89(1):1–5.
Gupta DK, Chatterjee S. Arsenic contamination in the environment: the issues and solutions. Berlin: Springer; 2017.
Tchounwou PB, Centeno JA, Patlolla AK. Arsenic toxicity, mutagenesis, and carcinogenesis–a health risk assessment and management approach. Mol Cell Biochem. 2004;255:47–55.
Parvez F, Chen Y, Brandt-Rauf PW, et al. A prospective study of respiratory symptoms associated with chronic arsenic exposure in Bangladesh: findings from the Health Effects of Arsenic Longitudinal Study (HEALS). Thorax. 2010;65(6):528–33.
Wang C-H, Hsiao CK, Chen C-L, et al. A review of the epidemiologic literature on the role of environmental arsenic exposure and cardiovascular diseases. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2007;222(3):315–26.
Zheng L, Kuo C-C, Fadrowski J, Agnew J, Weaver VM, Navas-Acien A. Arsenic and chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2014;1:192–207.
Tchounwou PB, Patlolla AK, Centeno JA. Invited reviews: carcinogenic and systemic health effects associated with arsenic exposure—a critical review. Toxicol Pathol. 2003;31(6):575–88.
Piriya VSA, Joseph P, Daniel SCGK, Lakshmanan S, Kinoshita T, Muthusamy S. Colorimetric sensors for rapid detection of various analytes. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;78:1231–45.
Rajat S, Thakur P, Thakur A, et al. Colorimetric sensing approaches of surface-modified gold and silver nanoparticles for detection of residual pesticides: a review. In J Environ Anal Chem. 2019;1:1–16.
Xiao J, Jiang C, Li L, et al. UV–vis spectrophotometer and smartphone RGB dual mode detection of inorganic arsenic based on hydride generation iodine–starch system. Microchem J. 2023;186:108298.
Haus J. Optical sensors: basics and applications. New York: Wiley; 2010.
Lieberzeit PA, Dickert FL. Sensor technology and its application in environmental analysis. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007;387:237–47.
Ajay Piriya VS, Joseph P, SCG KD, Lakshmanan S, Kinoshita T, Muthusamy S. Colorimetric sensors for rapid detection of various analytes. Mater Sci Eng C 2017;78:1231–1245.
Cho SH, Suh JM, Eom TH, Kim T, Jang HW. Colorimetric sensors for toxic and hazardous gas detection: a review. Electron Mater Lett. 2021;17:1–17.
Shalini T, Dumée LF, Gupta M, Singh BR, Yang W. Nano-enabled sensors for detection of arsenic in water. Water Res. 2020;188:116538.
Lingling G, Du B, Pan L, et al. Colorimetric Aggregation Assay for Arsenic(III) using Gold Nanoparticles. Microchim Acta. 2017;184:1185–90.
Jain R, Thakur A, Kumar P, Pooja D. Materials in colorimetric detection of water pollutants. In: Sensors in water pollutants monitoring: role of material. Springer; 2020:125–145.
Vera R, Zhang YL, Fontàs C, Almeida MIGS, Anticó E, Cattrall RW. Automatic determination of arsenate in drinking water by flow analysis with dual membrane-based separation. Food Chem. 2019;283:232–8.
Hung DQ, Nekrassova O, Compton RG. Analytical methods for Inorganic Arsenic in Water: a review. Talanta. 2004;64:269–77.
Lakso JU, Rose LJ, Peoples SA, Shirachi DY. A colorimetric method for the determination of arsenite, arsenate, monomethylarsonic acid, and dimethylarsinic acid in biological and environmental samples. J Agric Food Chem. 1979;27(6):1229–33.
Vieira HP, Nascentes CC, Germano A, Windmöller CC. Development of a method for the direct determination of arsenate in honey by hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry. Anal Methods. 2012;4(7):2068–73.
Arora M, Megharaj M, Naidu R. Arsenic testing field kits: some considerations and recommendations. Environ Geochem Health. 2009;31:45–8.
Bird F. The gutzeit test for arsenic. Analyst. 1901;26(July):181–8.
Salman M, Athar M, Shafique U, Anwar J, Rehman R, Ameer S, Azeem M. Micro-determination of arsenic in aqueous samples by image scanning and computational quantification. Analytical Methods. 2012;4(1):242–6.
Dal Cortivo LA, Cefola M, Umberger CJ. The determination of arsenic and antimony in biologic material. Anal Biochem. 1960;1(6):491–7.
