Current progress on bio-based polymers and their future trends
This article reviews the recent trends, developments, and future applications of bio-based polymers produced from renewable resources. Bio-based polymers are attracting increased attention due to environmental concerns and the realization that global petroleum resources are finite. Bio-based polymers not only replace existing polymers in a number of applications but also provide new combinations of properties for new applications. A range of bio-based polymers are presented in this review, focusing on general methods of production, properties, and commercial applications. The review examines the technological and future challenges discussed in bringing these materials to a wide range of applications, together with potential solutions, as well as discusses the major industry players who are bringing these materials to the market.
KeywordsBio-based polymers Renewable resources Biotechnologies Sustainable materials
Bio-based polymers are materials which are produced from renewable resources. The terms bio-based polymers and biodegradable polymers are used extensively in the literature, but there is a key difference between the two types of polymers. Biodegradable polymers are defined as materials whose physical and chemical properties undergo deterioration and completely degrade when exposed to microorganisms, carbon dioxide (aerobic) processes, methane (anaerobic processes), and water (aerobic and anaerobic processes). Bio-based polymers can be biodegradable (e.g., polylactic acid) or nondegradable (e.g., biopolyhethylene). Similarly, while many bio-based polymers are biodegradable (e.g., starch and polyhydroxyalkanoates), not all biodegradable polymers are bio-based (e.g., polycaprolactone).
Bio-based polymers still hold a tiny fraction of the total global plastic market. Currently, biopolymers share less than 1% of the total market. At the current growth rate, it is expected that biopolymers will account for just over 1% of polymers by 2015 (Doug 2010).
Bio-based polymers offer important contributions by reducing the dependence on fossil fuels and through the related positive environmental impacts such as reduced carbon dioxide emissions. The legislative landscape is also changing where bio-based products are being favored through initiatives such as the Lead Market Initiative (European Union) and BioPreferred (USA). As a result, there is a worldwide demand for replacing petroleum-derived raw materials with renewable resource-based raw materials for the production of polymers.
Using natural bio-based polymers with partial modification to meet the requirements (e.g., starch)
Producing bio-based monomers by fermentation/conventional chemistry followed by polymerization (e.g., polylactic acid, polybutylene succinate, and polyethylene)
Producing bio-based polymers directly by bacteria (e.g., polyhydroxyalkanoates).
Polylactic acid (PLA) has been known since 1845 but not commercialized until early 1990. PLA belongs to the family of aliphatic polyesters with the basic constitutional unit lactic acid. The monomer lactic acid is the hydroxyl carboxylic acid which can be obtained via bacterial fermentation from corn (starch) or sugars obtained from renewable resources. Although other renewable resources can be used, corn has the advantage of providing a high-quality feedstock for fermentation which results in a high-purity lactic acid, which is required for an efficient synthetic process. l-lactic acid or d-lactic acid is obtained depending on the microbial strain used during the fermentation process.
Variation in glass transition and melting temperature of PLA with various ratios of L-monomer composition
Glass transition ( T g),°C
Melting temperature ( T m),°C
PLA is a commercially interesting polymer as it shares some similarities with hydrocarbon polymers such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET). It has many unique characteristics, including good transparency, glossy appearance, high rigidity, and ability to tolerate various types of processing conditions.
PLA is a thermoplastic polymer which has the potential to replace traditional polymers such as PET, PS, and PC for packaging to electronic and automotive applications (Majid et al. 2010). While PLA has similar mechanical properties to traditional polymers, the thermal properties are not attractive due to low T g of 60°C. This problem can be overcome by changing the stereochemistry of the polymer and blending with other polymers and processing aids to improve the mechanical properties, e.g., varying the ratio of l and d isomer ratio strongly influences the crystallinity of the final polymer. However, much more work is required to improve the properties of PLA to suit various applications.
Global suppliers of PLA
140 (by 2013)
1.5 (by 2010)
Tate & Lyle
0.2 (by 2012)
PLA is widely used in many day-to-day applications. It has been mainly used in food packing (including food trays, tableware such as plates and cutlery, water bottles, candy wraps, cups, etc.). Although PLA has one of the highest heat resistances and mechanical strengths of all bio-based polymers, it is still not suitable for use in electronic devices and other engineering applications. NEC Corporation (Japan) recently produced a PLA with carbon and kenaf fibers with improved thermal and flame retardancy properties. Fujitsu (Japan) developed a polycarbonate blend with PLA to make computer housings. In recent years, PLA has been employed as a membrane material for use in automotive and chemical industry.
Application of PLA and their blends in various fields
Ovine pulmonary valve replacement
PLA/chitosan PLA/PLGA/chitosan PLA
Drug carrier/drug release
PLGA and copolymers
Porous scaffolds for cellular applications
Jung-Ju et al. 2012
PLA-CaP and PLGA-CaP
Bone fixation devices, plates, pins, screws, and wires, orthopedic applications
Huan et al. 2012
Coatings on metal implants
Schmidmaier et al. 2001
Use in cell-based gene therapy for cardiovascular diseases, muscle tissues, bone and cartilage regeneration, and other treatments of cardiovascular and neurological conditions
PLA and PLA blends
Packaging films, commodity containers, electrical appliances, mobile phone housings, floor mats, automotive spare parts
Rafael et al. 2010
Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) are a family of polyesters produced by bacterial fermentation with the potential to replace conventional hydrocarbon-based polymers. PHAs occur naturally in a variety of organisms, but microorganisms can be employed to tailor their production in cells. Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), the simplest PHA, was discovered in 1926 by Maurice Lemoigne as a constituent of the bacterium Bacillus megaterium (Lemoigne 1923).
PHA can be produced by varieties of bacteria using several renewable waste feedstocks. A generic process to produce PHA by bacterial fermentation involves fermentation, isolation, and purification from fermentation broth. A large fermentation vessel is filled with mineral medium and inoculated with a seed culture that contains bacteria. The feedstocks include cellulosics, vegetable oils, organic waste, municipal solid waste, and fatty acids depending on the specific PHA required. The carbon source is fed into the vessel until it is consumed and cell growth and PHA accumulation is complete. In general, a minimum of 48 h is required for fermentation time. To isolate and purify PHA, cells are concentrated, dried, and extracted with solvents such as acetone or chloroform. The residual cell debris is removed from the solvent containing dissolved PHA by solid-liquid separation process. The PHA is then precipitated by the addition of an alcohol (e.g., methanol) and recovered by a precipitation process (Kathiraser et al. 2007).
More than 150 PHA monomers have been identified as the constituents of PHAs (Steinbüchel and Valentin 1995). Such diversity allows the production of bio-based polymers with a wide range of properties, tailored for specific applications. Poly-3-hydroxybutyrate was the first bacterial PHA identified. It has received the greatest attention in terms of pathway characterization and industrial-scale production. It possesses similar thermal and mechanical properties to those of polystyrene and polypropylene (Savenkova et al. 2000). However, due to its slow crystallization, narrow processing temperature range, and tendency to ‘creep’, it is not attractive for many applications, requiring development in order to overcome these shortcomings (Reis et al. 2008). Several companies have developed PHA copolymers with typically 80% to 95% (R)-3-hydroxybutyric acid monomer and 5% to 20% of a second monomer in order to improve the properties of PHAs. Some specific examples of PHAs include the following:
Poly(3HB-co-3HV): Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate), PHBV
Poly (4-HB): Poly(4-hydroxybutyrate).
The copolymer poly(3HB-co-3HV) has a much lower crystallinity, decreased stiffness and brittleness, and increased tensile strength and toughness compared to poly(3HB) while remaining biodegradable. It also has a higher melt viscosity, which is a desirable property for extrusion and blow molding (Hanggi 1995).
Global suppliers of various types of PHAs
Production/planned capacity (kton/year)
10 (by 2013)
Mitsubishi Gas Chemicals
PHB Industrial S/A
Tianan Biological Materials
Tianjin Green Biosciences
Tianjin Northern Food
PHA polymers are thermoplastic, and their thermal and mechanical properties depend on their composition. The T g of the polymers varies from −40°C to 5°C, and the melting temperatures range from 50°C to 180°C, depending on their chemical composition (McChalicher and Srienc 2007). PHB is similar in its material properties to polypropylene, with a good resistance to moisture and aroma barrier properties. Polyhydroxybutyric acid synthesized from pure PHB is relatively brittle and stiff. PHB copolymers, which may include other fatty acids such as beta-hydroxyvaleric acid, may be elastic (McChalicher and Srienc 2007).
