Advertisement

Nanoscale Research Letters

, 11:402 | Cite as

Nano-structured CuO-Cu2O Complex Thin Film for Application in CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite Solar Cells

  • Lung-Chieh ChenEmail author
  • Cheng-Chiang Chen
  • Kai-Chieh Liang
  • Sheng Hsiung Chang
  • Zhong-Liang Tseng
  • Shih-Chieh Yeh
  • Chin-Ti Chen
  • Wen-Ti Wu
  • Chun-Guey Wu
Open Access
Nano Express

Abstract

Nano-structured CuO-Cu2O complex thin film-based perovskite solar cells were fabricated on an indium tin oxide (ITO)-coated glass and studied. Copper (Cu) thin films with a purity of 99.995 % were deposited on an ITO-coated glass by magnetron reactive sputtering. To optimize the properties of the nano-structured CuO-Cu2O complex thin films, the deposited Cu thin films were thermally oxidized at various temperatures from 300 to 400 °C. A CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite absorber was fabricated on top of CuO-Cu2O complex thin film by a one-step spin-coating process with a toluene washing treatment. Following optimization, the maximum power conversion efficiency (PCE) exceeded 8.1 %. Therefore, the low-cost, solution-processed, stable nano-structured CuO-Cu2O complex thin film can be used as an alternative hole transport layer (HTL) in industrially produced perovskite solar cells.

Keywords

Nano-structured CuO-Cu2O complex-based CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite 

Abbreviations

Cu2O

cuprous oxide

CuO

copper oxide

ETL

electron-transporting layer

FESEM

field-emission scanning electron microscope

HTL

hole transport layer

ITO

indium tin oxide

J-V

current density–voltage

PCE

power conversion efficiency

XRD

X-ray diffractometer

Background

Organic–inorganic hybrid perovskite (such as CH3NH3PbX3, X = I, Cl, Br) solar cells has attracted much attention because of its superior photovoltaic performance, including excellent light-harvesting ability and potential applications [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. In previous reports, the high power conversion efficiency (PCE) of perovskite solar cells was achieved when a conducting polymer PEDOT:PSS thin film that was formed using TiO2 nano-particles that had been sintered at high temperature was used as the electron transport layer (ETL) (hole transport layer (HTL)) [7, 8, 9]. However, a trade-off must be between fabrication cost and device stability, impeding the development of commercialized solar cells. Inorganic p-type materials as hole transport media have the double advantage of excellent chemical stability and simplicity of preparation [10, 11, 12]. Along with some inorganic HTLs (copper iodide (CuI) [13], copper thiocyanate (CuSCN) [14, 15, 16], graphene oxide (GO) [17], nickel oxide (NiO) [18], cuprous oxide (Cu2O), and copper oxide (CuO) [19] have attracted substantial interest owing to their direct gaps of 1.9–2.2 eV[20, 21, 22], and these have been widely used as HTLs in solar cells. Cu2O and CuO thin films can be prepared by various methods, including reactive sputtering [23], electrochemical deposition [24, 25, 26, 27], chemical dissolution [28, 29, 30], thermal oxidation [31], and successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction (SILAR) method [12, 32].

In this work, CuO-Cu2O complex thin films were prepared from thermally oxidized Cu thin films to form HTLs for use in perovskite solar cells. The structural, optical, and surface properties of CuO-Cu2O complex thin films were investigated to elucidate the performance of CuO-Cu2O complex thin film-based photovoltaics. The device with an optimized CuO-Cu2O complex thin film as the HTL exhibited superior photovoltaic performance, revealing that the CuO-Cu2O complex thin film is a potential inorganic HTL for use in perovskite solar cells.