Pu S, Sun H, Hou X, Xu K. A colorimetric assay for the determination of trace arsenic based on in-situ formation of AuNPs with synergistic effect of arsine and iodide. Anal Chim Acta. 2021;1144:61–7.
Dhar RK, Zheng Y, Rubenstone J, Geen AV. Arsenic detection. Anal Chim Acta. 2004;526:203–9.
Shingara SS. Colorimetric method for the determination of arsenic (III) in potable water. Analyst. 1976;101(1208):856–9.
Okazaki T, Kuramitz H, Hata N, Taguchi S, Murai K, Okauchi K. Visual colorimetry for determination of trace arsenic in groundwater based on improved molybdenum blue spectrophotometry. Anal Methods. 2015;7(6):2794–9.
Krishna MVB, Thangavel S, Sunitha Y, Sanjiv K. A blue arsenomolybdic acid-crystal violet ion-associate pair paving the way for the field detection of arsenic in groundwater. Anal Methods. 2022;14(36):3539–51.
Okazaki T, Wang W, Kuramitz H, Hata N, Taguchi S. Colorimetric arsenic detection. Anal Chem. 2013;29:67–72.
Véronique L, Deluchat V, Serpaud B, Bollinger J-C. Arsenite oxidation and arsenate determination by the molybdene blue method. Talanta. 2003;61(3):267–76.
Purnendu KD, Huiliang H, Genfa Z, Cobb GP. Photometric measurement of trace As(III) and As(V) in drinking water. Talanta. 2002;58(1):153–64.
Das J, Sarkar P. A new dipstick colorimetric sensor for detection of arsenate in drinking water. Environ Sci Water Res Technol. 2016;2(4):693–704.
Morita K, Kaneko E. Spectrophotometric determination of arsenic in water samples based on micro particle formation of ethyl violet-molybdoarsenate. Anal Sci. 2006;22(8):1085–9.
Bhattacharya S, Santu S, Raja S. Unique norbornene polymer based “in-field” sensor for As(iii). J Mater Chem A. 2013;1(29):8398–405.
Xu C, Liu D, Zhang D, Zhao C, Liu H. Ultrasensitive point-of-care testing of arsenic based on a catalytic reaction of unmodified gold nanoparticles. New J Chem. 2018;42(18):14857–62.
Chauhan K, Singh P, Kumari B, Singhal RK. Synthesis of new benzothiazole Schiff base as selective and sensitive colorimetric sensor for arsenic on-site detection at ppb level. Anal Methods. 2017;9(11):1779–85.
Anand BC, Panneerselvam P, Ravikumar A. Novel, sensitive and selective colorimetric detection of arsenate in aqueous solution by a Fenton-like reaction of Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles. Anal Methods. 2018;10(36):4378–86.
Choodum A, Jirapattanasophon V, Boonkanon C, Taweekarn T, Wongniramaikul W. Difluoroboron-Curcumin Doped Starch Film and Digital Image Colorimetry for Semi-Quantitative Analysis of Arsenic. Anal Sci. 2020:19SBP09.
Sirawatcharin S, Saithongdee A, Chaicham A, Tomapatanaget B, Imyim A, Praphairaksit N. Naked-eye and colorimetric detection of arsenic(III) using difluoroboron-curcumin in aqueous and resin bead support systems. Anal Sci. 2014;30(12):1129–34.
Ezeh VC, Harrop TC. Synthesis and properties of arsenic (III)-reactive coumarin-appended benzothiazolines: a new approach for Inorganic arsenic detection. Inorg Chem. 2013;52(5):2323–34.
Pasha C, Narayana B. Determination of arsenic in environmental and biological samples using toluidine blue or safranine O by simple spectrophotometric method. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2008;81(1):47–51.
Konstantinos CM, Punamiya P, Sarkar D, Datta R. Novel colorimetric method overcoming phosphorus interference during trace arsenic analysis in soil solution. Analyst. 2008;133(2):191–6.
Wang T, Milton RD, Abdellaoui S, Hickey DP, Minteer SD. Laccase inhibition by arsenite/arsenate: determination of inhibition mechanism and preliminary application to a self-powered biosensor. Anal Chem. 2016;88(6):3243–8.
Upadhyay LSB, Kumar N, Chauhan S. Minireview: whole-cell, nucleotide, and enzyme inhibition-based biosensors for the determination of arsenic. Anal Lett. 2018;51(3):1265–79.