PHAs can be processed in existing polymer-processing equipment and can be converted into injection-molded components: film and sheet, fibers, laminates, and coated articles; nonwoven fabrics, synthetic paper products, disposable items, feminine hygiene products, adhesives, waxes, paints, binders, and foams. Metabolix has received FDA clearance for use of PHAs in food contact applications. These materials are suitable for a wide range of food packing applications including caps and closures, disposable items such as forks, spoons, knives, tubs, trays, and hot cup lids, and products such as housewares, cosmetics, and medical packaging (Philip et al. 2007).
Application of PHAs and their blends in various fields
PHA polymer type
P(3HB), P(3HB-co-3HHX) and blends
Scaffolds, nerve regeneration, soft tissue, artificial esophagus, drug delivery, skin regeneration, food additive
Cardiac tissue engineering, drug delivery, cosmetics, drug molecules
P(4HB) and P(3HO)
Heart valve scaffolds, food additive
Drug delivery, scaffolds, artificial heart values, patches to repair gastrointestinal tracts, sutures
PHB, Mirel P103
Commodity applications, shampoo and cosmetic bottles, cups and food containers
Global producers of PBS
Brand name/polymer type
Production/planned capacity (kton/year)
Dupont de Nemours
Enpol, PBS, PBSA
Mitsubishi Gas Chemical
PBS, PES, PBSLa
Bionelle PBS, PBSA, PBS
Conventional processes for the production of 1,4-butanediol use fossil fuel feedstocks such as acetylene and formaldehyde. The bio-based process involves the use of glucose from renewable resources to produce succinic acid followed by a chemical reduction to produce butanediol. PBS is produced by transesterification, direct polymerization, and condensation polymerization reactions. PBS copolymers can be produced by adding a third monomer such as sebacic acid, adipic acid, and succinic acid which is also produced by renewable resources (Bechthold et al. 2008).
PBS is a semicrystalline polyester with a melting point higher than that of PLA. Its mechanical and thermal properties depend on the crystal structure and the degree of crystallinity (Nicolas et al. 2011). PBS displays similar crystallization behavior and mechanical properties to those of polyolefin such as polyethylene. It has a good tensile and impact strength with moderate rigidity and hardness. The T g is approximately −32°C, and the melting temperature is approximately 115°C. In comparison with PLA, PBS is tougher in nature but with a lower rigidity and Young's modulus. By changing the monomer composition, mechanical properties can be tuned to suit the required application (Liu et al. 2009a, b).
Applications of PBS and their blends
Packaging films, dishware, fibers, medical materials
PBS and blends
Drug encapsulation systems
Cornelia et al. 2011
Jian-Bing et al. 2011
PBS and copolymers
Jung et al. 2009
Polyethylene (PE) is an important engineering polymer traditionally produced from fossil resources. PE is produced by polymerization of ethylene under pressure, temperature, in the presence of a catalyst. Traditionally, ethylene is produced through steam cracking of naphtha or heavy oils or ethanol dehydration. With increases in oil prices, microbial PE or green PE is now being manufactured from dehydration of ethanol produced by microbial fermentation. The concept of producing PE from bioethanol is not a particularly new one. In the 1980s, Braskem made bio-PE and bio-PVC from bioethanol. However, low oil prices and the limitations of the biotechnology processes made the technology unattractive at that time (de Guzman 2010).
Currently, bio-PE produced on an industrial scale from bioethanol is derived from sugarcane. Bioethanol is also derived from biorenewable feedstocks, including sugar beet, starch crops such as maize, wood, wheat, corn, and other plant wastes through microbial strain and biological fermentation process. In a typical process, extracted sugarcane juice with high sucrose content is anaerobically fermented to produce ethanol. At the end of the fermentation process, ethanol is distilled in order to remove water and to yield azeotropic mixture of hydrous ethanol. Ethanol is then dehydrated at high temperatures over a solid catalyst to produce ethylene and, subsequently, polyethylene (Guangwen et al. 2007; Luiz et al. 2010).
Bio-based polyethylene has exactly the same chemical, physical, and mechanical properties as petrochemical polyethylene. Braskem (Brazil) is the largest producer of bio-PE with 52% market share, and this is the first certified bio-PE in the world. Similarly, Braskem is developing other bio-based polymers such as bio-polyvinyl chloride, bio-polypropylene, and their copolymers with similar industrial technologies. The current Braskem bio-based PE grades are mainly targeted towards food packing, cosmetics, personal care, automotive parts, and toys. Dow Chemical (USA) in cooperation with Crystalsev is the second largest producer of bio-PE with 12% market share. Solvay (Belgium), another producer of bio-PE, has 10% share in the current market. However, Solvay is a leader in the production of bio-PVC with similar industrial technologies. China Petrochemical Corporation also plans to set up production facilities in China to produce bio-PE from bioethanol (Haung et al. 2008).
Bio-based natural polymers
This group consists of naturally occurring polymers such as cellulose, starch, chitin, and various polysaccharides and proteins. These materials and their derivatives offer a wide range of properties and applications. In this section, some of the natural bio-based polymers and their applications in various fields are discussed.
Starch is a unique bio-based polymer because it occurs in nature as discrete granules. Starch is the end product of photosynthesis in plants - a natural carbohydrate-based polymer that is abundantly available in nature from various sources including wheat, rice, corn, and potato. Essentially, starch consists of the linear polysaccharide amylose and the highly branched polysaccharide amylopectin. In particular, thermoplastic starch is of growing interest within the industry. The thermal and mechanical properties of starch can vary greatly and depend upon such factors as the amount of plasticizer present. The T g varies between −50°C and 110°C, and the modulus is similar to polyolefins (Jane 1995). Several challenges exist in producing commercially viable starch plastics. Starch's molecular structure is complex and partly nonlinear, leading to issues with ductility. Starch and starch thermoplastics suffer from the phenomenon of retrogradation - a natural increase in crystallinity over time, leading to increased brittleness. Plasticizers need to be found to create starch plastics with mechanical properties comparable to polyolefin-derived packaging. Plasticized starch blends and composites and/or chemical modifications may overcome these issues, creating biodegradable polymers with sufficient mechanical strength, flexibility, and water barrier properties for commercial packaging and consumer products (Maurizio et al. 2005).
Global suppliers of starch-based products
Production/planned capacity (kton/year)
Japan Corn Starch
Wuhan Huali Environment Protection Sci. & Tech
Applications of thermoplastic starch polymers include films, such as for shopping, bread, and fishing bait bags, overwraps, flushable sanitary product, packing materials, and special mulch films. Potential future applications could include foam loose-fill packaging and injection-molded products such as ‘take-away’ food containers. Starch and modified starches have a broad range of applications both in the food and non-food sectors. In Europe in 2002, the total consumption of starch and starch derivatives was approximately 7.9 million tons, of which 54% was used for food applications and 46% in non-food applications (Frost & Sullivan report 2009).
Application of starch and their blends in various fields
Orthopedic implant devices as bone fillers
Ashammakhi and Rokkanen 1997
Starch/ethylene vinyl alcohol/HA starch/polycaprolactone blends
Bone replacement/fixation implants, orthopedic applications
Starch/cellulose acetate blends with methylmethacrylate and acrylic acid
Espigares et al. 2002
Asha and Martins 2012
Packaging, containers, mulch films, textile sizing agents, adhesives
Cellulose is the predominant constituent in cell walls of all plants. Cellulose is a complex polysaccharide with crystalline morphology. Cellulose differs from starch where glucose units are linked by β-1,4-glycosidic bonds, whereas the bonds in starch are predominantly α-1,4 linkages. The most important raw material sources for the production of cellulosic plastics are cotton fibers and wood. Plant fiber is dissolved in alkali and carbon disulfide to create viscose, which is then reconverted to cellulose in cellophane form following a sulfuric acid and sodium sulfate bath. There are currently two processes used to separate cellulose from the other wood constituents (Yan et al. 2009). These methods, sulfite and pre-hydrolysis kraft pulping, use high pressure and chemicals to separate cellulose from lignin and hemicellulose, attaining greater than 97% cellulose purity. The main derivatives of cellulose for industrial purposes are cellulose acetate, cellulose esters (molding, extrusion, and films), and regenerated cellulose for fibers.