Methods

Firstly, Cu layers were deposited on an indium tin oxide (ITO) glass substrate by RF magnetron reactive sputtering from Cu targets in gaseous argon (Ar) at a flow rate of 15 sccm and a stable working pressure of 3 × 10−3 Torr. The nano-structured CuO-Cu2O complex thin films were formed by thermally oxidizing Cu on ITO substrate at various annealing temperatures from 300 to 400 °C for 1 h in air, and these acted as HTLs. 1.25 M Pbl2 and 1.25 M methylammonium iodide (MAI) were dissolved in a cosolvent mixture of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and γ-butyrolactone (GBL) (vol. ratio = 1:1), and the resulting solution was used as the perovskite precursor solution. The CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite precursor was spin-coated on top of the nano-structured CuO-Cu2O complex/ITO/glass and underwent in situ non-polar solvent washing treatment [1, 2, 3] in a glove box that was filled with highly pure nitrogen. The CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite precursors were then coated onto the CuO-Cu2O complex/ITO/glass samples in two consecutive spin-coating steps at 1000 and 5000 rpm for 10 and 20 s, respectively. At 5000 rpm for 20 s, the wet spinning film was quenched by dropping 100 μl of anhydrous toluene onto it. After spin coating, the film was annealed at 100 °C for 5 min. Finally, C60, BCP, and the Ag electrode were sequentially deposited by thermal evaporation at a base pressure of 5 × 10−6 Pa. The thicknesses of C60, BCP, and Ag were 50, 5, and 100 nm, respectively. Figure 1a presents the steps in the preparation of CuO-Cu2O complex thin film-based perovskite solar cells. The C60 thin film, CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite thin film, and CuO-Cu2O complex thin film in the cell structure acted as the ETL, the active layer, and the HTL, respectively. A shadow mask firmly covered the sample to define an active area of 0.5 cm × 0.2 cm during C60/BCP/Ag deposition. Figure 1b shows the photo image of the shadow mask. Figure 1c schematically depicts the complete structure.
Fig. 1

a Preparation of nano-structured CuO-Cu2O complex films, b photograph image of shadow mask, and c structure of device

The crystal characteristics of the CuO-Cu2O complex thin films were determined using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD) (D8, Bruker). Raman scattering spectroscopy was used to analyze the CuO-Cu2O complex thin films. A field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) (LEO 1530) was used to observe the cross-section and surface morphology of the cells. The current density–voltage (J-V) characteristics were measured using a Keithley 2400 programmable source/meter unit under irradiation by a 1000 W xenon lamp. To evaluate the photovoltaic performance, the irradiation power density on the surface of the sample was calibrated as set to 1000 W/m2. Photoelectron emission measurement (manufactured by Riken Keiki, Model AC-2) was performed in the air and at room temperature.

Results and Discussion

Table 1 presents the Hall measurements of the CuO-Cu2O thin films. The increase in the carrier mobility at 250–300 °C could be attributed to an improvement in the crystallinity as well as a decrease in the carrier density because carrier mobility is generally affected by grain boundary scattering and by impurity scattering due to the native defects. However, as the annealing temperature increased to 400 °C, the mobility in the sample decreased from 33.5 to 17.9 cm2/Vs for owing to the decrease in the size of the grains caused by the phase transformation from Cu2O to CuO. As the thermal annealing temperature increased, the reduction of resistivity of the CuO-Cu2O complex films post-annealing may be attributed to both the carrier concentration and carrier mobility were decreased gradually, resulting in an increase in resistivity. The reduction of mobility is attributable to the transportation of carriers from one grain to another grain.
Table 1

Hall measurements of CuO-Cu2O complex films

Annealing temp. (°C)

Resistivity (Ω-cm)

Carrier concentration ×1017 (cm−3)

Mobility (cm2/V-s)