Li T, Berberich J, Sahle-Demessie E, Varughese E. A disposable acetylcholine esterase sensor for As(iii) determination in groundwater matrix based on 4-acetoxyphenol hydrolysis. Anal Methods. 2019;11(40):5203–13.
Lata S, Upadhyay B, Verma N. Enzyme inhibition based biosensors: a review. Anal Lett. 2013;46:225–41.
Zhang D, Zhao J, Li G. Protein-based voltammetric biosensors fabricated with nanomaterials. Protein Peptide Lett. 2008;15(8):764–71.
Jia Z, Zhang C-L, Yu S-H. Tuning gold nanoparticle aggregation through the inhibition of acid phosphatase bioactivity: a plasmonic sensor for light-up visual detection of arsenate (AsV). ChemPlusChem. 2016;81:1–6.
Tao W, Milton RD, Abdellaoui S, Hickey DP, Minteer SD. Laccase inhibition by As3+/As5+: determination of inhibition mechanism and preliminary application to a self-powered biosensor. Anal Chem. 2016;88:3243–8.
Madhavi V, Lele S. Laccase: properties and applications. BioResources. 2009;4(4).
Mao K, Zhang H, Wang Z, et al. Nanomaterial-based aptamer sensors for arsenic detection. Biosens Bioelectron. 2020;148:111785.
Liu Y, Yu C, Cao Z, Shvarts D, Trogler WC. A highly sensitive enzymatic catalysis system for trace detection of arsenic in water. Chemistry. 2017;23(43):10289.
Manca F, Houillon FB, Pasquato L, Scrimin P. Nanozymes: Gold-nanoparticle-based transphosphorylation catalysts. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43:6165–9.
Xue Q, Niu X, Liu P, et al. Analyte-triggered citrate-stabilized Au nanoparticle aggregation with accelerated peroxidase-mimicking activity for catalysis-based colorimetric sensing of arsenite. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2021;334:129650.
Liu B, Wang Y, Chen Y, Guo L, Wei G. Biomimetic two-dimensional nanozymes: synthesis, hybridization, functional tailoring, and biosensor applications. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8:10065–86.
Singh R, Umapathi A, Patel G, et al. Nanozyme-based pollutant sensing and environmental treatment: trends, challenges, and perspectives. Sci Total Environ. 2022;854:158771.
Shao-Hua W, Zhong X-L, Wu Y-D, Liang R-P, Zhang L, Qiu J-D. Colorimetric assay conversion to highly sensitive electrochemical assay for bimodal detection of arsenate based on cobalt oxyhydroxide nanozyme via arsenate absorption. Anal Chem. 2019;91(10):6487–97.
Xiao-Li Z, Wen S-H, Wang Y, et al. Colorimetric and electrochemical arsenate assays by exploiting the peroxidase-like activity of FeOOH nanorods. Microchim Acta. 2019;186(11):1–10.
Xu X, Zou X, Wu S, et al. Colorimetric determination of As (III) based on 3-mercaptopropionic acid assisted active site and interlayer channel dual-masking of Fe-Co-layered double hydroxides with oxidase-like activity. Microchim Acta. 2019;186(12):1–8.
Xuechao X, Luo J, Wei S, Zou X, Niu X, Pan J. Three-dimensional flower-like multifunctional adsorbents with excellent sorptive removal and colorimetric detection of arsenate. Chem Eng J. 2020;398:125649.
Xu X, Linjie W, Xiaobo Z, et al. Highly sensitive colorimetric detection of arsenite based on reassembly-induced oxidase-mimicking activity inhibition of dithiothreitol-capped Pd nanozyme. Sens Actuators, B Chem. 2019;298:126876.
Wang J, Tao H, Lu T, Wu Y. Adsorption enhanced the oxidase-mimicking catalytic activity of octahedral-shape Mn3O4 nanoparticles as a novel colorimetric chemosensor for ultrasensitive and selective detection of arsenic. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;584:114–24.
Shi C, Li Y, Gu N. Iron-based nanozymes in disease diagnosis and treatment. ChemBioChem. 2020;21(19):2722–32.
Xu X, Luo J, Wei S, Zou X, Niu X, Pan J. Three-dimensional flower-like multifunctional adsorbents with excellent sorptive removal and colorimetric detection of arsenate. Chem Eng J. 2020;398:125649.
Dhiman A, Priya K, Vipul B, Bruno JG, Kumar ST. Aptamer-based point-of-care diagnostic platforms. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2017;246:535–53.
Lingyi L, Yao Y, Ping J, Ying Y. Recent progress in nanomaterial-based optical aptamer assay for the detection of food chemical contaminants. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(28):23287–301.