Cellulose is a hard polymer and has a high tensile strength of 62 to 500 MPa and elongation of 4% (Bisanda and Ansell 1992; Eichhorn et al. 2001). In order to overcome the inherent processing problems of cellulose, it is necessary to modify, plasticize, and blend with other polymers. The mechanical and thermal properties vary from blend to blend depending on the composition. The T g of cellulosic derivatives ranged between 53°C and 180°C (Picker and Hoag 2002).
Global suppliers of cellulosic products
There are three main groups of cellulosic polymers that are produced by chemical modification of cellulose for various applications. Cellulose esters, namely cellulose nitrate and cellulose acetate, are mainly developed for film and fiber applications. Cellulose ethers, such as carboxymethyl cellulose and hydroxyethyl cellulose, are widely used in construction, food, personal care, pharmaceuticals, paint, and other pharmaceutical applications (Kamel et al. 2008). Finally, regenerated cellulose is the largest bio-based polymer produced globally for fiber and film applications. Regenerated cellulose fibers are used in textiles, hygienic disposables, and home furnishing fabrics because of its thermal stability and modulus (Kevin et al. 2001).
Application of cellulose and their compounds in various fields
Membranes for separation
Kumano and Fujiwara 2008
Carboxylated methyl cellulose
Drug formulations, as binder for drugs, film-coating agent for drugs, ointment base
Cellulose acetate fibers
Spray for clothes polluted with pollen
Hori et al. 2005
Modified celluloses, cellulose whiskers, microfibrous cellulose
Barrier films, water preservation in food packing
Amit and Ragauskas 2009
Zeeshan et al. 2013
Chromatographic applications, chiral separations
Chitin and chitosan
Chitin and chitosan are the most abundant natural amino polysaccharide and valuable bio-based natural polymers derived from shells of prawns and crabs. Currently, chitin and chitosan are produced commercially by chemical extraction process from crab, shrimp, and prawn wastes (Roberts 1997). The chemical extraction of chitin is quite an aggressive process based on demineralization by acid and deproteination by the action of alkali followed by deacetylated into chitosan (Roberts 1997). Chitin can also be produced by using enzyme hydrolysis or fermentation process, but these processes are not economically feasible on an industrial scale (Win and Stevens 2001). Currently, there are few industrial-scale plants of chitin and chitosan worldwide located in the USA, Canada, Scandinavia, and Asia (Ravi Kumar 2000).
Chitosan displays interesting characteristics including biodegradability, biocompatibility, chemical inertness, high mechanical strength, good film-forming properties, and low cost (Marguerite 2006; Virginia et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2012). Chitosan is being used in a vast array of widely varying products and applications ranging from pharmaceutical and cosmetic products to water treatment and plant protection. For each application, different properties of chitosan are required, which changes with the degree of acetylation and molecular weight. Chitosan is compatible with many biologically active components incorporated in cosmetic product composition (Ravi Kumar 2000). Due to its low toxicity, biocompatibility, and bioactivity, chitosan has become a very attractive material in such diverse applications as biomaterials in medical devices and as a pharmaceutical ingredient (Bae and Moo-Moo 2010; Ramya et al. 2012). Chitosan has application in shampoos, rinses, and permanent hair-coloring agents. Chitosan and its derivatives also have applications in the skin care industry. Chitosan can function as a moisturizer for the skin, and because of its lower costs, it might compete with hyaluronic acid in this application (Bansal et al. 2011; Valerie and Vinod 1998; Hafdani and Sadeghinia 2011).
Pullulan is a linear water-soluble polysaccharide mainly consisting of maltotriose units connected by α-1,6 glycosidic units. Pullulan was first reported by Bauer (1938) and is obtained from the fermentation broth of Aureobasidium pullulans. Pullulan is produced by a simple fermentation process using a number of feedstocks containing simple sugars (Bernier 1958; Catley 1971; Sena et al. 2006). Pullulan can be chemically modified to produce a polymer that is either less soluble or completely insoluble in water. The unique properties of this polysaccharide are due to its characteristic glycosidic linking. Pullulan is easily chemically modified to reduce the water solubility or to develop pH sensitivity, by introducing functional reactive groups, etc. Due to its high water solubility and low viscosity, pullulan has numerous commercial applications including use as a food additive, a flocculant, a blood plasma substitute, an adhesive, and a film (Zajic and LeDuy 1973; Singh et al. 2008; Cheng et al. 2011). Pullulan can be formed into molding articles which can resemble conventional polymers such as polystyrene in their transparency, strength, and toughness (Leathers 2003).
Pullulan is extensively used in the food industry. It is a slow-digesting macromolecule which is tasteless as well as odorless, hence its application as a low-calorie food additive providing bulk and texture. Pullulan possesses oxygen barrier property and good moisture retention, and also, it inhibits fungal growth. These properties make it an excellent material for food preservation, and it is used extensively in the food industry (Conca and Yang 1993). In recent years, pullulan has also been studied for biomedical applications in various aspects, including targeted drug and gene delivery, tissue engineering, wound healing, and even in diagnostic imaging medium (Rekha and Chrndra 2007). Other emerging markets for pullulan include oral care products (Barkalow et al. 2002) and formulations of capsules for dietary supplements and pharmaceuticals (Leathers 2003), leading to increased demand for this unique biopolymer.
Collagen and gelatin
Collagen is the major insoluble fibrous protein in the extracellular matrix and in connective tissue. In fact, it is the single most abundant protein in the animal kingdom. There are at least 27 types of collagens, and the structures all serve the same purpose: to help tissues withstand stretching. The most abundant sources of collagen are pig skin, bovine hide, and pork and cattle bones. However, the industrial use of collagen is obtained from nonmammalian species (Gomez-Guille et al. 2011). Gelatin is obtained through the hydrolysis of collagen. The degree of conversion of collagen into gelatin depends on the pretreatment, function of temperature, pH, and extraction time (Johnston-Banks 1990).
Collagen is one of the most useful biomaterials due to its biocompatibility, biodegradability, and weak antigenicity (Maeda et al. 1999). The main application of collagen films in ophthalmology is as drug delivery systems for slow release of incorporated drugs (Rubin et al. 1973). It was also used for tissue engineering including skin replacement, bone substitutes, and artificial blood vessels and valves (Lee et al. 2001).
The classical food, photographic, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical applications of gelatin is based mainly on its gel-forming properties. Recently in the food industry, an increasing number of new applications have been found for gelatin in products in line with the growing trend to replace synthetic agents with more natural ones (Gomez-Guille et al. 2011). These include emulsifiers, foaming agents, colloid stabilizers, biodegradable film-forming materials, and microencapsulating agents.
Alginate is a linear polysaccharide that is abundant in nature as it is synthesized by brown seaweeds and by soil bacteria (Draget et al. 1997). Sodium alginate is the most commonly used alginate form in the industry since it is the first by-product of algal purification (Draget 2000). Sodium alginate consists of α-l-guluronic acid residues (G blocks) and β-d-mannuronic acid residues (M blocks), as well as segments of alternating guluronic and mannuronic acids.
Although alginates are a heterogeneous family of polymers with varying content of G and M blocks depending on the source of extraction, alginates with high G content have far more industrial importance (Siddhesh and Edgar 2012). The acid or alkali treatment processes used to make sodium alginate from brown seaweeds are relatively simple. The difficulties in processing arise mainly from the separation of sodium alginate from slimy residues (Black and Woodward 1954). It is estimated that the annual production of alginates is approximately 38,000 tons worldwide (Helgerud et al. 2009).
