Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Characterization of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from farmed sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) during disease outbreaks

International Aquatic Research volume 5, Article number: 13 (2013) Cite this article

Abstract

Vibrio parahaemolyticus was isolated from the internal organs of diseased sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) cultured in a marine cage farm and an inshore fish farm in the summer 2010. All strains isolated from diseased sea bass were tested for virulence by intraperitoneal injection. The isolates (n = 6) were pathogenic for sea bass. Only bacterial strains showing haemolytic activity were virulent. LD50 values ranged from 3.52 × 104 to 2.29 × 106 cfu fish−1. In this study, we report the characterization and the virulence of V. parahaemolyticus strains isolated from sea bass originating from two different fish farms (marine cage farm and inshore fish farm in Tunisia).

Background

Vibrio parahaemolyticus is part of the natural estuarian microflora and coastal marine waters and can be present in seafood, especially shellfish and bivalve mollusks (DePaola et al. 2003; Zorrilla et al. 2003). Starting from 2000, an increase of outbreaks associated with the 03:K6 serovar has been observed in Asia (Matsumoto et al. 2000), North America and Chile (Martinez-Urtaza et al. 2005). This serovar was also reported from outbreaks or sporadic cases in Europe, France and Spain (Martinez-Urtaza et al. 2005; Quilici et al. 2005), and Africa and Russia (Nair et al. 2007).

The Vibrio pathogenic species produce various virulence factors including enterotoxin, haemolysin, cytotoxin, protease, lipase, phospholipase, siderophore, adhesive factor and/or haemagglutinins (Zhang and Austin 2005). The virulence of V. parahaemolyticus strains is commonly associated with expression of thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH) and TDH-related hemolysin (TRH), which are encoded by the tdh and trh genes. Therefore, the tdh gene, marked by a β-type haemolysis on Wagatsuma agar (Nishibuchi and Kaper 1995), and the trh gene, correlated to a positive urease tests (Okuda et al. 1997), serve as markers for pathogenic strains. Many extracellular proteases are suggested to play important roles in virulence of Vibrio spp. In a recent study (Lee et al. 2002), a protease was identified as the major virulence factor in a clinical tdh and trh negative V. parahaemolyticus isolate, and this enzyme showed cytotoxic activity on CHO and Vero cells. In this study, we reported the characterization of six V. parahaemolyticus isolated during outbreaks affecting sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) isolated in two different fish farms (inshore and offshore fish farms), and we demonstrate its implication in the disease experimental challenges.

Methods

Sampling and bacterial isolation

Juvenile (weight 5 to 7 g, length 8 to 10 cm) and adults (weight 100 to 120 g, length 14 to 16 cm) D. labrax were obtained from two different fish farm, marine cage farm and inshore fish farm in summer 2010. Ten fish were collected from each size and each site (20 juveniles and 20 adults). The two fish farms are located in the biggest centre in Tunisia (Sousse, Centre of Tunisia). Samples from liver, spleen, kidney and external lesions of several fish from marine cage farm and inshore fish farm were cultured on alkaline peptone water (1% NaCl, pH 8.6) and incubated at 37°C for 18 to 24 h. A loopful of the enrichment culture was streaked onto thiosulphate-citrate-bile salt-sucrose agar used for the selective isolation of Vibrio strains (TCBS agar, Scharlau Microbiology, Spain). After 18 to 24 h of incubation at 37°C, the cultures giving pure green colonies were randomly selected then subcultured on tryptic soy agar (TSA, Difco, Spain) supplemented with 1% NaCl according to the protocol described by Hara-Kudo et al. (2001). The isolated bacteria were frozen at −80°C with 20% (v/v) glycerol for further analysis.