Farzin L, Mojtaba S, Shahab S. A review: Aptamer-based analytical strategies using the nanomaterials for environmental and human monitoring of toxic heavy metals. Talanta. 2017;174:619–27.
Kim M, Um H-J, Bang S, et al. Arsenic removal from Vietnamese groundwater using the arsenic-binding DNA aptamer. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(24):9335–40.
Cui L, Jie W, Huangxian J. Label-free signal-on aptasensor for sensitive electrochemical detection of arsenite. Biosens Bioelectron. 2016;79:861–5.
Priyadarshini PN. Gold nanoparticles as efficient sensors in colorimetric detection of toxic metal ions: a review. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2017;238:888–902.
Ghodake G, Vassiliadis VS, Choi J-H, Jang J, Lee DS. Facile synthesis of gold nanoparticles by amino acid asparagine: selective sensing of arsenic. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2015;15(9):7235–9.
Wu Y, Zhan S, Wang F, He L, Zhi W, Zhou P. Cationic polymers and aptamers mediated aggregation of gold nanoparticles for the colorimetric detection of arsenic (III) in aqueous solution. Chem Commun. 2012;48(37):4459–61.
Wu Y, Liu L, Zhan S, Wang F, Zhou P. Ultrasensitive aptamer biosensor for arsenic (III) detection in aqueous solution based on surfactant-induced aggregation of gold nanoparticles. Analyst. 2012;137(18):4171–8.
Zhan S, Yu M, Lv J, Wang L, Zhou P. Colorimetric detection of trace arsenic (III) in aqueous solution using arsenic aptamer and gold nanoparticles. Aust J Chem. 2014;67(5):813–8.
Wu Y, Wang F, Zhan S, Liu L, Luo Y, Zhou P. Regulation of hemin peroxidase catalytic activity by arsenic-binding aptamers for the colorimetric detection of arsenic (III). RSC Adv. 2013;3(48):25614–9.
Nguyen NLT, Park CY, Park JP, Kailasa SK, Park TJ. Synergistic molecular assembly of an aptamer and surfactant on gold nanoparticles for the colorimetric detection of trace levels of As 3+ ions in real samples. New J Chem. 2018;42(14):11530–8.
Ru-Ping L, Wang ZX, Zhang L, Qiu JD. Label-free colorimetric detection of arsenite utilizing G-/T-rich oligonucleotides and unmodified Au nanoparticles. Chem A Eur J. 2013;19(16):5029–33.
Zhang D, Liu Y, Ding J, et al. Label-free colorimetric assay for arsenic (III) determination based on a truncated short ssDNA and gold nanoparticles. Microchim Acta. 2021;188(2):1–9.
Divsar F, Kazhal H, Shahab S, Mahdi S. Aptamer conjugated silver nanoparticles for the colorimetric detection of arsenic ions using response surface methodology. Anal Methods. 2015;7(11):4568–76.
Xiao Y, Ling J, Qian S, et al. Preconcentration of trace arsenite and arsenate with titanium dioxide nanoparticles and subsequent determination by silver diethyldithiocarbamate spectrophotometric method. Water Environ Res. 2007;79(9):1015–22.
Baghbaderani SS, Noorbakhsh A. Novel chitosan-Nafion composite for fabrication of highly sensitive impedimetric and colorimetric As (III) aptasensor. Biosens Bioelectron. 2019;131:1–8.
Xia N, Shi Y, Zhang R, Zhao F, Liu F, Liu L. Simple, rapid and label-free colorimetric assay for arsenic based on unmodified gold nanoparticles and a phytochelatin-like peptide. Anal Methods. 2012;4:3937–41.
Yang T, Zhang X-X, Yang J-Y, Wang Y-T, Chen M-L. Screening arsenic (III)-binding peptide for colorimetric detection of arsenic (III) based on the peptide induced aggregation of gold nanoparticles. Talanta. 2018;177:212–6.
Gennaro S, Carrese B, Lamberti A. Nanoparticle surface functionalization: how to improve biocompatibility and cellular internalization. Front Mol Biosci. 2020;7:587012.
Shan J, Win KY, Liu S, Teng CP, Zheng Y, Han M-Y. Surface-functionalized nanoparticles for biosensing and imaging-guided therapeutics. Nanoscale. 2013;5:3616–38.
Marie AN, Schubert U. Surface modification and functionalization of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles by organic ligands. Monatsh Chem. 2008;139:183–95.
Lu Y, Li N. Noble metal nanoparticles-based colorimetric biosensor for visual quantification: a mini review. Chemosensors. 2019;7:53.
Liu B, Zhuang J, Wei G. Recent advance in the design of colorimetric sensors for environmental monitoring. Environ Sci Nano. 2020;7:2195–213.
Bjørklund G, Oliinyk P, Lysiuk R, et al. Arsenic intoxication: general aspects and chelating agents. Arch Toxicol. 2020;94:1879–97.
Hall AH. Chronic arsenic poisoning. Toxicol Lett. 2002;128(1–3):69–72.
Zhang L, Chen X-R, Wen S-H, Liang R-P, Qiu J-D. Optical sensors for inorganic arsenic detection. Trends Anal Chem. 2019;118:869–79.
Boruah BS, Biswas R, Deb P. A green colorimetric approach towards detection of arsenic (III): a pervasive environmental pollutant. Opt Laser Technol. 2019;111:825–9.
Wi E, Kim Y. Highly selective paper-based and colorimetric detection for arsenic (V) with methylene blue-functionalized gold nanoparticles. J Ind Eng Chem. 2023;124:481–9.
Kalluri JR, Arbneshi T, Afrin Khan S, et al. Use of gold nanoparticles in a simple colorimetric and ultrasensitive dynamic light scattering assay: selective detection of arsenic in groundwater. Angew Chem. 2009;121(51):9848–51.
Domínguez G, González Varela L, Bermejo-Barrera P. Functionalized gold nanoparticles for the detection of arsenic in water. Talanta. 2014;118:262–9.
Zheng B, Li J, Zheng Z, et al. Rapid colorimetric detection of arsenic (III) by glutathione functionalized gold nanoparticles based on RGB extracting system. Opt Laser Technol. 2021;133: 106522.
Devi P, Thakur A, Lai RY, Saini S, Jain R, Kumar P. Progress in the materials for optical detection of arsenic in water. Trends Anal Chem. 2019;110:97.
Kun G, Liu J, Fang G, Wang P, Zhang D, Wang S. A colorimetric probe based on functionalized gold Nanorods for sensitive and selective detection of as (III) ions. Sensors. 2018;18(7):2372.
Shrivas K, Shankar R, Dewangan K. Gold nanoparticles as a localized surface plasmon resonance based chemical sensor for on-site colorimetric detection of arsenic in water samples. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2015;220:1376–83.
Zhi-Qiang T, Liu J-F, Yin Y-G, Shi Q-T, Jing C-Y, Jiang G-B. Colorimetric Au nanoparticle probe for speciation test of arsenite and arsenate inspired by selective interaction between phosphonium ionic liquid and arsenite. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6(22):19833–9.
Lakatos M, Matys S, Raff J, Pompe W. Colorimetric As (V) detection based on S-layer functionalized gold nanoparticles. Talanta. 2015;144:241–6.
Kongor A, Panchal M, Athar M, et al. Colorimetric and electrochemical sensing of As (III) using calix [4] pyrrole capped gold nanoparticles and evaluation of its cytotoxic activity. J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem. 2020;98(1):29–41.
Boruah BS, Rajib B. Selective detection of arsenic (III) based on colorimetric approach in aqueous medium using functionalized gold nanoparticles unit. Mater Res Express. 2018;5(1):015059.
Wen S-H, Liang R-P, Zhang L, Qiu J-D. Multimodal assay of arsenite contamination in environmental samples with improved sensitivity through stimuli-response of multiligands modified silver nanoparticles. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2018;6(5):6223–32.
Zhou Y, Huang X, Liu C, et al. Color-multiplexing-based fluorescent test paper: dosage-sensitive visualization of arsenic (III) with discernable scale as low as 5 ppb. Anal Chem. 2016;88(12):6105–9.
Siangproh W, Chailapakul O, Songsrirote K. Simple and fast colorimetric detection of inorganic arsenic selectively adsorbed onto ferrihydrite-coated silica gel using silver nanoplates. Talanta. 2016;153:197–202.
Boruah BS, Kumar DN, Biswas R. Functionalized silver nanoparticles as an effective medium towards trace determination of arsenic (III) in aqueous solution. Results Phys. 2019;12:2061–5.
Reich ND, Nghiem AA, Nicholas S, Bostick BC, Campbell MG. Determination of arsenic content in water using a silver coordination polymer. ACS Environ Au. 2022;2(2):150–5.
Hosseini MS, Belador F. A novel spectrofluorometric method for the determination of arsenic in human hair using Dy2O3-doped CeO2 nanoparticles. Analyst. 2014;139(19):5007–13.
Laghari GN, Nafady A, Al-Saeedi SI, et al. Ranolazine-functionalized copper nanoparticles as a colorimetric sensor for trace level detection of As3+. Nanomaterials. 2019;9(1):83.
Jin HL, Ong KK, Zin W, et al. Optimisation of Arsenic (III) by colorimetric incorporated with image processing technique. Orient J Chem. 2016;32(5):2407–23.
Pena-Pereira F, Villar-Blanco L, Lavilla I, Bendicho C. Test for arsenic speciation in waters based on a paper-based analytical device with scanometric detection. Anal Chim Acta. 2018;1011:1–10.
Nagy P, Bonyar A, Sántha H, Harsányi G. The effect of elevated water sample temperature on the performance of a custom-developed colorimetric arsenic sensor. Procedia Eng. 2016;168:1479–82.
Rajasekhar R, Mandal TK. A photoresistor-based portable digital sensor for rapid colorimetric detection of Arsenic. Microchem J. 2023;196:109574.
Liu B, Zhuang J, Wei G. Recent advances in the design of colorimetric sensors for environmental monitoring. Environ Sci Nano. 2020;7(8):2195–213.
Yogarajah N, Tsai SS. Detection of trace arsenic in drinking water: challenges and opportunities for microfluidics. Environ Sci Water Res Technol. 2015;1(4):426–47.
Sriram G, Bhat MP, Patil P, et al. Paper-based microfluidic analytical devices for colorimetric detection of toxic ions: a review. Trends Anal Chem. 2017;93:212–27.
Saadati A, Farshchi F, Hasanzadeh M, Liu Y, Seidi F. Colorimetric and naked-eye detection of arsenic (III) using a paper-based colorimetric device decorated with silver nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2022;12(34):21836–50.
Nath P, Arun RK, Chanda N. A paper based microfluidic device for the detection of arsenic using a gold nanosensor. RSC Adv. 2014;4(103):59558–61.
Harisha K, Narayana B, Sangappa Y. Highly selective and sensitive colorimetric detection of arsenic (III) in aqueous solution using green synthesized unmodified gold nanoparticles. J Dispersion Sci Technol. 2023;44(1):132–43.
Priyadarshni N, Nath P, Nagahanumaiah, Chanda N. DMSA-functionalized gold nanorod on paper for colorimetric detection and estimation of arsenic (III and V) contamination in groundwater. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2018;6(5):6264–72.
Peuli N, Priyadarshni N, Chanda N. Europium-coordinated gold nanoparticles on paper for the colorimetric detection of arsenic(III, V) in aqueous solution. ACS Applied Nano Mater. 2018;1(1):73–81.
Kamlesh S, Patel S, Sinha D, et al. Colorimetric and smartphone-integrated paper device for on-site determination of arsenic (III) using sucrose modified gold nanoparticles as a nanoprobe. Microchim Acta. 2020;187(3):1–9.
Mohd FS, Kim S, Jeon H, Kim T, Joo C, Park S. Miniaturized sample preparation and rapid detection of arsenite in contaminated soil using a smartphone. Sensors. 2018;18(3):777.
Motalebizadeh A, Bagheri H, Asiaei S, Fekrat N, Afkhami A. New portable smartphone-based PDMS microfluidic kit for the simultaneous colorimetric detection of arsenic and mercury. RSC Adv. 2018;8(48):27091–100.
Lace A, Ryan D, Bowkett M, Cleary J. Arsenic detection in water using microfluidic detection systems based on the leucomalachite green method. Anal Methods. 2019;11(42):5431–8.
Nath P, Priyadarshni N, Chanda N. Europium-coordinated gold nanoparticles on paper for the colorimetric detection of arsenic (III, V) in aqueous solution. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2017;1(1):73–81.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge Mekelle University for providing institutional fellowship during this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KHG conceived, designed and drafted the original manuscript and revised it. KHG, MHK, NKW, TK, BAB, AGG, AHT and AGA contributed to the writing, editing and discussion of the manuscript. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All authors agreed with content of the article and all gave explicit consent to submit the article.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gebremedhin, K.H., Kahsay, M.H., Wegahita, N.K. et al. Nanomaterial-based optical colorimetric sensors for rapid monitoring of inorganic arsenic species: a review. Discover Nano 19, 38 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-024-03981-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-024-03981-2