Alginates have various industrial uses as viscosifiers, stabilizers, and gel-forming, film-forming, or water-binding agents (Helga and Svein 1998). These applications range from textile printing and manufacturing of ceramics to production of welding rods and water treatment (Teli and Chiplunkar 1986; Qin et al. 2007; Xie et al. 2001). The polymer is soluble in cold water and forms thermostable gels. These properties are utilized in the food industry in products such as custard creams and restructured food. The polymer is also used as a stabilizer and thickener in a variety of beverages, ice creams, emulsions, and sauces (Iain et al. 2009).
Alginates are widely used as a gelling agent in pharmaceutical and food applications. Studies into their positive effects on human health have broadened recently with the recognition that they have a number of potentially beneficial physiological effects in the gastrointestinal tract (Peter et al. 2011; Mandel et al. 2000). Alginate-containing wound dressings are commonly used, especially in making hydrophilic gels over wounds which can produce comfortable, localized hydrophilic environments in healing wounds (Onsoyen 1996). Alginates are used in controlled drug delivery, where the rate of drug release depends on the type and molecular weight of alginates used (Alexnader et al. 2006; Goh et al. 2012). Additionally, dental impressions made with alginates are easy to handle for both dentist and patient as they fast set at room temperature and are cost-effective (Onsoyen 1996). Recent studies show that alginates can be effective in treating obesity, and currently, various functional alginates are being evaluated in human clinical trials (Georg et al. 2012).
Current status and future trends
The use of bio-based feedstocks in the chemical sector is not a novel concept. They have been industrially feasible on a large scale for more than a decade. However, the price of oil was so cost-effective, and the development of oil-based products created so many opportunities that bio-based products were not prioritized at the time. Several factors, such as the limitations and uncertainty in supplies of fossil fuels, environmental considerations, and technological developments, accelerated the advancement of bio-based polymers and products. It took more than a century to evolve the fossil fuel-based chemical industry; however, the bio-based polymer industry is already catching up with fossil fuel-based chemical industry, which has augmented in the last 20 years. Thanks to advancements in white biotechnology, the production of bio-based polymers and other chemicals from renewable resources has become a reality. The first-generation technologies mainly focused on food resources such as corn, starch, rice, etc. to produce bio-based polymers. As the food-versus-fuel debate ascended, the focus of technologies diverted to cellulose-based feedstocks, focusing on waste from wood and paper, food industries, and even stems and leaves and solid municipal waste streams. More and more of these technologies are already in the pipeline to align with the abovementioned waste streams; however, it may take another 20 years to develop the full spectrum of chemicals based on these technologies (Michael et al. 2011).
Challenges that need to be addressed in the coming years include management of raw materials, performance of bio-based materials, and their cost for production. Economy of scale will be one of the main challenges for production of bio-based monomers and bio-based polymers from renewable sources. Building large-scale plants can be difficult due to the lack of experience in new technologies and estimation of supply/demand balance. In order to make these technologies economically viable, it is very important to develop (1) logistics for biomass feedstocks, (2) new manufacturing routes by replacing existing methods with high yields, (3) new microbial strains/enzymes, and (4) efficient downstream processing methods for recovery of bio-based products.
The current bio-based industry focus is mainly on making bio-versions of existing monomers and polymers. Performance of these products is well known, and it is relatively easy to replace the existing product with similar performance of bio-versions. All the polymers mentioned above often display similar properties of current fossil-based polymers. Recently, many efforts are seen towards introducing new bio-based polymers with higher performance and value. For example, Nature Works LLC has introduced new grades of PLA with higher thermal and mechanical properties. New PLA-tri block copolymers have been reported to behave like thermoplastic elastomer. Many developments are currently underway to develop various polyamides, polyesters, polyhydroxyaloknates, etc. with a high differentiation in their final properties for use in automotive, electronics, and biomedical applications.
The disadvantage of some of the new bio-based polymers is that they cannot be processed in all current processing equipment. There is vast knowledge on additive-based chemistry developed for improving the performance and processing of fossil fuel-based polymers, and this knowledge can be used to develop new additive chemistry to improve the performance and properties of bio-based polymers (Ray and Bousmina 2005). For bio-based polymers like PLA and PHA, additives are being developed to improve their performance, by blending with other polymers or making new copolymers. However, the additive market for bio-based polymers is still very small, which makes it difficult to justify major development efforts according to some key additive supplier companies.
The use of nanoparticles as additives to enhance polymer performance has long been established for petroleum-based polymers. Various nano-reinforcements currently being developed include carbon nanotubes, graphene, nanoclays, 2-D layered materials, and cellulose nanowhiskers. Combining these nanofillers with bio-based polymers could enhance a large number of physical properties, including barrier, flame resistance, thermal stability, solvent uptake, and rate of biodegradability, relative to unmodified polymer resin. These improvements are generally attained at low filler content, and this nano-reinforcement is a very attractive route to generate new functional biomaterials for various applications.
Even though new bio-based polymers are produced on an industrial scale, there are still several factors which need to be determined for the long-term viability of bio-based polymers. It is expected that there will be feedstock competition as global demand for food and energy increases over time. Currently, renewable feedstocks used for manufacturing bio-based monomers and polymers often compete with requirements for food-based products. The expansion of first-generation bio-based fuel production will place unsustainable demands on biomass resources and is as much a threat to the sustainability of biochemical and biopolymer production as it is to food production (Michael et al. 2011). Indeed the European commission has altered its targets downwards for first-generation biofuels since October 2012, indicating its preference for non-food sources of sugar for biofuel production (EurActiv.com 2012). Several initiatives are underway to use cellulose-based feedstocks for the production of usable sugars for biofuels, biochemicals, and biopolymers (Jong et al. 2010).
Bio-based polymers are closer to the reality of replacing conventional polymers than ever before. Nowadays, bio-based polymers are commonly found in many applications from commodity to hi-tech applications due to advancement in biotechnologies and public awareness. However, despite these advancements, there are still some drawbacks which prevent the wider commercialization of bio-based polymers in many applications. This is mainly due to performance and price when compared with their conventional counterparts, which remains a significant challenge for bio-based polymers.
RPB would like to acknowledge the financial support from the Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland, under grant no. 2008-ET-LS-1-S2.