As-deposited

2.1

2.9

10.3

300

1.5

2.1

19.3

350

2.0

9.2

33.5

400

9.7

3.6

17.9

Figure 2 plots the J-V curves for the CuO-Cu2O complex thin film-based perovskite solar cells under 100 mW/cm2 illumination (AM 1.5G). Tables 2 and 3 list the characteristic parameters of these devices. The PCE is improved from 3.15 to 7.32 % as the thermal oxidation temperature increases from 300 to 350 °C, mainly owing to the increase in the photo-generated carriers extracted and injected into the electrode caused by the carrier mobility and series resistance in the device, and then to result in the increase in the short-circuit current density (JSC). The PCE decreases from 7.32 to 6.43 % as the thermal oxidation temperature increased from 350 to 400 °C. As listed in Table 2, for the device annealing at 400 °C, the series resistance (Rs) increases and the shunt resistance (Rsh) decreases. The degradation of the performance may be attributed to the degradation of ITO electrode and leakage between CuO-Cu2O complex and perovskite layer. The PCE of CuO-Cu2O complex thin film-based perovskite solar cells is improved from 7.32 to 8.10 % as the thickness of CuO-Cu2O complex thin film increased from 30 to 60 nm. However, further increasing the thickness of the CuO-Cu2O complex thin film to 120 nm reduced the PCE from 8.10 to 5.20 % due to the series resistance effect in the cell, as listed in Table 3. According to the J-V curve and PCE value, the optimized thickness of the CuO-Cu2O complex thin film is 60 nm.
Fig. 2

Current–voltage (J-V) characteristics of perovskite solar cell that was constructed using CuO-Cu2O complex thin film under simulated illumination with a light intensity of 100 mW/cm2 (AM 1.5). a Thermal oxidation temperatures. b The thicknesses of CuO-Cu2O complex thin film

Table 2

Parameters of CuO-Cu2O complex thin film-based perovskite solar cells following thermal oxidation of the film at various temperatures

Annealing temp. (°C)

VOC(V)

JSC(mA/cm2)

FF(%)

Eff(%)

Rs(Ω)

Rsh(Ω)

300

0.88

8.56

41. 42

3.15

25.8

234

350

0.95

13.88

55.54

7.32

7.9

738

400

0.89

12.71

56.89

6.43

12.5

698

Table 3

Parameters of CuO-Cu2O complex thin film-based perovskite solar cells with films of different thicknesses

CuO-Cu2O complex thickness (nm)

VOC(V)

JSC(mA/cm2)

FF(%)

Eff(%)

Rs(Ω)

Rsh(Ω)

30

0.95

13.88

55.54

7.32

12.9

410

60

0.96

14.40

58.61

8.10

10.3

789

120

0.93

10.28

54.45

5.20

21.9

338

In this study, the X-ray diffraction technique was used to elucidate the crystal characteristics of CuO-Cu2O complex thin films. To determine the relationship between thermal oxidation temperature and mechanism, the phase of the CuO-Cu2O complex thin films was identified. Figure 3 shows the XRD patterns of CuO-Cu2O complex thin films that were deposited on a glass substrate. XRD experimental results demonstrate that the crystalline phases of CuO and Cu2O were formed at different thermal oxidation temperatures. Diffraction peaks at 35.84° and 38.85° corresponded to the (−111) and (100) planes of the cubic-structured CuO, and diffraction peaks at 36.8° and 38.63° corresponded to the (111) and (200) planes of the cubic-structured Cu2O. A broad diffraction peak at 35.84° was obtained from the Cu/ITO/glass sample following thermal annealing at 350 °C. This peak may be attributed to a complex layer that comprised the (−111) plane of CuO and the (111) plane of Cu2O. The XRD patterns of Cu2O (CuO) gradually decrease (increase) as the thermal annealing temperature increased from 300 to 400 °C, indicating that the crystalline Cu2O is completely converted to crystalline CuO. The crystal domain size G was calculated according to the Scherrer’s equation: [33]
Fig. 3

