Skip to main content

An improved method for the purification of fullerene from fullerene soot with activated carbon, celite, and silica gel stationary phases

Abstract

Extracting pure fullerene (C60) from fullerene soot was accomplished in two steps. In the first step, extraction was carried out using a Soxhlet extractor. Different solvents, such as toluene, were used in this method. In this process, light and heavy fullerenes were separated from impurities such as soot and other compounds. The applied fullerene soot was produced using an electric arc method, and the obtained purity was close to 7%. In the next step, fullerene C60 can be separated from other fullerenes (particularly C70) by column chromatography. The stationary phase in the chromatography column contained a mixture of activated carbon, silica gel, and celite, and in order to achieve a high efficiency for separation, the column was filled with a combination of these compounds. Organic solvents such as chlorobenzene and 1,2-dichlorobenzene were used as the mobile phase. Several experiments were designed and conducted to obtain optimal conditions, and consequently, the fullerene C60 was purified with proper efficiency. In this method, parameters including efficiency, low cost, and simplicity are of great importance in the aim of obtaining an optimized method. As a result, a suitable method with low cost and high efficiency was used in this research.

Correspondence/Findings

Background

Fullerenes can be produced through several developing methods which have their own advantages and disadvantages. Fullerenes can be synthesized by ablating graphite with a laser [1], burning graphite in a furnace [2], and by producing an arc across two graphite electrodes in an inert atmosphere [3]. Other methods include using negative ion/desorption chemical ionization techniques [413], benzene flame [14, 15], combustion method [16], and soot-free synthesis of C60[17]. At the present time, the most common method for synthesizing fullerenes is the Huffman-Kratschmer carbon arc technique [18]. In this method, pure carbon in the form of graphite was heated under plasma temperature by means of graphite electrodes in an inert atmosphere (usually helium). This method leads to the production of soot, in which the fullerenes have to be separated from. Until recently, only a few methods have been developed to separate fullerenes successfully. Most known separation methods employ a column chromatography technique [19]. Column chromatography uses a tube that is open at the top with a valve at the bottom to control the flow of liquid through the tube. The column is filled with a substance that has some affinity with the material that one is trying to separate (stationary phase). After the material to be separated is placed inside the top of the column, a solvent is passed through the column. The material to be separated has different interactions with the solvent and stationary phase; consequently, it moves through the tube slower than the solvent. The components will be carried along with the mobile phase to varying degrees, and a separation will be achieved. Most attempts to separate fullerenes involved using large amounts of stationary phase and solvent and an extended period of time for separation. The most common stationary phase for column chromatography is silica gel which is not able to separate the compounds effectively, and consequently, silica gel is used with alumina. Fullerenes have low solubility in common solvents, such as hexane. Their low solubility in inexpensive common solvents leads to ineffective separations with common stationary phases such as silica gel. An area of potential interest lies in the development of effective materials to separate the compounds properly for isolating gram quantities of 25 fullerenes. Recently, it was discovered that the use of an activated carbon (AC) and silica gel mixture can provide adequate and cost-effective separation of gram quantities of C60 and C70[20, 21].

One of the current interests in fullerenes is directed toward large-scale production and commercial applications. Although more than a decade has passed since fullerenes have been separated, an increasing number of researchers in both academic and industrial environment are still working on this subject [2]. Quite recently, industrial-scale fullerene extraction (a mixture of C60, C70, and C >70) began and lowered the price to less than one-fourth compared to the former prices [22]. With respect to the purification of fullerenes [19, 23], chromatographic methods have been commonly employed [2428]. Although these methods are quite useful for laboratory-scale purification, a few drawbacks were observed in the case of larger-scale production such as limited column loadings, duration of the process with constant attention, and the amounts of both required stationary and mobile phases. Non-chromatographic methods such as selective complexation [2933] and fractional crystallization [3437] are not always efficient especially for large-scale purification since they require a long stirring time, sometimes at elevated temperatures, and repeating the precipitation-filtration process a few times. Therefore, there is an increasing demand for a more efficient purification method that is applicable for the large-scale production of pure fullerenes. There are also several methods for the purification of fullerene derivatives [38]. In the present paper, we report a novel method for purifying C60 with a Soxhlet extractor, column choromatography, and the characterization of purified fullerene by Fourier transmittance infrared (FT-IR), ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). As a result, these methods lead us to methods with low cost and high-efficiency purification.

Results and discussion

A process has been developed to separate the compounds effectively and recover pure amounts of C60 from the fullerene soot containing higher and lower molecular weight fullerenes. This process first extracts the fullerenes from carbon soot and then separates the C60 molecules sequentially with high-performance or low-adsorption chromatography packed column containing a silica gel, AC, or celite.

In this process, the first step of fullerene extraction is preferably accomplished by the Soxhlet method. Several solvents were examined on small scales using the Soxhlet method. The choice of solvent is important and is based on the solubility of C60 fullerene. Experimental solubilization of C60 has been carried out via different solvents. The used solvents are classified in the following groups: polars (N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP)), benzenes (toluene, chlorobenzene (CB), orthodichlorobenzene (ODCB), 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (TCB)), naphthalenes (MN, dimethylnaphthalenes (DMN), 1-phenylnaphthalene (PN), 1-chloronaphthalene (CN)), and miscellaneous (carbon disulfide (CDS)). The measured solubilities confirm that C60 is poorly soluble in polar and H-bonding solvents and has low solubility in alkanes (the higher the number of carbons, the better the solubility), even though declining that solubilized C60 is more soluble in halogenated derivatives than in analog alkanes. In general, aromatics are proper solvents; increasing the number of rings increases solubility. As shown in Table 1, the most applicable solvent is CN (51 g/L, at room temperature) [39]. In addition to the high solubility, the solvent cost is also of great importance. As shown in Table 2, in the constant conditions of extraction, the highest efficiency is observed in run numbers of 4 to 9. The best solvent for extracting fullerenes from soot at a reasonable price that also showed high performance is ODCB. As illustrated in Figure 1, some of the solvents yield more than 100%, which means that the actual amount of fullerenes is 7% higher than the theoretical value. In the second step, fullerenes were extracted using ODCB solvent, and about 20 g of fullerenes were obtained by the Soxhlet extraction process. The solvent was then recovered using a rotary evaporator. The fullerenes were used for the purification in the second stage. Qualitative and quantitative tests were performed on fullerenes, such as IR, HPLC, and UV–vis spectroscopy. Analysis of the results showed that a mixture of fullerenes was extracted by the Soxhlet method.

Figure 1
figure 1

Efficiency of fullerene extraction from soot by the Soxhlet method.

Table 1 Solubility of C 60 in various solvents
Table 2 Extraction of fullerenes from soot with the Soxhlet method

In the second step, C60 was purified from the mixture of fullerenes by using column chromatography. As shown in Table 3, the purification efficiency can be optimized by changing parameters such as the combination of stationary phase and mobile phase. The various chromatographic methods used for fullerene separation have been investigated in several investigations, including stationary and mobile phases, conditions of detection, separation yields in some case, and a general discussion for each method. Stationary phases that have been reviewed include alumina [40], silica [41], molecular sieve, and AC [4244]. In comparison with single materials, combinations of materials are more applicable and have been investigated more. In order to examine changes in the composition of the stationary phase material, 33 tests were designed. In addition to changing the mobile phase, four solvents were considered separately as a mobile phase. Large numbers of experiments have to be performed in order to evaluate all factors. The effects of all the parameters can be incorporated into designing the experiments. In runs 1 to 11, the effect of increasing AC and celite in the silica gel are shown. By adding these compounds to the silica gel, the purification efficiency increases significantly. Similarly, runs 12 to 22 show the effect of increasing the silica gel and celite on the AC. In runs 23 to 33, adding silica gel and AC to celite at first shows an increase in efficiency and purification, and then a reduction was observed. This trend of increase and decrease is shown in Figure 2. The increased efficiency in the first and second series of runs indicates that the exchange molecules of silica gel with celite and AC, and AC with celite and silica gel lead to increases in the separation process in columns. The reduced efficiency of separation in the third series of runs indicates that unlike previous series, the exchange of celite with silica gel and AC reduces the performance of the separation. The results in Table 3 and the slope of the curve in Figure 2 show that the purification efficiency of C60 is increased by the addition of celite to the stationary phase. A comparison of efficiency in runs 1, 12, and 23 indicates that when celite is used individually, high separation performance will be observed.

Figure 2
figure 2

Efficiency of C 60 purification by column chromatography.

Table 3 Separation of C 60 (%) with different mobile phases and stationary phases

Comparing the results shown in Table 3, it can clearly be seen that celite is essential for the separation of fullerene C60. For the stationary phase containing 100% of silica gel, AC, and celite, the efficiency of C60 purification is 33.21, 82.36, and 90.14, respectively.

The maximum peak of four curves is related to run number 29 in which the mobile phase consisted of 30%, 30%, and 40% of silica gel, AC and celite, respectively. Four solvents, CB, ODCB, CDS, and toluene, were used as the mobile phase in this method. As shown in Figure 2, the purification efficiency is as follows: ODCB > CB > toluene > CDS. The main impurity in fullerene C60 is C70. The highest obtained purity in these experiments was 99.34%. High purity can be confirmed by FT-IR, NMR, UV–vis spectroscopy, and XRD patterns.

XRD is another technique for the determination of fullerene purity. The XRD pattern of pure fullerene C60 (shown in Figure 3) is clear and appears at 2θ = 10.8, 17.6, and 20.7. Figure 3 shows the XRD patterns of a mixture of fullerenes extracted by the Soxhlet method. Solid C60 forms a face-centered-cubic structure at room temperature [45, 46]. The presence of impurities in the extracted product by the Soxhlet system is observable by broadening obtained peaks and observing other peaks that are related to C60.

Figure 3
figure 3

Comparison between XRD patterns of soot, mixture of fullerenes, and extracted fullerene (C 60 ).

The 13C NMR spectrum of purified C60 shows one signal at 143.2. The amount of fullerene in the NMR samples is low, and the spin–lattice relaxation times are quite long (≥20 s for C60) [47]. The FT-IR spectra of fullerene soot and purified C60 are shown in Figure 4. Four absorption areas at 527, 576.5, 1,182.5, 1,429 cm-1 are related to C-C bond stretching and bending frequencies [48].

Figure 4
figure 4

FT-IR spectra of fullerene soot and purified C 60 . (a) Fullerenes extracted by Soxhlet (toluene) and (b) fullerenes purified by column chromatography are related to samples no. 29.

The electronic absorption spectra (UV–vis) of C60 and fullerene soot are characterized by stronger absorptions between 190 and 410 nm and the forbidden transitions in the visible region of the spectrum. For C60, the number and the type of transitions were confirmed by means of theoretical calculation results. The assignment of the transitions has been carried out using the results of theoretical calculations [49, 50]. The absorptions between 190 and 410 nm are related to the allowed 1T1u - 1Ag transitions, while absorptions between 410 and 620 nm are related to orbitally forbidden singlet-singlet transitions. These absorptions that appeared in the visible part are responsible for the purple color of C60 and the red color of C70[51].

Raw and pure samples of fullerene were also analyzed by HPLC (Figure 5). Chromatography was performed using Agilent 1200 HP HPLC (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with Develosil ODS-5 column (Nomura Chemical Co., Ltd., Seto, Japan) at room temperature (ca. 15°C to 20°C) with mobile phase toluene/acetonitrile = 50/50, flow rate of 2 mL/min, and UV detector at 325 nm. Clearly, the peaks corresponding to fullerenes separated by means of an appropriate method of analysis.

Figure 5
figure 5

HPLC chromatograms. (a) Fullerene soot, (b) fullerenes extracted by Soxhlet (toluene), and (c) fullerene purified by column chromatography are related to samples no. 2 (toluene); those in (d, f, g) are related to samples no. 29.

Methods

Materials and equipment

Fullerene soot was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemise GmbH Company (purity 7%; Steinheim, Germany); celite R-630, silica gel 40, and powdered AC Norite A (particle size 1 to 150 μm) were purchased from the Merck company (Dramstadt, Germany). Toluene, ODCB, other chemical materials, and solvents were purchased from both Merck and Aldrich. These materials were used without further purification. IR spectra were recorded using a Shimadzu FT-IR 8400 (Kyoto, Japan); UV–vis spectrophotometers Scinco S-2100 (SCINCO, Twin Lakes, WI, USA), NMR Jeol 90 MHz (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), HPLC Agilent 1200 HP, and rotary evaporator Heidolph Laborota 4000 (Schwabach, Germany) were used.

Soxhlet extraction procedure

Fullerene-containing carbon soot (5 g) was directly added to a cellulose extraction thimble. The extractions were performed using 50 mL of toluene for more than 1 h. Then, solids were separated from the solution by a rotary evaporator. The obtained solid was dried in an oven at 110°C (0.16 g). The extraction of fullerenes from soot was carried out by different solvents such as NMP, CB, ODCB, TCB, 1-ethylnaphthalene, DMN, PN, CN, or CDS. The fullerenes obtained were analyzed with FT-IR, NMR, UV–vis, XRD, and HPLC.

Preparing the column

The following steps were performed to prepare the column. In this step, a clean column (1.5 × 50 cm) with a glass wool at the bottom was used. It is notable that the applied glass container and column have to be washed with soapy water, rinsed with distilled water and a small amount of acetone, and ultimately dried in an oven. A small amount (0.5 cm) of dry sand was added to the column on top of the glass wool. The column was filled with the stationary phase including different percentages of silica gel, AC, and celite. Hexan was added to the beaker containing stationary phase as a solvent. The contents of the beaker were stirred to remove air bubbles, and solid particles were allowed to get wet. A funnel was placed on top of the column, and the stationary phase was poured quickly into the column. If necessary, the columns' stopcock will be opened, and some of the hexane was drained away to the stationary phase. This process was repeated until most of the stationary phase transferred to the column. The column was then gently tapped in order to remove the bubbles and compress the stationary phase; 1 cm of sand was smoothly added to the top of the stationary phase. The stopcock was opened, and the excess hexane was drained until its level reaches above the sand level.

Running the column

The extracted fullerene (50 mg) was poured into an Erlenmeyer flask, and then 20 mL of the solvent was added to the flask for purification purpose. The mixture was stirred properly and transferred to the top of the sand layer in the column. The opened stopcock in the column allows the fullerene to pass through the sand and the stationary phase. Subsequent to this step, 5 mL of the solvent was added to the solution. The components were collected as the solvent drips from the bottom of the column, and a rotary was used to evaporate the solvent and isolate the fullerenes. The obtained solid fullerenes were analyzed. This process was repeated for different stationary phases, and the efficiency of each test was also evaluated.

Conclusions

Celite is a naturally occurring, soft, chalk-like sedimentary rock that is easily crumbled into a fine white to off-white powder. This powder has an abrasive characteristic, similar to pumice powder, and is very light due to its high porosity. The typical chemical composition of diatomaceous earth is 86% silica, 5% sodium, 3% magnesium, and 2% iron. It is used as a filtration aid, mild abrasive, mechanical insecticide, absorbent for liquids, cat litter, activator in blood clotting studies, and heterogeneous catalyst [5255].

Celite is a cheap material, which together with activated carbon and silica gel increases the efficiency of purification. This material with good pores traps the heavier fullerenes of C60 and allows fullerene C60 to pass through the column. The use of this material with silica gel and activated carbon can increase the efficiency significantly. Here are a series of chemical and physical interactions of fullerene with celite and also celite with AC and silica gel. This method is a simple and yet efficient method to use. In addition to the laboratory base, this method can be used in the bench base. The applied solvents are easily recyclable by rotary evaporators for use in the next stages. The mobile phase can be recovered using a suitable solvent. In this method, parameters including efficiency, low cost, and simplicity are of great importance in the aim of obtaining an optimized method. As a result, a suitable method with low cost and high efficiency was used in this research.

References

  1. Kroto HW, Heath JR, O'Brien SC, Curl RF, Smalley RE: C 60 : buckminsterfullerene. Nature 1985,318(6042):162–163. 10.1038/318162a0

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kratschmer W, Lamb LD, Fostiropoulos K, Huffman DR: Solid C 60 : a new form of carbon. Nature 1990,347(6291):354–358. 10.1038/347354a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haufler RE, Conceicao J, Chibante LPF, Chai Y, Byrne NE, Flanagan S, Haley MM, O'Brien SC, Pan C, Xiao Z, Billups WE, Ciufolini MA, Hauge RH, Margrave JL, Wilson LJ, Curl RF, Smalley RE: Efficient production of C 60 (buckminsterfullerene), C 60 H 36 , and the solvated buckide ion. J. Phys. Chem 1990,94(24):8634–8636. 10.1021/j100387a005

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gerhardt PH, Loffler S, Homann KH: Polyhedral carbon ions in hydrocarbon flames. Chem. Phys. Lett 1987,137(4):306–310. 10.1016/0009-2614(87)80889-8

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gerhardt PH, Loffler S, Homann KH: The formation of polyhedral carbon ions in fuel-rich acetylene and benzene flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 1988, 22: 395–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gerhardt PH, Homann KH: Ions and charged soot particles in hydrocarbon flames. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94: 5381–5391. 10.1021/j100376a039

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baum T, Loffler S, Weilmunster P, Homann KH: Polycyclic aromatics, fullerenes and soot particles as charged species in flames. Prepr. Pap. Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Fuel. Chem. 1991, 36: 1533–1540.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Baum T, Loffler S, Loffler P, Weilmunster P, Homann KH: Fullerene ions and their relation to PAH and soot in low-pressure hydrocarbon flames. Ber. Bunsen. Ges. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96: 841–857.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahrens J, Kovacs R, Shafranovskii EA, Homann KH: On-line multi-photon ionization mass spectrometry applied to PAH and fullerenes in flames. Ber. Bunsen. Ges. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98: 265–268. 10.1002/bbpc.19940980224

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahrens J, Bachmann M, Baum T, Griesheimer J, Kovacs R, Weilmunster P, Homann KH: Fullerenes and their ions in hydrocarbon flames. Int. J. Mass. Spectrom. Ion. Proc. 1994, 138: 133–148.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bachmann M, Wiese W, Homann KH: Fullerenes versus soot in benzene flames. Combust. Flame. 1995, 101: 548–550. 10.1016/0010-2180(94)00276-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bachmann M, Wiese W, Homann KH: PAH and aromers: precursors of fullerenes and soot. Proc. Combust. Inst. 1996, 26: 2259–2267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahrens J, Keller A, Kovacs R, Homann KH: Large molecules, radicals, ions, and small soot. Particles in fuel-rich hydrocarbon flames. Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem 1998, 102: 1823–1839. 10.1002/bbpc.19981021213

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Howard JB, McKinnon JT, Makarovsky Y, Lafleur AL, Johonson ME: Production and characterization of fullerenes in flames. Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. SOC., Div. Fuel Chem 1991,36(3):1022–1025.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McKinnon JT, Bell WL, Barkley RM: Combustion synthesis of fullerenes. Combust. Flame. 1992, 88: 102–112. 10.1016/0010-2180(92)90010-M

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hiroaki T, Masashi F, Mineyuki A, Michael DDJ, Michael A: Experimental study of industrial scale fullerene production by combustion synthesis. Carbon 2005, 43: 311–319. 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.09.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ryan PR, Peter TAR, William B, Whitten J, Michael R: Soot-free synthesis of C 60 . Carbon 2003, 41: 1469–1475. 10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00175-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Howard JB, Lafleur AL, Makarovsky Y, Mitra S, Pope CJ, Yadav TK: Fullerenes synthesis in combustion. Carbon 1992,30(8):1183–1201. 10.1016/0008-6223(92)90061-Z

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fetzer JC: The preparative separation of fullerenes. In Separation of fullerenes by liquid chromatography. Edited by: Jinno K. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry; 1999:25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Govindraj A, Rao CNR: Convenient procedures for obtaining pure C 60 and C 70 in relatively large quantities. Fullerene. Sci. Tec. 1993,1(4):557–562. 10.1080/15363839308009531

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. James M: Purification of fullerenes. 1997. US 55662876 US 55662876

    Google Scholar 

  22. Howard JB, McKinnon JT, Johnson ME, Makarovsky Y, Lafleur AL: Production of C 60 and C 70 fullerenes in benzene-oxygen flames. J. Phys. Chem 1992,96(16):6657–6662. 10.1021/j100195a026

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Theobald J: Extraction and purification of fullerenes: a comprehensive review. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1995,30(14):2783–2819. 10.1080/01496399508013716

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Scrivens WA, Cassell AM, North BL, Tour JM: Single column purification of gram quantities of C 70 . J. Am. Chem. Soc 1994,116(15):6939–6940. 10.1021/ja00094a060

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Darwish AD, Kroto HW, Taylor R, Walton DRM: Improved chromatographic separation of C 60 and C 70 . J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1994, 1: 15–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Isaacs L, Wehrsig A, Diederich F: Improved purification of C 60 and formation of sigma- and pai-homoaromatic methano-bridged fullerenes by reaction with alkyl diazoacetates. Helv. Chim. Acta. 1993,76(3):1231. 10.1002/hlca.19930760310

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Scrivens WA, Bedworth PV, Tour JM: Purification of gram quantities of C 60 . A new inexpensive and facile method. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1992,114(20):7917–7919. 10.1021/ja00046a051

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wilson MA, Pang LSK, Vassallo AM: C 60 separation on coal. Nature 1992, 355: 117–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Komatsu N: Preferential precipitation of C 70 over C 60 with phalohomooxacalix [3] arenes. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003,1(1):204–209. 10.1039/b208107e

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Komatsu N: New synthetic route to homooxacalix[n]arenes via reductive coupling of diformylphenols. Tetrahedron. Lett. 2001,42(9):1733–1736. 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)02336-4

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Atwood JL, Koutsantonis GA, Raston CL: Purification of C 60 and C 70 by selective complexation with calixarenes. Nature 1994, 368: 229–231. 10.1038/368229a0

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Suzuki T, Nakashima K, Shinkai S: Very convenient and efficient method for fullerrene (C 60 ) with calix [8]arene. Chem. Lett. 1994, 4: 699–702. 10.1016/S0960-894X(01)80183-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bucsi I, Aniszfeld R, Shamma T, Prakash GKS, Olah GA: Convenient separation of high-purity C 60 from crude fullerene extract by selective complexation with AlCl 3 . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994,91(19):9019–9021. 10.1073/pnas.91.19.9019

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Doome RJ, Fonseca A, Richter H, Nagy JB, Thiry PA, Lucas AA: Purification of C 60 by fractional crystallization. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1997,58(11):1839–1843. 10.1016/S0022-3697(97)00094-2

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhou X, Gu Z, Wu Y, Sun Y, Jin Z, Xiong Y: Separation of C 60 and C 70 fullerenes in gram quantities by fractional crystallization. Carbon 1994,32(5):935–937. 10.1016/0008-6223(94)90052-3

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu Y, Sun Y, Gu Z, Zhou X, Xiong Y, Sun B: A combined recrystallization and preparative liquid chromatographic method for the isolation of pure C 70 fullerenes. Carbon 1994,32(6):1180–1182. 10.1016/0008-6223(94)90228-3

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Coustel N, Bernier P, Aznar R, Zahab A, Lambert J-M: Purification of C 60 by a simple crystallization procedure. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1992, 19: 1402–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Juan L, Mingyi Z, Baoyun S, Gengmei X, Yan S, HaiLi G, Chang Y, Ge Y, Zhao Y: Separation and purification of fullerenols for improved biocompatibility. Carbon 2012, 50: 460–469. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.08.073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ruoff RS, Tse DS, Malhotra R, Lorents DC: Solubility of C 60 in a variety of solvents. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97: 3379–3383. 10.1021/j100115a049

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sivaraman N, Dhamodaran R, Kaliappan I, Srinivasan TG, Vasuveva , Rao PR, Mathews CK: Solubility of C60 in organic solvents. J. Org. Chem 1992, 57: 6077–6079. 10.1021/jo00048a056

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Taylor R, Hare JP, Abdul-Sada A, Kroto H: Isolation, separation and characterisation of the fullerenes C 60 and C 70 . J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1990, 20: 1423–1425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Diack M, Compton RN, Guiochon G: Evaluation of stationary phases for the separation of buckminsterfullerenes by high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chrom. 1993, 639: 129–140. 10.1016/0021-9673(93)80247-6

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Steven PW, Thomas P, Jamey L, Michele AW, Christopher SF: Extraction, isolation and characterization of fullerene C 60 . J. Chem. Educ 1997,74(30):311–312.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Manolova N, Rashkov I, Legras D, Delpeux S, Beguin F: Separation of C 60 /C 70 mixture on activated carbon and activated carbon fibers. Carbon 1995, 33: 209–213. 10.1016/0008-6223(94)00132-J

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Naoki K, Toshiyuki O, Kazumi M: A highly improved method for purification of fullerenes applicable to large-scale production. Carbon 2004, 42: 163–167. 10.1016/j.carbon.2003.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kortan AR, Kopylov N, Glarum S, Gyorgy EM, Ramirez AP, Fleming RM: Superconductivity at 8.4 K in calcium-doped C 60 . Nature 1992, 355: 529. 10.1038/355529a0

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Gasyna Z, Schatz PN, Hare JP, Dennis TJ, Kroto HW, Taylor R: The magnetic circular dichroism and absorption spectra of C 60 isolated in argon matrices. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1991, 183: 283–291. 10.1016/0009-2614(91)80064-5

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Taylor R, Langley GJ, Dennis TJS, Kroto HW, Walton DRM: A mass spectrometric/NMR study of fullerene-78 isomers. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1992, 15: 1043–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hare JP, Dennis TJ, Kroto HW, Taylor R, Allaf AW, Balm S, Walton DRM: The IR spectra of fullerene-60 and -70. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1991, 6: 412–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hare JP, Kroto HW, Taylor R: Preparation and UV/VIS spectra of fullerenes C 60 and C 70 . Chem. Phys. Lett. 1991, 177: 394–398. 10.1016/0009-2614(91)85072-5

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Leach S, Vervloet M, Desprès A, Brèheret E, Hare JP, Dennis T, Kroto HW, Taylor R, Walton DRM: Electronic spectra and transitions of the fullerene C 60 . Chem. Phys. 1992, 160: 451–466. 10.1016/0301-0104(92)80012-K

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Krätschmer W, Fostiropoulos K, Huffman DR: The infrared and ultraviolet absorption spectra of laboratory-produced carbon dust evidence for the presence of the C 60 molecule. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1990, 170: 167. 10.1016/0009-2614(90)87109-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Arthur B: Diatomite in industrial minerals and rocks. 3rd edition. Dove Valley: American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers; 1960:303–319.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fatemeh T, Alireza N, Somayeh F: CsF–celite as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for sulfonylation and desulfonylation of heteroatoms. Catal. Commun. 2011, 12: 1477–1482. 10.1016/j.catcom.2011.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Shakeel AA, Qayyum H: Lactose hydrolysis from milk/whey in batch and continuous processes by concanavalin A-celite 545 immobilized Aspergillus oryzae β galactosidase. Food. Bioprod. Process. 2012, 90: 351–359. 10.1016/j.fbp.2011.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Department of Chemistry of Bu-Ali Sina University and the Ministry of Science, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI) for their financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hassan Keypour.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

MN participated in the experimental section. MN and AR participated in the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis. HK, as the supervisor, participated in this work. HK, MN, and AR carried out the manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Mohammad Noroozi and Alimorad Rashidi contributed equally to this work.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keypour, H., Noroozi, M. & Rashidi, A. An improved method for the purification of fullerene from fullerene soot with activated carbon, celite, and silica gel stationary phases. J Nanostruct Chem 3, 45 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-8865-3-45

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-8865-3-45

Keywords

  • Fullerene
  • Purification
  • Chromatography
  • Celite