- 1.Aamer AS, Fariha H, Abdul H, Safia A: Biological degradation of plastics: a comprehensive review. Biotechnol Adv 2008, 26: 246–265.Google Scholar
- 2.Abdelrahman T, Newton H: Wound dressings: principles and practice. Surgery 2011, 29: 491–495.Google Scholar
- 3.Alexnader DA, Kong HJ, Mooney DJ: Alginate hydrogels as biomaterials. Macromolecular Biosciences 2006, 6: 623–633.Google Scholar
- 4.Amass W, Amass A, Tighe B: A review of biodegradable polymers: uses, current developments in the synthesis and characterization of biodegradable polyesters, blends of biodegradable polymers and recent advances in biodegradation studies. Polymer International 1998, 47: 89–144.Google Scholar
- 5.Amit S, Ragauskas AJ: Water transmission barrier properties of biodegradable films based on cellulosic whiskers and xylan. Carbohydr Polym 2009,78(2):357–360.Google Scholar
- 6.Arshady R: Beaded polymer supports and gels: 2. Physicochemical criteria and functionalization. J Chromatogr 1991, 586: 199–219.Google Scholar
- 7.Arshady R: Beaded polymer supports and gels: 1. Manufacturing techniques. J Chromatogr 1991, 586: 181–197.Google Scholar
- 8.Asha R, Martins E: Recent applications of starch derivatives in nanodrug delivery. Carbohydr Polym 2012,87(2):987–994.Google Scholar
- 9.Ashammakhi N, Rokkanen P: Absorbable polyglycolide devices in trauma and bone surgery. Biomaterials 1997,18(1):3–9.Google Scholar
- 10.Avinc A, Akbar K: Overview of poly (lactic acid) fibres. Part I: production, properties, performance, environmental impact, and end-use applications of poly (lactic acid) fibres. Fiber Chemistry 2009,41(6):391–401.Google Scholar
- 11.Bae KP, Moo-Moo K: Applications of chitin and its derivatives in biological medicine. Int J Mol Sci 2010, 11: 5152–5164.Google Scholar
- 12.Bansal V, Pramod KS, Nitin S, Omprakask P, Malviya R: Applications of chitosan and chitosan derivatives for drug delivery. Adva Biol Res 2011, 5: 28–37.Google Scholar
- 13.Barkalow DG, Chapedelaine AH, Dzija MJ: Improved pullulan free edible film compositions and methods of making same. PCT International Application WO 02/43657, US 01/43397, 21 Nov 2002.Google Scholar
- 14.Bauer R: Physiology of Dematium pullulans de Bary. Zentralbl Bacteriol Parasitenkd Infektionskr Hyg Abt2 1938, 98: 133–167.Google Scholar
- 15.Bayram C, Denbas EB: Preparation and characterization of triamcinolone acetonide-loaded poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) (PHBHx) microspheres. J Bioactive and Compatible Polymer 2008, 23: 334–347.Google Scholar
- 16.Bechthold I, Bretz K, Kabasci S, Kopitzky R, Springer A: Succinic acid: a new platform chemical from biobased polymers from renewable resources. Chemical Engg Technol 2008, 31: 647–654.Google Scholar
- 17.Bernier B: The production of polysaccharides by fungi active in the decomposition of wood and forest litter. Can J Microbiol 1958, 4: 195–204.Google Scholar
- 18.Bhatia A, Gupta RK, Bhattacharaya SN, Choi HJ: Compatibility of biodegradable PLA and PBS blends for packaging applications. Korea Aust Rheol J 2007, 19: 125–131.Google Scholar
- 19.Bisanda ETN, Ansell MP: Properties of sisal-CNSL composites. J Mater Sci 1992, 27: 1690–1700.Google Scholar
- 20.Black WAP, Woodward FN: Alginates from common British brown marine algae. In Natural plant hydrocolloids. Adv Chem Ser Am Chem Soc 1954, 11: 83–91.Google Scholar
- 21.Catley BJ: Utilization of carbon sources by Pullularia pullulans for the elaboration of extracellular polysaccharides. Appl Microbiol 1971, 22: 641–649.Google Scholar
- 22.Chambin DC, Debray C, Rochat-Gonthier MH, Le MM, Pourcelot M: Effects of different cellulose derivatives on drug release mechanism studied at a pre-formulation stage. J Controll Release 2004,95(1):101–108.Google Scholar
- 23.Chandy T, Das GS, Rao GH: 5-Fluorouracil-loaded chitosan coated polylactic acid microspheres as biodegradable drug carriers for cerebral tumours. J Microencapsul 2000, 5: 625–631.Google Scholar
- 24.Chen GQ, Qiong W: The application of polyhydroxyalkanoates as tissue engineering materials. Biomaterials 2005, 26: 6565–6578.Google Scholar
- 25.Chen GQ, Martin KP: Plastics derived from biological sources: present and future: a technical and environmental review. Chem Rev 2012, 112: 2082–2099.Google Scholar
- 26.Chen QZ, Harding SE, Ali NN, Lyon AR, Boccaccini AR: Biomaterials in cardiac tissue engineering: ten years of research survey. Materials Sci Eng: Reports 2008, 59: 1–37.Google Scholar
- 27.Cheng KC, Demirci A, Catchmark JM: Pullulan: biosynthesis, production, and applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011, 92: 29–44.Google Scholar
- 28.Cheng Y, Deng S, Chen P, Ruan R: Polylactic acid (PLA) synthesis and modifications: a review. Front Chem China 2009, 4: 259–264.Google Scholar
- 29.Clarinval AM, Halleux J: Classification of biodegradable polymers. In Biodegradable polymers for industrial applications. Edited by: Smith R. Woodhead, Cambridge; 2005.Google Scholar
- 30.Conca KR, Yang TCS: Edible food barrier coatings. In Biodegradable polymers and packaging. Edited by: Ching C, Kaplan DL, Thomas EL. Technomic, Lancaster; 1993:357–369.Google Scholar
- 31.Cornelia TB, Erkan TB, Elisabete DP, Rui LR, Nuno MN: Performance of biodegradable microcapsules of poly(butylene succinate), poly(butylene succinate-co-adipate) and poly(butylene terephthalate-co-adipate) as drug encapsulation systems. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2011, 84: 498–507.Google Scholar
- 32.Coutu DL, Yousefi AM, Galipeau J: Three-dimensional porous scaffolds at the crossroads of tissue engineering and cell-based gene therapy. J Cell Biochem 2009, 108: 537–546.Google Scholar
- 33.Dave AM, Mehta MH, Aminabhavi TM, Kulkarni AR, Soppimath KS: A review on controlled release of nitrogen fertilizers through polymeric membrane devices. Polymer- Plastics Technol Eng 1999, 38: 675–711.Google Scholar
- 34.de Roo G, Kellerhals MB, Ren Q, Witholt B, Kessler B: Production of chiral R -3-hydroxyalkanoic acids and R -3-hydroxyalkanoic acid methylesters via hydrolytic degradation of polyhydroxyalkanoate synthesized by pseudomonads. Biotechnol Bioeng 2002, 77: 717–722.Google Scholar
- 35.de Guzman D: Bioplastic development increases with new applications. 2010. . Accessed October 2010 http://www.icis.com/Articles/2010/10/25/9402443/bioplastic-development-increases-with-new-applications.htmlGoogle Scholar
- 36.Dorozhkin SV: Calcium orthophosphate-based biocomposites and hybrid biomaterials. J Mater Sci 2009, 44: 2343–2387.Google Scholar
- 37.Doug S: Bioplastics: technologies and global markets. BCC research reports PLS050A 2010. http://www.bccresearch.com/report/bioplastics-technologies-markets-pls050a.htmlGoogle Scholar
- 38.Draget KI: Alginates. In Handbook of hydrocolloids. Edited by: Philips O, Williams A. Woodhead, Philadelphia; 2000:379.Google Scholar
- 39.Draget KI, Skjåk-Braek G, Smidsrød O: Alginate based new materials. Int J Biol Macromol 1997, 21: 47–55.Google Scholar
- 40.DSM press release: DSM invests in development of bio-based materials. 2008. . Accessed March 2008 http://www.observatorioplastico.com/detalle_noticia.php?no_id=73274&seccion=mercado&id_categoria=80002Google Scholar
- 41.Eichhorn SJ, Baillie CA, Zaferiropouls N, Mwaikambo LY, Ansell MP, Dufresne A, Entwistle KM, Herrera-Franco PJ, Escamilla GC, Groom L, Hughes M, Hill C, Rials TG, Wild PM: Review: current international research into cellulosic fibres and composites. J Material Sc 2001, 36: 2107–2131.Google Scholar
- 42.Erwin TH, David AG, Jeffrey JK, Robert JW, Ryan PO: The eco-profiles for current and near-future NatureWorks® polylactide (PLA) production. Industrial Biotechnology 2007, 3: 58–81.Google Scholar
- 43.Eslmai H, Kamal RM: Elongational rheology of biodegradable poly(lactic acid)/poly[(butylene succinate)-co-adipate] binary blends and poly(lactic acid)/poly[(butylene succinate)-co-adipate]/clay ternary nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 2013, 127: 2290–2306.Google Scholar
- 44.Espigares I, Elvira C, Mano JF, Vlazquez B, Roman JS, Reis RL: New partially degradable and bioactive acrylic bone cements based on starch blends and ceramic fillers. Biomaterials 2002,23(8):1883–1895.Google Scholar
- 45.EurActiv.com: EU calls time on first-generation biofuels. 2012. . Accessed Oct 2012 http://www.euractiv.com/climate-environment/eu-signals-generation-biofuels-news-515496Google Scholar
- 46.Frost & Sullivan report: Global bio-based plastic market, M4AI-39. Chapter 5. 2009. ctxixpLink=FcmCtx9&searchQuery=Global+bio-based+plastic+market%2C+2009&bdata=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5mcm9zdC5jb20vc3JjaC9jYXRhbG9nLXNlYXJjaC5kbz9wdWJsaWNhdGlvblllYXJzPTIwMDkmcXVlcnlUZXh0PUdsb2JhbCtiaW8tYmFzZWQrcGxhc3RpYyttYXJrZXQlMkMrMjAwOSZmaWx0ZXJTd2l0Y2g9ZmFsc2UmcGFnZVNpemU9MTJAfkBTZWFyY2ggUmVzdWx0c0B%2BQDEzNjMxMDQzNjA1NjA%3D&ctxixpLabel=FcmCtx10&id=M4A1–01–00–00–00. Accessed 22 Dec 2009 http://www.frost.com/sublib/display-report.do?Google Scholar
- 47.Freier T, Kunze C, Nischan C: In vitro and in vivo degradation studies for development of a biodegradable patch based on poly(3-hydroxybutyrate). Biomaterials 2002, 23: 2649–2657.Google Scholar
- 48.Fuentes Z, Riquelme MJN, Sánchez-Zapata E, Pérez JAÁ: Resistant starch as functional ingredient: a review. Food Res Int 2010, 43: 931–942.Google Scholar
- 49.Garlotta D: A literature review of poly (lactic acid). J Polyms and the Envir 2001,9(2):63–84.Google Scholar
- 50.Georg JM, Kristensen M, Astrup A: Effect of alginate supplementation on weight loss in obese subjects completing a 12-week energy restricted diet: a randomized controlled trail. Am J Clin Nutr 2012, 96: 5–13.Google Scholar
- 51.Goh GH, Heng PWS, Chan LW: Alginates as a useful natural polymer for microencapsulation and therapeutic applications. Carbohydr Polym 2012, 88: 1–12.Google Scholar
- 52.Gomez-Guille MC, Gimenez B, Lopez CME, Montero MP: Functional bioactive properties of collagen and gelatin from alternative sources: a review. Food Hydrocolloids 2011, 25: 1813–1827.Google Scholar
- 53.Guangwen C, Shulian L, Fengjun J, Quan Y: Catalytic dehydration of bioethanol to ethylene over TiO2/γ-Al2O3 catalyst in microchannel reactors. Catal today 2007, 125: 111–119.Google Scholar
- 54.Guo M, Liu M, Zhan F, Wu L: Preparation and properties of a slow-release membrane-encapsulated urea fertilizer with superabsorbent and moisture preservation. Ind Eng Chem Res 2005, 44: 4206–4211.Google Scholar
- 55.Gupta B, Revagade N, Hilborn J: Poly(lactic acid) fiber: an overview. Prog Polym Sci 2007, 34: 455–482.Google Scholar
- 56.Hafdani FN, Sadeghinia N: A review on applications of chitosan as a natural antimicrobial. World Academy of Sci Engg Technol 2011, 50: 252–256.Google Scholar
- 57.Hanggi JU: Requirements on bacterial polyesters as future substitute for conventional plastics for consumer goods. FEMS Microbioly Rev 1995, 16: 213–220.Google Scholar
- 58.Haung YM, Li H, Huang XJ, Hu YC, Hu Y: Advances of bio-ethylene. Chin J Bioprocess Eng 2008, 6: 1–6.Google Scholar
- 59.Helga E, Svein V: Biosynthesis and applications of alginates. Polym Degradation and Stability 1998, 59: 85–91.Google Scholar
- 60.Helgerud T, Gaserød O, Fjreide T, Andresen PO, Larsen CK: Alginates. In Food stabilisers, thickeners and gelling agents. Edited by: Imeson A. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford; 2009:50–72.Google Scholar
- 61.Hirosawa E, Danjo K, Sunada H: Influence of granulating method on physical and mechanical properties, compression behavior, and compactibility of lactose and microcrystalline cellulose granules. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2000, 26: 583–593.Google Scholar
- 62.Hori K, Nojiri H, Nonomura M, Okuda F, Yanagida H: Allergen inactivator. 2005. US Patent 197319, 20 Nov 2005 US Patent 197319, 20 Nov 2005Google Scholar
- 63.Huan Z, Joseph GL, Sarit BB: Fabrication aspects of PLA-CaP/PLGA-CaP composites for orthopedic applications: a review. Acta Biomater 2012,8(6):1999–2016.Google Scholar
- 64.Iain AB, Seal CJ, Wilcox M, Dettmar PW, Pearson PJ: Applications of alginates in food. In Alginates: biology and applications. Microbiology monographs 13. Edited by: Brend HAR. Springer, Hiedelberg; 2009:211–228.Google Scholar
- 65.Jane J: Starch properties, modifications and applications. J Macromolecular Sci 1995, 32: 751–757.Google Scholar
- 66.Jaspreet S, Lovedeep K, McCarthy OJ: Factors influencing the physico-chemical, morphological, thermal and rheological properties of some chemically modified starches for food applications—a review. Food Hydrocolloids 2007, 21: 1–22.Google Scholar
- 67.Jayanth P, Vinod L: Biodegradable nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery to cells and tissue. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2012, 64: 61–71.Google Scholar
- 68.Jeevitha D, Kanchana A: Chitosan/PLA nanoparticles as a novel carrier for the delivery of anthraquinone: synthesis, characterization and in vitro cytotoxicity evaluation. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2013,101(1):126–134.Google Scholar
- 69.Jian-Bing Z, Ling J, Yi-Dong L, Madhusudhan S, Tao L, Yu-Zhong W: Bio-based blends of starch and poly(butylene succinate) with improved miscibility, mechanical properties, and reduced water absorption. Carbohydr Polym 2011, 83: 762–768.Google Scholar
- 70.Johnston-Banks FA: Gelatin. In Food gels. Edited by: Harris P. Elsevier, London; 1990:233–289.Google Scholar
- 71.Jong ED, Higson A, Walsh P, Maria W: Bio-based chemicals: value added products from biorefineries. IEA Bioenergy Task 42 Biorefinery 2010, 1–34. . Accessed 15 Feb 2012 http://www.iea-bioenergy.task42-biorefineries.com/publications/reports/?eID=dam_frontend_push&docID=2051Google Scholar
- 72.Jun X, Bao-Hua G: Microbial succinic acid, its polymer poly(butylene succinate), and applications. Microbiology Monographs 2010, 14: 347–388.Google Scholar
- 73.Jun X, Bao-Hua G: Poly(butylene succinate) and its copolymers: research, development and industrialization. Biotechnol J 2010, 5: 1149–1163.Google Scholar
- 74.Jung S, Lim E, Jong HK: New application of poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) based ionomer as biopolymer: a role of ion group for hydroxyapatite (HAp) crystal formation. J Mater Sci 2009, 44: 6398–6403.Google Scholar
- 75.Jung-Ju K, Guang-Zhen J, Hye-Sun Y, Seong-Jun C, Hae-Won K, Ivan BW: Providing osteogenesis conditions to mesenchymal stem cells using bioactive nanocomposite bone scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C 2012, 32: 2545–2551.Google Scholar
- 76.Kamel S, Ali N, Jahangir K, Shah SM, El-Gendy : Pharmaceutical significance of cellulose: a review. Express polymer Letters 2008, 2: 758–778.Google Scholar
- 77.Kasirajan S, Ngouajio M: Polyethylene and biodegradable mulches for agricultural applications: a review. Agronomy Sustainable Dev 2012,32(2):501–529.Google Scholar
- 78.Kathiraser Y, Aroua MK, Ramachandran KB, Tan IKP: Chemical characterization of medium-chain-length polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) recovered by enzymatic treatment and ultrafiltration. J Chem Tech Biotech 2007, 82: 847–855.Google Scholar
- 79.Kellomaki M, Niiranen H, Puumanen K, Ashammakhi N, Waris T, Tormala P: Bioabsorbable scaffolds for guided bone regeneration and generation. Biomaterials 2000, 21: 2495–2505.Google Scholar
- 80.Kevin JE, Charles MB, John DS, Paul AR, Brian DS, Michael CS, Debra T: Advances in cellulose eater performance and applications. Progress in Polymer Sci 2001, 26: 1605–1688.Google Scholar
- 81.Kumano A, Fujiwara N: Cellulose triacetate membranes for reverse osmosis. In Advanced membrane technology and application. Edited by: Normam AGF, Li N, Winston Ho WS, Matsuura T. Wiley, New Jersey; 2008:21–43.Google Scholar
- 82.Kumbar SG, Kulkarni AR, Dave AM, Aminabha TM: Encapsulation efficiency and release kinetics of solid and liquid pesticides through urea formaldehyde cross-linked starch, guar gum, and starch + guar gum matrices. J Appli Polym Sci 2001, 82: 2863–2866.Google Scholar
- 83.Kunze C, Edgar Bernd H, Androsch R: In vitro and in vivo studies on blends of isotactic and atactic poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) for development of a dura substitute material. Biomaterials 2006, 27: 192–201.Google Scholar
- 84.Leathers TD: Biotechnological production and applications of pullulan. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2003, 62: 468–473.Google Scholar
- 85.Lee SH, Wang S: Biodegradable polymers/bamboo fiber composite with bio-based coupling agent. Compos Part 2006, A37: 80–91.Google Scholar
- 86.Lee HC, Anuj S, Lee Y: Biomedical applications of collagen. International J of Pharmaceutics 2001, 221: 1–22.Google Scholar
- 87.Lemoigne M: Production d'acide β-oxybutyrique par certaines bact’eries du groupe du Bacillus subtilis. CR. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci 1923, 176: 1761.Google Scholar
- 88.Levison PR: Cellulosics as ion-exchange materials. In Cellulosics: materials for selective separations and other technologies. Edited by: Kennedy JF, Phillips GO, Williams PA. Ellis Horwood, Chichester; 1993:25–36.Google Scholar
- 89.Li G, Yong H, Chen C: Discussion on application prospect of starch-based adhesives on architectural gel materials. Adv Materials Res 2011, 250: 800–803.Google Scholar
- 90.Li S, Juliane H, Martin KP: Product overview and market projection of emerging biobased products. PRo-BIP 2009, 1: 1–245.Google Scholar
- 91.Liu L, Yu J, Cheng L, Qu W: Mechanical properties of poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) biocomposites reinforced with surface modified jute fibre. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing 2009, 40: 669–674.Google Scholar
- 92.Liu LF, Yu JY, Cheng LD, Yang XJ: Biodegradability of PBS composite reinforced with jute. Polym Degrade Stab 2009, 94: 90–94.Google Scholar
- 93.Liu M, Zhang Y, Wu C, Xiong S, Zhou C: Chitosan/halloysite nanotubes bionanocomposites: structure, mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Int J Biological Macromol 2012, 51: 566–575.Google Scholar
- 94.Luc A, Eric P: Biodegradable polymers. In Environmental silicate nano-biocomposites. Green energy and technology. Springer, Hiedelberg; 2012:13–39.Google Scholar
- 95.Luiz A, De Castro R, Morschbacker : A method for the production of one or more olefins, an olefin, and a polymer. 2010. US 2010/0069691A1, 18 Mar 2010 US 2010/0069691A1, 18 Mar 2010Google Scholar
- 96.Maeda M, Tani S, Sano A, Fujioka K: Microstructure and release characteristics of the minipellet, a collagen based drug delivery system for controlled release of protein drugs. J Controlled Rel 1999, 62: 313–324.Google Scholar
- 97.Mainil V, Rahn B, Gogolewski S: Long-term in vivo degradation and bone reaction to various polylactides: 1. One-year results. Biomaterials 1997, 18: 257–266.Google Scholar
- 98.McChalicher CW, Srienc F: Investigating the structure–property relationship of bacterial PHA block copolymers. J Biotechnology 2007, 132: 296–302.Google Scholar
- 99.Ravi Kumar MNV: A review of chitin and chitosan applications. Reactive Functional Polym 2000, 46: 1–27.Google Scholar
- 100.Majid J, Elmira AT, Muhammad I, Muriel J, St'ephane D: Poly-lactic acid: production, applications, nanocomposites, and release studies. Comprehensive Rev Food Sci Safety 2010,9(5):552–571.Google Scholar
- 101.Mandel KG, Daggy BP, Brodie DA, Jacoby HI: Review article: alginate-raft formulations in the treatment of heartburn and acid reflux. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000, 14: 669–690.Google Scholar
- 102.Marguerite R: Chitin and chitosan: properties and applications. Progress in Polym Sci 2006, 31: 603–632.Google Scholar
- 103.Marques AP, Reis RL: Hydroxyapatite reinforcement of different starch-based polymers affect osteoblast-like cells adhesion/spreading and proliferation. Mater Sci Engg 2005,25(2):215–229.Google Scholar
- 104.Maurizio A, Jan JDV, Maria EE, Sabine F, Paolo V, Maria GV: Biodegradable starch/clay nanocomposite films for food packaging applications. Food Chem 2005,93(3):467–474.Google Scholar
- 105.Mendes RL, Reis YP, Bovell AM, Cunha CA, Blitterswijk V, de Bruijn JD: Biocompatibility testing of novel starch-based materials with potential application in orthopedic surgery: a preliminary study. Biomaterials 2001, 22: 2057–2064.Google Scholar
- 107.Nagarwal RC, Singh PN, Kant S, Maiti P, Pandit JK: Chitosan coated PLA nanoparticles for ophthalmic delivery: characterization, in-vitro and in-vivo study in rabbit eye. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2010, 6: 648–656.Google Scholar
- 108.Nicolas J, Floriane F, Francoise F, Alan R, Jean PP, Patrick F, Rene SL: Synthesis and properties of poly(butylene succinate): efficiency of different transesterfication catalysts. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 2011, 49: 5301–5312.Google Scholar
- 109.Obae HI, Imada K: Morphological effect of microcrystalline cellulose particles on tablet tensile strength. Int J Pharm 1999, 182: 155–164.Google Scholar
- 110.Onsoyen E: Commercial applications of alginates. Carbohydrates in Europe 1996, 14: 26–31.Google Scholar
- 111.Orawan S, Uracha R, Pitt S: Electrospun cellulose acetate fiber mats containing asiaticoside or Centella asiatica crude extract and the release characteristics of asiaticoside. Polymer 2008,49(19):4239–4247.Google Scholar
- 112.Ozdemir M, Floros JD: Active food packaging technologies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2004, 44: 185–193.Google Scholar
- 113.Papenburg BJ, Liu J, Higuera G, Barradas AMC, Boer J, Blitterswijk VCA, Wessling M, Stamatialis D: Development and analysis of multi-layer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2009, 30: 6228–6239.Google Scholar
- 114.Peter WD, Vicki S, Richardson JC: The key role alginates play in health. Food Hydrocolloids 2011, 25: 263–266.Google Scholar
- 115.Philip S, Keshavarz T, Roy I: Polyhydroxyalkanoates: biodegradable polymers with a range of applications. J Chemical Tech Biotech 2007,2(3):233–247.Google Scholar
- 116.Picker KM, Hoag SW: Characterization of the thermal properties of microcrystalline cellulose by modulated temperature differential scanning calorimetry. J Pharmaceutical Sci 2002, 91: 342–349.Google Scholar
- 117.Prashant RC, Ishwar BB, Shrikant AS, Rekha SS: Microbial cellulose: fermentive production and applications. Food Technol Biotechnol 2009, 47: 107–124.Google Scholar
- 118.Qin Y, Cai L, Feng D, Shi B, Liu J, Zhang W, Shen Y: Combined use of chitosan and alginate in the treatment of waste water. J Appl Polym Sci 2007, 104: 3181–3587.Google Scholar
- 119.Rafael A, Loong TL, Susan EM, Selke HT: Poly(lactic acid): synthesis, structures, properties, processing and applications. Chapter 2010, 28: 457–467.Google Scholar
- 120.Rajev AJ: The manufacturing techniques of various drug loaded biodegradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) devices. Biomaterials 2000, 21: 2475–2490.Google Scholar
- 121.Ramya R, Venkatesan , Jayachanndran Kim S, Sudha PN: Biomedical applications of chitosan: an overview. J Biomaterial Tissue Engg 2012, 2: 100–111.Google Scholar
- 122.Ravenstijn JTJ: The state-of-the art on bioplastics: products, markets, trends and technologies. Polymedia, Lüdenscheid; 2010.Google Scholar
- 123.Ray SS, Bousmina M: Biodegradable polymers and their layered silicate nanocomposites: in greening the 21st century materials world. Progress Material Sci 2005, 50: 962–1079.Google Scholar
- 124.Reis KC, Pereira J, Smith AC, Carvalho CWP, Wellner N, Yakimets I: Characterization of polyhydroxybutyrate-hydroxyvalerate (PHB-HV)/maize starch blend films. J Food Engg 2008, 89: 361–369.Google Scholar
- 125.Rekha MR, Chrndra PS: Pullulan as a promising biomaterial for biomedical applications: a perspective. Trends in Biomaterials and Artificial Organs 2007, 20: 21–45.Google Scholar
- 126.Roberts GAF: Chitosan production routes and their role in determining the structure and properties of the product. In Advances in Chitin Science, vol. 2, National Taiwan Ocean University, Taiwan. Edited by: Domard M, Roberts AF, Vårum KM. Jacques Andre, Lyon; 1997:22–31. 1998 1998Google Scholar
- 127.Rubin AL, Stenzel KH, Miyata T, White MJ, Dune M: Collagen as a vehicle for drug delivery: preliminary report. J of Clinical Pharmacology 1973, 13: 309–312.Google Scholar
- 128.Ruth KG, Hartmann R, Egli T, Zinn M, Ren Q: Efficient production of ( R )-3-hydroxycarboxylic acids by biotechnological conversion of polyhydroxyalkanoates and their purification. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8: 279–286.Google Scholar
- 129.Savenkova L, Gercberga Z, Nikolaeva V, Dzene A, Bibers I, Kalina M: Mechanical properties and biodegradation characteristics of PHB-based films. Process Biochem 2000, 35: 537–579.Google Scholar
- 130.Schmidmaier G, Wildemann A, Stemberger A, Has MR: Biodegradable poly(D, L-lactide) coating of implants for continuous release of growth factors. J Biomed Mater Res 2001, 58: 449–455.Google Scholar
- 131.Sena RF, Costelli MC, Gibson LH, Coughlin RW: Enhanced production of pullulan by two strains of A. pullulans with different concentrations of soybean oil in sucrose solution in batch fermentations. Brazilian J Chem Eng 2006, 2: 507–515.Google Scholar
- 132.Siddhesh NP, Edgar KJ: Alginate derivatization: a review chemistry, properties and applications. Biomaterials 2012, 33: 3279–3305.Google Scholar
- 133.Singh RS, Saini GK, Kennedy JF: Pullulan: microbial sources, production and applications. Carbohydr Polym 2008, 73: 515–531.Google Scholar
- 134.Sodian R, Hoerstrup SP, Sperling JS, Daebritz S, Martin DP, Moran AM, Kim BS, Schoen FJ, Vacanti JP, Mayer JE: Early in vivo experience with tissue engineered trileaflet heart valves. Circulation 2000, 102: 22–29.Google Scholar
- 135.Sodian R, Sperling JS, Martin DP: Tissue engineering of a trileaflet heart valve-early in vitro experiences with a combined polymer. Tissue Engg 1999, 5: 489–494.Google Scholar
- 136.Steinbüchel A, Valentin HE: Diversity of bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoic acids. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1995, 128: 219–228.Google Scholar
- 137.Tang H, Ishii D, Mahara A, Murakami S, Yamaoka T, Sudesh K, Samian R, Fujita M, Maeda M, Iwata T: Scaffolds from electrospun polyhydroxyalkanoate copolymers: fabrication, characterization, bio absorption and tissue response. Biomaterials 2008, 29: 1307–1317.Google Scholar
- 138.Teli MD, Chiplunkar V: Role of thickeners in final performance of reactive prints. Textile Dyer Printer 1986, 19: 13–19.Google Scholar
- 139.Türesin F, Gürsel I, Hasirci V: Biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoate implants for osteomyelitis therapy: in vitro antibiotic release. J Biomaterials Sci 2001,12(2):195–207. Polymer Edition Polymer EditionGoogle Scholar
- 140.Valantin MA, Aubron-Olivier C, Ghosn J, Laglenne E, Pauchard M, Schoen H: Polylactic acid implants to correct facial lipoatrophy in HIV-infected patients: results of the open-label study. Vega Aids 2003, 17: 2471–2477.Google Scholar
- 141.Valappil S, Misra S, Boccaccini A, Roy I: Biomedical applications of polyhydroxyalkanoates, an overview of animal testing an in vivo responses. Expert Rev Med Devices 2006, 3: 853–868.Google Scholar
- 142.Valerie D, Vinod DV: Pharmaceutical applications of chitosan. Pharmaceutical Sci Technol Today 1998, 1: 246–253.Google Scholar
- 143.Virginia E, Marie G, Eric P, Luc A: Structure and properties of glycerol plasticized chitosan obtained by mechanical kneading. Carbohydrate Polym 2011, 83: 947–952.Google Scholar
- 144.Volova T, Shishatskaya E, Sevastianov V, Efremov S, Mogilnaya O: Results of biomedical investigations of PHB and PHB/PHV fibers. Biochem Eng J 2003, 16: 125–133.Google Scholar
- 145.Vona IA, Costanza JR, Cantor HA, Robert WJ: Manufacture of plastics, vol 1. Wiley, New York; 1965:141–142.Google Scholar
- 146.Walle GAM, de Koning GJM, Weusthuis RA, Eggink G: Properties, modifications and applications of biopolyesters. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2001, 71: 264–291.Google Scholar
- 147.Wang Z, Itoh Y, Hosaka Y, Kobayashi I, Nakano Y, Maeda I, Umeda F, Yamakawa J, Kawase M, Yagi K: Novel transdermal drug delivery system with polyhydroxyalkanoate and starburst polyamidoamine dendrimer. J Biosci and Bioengg 2003,95(5):541–543.Google Scholar
- 148.Weraporn PA, Sorapong P, Narongchai OC, Ubon I, Puritud J, Sommai PA: Preparation of polymer blends between poly (L-lactic acid), poly (butylene succinate-co-adipate) and poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) for blown film industrial application. Energy Procedia. 2011, 9: 581–588.Google Scholar
- 149.Westermark S, Juppo AM, Kervinen L, Yliruusi J: Microcrystalline cellulose and its microstructure in pharmaceutical processing. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 1999, 48: 199–206.Google Scholar
- 150.Williams SF, Martin DP, Horowitz DM, Peoples OP: PHA applications: addressing the price performance issue I. Tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromolecules 1999, 25: 111–121.Google Scholar
- 151.Win NN, Stevens WF: Shrimp chitin as substrate for fungal chitin deacetylase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2001, 57: 334–341.Google Scholar
- 152.Xie ZP, Huang Y, Chen YL, Jia Y: A new gel casting of ceramics by reaction of sodium alginate and calcium iodate at increased temperature. J Mat Sci Lett 2001, 20: 1255–1257.Google Scholar
- 153.Yan YF, Krishnaiah D, Rajin M, Bono A: Cellulose extraction from palm kernel cake using liquid phase oxidation. J Engg Sci Tech 2009, 4: 57–68.Google Scholar
- 154.Yang F, Li X, Li G, Zhao N, Zhang X: Study on chitosan and PHBHHx used as nerve regeneration conduit material. J Biomedical Engg 2002, 19: 25–29.Google Scholar
- 155.Zajic JE, LeDuy A: Flocculant and chemical properties of a polysaccharide from Pullularia pullulans. Appl Microbiol 1973, 25: 628–635.Google Scholar
- 156.Zeeshan K, Gopiraman M, Yuichi H, Kai W, Kim IS: Cationic-cellulose nanofibers: preparation and dyeability with anionic reactive dyes for apparel application. Carbohydrate 2013, 91: 434–443.Google Scholar
- 157.Zhao RX, Torley P, Halley PJ: Emerging biodegradable materials: starch- and protein-based bio-nanocomposites. J Mat Sci 2008, 43: 3058–3071.Google Scholar
- 158.Zhao K, Tian G, Zheng Z, Chen JC, Chen GQ: Production of d-(−)-3-hydroxyalkanoic acid by recombinant Escherichia coli . FEMS Microbiol Lett 2003, 218: 59–64.Google Scholar
- 159.Zhao P, Liu W, Wu Q, Ren J: Preparation, mechanical, and thermal properties of biodegradable polyesters/poly(lactic acid) blends. J of Nanomaterials 2010, 2010: 1–8.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.