XRD diffractograms of CuO-Cu2O complex thin film following thermal oxidation at various temperatures

$$ G=\frac{0.9\lambda }{\beta \cos \theta } $$
(1)
where G, λ, β, and θ denote the grain size, the X-ray wavelength, the full width at half maximum (FWHM) in radians, and the Bragg angle of CuO or Cu2O peak, respectively. The phase transformation from crystalline Cu2O to crystalline CuO reduces the crystal domain size from 31.83 to 29.39 nm, and thereby increases the carrier mobility of the CuO-Cu2O complex thin films, improving the carrier collection at the CH3NH3PbI3/CuO-CuO2 complex interface. However, the phase transformation reduces the grain size and surface roughness of the CuO-Cu2O complex thin films, as presented in Fig. 4, which presents FESEM images of the Cu layers that had undergone thermal oxidation at various annealing temperatures. More flat surface favors the coverage of the subsequently coated perovskite layer and C60 layer on the Cu-CuO2 complex thin films to form the continuous films and so improves the fill factor of the perovskite solar cells (Table 2). The image of the Cu layer that underwent thermal treatment at 350 °C reveals that the surface of the film consisted of small particles. The mean particle size was approximately 20 nm, as displayed in Fig. 4a. When the annealing temperature exceeded 300 °C, thin oxides were formed, particularly in the grain boundary regions, implying that they were formed by fast diffusion processes, as presented in Fig. 4. To elucidate the relation between the crystal domain size and the grain size in CuO-Cu2O complex thin films, the Raman scattering spectra of CuO-Cu2O complex thin films were measured, as shown in Fig. 5. According to two relevant investigations [34, 35], the five peaks at 201, 300, 406, 489, and 638 cm−1 and the three peaks at 274, 328, and 627 cm−1 are the Raman fingerprints of Cu2O and CuO, respectively. The Cu2O phase is completely converted to the CuO phase as the annealing temperature increased from 300 to 400 °C, revealing that the Cu2O is converted to CuO. The results are consistent with the results of XRD patterns in Fig. 3. Therefore, the grain size (Fig. 4) is reduced when the annealing temperature increased from 350 to 400 °C owing to the phase transformation. Figure 6 presents the photoemission spectra of Cu-Cu2O complex thin films, which were used to determine their work functions. The work function of a CuO-Cu2O complex thin film is proportional to the Voc of the perovskite solar cell in which it is used.
Fig. 4

FESEM images of CuO-Cu2O complex thin films fabricated using thermal oxidation at various temperatures. a Thermal treatment at 300 °C. b Thermal treatment at 350 °C. c Thermal treatment at 400 °C

Fig. 5

Raman scattering spectra of CuO-Cu2O complex thin films under 473-nm excitation

Fig. 6

Photoelectron emission spectra of CuO-Cu2O complex thin films

Conclusions

This study examined the characteristics of a nano-structured CuO-Cu2O complex thin-film for use in perovskite solar cells. A CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite absorber was fabricated on top of a CuO-Cu2O complex thin film in a one-step spin-coating process, which was followed by toluene washing treatment. The work function of the Cu-Cu2O complex thin film varied with the annealing temperature. The work function of a CuO-Cu2O complex thin film is proportional to the Voc of the perovskite solar cell in which it is used. Following optimization, the maximum power conversion efficiency (PCE) exceeded 8.1 %. Therefore, the low-cost, solution-processed, stable nano-structured CuO-Cu2O complex thin film can be used in alternative hole transport layers (HTLs) in industrially produced perovskite solar cells.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China under Contract No. NSC 105-2221-E-027-055.

Funding

This work was supported by the financial plan of the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China.