Phenotypic characterization of bacterial strains

Standard procedures described in Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (Alsina and Blanch 1994) were used for the species identification. Gram coloration, cell morphology, the oxidase, catalase, indole production, O-F test, motility (mannitol-motility agar, Pronadisa, Madrid, Spain) and susceptibility to the vibriostatic compound O/129 (10 and 150 μg/disc) were the first tests employed to identify the organisms belonging to the Vibrio genus. The API 20NE (bioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) procedure was modified in order to incorporate a 2.5% NaCl concentration in all microtubes. An initial bacterial suspension was therefore prepared in 5 mL of a 2.5% NaCl solution instead of the recommended 0.85% NaCl medium. Incubation time and temperature were maintained within the limits prescribed (30°C for 24 h) (Croci et al. 2007). Identification was obtained through the APILAB PLUS software (bioMerieux) and was considered acceptable when giving a probability equal or greater than 80% (Croci et al. 2007).

Halophilism tests were performed using tryptone broth composed of casein enzymic hydrolysate and different concentrations of NaCl (0%, 3%, 6%, 8% and 10% w/v). Additional characterization tests for the identification of V. parahaemolyticus (Hormansdorfer et al. 2000), arginine dehydrolase tests and O/129 susceptibility tests were performed (FDA and Drug Administration 1992). The reference strains listed in Table 1 were used as positive controls.

Table 1 Biochemical and morphological characterization of isolates from sea bass D. and V. parahaemolyticus (ATCC 17802 and ATCC43996)
Full size table

Confirmation of the species level by detection of toxR gene

DNA minipreparations were made from each strain using the Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The DNA was later resuspended in TE (10 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM EDTA, pH 7.8) buffer and stored at −20°C. The quantity of genomic DNA in each sample was measured at 260 nm using a spectrophotometer (Ultraspec 2100 Pro; Amersham Biosciences Europe GmbH, France). The DNA concentration of each sample was adjusted to (40 ng/μL) for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) by diluting DNA in distilled deionized water.

V. parahaemolyticus identification was confirmed with the presence of the outer membrane protein regulation operon gene (toxR) (Kim et al. 1999). The reaction for toxR analysis was performed in a total volume of 25 μL containing 2.5 μL of DNA sample, 15.25 μL of deionized water, 2.5 μL of 10 × buffer, 2 μL of 25 mM concentration of MgCl2, 0.5 μL of 10 mM concentration of dNTP, 1 μL (10 μM) of each primer (ToxR-F GTCTTCTGACGCAATCGTTG and ToxR-R ATACGAGTGGTTGCTGTCATG) and 0.25 μL of 5 U/μL of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega). The PCR assay was performed at 94°C for 5 min followed by cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 63°C for 1 min and 72°C for 2 min in a DNA thermal cycler (Kim et al. 1999). The PCR fragments were subjected to electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel in Trisborate-EDTA buffer (0.89 mol/L Tris, 0.89 mol/L boric acid, 0.02 mol/L EDTA, pH 8.0), visualized by ethidium bromide staining and photographed using Gel Doc XR apparatus (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Serum sensitivity and exoenzyme productions

Enzymatic activities of isolates were analysed by spot inoculations on TSA 2% NaCl supplemented with skimmed milk (2% w/v), Tween 80 (1% w/v), egg yolk emulsion (2% w/v), fibrinogen (0.28% w/v) and elastin (0.1% w/v) (Alcaide et al. 1999). DNase production was assayed on DNase agar (Oxoid, Hampshire, England). Gelatinase potency was evaluated using nutrient gelatin differential medium (Oxoid) that tests the ability of an organism to produce an exoenzyme that hydrolyzes gelatin. Haemolysin potency was evaluated using a modified plate assay technique described previously (Quindos et al. 1994). Briefly, 10 μL of suspensions (108 ufc mL−1) were spotted onto human blood and fish blood agar made by mixing 70 mL of each blood with 1,000 mL (TSA) supplemented with 3% g NaCl (w/v). Fish blood was collected by caudal venous puncture from four or five healthy sea bass with weight over 100 g. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Positive haemolytic potency was recorded by the presence of a distinct translucent halo around the inoculum area. The diameters of the zones of lysis and the colony were measured, and the ratio (equal to or larger than 1) was used as a haemolytic index to represent the intensity of haemolysin production by the tested strains. All the experiments were repeated three times. As phenotypic marker of the trh gene from V. parahaemolyticus isolates, the urease activity (Ure) was assayed through a conventional method, using Christensen's urea agar base (with 3% NaCl) which is used for rapid detection of urease activity (Hammack et al. 2001; Christensen 1946).

Infectivity tests

The 50% lethal dose (LD50) test (with batches of 20 fish per dose) was conducted by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection as previously described (Alcaide et al. 1999). Briefly, juveniles of D. labrax (weight 7 g and length 80 mm), kindly provided by the hatchery of higher Institute of Sea Monastir, were injected with 50 μL of a bacterial suspension containing 108 to 102 cfu mL−1. The six strains were used in virulence test to quantify their virulence; the strains were grown overnight in TSA 3% NaCl at 30°C, from which one colony was subcultured in 40-mL fresh medium (TSB 3% NaCl) at the same condition for 16 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation (5,000×g, 10 min), washed and resuspended in PBS (0.01 M) to OD600 of 0.2 to 0.9, so that the bacterial concentrations were 102 to 108 cfu mL−1 determined by dilution plate method. Sterile PBS was injected i.p. into fish as control. The water temperature of the experiment was adjusted to 25°C. D. labrax juveniles were acclimated in sea water of 25°C for 4 to 5 days. Before infection, the juveniles of sea bream were fed with commercial food (ALLER FUTURA EX., ALLER AQUA, Aller, Christiansfeld, Denmark).

The juvenile fish were maintained at 25°C, 37‰ salinity and under continuous aeration. The juveniles were kept without feeding during the virulence test. Mortalities were recorded daily for 7 days and were only considered infected if V. parahaemolyticus was recovered from the assayed fish. The LD50 was calculated by simple method for estimating 50% endpoints (Reed and Muench 1938).

Survival in fish serum

The strains of V. parahaemolyticus were tested for their ability to resist the bactericidal activity of sea bass natural serum in a plate plaque assay. Sea bass serum was collected by centrifugation of total blood at 3,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C and stored at −20°C. The tests were conducted in 96-well microtitre dishes by mixing 100 μL of fresh serum or heat inactivated serum (44°C, 20 min) with 100 μL of bacteria suspension (106 cfu mL−1) in PBS (pH 7). The assays were made by taking samples (10 μL) of the mixture (serum and bacteria) every 30 min for 4 h of incubation at room temperature (30°C). Viable counts were determined by drop plate on TSA 1% NaCl. Survival curve of all V. parahaemolyticus strains was determined using an Excel program.

Results

Biochemical and genetic identification

Table 1 describes the biochemical characterization of the strains isolated. The most outstanding character in the environmental strains is tryptophan deaminase and indole negative. According to API 20NE profiles (Table 2), four strains are identified as V. parahaemolyticus, and two are Burkholderia gladioli. The isolates which were initially identified as V. parahaemolyticus by conventional biochemical tests were further confirmed by PCR targeting species specific toxR (368 bp) gene (Figure 1). The two strains identified like B. gladioli were also positive for the toxR gene.

Table 2 Origin, hydrolytic enzymes and virulence factors of different strains isolated from internal organs diseased fish
Full size table
Figure 1
figure1

Reaction (PCR). M, molecular mass marker 100 bp; T, control; T1 and T2, controls + V. parahaemolyticus ATCC 43996 and ATCC 17802; S1, S4 and S5, environmental strains.

Full size image

Characterization of V. parahaemolyticus isolates

In the present study, none of the strains showed beta haemolytic activity, but four strains were found to exhibit weak haemolysis, and all stains were negative for urease (Table 2). Most of the Vibrio isolates were producers of extracellular lipase, amylase, caseinase, DNase and gelatinase (Table 2). Experimentally infected fish showed external signs similar to those observed in outbreaks. During the determination of the LD50, all strains showing haemolytic activity were virulent and caused mortality during the infection tests. Pure culture of V. parahaemolyticus was isolated from liver and skin of moribund fish, and no moralities were detected in the control group. Signs of infection began to appear on the second day with strains S1 and S2, whereas for other strains, such signs were present only from the fourth day. The LD50 of the pathogenic strains ranged between 3.52 × 104 and 2.29 × 106 cfu g−1 fish (Table 2). Healthy fish infected with V. parahaemolyticus (S1 and S2) during virulence tests developed skin ulcers, similar to those observed on the surface of sea bass collected from initial outbreaks in fish farms (Figure 2). With S4 and S5 strains, the fish do not show any signs of infection during the rest of experiments.

Figure 2
figure2

Signs of infection observed on D. labrax larvae including. Skin haemorrhages (left) and necroses (right) after infection tests.

Full size image

V. parahaemolyticus survival in fish serum

Only two strains isolated from sea bass (S5 and S4) were found to be serum sensitive. The survival curves of V. parahaemolyticus strains in sea bass serum are shown in Figure 3. The two strains showed different profiles: (A) strains that resisted the bactericidal action of the serum and were capable of proliferating, and (B) other strains that showed sensitivity to the serum and of which the percentage of survival decreased.

Figure 3
figure3

Survival curves. Six V. parahaemolyticus strains and the two reference strains (ATCC 43996 and ATCC 17802) in sea bass serum.

Full size image

Discussion

During the spring of 2010, a wide mortality occurred in two aquaculture farms, starting in the offshore farm and then the same sign and the same mortality occurred in the inshore farm. The clinical signs of vibriosis affecting sea bass (D. labrax) included darkened body colour, white nodular skin lesion and sudden death with haemorrhages in the skeletal muscle. The six strains isolated during our study were reported to exhibit variation in one or two biochemical reactions, inducing errors in species identification (Dileep et al. 2003). The atypical reactions in environmental Vibrio spices may pose difficulties in organism biochemical identification (Karunasagar et al. 1996). B. gladioli is indole negative and lysine decorboxylation negative bacteria, knowing that most of the Tunisian Vibrio isolates were negative for indole production (Ben Kahla-Nakbi et al. 2007). Identifying V. parahaemolyticus strains through PCR-based method which targets the conserved region of V. parahaemolyticus such as gyrB and toxR gene is more efficient, reliable and faster compared to identifying through biochemical tests (Kim et al. 1999). Although V. parahaemolyticus is widely distributed in the coastal environments all over the world, most of the environmental strains are not pathogenic to humans, and only 1 to 2% of the environmental strains have shown to be positive Kanagawa TDH (Hervio-Heath et al. 2002; Robert-Pillot et al. 2004). In the present study, four of the isolates were found to exhibit weak haemolysis, and none of them was found to exhibit positive amplification for the tdh gene; none of the weak haemolytic strains were found to exhibit urease activity. It is likely that the tdh and trh positive strains are present in very low numbers along with strains negative for these genes (Dileep et al. 2003). The weak haemolysis points towards the presence of other virulence factors other than tdh in V. parahaemolyticus. This is confirmed during the determination of LD50. All strains showing haemolytic activity are virulent and cause mortality during the infection tests even with the absence tdh and trh genes. V. parahaemolyticus is considered as a human pathogen more than a fish pathogen. Several cases of fish mortality due to this germ are reported in Mediterranean coasts (Alcaide et al. 1999; Zorrilla et al. 2003). The organism has been associated with mortalities in Iberian toothcarp (Aphanius iberus) with the signs centred on external haemorrhages and tail rot (Austin and Austin 2007). Cultures regarded as intermediate between V. alginolyticus and V. parahaemolyticus were recovered from diseased milkfish (Chanos chano s) in the Philippines (Austin and Austin 2007). In Penaeus monodon, the organism has been implicated as a cause of red disease in India (Jayasree 2009). Pathogenicity has been established in Solea senegalensis, amberjack and eel by i.p. infections with LD50 dose of 6.3 × 105, 5 × 103 and 6.2 × 105 cfu fish−1, respectively (Alcaide et al. 1999; Zorrilla et al. 2003). The corresponding value in abalone post-larvae was 3.5 × 105 cfu mL−1, with the disease mirroring that of natural infections (Cai et al. 2007).

Many extracellular proteases are suggested to play important roles in the virulence of Vibrio spp. In a recent study (Lee et al. 2002), a protease was identified as the major virulence factor in a clinical tdh- and trh-negative V. parahaemolyticus isolate, and this enzyme showed cytotoxic activity on CHO and Vero cells (Ottaviani et al. 2005).

The enzymes' arsenal in these microorganisms gives them an edge in survival under adverse and stressful environmental conditions. Hydrolytic activities allow Vibrio strains the faculty to adhere to the epithelial cells of the juveniles of both D. labrax and Sparus aurata, to break the first barrier of natural defence and to colonize all internal organs, inducing external haemorrhages, necrotic eyes, deep ulcers, haemorrhagic liver, pale kidney and splenomegaly (Ben Kahla-Nakbi et al. 2009). In fact, virulence factors of non-toxigenic V. parahaemolyticus centre on proteases and adhesines. Serum plays an important role in the natural defence of fish against bacterial infections. The resistance to the serum is often associated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The high molecular weight portion of LPS is usually responsible for serum resistance in several bacterial pathogens (Amaro et al. 1995). Our results showed that virulent strains can survive the bactericidal action of the sea bass serum. Resistance to the bactericidal mechanisms of normal serum appears to be an important contributor to the virulence of fish-pathogenic Vibrio (Bordas et al. 1996).

However, the V. parahaemolyticus strains isolated during this outbreak were pathogenic to fish, but they did not possess any detectable virulence gene. The high diversity of strains belonging to the same species may explain the strain-specific expression of virulence factors and consequently the different data obtained from various geographic areas (Baffone et al. 2000).

Conclusions

This is the first report on the characterization and virulence of V. parahaemolyticus for sea bass in Tunisia and in Mediterranean coast. Vibriosis causes enormous economic loss in Tunisian aquaculture. The present study indicates that high abundance of extracellular hydrolytic enzyme profiles in the different strains isolated during this outbreak can be a main reason for the high mortality caused by this species. Knowing that, most of the fish larvae elevated in offshore farm are imported from several hatcheries in the Mediterranean Sea countries (France, Spain and Italy), and the inshore farm has its own hatchery. Moreover, genetic study is needed to view if strains responsible for such mortalities are imported with these larvae and introduced into Tunisian environment or they are already present in our environment (autochthon strains).

References

  1. Alcaide E, Amaro C, Todoli R, Oltra R: Isolation and characterization of Vibrio parahaemolyticus causing infection in Iberian toothcarp Aphanius iberus . Dis Aquat Organ 1999,35(1):77–80. doi:10.3354/dao035077 doi:10.3354/dao035077

  2. Alsina M, Blanch AR: A set of keys for biochemical identification of environmental Vibrio species. J Appl Bacteriol 1994,76(1):79–85. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1994.tb04419.x

  3. Amaro C, Biosca EG, Fouz B, Alcaide E, Esteve C: Evidence that water transmits Vibrio vulnificus biotype 2 infections to eels. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995,61(3):1133–1137.

  4. Austin B, Austin DA: Bacterial fish pathogens, disease of farmed and wild fish. 4th edition. Godalming: Springer Praxis; 2007.

  5. Baffone W, Pianetti A, Bruscolini F, Barbieri E, Citterio B: Occurrence and expression of virulence-related properties of Vibrio species isolated from widely consumed seafood products. Int J Food Microbiol 2000,54(1–2):9–18. doi:10.1016/S0168–1605(99)00189–0 doi:10.1016/S0168-1605(99)00189-0 10.1016/S0168-1605(99)00189-0

  6. Ben Kahla-Nakbi A, Besbes A, Bakhrouf A, Alcaide E: Characterization and virulence properties of Vibrio strains isolated from diseased gilthead sea bream ( Sparus aurata ) cultured in Tunisia. Bull Eur Assoc Fish Pathol 2007, 27: 90–99.

  7. Ben Kahla-Nakbi A, Chaieb K, Bakhrouf A: Investigation of several virulence properties among Vibrio alginolyticus strains isolated from diseased cultured fish in Tunisia. Dis Aquat Organ 2009,86(1):21–28.

  8. Bordas MA, Balebona MC, Zorrilla I, Borrego JJ, Morinigo MA: Kinetics of adhesion of selected fish-pathogenic Vibrio strains of skin mucus of gilt-head sea bream ( Sparus aurata L .). Appl Environ Microbiol 1996,62(10):3650–3654.

  9. Cai J, Li J, Thompson KD, Li C, Han H: Isolation and characterization of pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus from diseased post-larvae of abalone Haliotis diversicolor supertexta . J Basic Microbiol 2007,47(1):84–86. doi:10.1002/jobm.200610192 doi:10.1002/jobm.200610192 10.1002/jobm.200610192

  10. Christensen WB: Urea decomposition as a means of differentiating Proteus and paracolon cultures from each other and from Salmonella and Shigella types. J Bacteriol 1946,52(4):461–466.

  11. Croci L, Suffredini E, Cozzi L, Toti L, Ottaviani D, Pruzzo C, Serratore P, Fischetti R, Goffredo E, Loffredo G, Mioni R: Comparison of different biochemical and molecular methods for the identification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus . J Appl Microbiol 2006,102(1):229–237. doi:10.1111/j.1365–2672.2006.03046.x doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03046.x

  12. DePaola A, Nordstrom JL, Bowers JC, Wells JG, Cook DW: Seasonal abundance of total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Alabama oysters. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003,69(3):1521–1526. 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1521-1526.2003

  13. Dileep V, Kumar HS, Kumar Y, Nishibuchi M, Karunasagar I: Application of polymerase chain reaction for detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus associated with tropical seafoods and coastal environment. Lett Appl Microbiol 2003,36(6):423–427. doi:10.1046/j.1472–765X.2003.01333.x doi:10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01333.x 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01333.x

  14. Food and Drug Administration: Bacteriological analytical manual. 2nd edition. Washington DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 1992.

  15. Hammack TS, Amaguana RM, Andrews WH: An improved method for the recovery of Salmonella serovars from orange juice using universal preenrichment broth. J Food Prot 2001,64(5):659–663.

  16. Hara-Kudo Y, Sugiyama K, Nishina T, Saitoh A, Nakagawa H, Ichihara T, Konuma H, Hasegawa J, Kumagai S: Detection of TDH-producing Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 from naturally contaminated shellfish using an immunomagnetic separation method and chromogenic agar medium. Kansenshogaku Zasshi 2001,75(11):955–960.

  17. Hervio-Heath D, Colwell RR, Derrien A, Robert-Pillot A, Fournier JM, Pommepuy M: Occurrence of pathogenic Vibrios in coastal areas of France. J Appl Microbiol 2002,92(6):1123–1135. doi:10.1046/j.1365–2672.2002.01663.x doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01663.x 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01663.x

  18. Hormansdorfer S, Wentges H, Neugebaur-Buchler K, Bauer J: Isolation of Vibrio alginolyticus from seawater aquaria. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2000,203(2):169–175. 10.1078/S1438-4639(04)70024-3

  19. Jayasree S: Identification of immune cells interacting with Vibrio spp. and its in vitro post-phagocytic killing mechanism of haemocytes in the penaeid shrimp, Penaeus indicus H. Milne Edwards. J Fish Dis 2009,32(4):359–365. doi:10.1111/j.1365–2761.2009.01018.x. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2761.2009.01018.x. 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2009.01018.x

  20. Karunasagar I, Sugumar G, Reilly PJ: Rapid polymerase chain reaction method for detection of Kanagawa positive Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafoods. Int J Food Microbiol 1996,31(1–3):317–323.

  21. Kim YB, Okuda J, Matsumoto C, Takahashi N, Hashimoto S, Nishibuchi M: Identification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains at the species level by PCR targeted to the toxR gene. J Clin Microbiol 1999,37(4):1173–1177.

  22. Lee CY, Cheng MF, Yu MS, Pan MJ: Purification and characterization of a putative virulence factor, serine protease, from Vibrio parahaemolyticus . FEMS Microbiol Lett 2002,209(1):31–37. doi:10.1016/S0378–1097(02)00477–9 doi:10.1016/S0378-1097(02)00477-9 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11105.x

  23. Martinez-Urtaza J, Simental L, Velasco D, DePaola A, Ishibashi M, Nakaguchi Y, Nishibuchi M, Carrera-Flores D, Rey-Alvarez C, Pousa A: Pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6, Europe. Emerg Infect Dis 2005,11(8):1319–1320. 10.3201/eid1108.050322

  24. Matsumoto C, Okuda J, Ishibashi M, Iwanaga M, Garg P, Rammamurthy T, Wong HC, Depaola A, Kim YB, Albert MJ, Nishibuchi M: Pandemic spread of an O3:K6 clone of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and emergence of related strains evidenced by arbitrarily primed PCR and toxRS sequence analyses. J Clin Microbiol 2000,38(2):578–585.

  25. Nair GB, Ramamurthy T, Bhattacharya SK, Dutta B, Takeda Y, Sack DA: Global dissemination of Vibrio parahaemolyticus serotype O3:K6 and its serovariants. Clin Microbiol Rev 2007,20(1):39–48. doi:10.1128/CMR.00025–06 doi:10.1128/CMR.00025-06

  26. Nishibuchi M, Kaper JB: Thermostable direct hemolysin gene of Vibrio parahaemolyticus : a virulence gene acquired by a marine bacterium. Infect Immun 1995,63(6):2093–2099.

  27. Okuda J, Ishibashi M, Abbott SL, Janda JM, Nishibuchi M: Analysis of the thermostable direct hemolysin ( tdh ) gene and the tdh -related hemolysin ( trh ) genes in urease-positive strains of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated on the West Coast of the United States. J Clin Microbiol 1997,35(8):1965–1971.

  28. Ottaviani D, Santarelli S, Bacchiocchi S, Masini L, Ghittino C, Bacchiocchi I: Presence of pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains in mussels from the Adriatic Sea, Italy. Food Microbiol 2005, 22: 585–590. 10.1016/j.fm.2005.01.005

  29. Quilici ML, Robert-Pillot A, Picart J, Fournier JM: Pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 spread, France. Emerg Infect Dis 2005,11(7):1148–1149. 10.3201/eid1107.041008

  30. Quindos G, Salesa R, Carrillo-Munoz AJ, Lipperheide V, Jaudenes L, San Millan R, Torres-Rodriguez JM, Ponton J: Multicenter evaluation of ATB fungus: a standardized micromethod for yeast susceptibility testing. Chemotherapy 1994,40(4):245–251. 10.1159/000239200

  31. Reed M, Muench H: A simple method for estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am J Hyg 1938, 27: 493–497.

  32. Robert-Pillot A, Guenole A, Lesne J, Delesmont R, Fournier JM, Quilici ML: Occurrence of the tdh and trh genes in Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates from waters and raw shellfish collected in two French coastal areas and from seafood imported into France. Int J Food Microbiol 2004,91(3):319–325. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.07.006 doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.07.006 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.07.006

  33. Zhang XH, Austin B: Haemolysins in Vibrio species. J Appl Microbiol 2005,98(5):1011–1019. doi:10.1111/j.1365–2672.2005.02583.x doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02583.x 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02583.x

  34. Zorrilla I, Arijo S, Chabrillon M, Diaz P, Martinez-Manzanares E, Balebona MC, Morinigo MA: Vibrio species isolated from diseased farmed sole, Solea senegalensis (Kaup), and evaluation of the potential virulence role of their extracellular products. J Fish Dis 2003,26(2):103–108. 10.1046/j.1365-2761.2003.00437.x

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Département de Microbiologie, Faculté de Pharmacie, Laboratoire d'Analyse, Traitement et Valorisation des Polluants de l'Environnement et des Produits, Rue Avicenne, Monastir, 5000, Tunisia
    • Sadok Khouadja
    • , Faouzi Lamari
    •  & Amina Bakhrouf
Authors
  1. Search for Sadok Khouadja in:
  2. Search for Faouzi Lamari in:
  3. Search for Amina Bakhrouf in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sadok Khouadja.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

Faouzi Lamari carried out the infective tests,Amina Bakhrouf participated in the design of the study.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khouadja, S., Lamari, F. & Bakhrouf, A. Characterization of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from farmed sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) during disease outbreaks. Int Aquat Res 5, 13 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/2008-6970-5-13

Download citation

Keywords

  • Vibrio parahaemolyticus
  • Outbreaks
  • Virulence properties