Authors’ Contributions

LCC wrote the paper, designed the experiments, and analyzed the data. CCC, KCL, SHC, ZLT, and WTW prepared the samples and did all the measurements. SCY, CTC, and CGW made the discussion and suggested the parameter. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1.
    Kojima A, Teshima K, Shirai Y, Miyasaka T (2009) Organometal halide perovskites as visible-light sensitizers for photovoltaic cells. J Am Chem Soc 131:6050–6051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Etgar L, Gao P, Xue Z, Peng Q, Chandiran AK, Liu B, Nazeeruddin MK, Gratzel M (2012) Mesoscopic CH3NH3PbI3/TiO2 heterojunction solar cells. J Am Chem Soc 134:17396–17399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Im JH, Lee CR, Lee JW, Park SW, Park NG (2011) 6.5% efficient perovskite quantum-dot-sensitized solar cell. Nanoscale 3:4088–4093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee MM, Teuscher J, Miyasaka T, Murakami TN, Snaith HJ (2012) Efficient hybrid solar cells based on meso-superstructured organometal halide perovskites. Science 338:643–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim HS, Lee CR, Im JH, Lee KB, Moehl T, Marchioro A, Moon SJ, Humphry-Baker R, Yum JH, Moser JE, Gratzel M, Park NG (2012) Lead iodide perovskite sensitized all- solid-state submicron thin film mesoscopic solar cell with efficiency exceeding 9 %. Sci Rep 2:591Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jeng JY, Chiang YF, Lee MH, Peng SR, Guo TF, Chen P, Wen TC (2013) CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite/fullerene planar-heterojunction hybrid solar cells. Adv Mater 25:3727–3732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou H, Chen Q, Li G, Luo S, Song T-B, Duan H-S, Hong Z, You J, Liu Y, Yang Y (2014) Interface engineering of highly efficient perovskite solar cells. Science 345:542–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu D, Kelly TL (2014) Perovskite solar cells with a planar heterojunction structure prepared using room-temperature solution processing techniques. Nat Pho- tonics 8:133–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burschka J, Pellet N, Moon S-J, Humphry-Baker R, Gao P, Nazeeruddin MK, Gratzel M (2013) Sequential deposition as a route to high-performance perovskite-sensitized solar cells. Nature 499:316–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chavhan S, Miguel O, Grande HJ, Gonzalez-Pedro V, Sánchez RS, Barea EM, Mora-Seró I, Tena-Zaera R (2014) Organo-metal halide perovskite-based solar cells with CuSCN as the inorganic hole selective contact. J Mater Chem A 2:12754–12760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ito S, Tanaka S, Manabe K, Nishino H (2014) Effects of surface blocking layer of Sb2S3 on nanocrystalline TiO2 for CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells. J Phys Chem C 118:16995–17000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Docampo P, Ball JM, Darwich M, Eperon GE, Snaith HJ (2013) Efficient organometal trihalide perovskite planar-heterojunction solar cells on flexible polymer substrates. Nat Commun 4:2761Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Christians JA, Fung RCM, Kamat PV (2014) An inorganic hole conductor for organo-lead halide perovskite solar cells. Improved hole conductivity with copper iodide. J Am Chem Soc 136:758–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Qin P, Tanaka S, Ito S, Tetreault N, Manabe K, Nishino H, Nazeeruddin MK, Gratzel M (2014) Inorganic hole conductor-based lead halide perovskite solar cells with 12.4% conversion efficiency. Nat Commun 5:3834Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Subbiah AS, Halder A, Ghosh S, Mahuli N, Hodes G, Sarkar SK (2014) Inorganic hole conducting layers for perovskite-based solar cells. J Phys Chem Lett 5:1748–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ye SY, Sun WH, Li YL, Yan WB, Peng HT, Bian ZQ, Liu ZW, Huang CH (2015) CuSCN-based inverted planar perovskite solar cell with an average PCE of 15.6%. Nano Lett 15:3723–3728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu Z, Bai S, Xiang J, Yuan Z, Yang Y, Cui W, Gao X, Liu Z, Jin Y, Sun B (2014) Efficient planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells employing graphene oxide as hole conductor. Nanoscale 6:10505–10510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang KC, Jeng JY, Shen PS, Chang YC, Diau EWG, Tsai CH, Chao TY, Hsu HC, Lin PY, Chen P, Guo TF, Wen TC (2014) P-type mesoscopic nickel oxide/organometallic perovskite heterojunction solar cells. Sci Rep 4:4756Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zuo C, Ding L (2015) Solution-processed Cu2O and CuO as hole transport materials for efficient perovskite solar cells. Small 11:5528–5532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    P. E. de Jongh, D. Vanmaekelbergh and J. J. Kelly, (1999) Cu2O: a catalyst for the photochemical decomposition of water?, Chem Commun 1069–1070.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Akimoto K, Ishizuka S, Yanagita M, Nawa Y, Paul GK, Sakurai T (2006) Thin film deposition of Cu2O and application for solar cells. Sol Energy 80:715–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jiang T, Xie T, Zhang Y, Chen L, Peng L, Li H, Wang D (2010) Photoinduced charge transfer in ZnO/Cu2O heterostructure films studied by surface photovoltage technique. Phys Chem Chem Phys 12:15476–15481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ishizuka S, Kato S, Maruyama T, Akimoto K (2001) Nitrogen doping into Cu2O thin films deposited by reactive radio-frequency magnetron sputtering. Jpn J Appl Phys 40:2765–2768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nakaoka K, Ogura K (2002) Electrochemical preparation of p- type cupric and cuprous oxides on platinum and gold substrates from copper(II) solutions with various amino acids. J Electrochem Soc 149:C579–C585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mukhopadhyay AK, Chakraborty AK, Chatterjee AP, Lahiri SK (1992) Galvanostatic deposition and electrical characterization of cuprous oxide thin films. Thin Solid Films 209:92–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Joseph S, Kamath PV (2008) Electrochemical deposition of Cu2O on stainless steel substrates: promotion and suppression of oriented crystallization. Solid State Sci 9:1215–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fujiwara T, Nakaue T, Yoshimura M (2004) Direct fabrication and patterning of Cu2O film by local electrodeposition method. Solid State Ionics 175:541–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang L, Li H, Ni Y, Li J, Liao K, Zhao G (2009) Porous cuprous oxide microcubes for non-enzymatic amperometric hydrogen peroxide and glucose sensing. Electrochemistry Com- munications 11:812–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kuo CH, Huang MH (2008) Fabrication of truncated rhombic dodecahedral Cu2O nanocages and nanoframes by particle aggregation and acidic etching. J Am Chem Soc 130:12815–12820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jimenez-Cadena G, Comini E, Ferroni M, Sberveglieri G (2010) Synthesis of Cu2O bi-pyramids by reduction of Cu(OH)2 in solution. Mater Lett 64:469–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chen CC, Chen LC, Lee YH (2012) Annealing effects of sputtered Cu2O nanocolumns on ZnO-coated glass substrate for solar cell applications. Adv Condense Matter Phys 2012:129139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chatterjee S, Pal AJ (2016) Introducing Cu2O thin films as a hole-transport layer in efficient planar perovskite solar cell structures. J Phys Chem C 120:1428–1437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Singh F, Kulriya PK, Pivin JC (2010) Origin of swift heavy ion induced stress in textured ZnO thin films: an in situ X-ray diffraction study. Solid State Commun 150:1751–1754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xu JF, Ji W, Shen ZX, Li WS, Tang SH, Ye XR, Jia DZ, Xin XQ (1999) Raman spectra of CuO nanocrytals. J Raman Spectrosc 30:413–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mao J, He J, Sun X, Li W, Lu X, Gan J, Liu Z, Gong L, Chen J, Liu P, Tong Y (2012) Electrochemical synthesis of hierarchical Cu2O stars with enhanced photoelectrochemical properties. Electrochim Acta 62:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2016

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lung-Chieh Chen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cheng-Chiang Chen
    • 2
  • Kai-Chieh Liang
    • 1
  • Sheng Hsiung Chang
    • 2
    • 3
  • Zhong-Liang Tseng
    • 1
  • Shih-Chieh Yeh
    • 4
  • Chin-Ti Chen
    • 4
  • Wen-Ti Wu
    • 4
  • Chun-Guey Wu
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electro-Optical EngineeringNational Taipei University of TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Research Center for New Generation PhotovoltaicsNational Central UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan
  3. 3.Department of Optics and PhotonicsNational Central UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan
  4. 4.Institute of ChemistryAcademia SinicaTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations