Abstract
The optimum UV irradiation duration for the complete inactivation of Heteropneustes fossilis egg’s nucleus was developed. The unfertilized eggs were suspended in Hanks’ balanced salt solution and were irradiated with UV light from both the dorsal and the ventral side for different exposure times ranging from 20 to 200 s (2,500 to 25,000 ergs/mm2). Egg viability was assessed for the different exposure durations at fertilization, hatching, and haploidy. Majority of the larvae derived from irradiated eggs had an abnormal appearance. Complete inactivation of maternal genome was evaluated by haploid chromosome number and morphology which also exhibited haploid syndrome. Successful genome inactivation occurred from 100 s onwards. Larvae resulting from eggs irradiated above 12,500 ergs/mm2 were 100% haploid, with better hatching (81.59%). The genetic inactivation of maternal chromosomes was confirmed by the chromosome count of the resulting embryo (n = 29). Completely anuclear embryos were obtained when the eggs were exposed with UV irradiation between 12,500 and 25,000 ergs/mm2. We conclude that the optimum UV dosage for the complete genetic inactivation of the egg nucleus requires more than 12,500 ergs/mm2.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Background
Fish, by virtue of their high fecundity, external fertilization, and ability to tolerate manipulations of their chromosome sets, are suitable models to study different aspects of genetics. In addition, the production of polyploid fish and fish with uniparental inheritance has a significant impact in the aquaculture of various species (Thorgaard [1983]). Androgenesis is a form of uniparental chromosome inheritance from males. Androgenetic development in fish can be triggered by fertilizing gamma-, X-ray-, or UV-irradiated eggs with normal spermatozoa, but the resultant embryos show inviable abnormality due to haploidy. Viable diploid androgens can be produced by doubling the paternal chromosome set through the suppression of the first cleavage using physical shocks such as temperature or pressure treatment or by the fertilization of inactivated eggs with diploid spermatozoa from tetraploid males.
Although complete genetic inactivation of egg nucleus is a prerequisite for a successful induction of androgenesis, the majority of experimental studies have concentrated on the production of diploid androgenotes that are viable. Relatively few studies have focused on identifying the optimal conditions for the genetic inactivation of the egg nucleus.
UV light has been successfully used in irradiating eggs of white sturgeon, Acipense transmontanus (Kowtal [1987]); common carp, Cyprinus carpio (Bongers et al. [1993, 1994]); Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (Myers et al. [1995]); loach, Misgurnus anguillicaudatus (Arai et al. [1992]); African catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Bongers et al. [1995]); and so on. Furthermore, UV irradiation results in no residual fragments, in contrast to gamma irradiation, and it is easy to use anywhere, inexpensive, and safer to apply (Ihssen et al. [1990]; Thorgaard [1983]; Myers [1995]).
Haploid androgenesis has been induced in the loach, M. anguillicaudatus (Ihssen et al. [1990]); flounder, Pleuronectes flesus (Purdom [1969]); masu salmon, Oncorhynchus masou (Arai et al. [1979]); rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Parsons and Thorgaard [1985]); and brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis (May et al. [1988]).
The applicable potential of androgenesis involves the rapid establishment of inbred lines for breeding programs and research purposes (Purdom [1969]; Ihssen et al. [1990]), sex control using anticipated supermale (YY) in the male heterogametic species (Thorgaard [1983]; Myers [1995]), production of a nucleocytoplasmic hybrid between different species, and recovery of genotypes from those which are contaminated by hybridization (Ihssen et al. [1990]; McAndrew et al. [1993]).
Androgenesis can also be used to aid recovery of endangered species form its cryopreserved spermatozoa. This is done by fertilizing the endangered species’ sperm with genetically inactived eggs followed by shock treatment to induce diploidy.
To induce viable androgenetic diploid individuals, it is essential to achieve both successful genetic inactivation of the egg nucleus and restoration of diploidy. Therefore, optimization of intensity and duration of irradiation is the first step for the successful production of androgens.
Heteropneustes fossilis (stinging catfish) is a commercially important freshwater catfish distributed in the tropical waters of the Indian subcontinent. H. fossilis is highly prized for its low-fat, high-protein, and high-iron content. It adapts well to water bodies with low dissolved oxygen and higher stocking densities, and its air breathing apparatus enables it to be sold as ‘live fish’ in the market. In H. fossilis, there are considerable studies on the reproductive biology and artificial breeding but only a very few studies on genetic manipulation. The family Heteropneustidae is represented by a single genus confined to the freshwaters of India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Burma. It has two species, viz H. fossilis and H. microps. Between the two, H. microps is rare and its distribution range is not well known, and H. fossilis is the only viable population of the family.
In the present study, the optimum UV irradiation required for the denaturation of egg genome to develop haploid condition was optimized.
Methods
Gamete collection and artificial fertilization
Specimens of H. fossilis which range from 40 to 80 g for male and from 80 to 120 g for female were collected during the month of June (early spawning phase) from the ponds around Alwarkurichi, Tamil Nadu (8°48′00″N; 77°27′30″E). On arrival to the laboratory, the fish were disinfected with formalin (50 ppm) for 2 h to remove external parasites. Mature female brood fish were primarily selected on the basis of a soft and bulging belly, which yielded continuous ova of uniform size on gentle stripping. Then, these eggs were examined under a stereozoom microscope to check its maturity. These selected fish were stocked in a polyvinyl chloride tank (3 × 2 × 1 m) with continuous aeration, normal photoperiod (13.5-h L:10.5-h D), and an ambient water temperature (26 ± 2°C) to induce final ovulation. The induction of final maturation and ovulation was stimulated using a single intramuscular injection of Ovaprim marketed by GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Limited (Mumbai, India), each milliliter contains salmon gonadotropin-releasing hormone of 20 mcg and Domperidone of 10 mcg at the rates of 0.3 and 0.5 mg kg−1 body weights for males and females, respectively. The gametes were collected separately 10 h after Ovaprim injection at an ambient water temperature of 26 ± 1°C (Godwin et al. [2009]); gently pressing the abdomen towards the anus yields a copious stream of transparent greenish brown eggs. These eggs were collected in a glass bowl previously rinsed with Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS).
The males were anesthetized with 75 mg/l tricane methanesulfonate [MS-222] for 5 min and sacrificed for the collection of milt. The testes were surgically removed and were cut into small bits, then gently squeezed in a glass tissue homogenizer with a few drops of HBSS. The left out tissue particles were removed, and the milt was diluted to 1:10 with HBSS. The sperm motility was checked for each sample, by taking an aliquot of 10 μl in a microslide and activated by 3 μl of tap water, then viewed under the microscope at × 400. Samples with high motility (97%) alone were used for the experiment. The sperm suspension was prepared 1 h before the stripping of eggs and kept in the refrigerator at 4°C. The sperm remains viable for more than 6 h at 4°C (Rexlin [1996]).
Genetic inactivation of egg genome
A simple glass UV irradiation chamber was designed with four UV-C, 15-W germicidal lamps (Philips, Amsterdam, Holland). Two lamps on the dorsal side and two on the ventral side were fixed at a distance of 27 cm from the center, fine threads passed across the center where the egg trays were placed for irradiation. The threads were connected to a vortex mixture in order to create vibration for the egg rotation. The lamps were switched on for half an hour before the experiment to stabilize the energy of the UV rays (Onozato and Yamaha [1983]). Egg tray surface was measured with a UV meter (Ultra-Violet Products, Inc., San Gabriel, CA, USA) for dosage calculations.
The eggs were soaked in the HBSS to keep them wet always and were placed on a thin (25 μm), transparent film dish to a single layer without any overlap and placed at the center (between the dorsal and ventral lamps) for UV irradiation. During UV irradiation, the eggs were always rolling in the fluid due to a vibrational force created by the vortex mixture (stirrer). For each batch, approximately 300 to 400 eggs were used. The whole process was carried out in the dark to avoid genetic photoreactivation (at 24°C). After the irradiation of eggs for different durations from 20 to 200 s, i.e., 2,500 to 25,000 ergs/mm2, the eggs were immediately mixed with a 200 μl of sperm suspension and allowed to fertilize by activating the sperm (adding water). One batch of eggs was not irradiated and served as the control. Then, they were transferred to egg baskets (diameter, 10 cm) with a mesh bottom (mesh size, 0.5 mm) and incubated in water temperature at 27°C in a dark room.
Ploidy determination
Ploidy was determined in 1-day-old post-hatch larvae. Haploid individuals were confirmed by chromosome counting followed by drop method (Kligerman and Bloom [1977]). At least 20 karyotypes were counted per individual, and 10 individuals were sampled from each group. Also, the haploids had the characteristic haploid syndrome. All authors followed International standards in handling the animals.
Results
UV irradiation and haploid androgenesis
The percentage of fertilization, hatching, and normal and deformed larvae head formation in the control and irradiated groups are shown in Table 1. This table also shows the percentage occurrence of haploids in each treatment group. In all the groups with UV irradiation above 5,000 erg/mm2 of exposure, the fertilization rate decreased considerably compared with the control group. The rate of hatching also decreased with increasing UV dose, but a sharp decrease compared with the control group was noted at 12,500 erg/mm2. In the control group, 95% of the larvae that hatched were normal. In the UV irradiation groups, few normal larvae hatched; the highest rate of normal larvae in the treated groups was seen in the 2,500 erg/mm2 group in which 60.11% were normal embryo.
UV treatment of eggs with various doses caused various abnormalities in the external appearance of larvae 3 days after fertilization. In the control group, all hatched larvae exhibited almost normal appearance (Figure 1). In the larvae from UV-irradiated eggs, a range of abnormalities were observed: ‘haploid syndrome,’ showing dwarfing, microcephaly, and microphthalmus (microcephaly - a disorder where the head circumference is less than normal embryo; microphthalmus - abnormality in eye size); deformed head formation showing a range of defects in the head region. Abnormal larvae in the 5,000 erg/mm2 group showed a wide range of appearances of body shapes (body axes). Most abnormal larvae in the 10,000 erg/mm2 group showed the haploid syndrome; they were smaller than normal (Figure 2). Abnormal larvae classified as having ‘deformed head formation’ were observed at a higher percentage in the low-UV dose groups. The proportion of affected larvae in the 5,000 erg/mm2 group (29.71%) was higher than that in the other irradiated groups. The percentage of deformed head decreased with the increase in the UV dose.
The groups that received a UV dosage of more than 12,500 erg/mm2 showed 100% haploid syndrome. Deformed larvae were more frequent in groups which received a UV irradiation of 2,500 to 7,500 erg/mm2 than those with a higher dosage of UV irradiation (≪10,000 erg/mm2; Table 1).
Following irradiation of eggs, we observed a depression in the yolk of some embryos ( 3) in the UV treatment groups of 20,000 and 25,000 erg/mm2. This depression was absent in the eggs of the control and low-UV irradiation groups.
Chromosome analysis
Chromosome analysis of normal larvae from the control group indicated a modal chromosome number of 58. In contrast, abnormal larvae from the 2,500 to 7,500 erg/mm2 group did not have a clear modal number but showed a range of 29 to 58 chromosomes. Furthermore, chromosome fragments were also observed in the metaphase spreads. A clear modal chromosome number of 29 was obtained above 12,500 erg/mm2. The frequencies of chromosome fragments decreased with increased UV dose. In the groups that receive more than 12,500 erg/mm2, the chromosome number was clearly haploid without any chromosome fragment.
Discussion
The present study indicates that UV irradiation successfully inactivated the nuclear DNA in H. fossilis eggs. The determination of optimal dose and duration of UV irradiation for the complete egg genome inactivation is the prerequisite. Many authors have successfully inactivated egg genome at different UV dosages. In African catfish, C. gariepinus, Bongers et al. [1995] worked on an optimum UV dose of 1,250 J/m2 (corresponding to 12,500 ergs/mm2). Lin and Dabrowski ([1998]) reported haploid androgenetic muskellunge, Esox masquinongy with optimal UV irradiation doses of 620 to 1,320 J/m2 (corresponding to 6,200 to 13,200 ergs/mm2). Marengoni and Onoue ([1998]) obtained androgenetic haploid O. aureus and O. niloticus, at total UV doses of 594 and 693 J/m2 (corresponding to 5,940 to 6,930 ergs/mm2); similarly, Myers et al. ([1995]) used 450 to 900 J/m2 (corresponding to 4,500 to 9,000 ergs/mm2) in the Nile tilapia; Kirankumar and Pandian ([2003]) used 3.5 min at 4.2 W/m2 (corresponding to 8,820 ergs/mm2) in the tiger barb, Puntius tetrazona; David and Pandian ([2006]) used 2.75 min at 4.2 W/m2 (corresponding to 6,930 ergs/mm2) in the Buenos Aires tetra. Fujimoto et al. ([2007]) reported 150 mJ/cm2 (corresponding to 15,000 ergs/mm2) in the loach, M. anguillicaudatus. In the present study, a UV dose greater than 12,500 ergs/mm2 was required for the complete genetic inactivation of the maternal genome. The variations could be due to sensitivity to UV irradiation from species to species and could be explained by differences in the thickness, composition, and optical qualities of egg chorion, egg size and shape, and the relative position of the female pronucleus (Myers et al. [1995]).
Rotation of the eggs to expose the animal pole to radiation from the UV lamp yielded better results of complete genome inactivation. Bongers et al. ([1995]) stirred the eggs of C. gariepinus in a synthetic ovarian fluid while exposing under UV irradiation and reported high yields of androgenetic haploid. The stirring did not negatively interfere with hatching but increased the efficiency of the UV treatment. Similar results were obtained in common carp, C. carpio using the same method of egg rotation (Bongers et al. [1994]). Similarly, Arai et al. ([1995]) exposed M. anguillicaudatus eggs to a UV source from the upper and lower sides to get maximum exposure. The same methodology was adapted for H. fossilis by placing the eggs in HBSS which was more successful and also reduces the time of eggs in the UV chamber. This chamber has made it possible to achieve more effective inactivation by ensuring that all of the eggs received equal irradiation. Moreover, the experiment was carried out in a complete dark chamber, which in turn prevents the photoreactivation of the inactivated chromosomes.
In general, survival of androgenetic haploid fishes after hatching is rare. Thus, it is analyzed till hatching. Arai et al. ([1995]) reported 22% hatched androgenetic haploids in loach, M. anguillicaudatus. In muskellunge, E. masquinongy, the yield of haploid androgenetic was 22.5% (Lin and Dabrowski [1998]). Marengoni and Onoue ([1998]) obtained survival rates of 57% and 55% (relative to controls) in androgenetic haploid O. aureus and O.niloticus. Bongers et al. ([1995]) were able to produce higher numbers of androgenetic haploids (81% to hatching, relative to control) in African catfish, C. gariepinus. Fujimoto et al. ([2007]) reported 82% hatching from a fertilization success of 40%, which corresponds to 32.8%. Similarly, in the present study, 85% hatching from a fertilization success of 60%, which corresponds to 51% of the total number of eggs used at 12,500 ergs/mm2, is reported.
The ‘Hertwig effect,’ a phenomenon in which there is a decreased survival rate at low doses of radiation and a paradoxical recovery in survival rate at higher doses, has been observed in experimental studies that have used X-rays and -rays to induce gynogenesis or androgenesis. In studies of androgenesis that used UV to inactivate the maternal genome, the Hertwig effect has only been observed in the tiger barb (Kirankumar and Pandian [2003]). Survival rates decreased with increased doses of UV in other species also (Arai et al. [1992]; Bongers et al. [1994, 1995]; Myers et al. [1995]; Lin and Dabrowski [1998]; David and Pandian [2006]; Kirankumar and Pandian [2003]). However, it is unclear whether the decrease in survival rate was due to a UV irradiation effect on fertilization or on embryogenesis. In this study, a decrease in fertilization rate with increased UV dosage at 25,000 ergs/mm2 (39%) was more apparent than a decrease in hatching rates (32.69%). Thus, this suggests that higher UV dosage impaired fertilization of irradiated eggs.
The use of higher UV doses to induce androgenesis in the zebrafish and muskellunge produced embryos that developed as a cell mass without a body axis (Lin and Dabrowski [1998]; Ungar et al. [1998]). In this study, larvae with deformed head formation frequently appeared at the low UV doses. The presence of depression in the yolk may be indicative of UV-induced cytological damage to the egg only at higher UV doses. This type of cytological damage is reported by Ungar et al. ([1998]) in zebrafish eggs exposed to 2- or 2.5-fold increased dosage.
When comparing the UV dosage required in sperm genome irradiation for haploid gynogenesis (Godwin et al. [2010]) and egg genome inactivation for haploid androgenesis in H. fossilis, a minimum of 90 s corresponding to 11,250 ergs/mm2 and 100 s (corresponding to 12,500 ergs/mm2 for egg genome) were required, respectively. At the same time, sperms have the capacity to withstand a very high UV dosage of 270 s corresponding to 33,750 ergs/mm2 (Godwin et al. [2010]), but the eggs started developing cytological damages even at 22,500 ergs/mm2.
Conclusions
We therefore concluded that a dose of 12,500 to 17,500 ergs/mm2 of UV radiation is required to ensure genetic inactivation of maternal genome in H. fossilis.
References
Arai K, Onozato H, Yamazaki F: Artificial androgenesis induced with gamma irradiation in masu salmon, Oncorhynchus masou. Bull Fac Fish Hokkaido Univ 1979, 30: 181–186.
Arai K, Masaoka T, Suzuki R: Optimum conditions of UV ray irradiation for genetic inactivation of loach eggs. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 1992,58(7):1197–1201. 10.2331/suisan.58.1197
Arai K, Ikeno M, Suzuki R: Production of androgenetic diploid loach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus using spermatozoa of natural tetraploids. Aquaculture 1995, 137: 131–138. 10.1016/0044-8486(95)01106-4
Bongers ABJ, Eding EH, Richter CJJ: Androgenesis in common carp, Cyprinus carpio L. 1993.
Bongers ABJ, Veld EPC, Abo HK, Bremmer IM, Eding EH, Komen J, Richter CJJ: Androgenesis in common carp Cyprinus carpio (L.) using UV-irradiation in a synthetic ovarian fluid and heat shocks. Aquaculture 1994, 122: 119–132. 10.1016/0044-8486(94)90504-5
Bongers ABJ, Nguenga D, Eding EH, Richter CJJ: Androgenesis in the African catfish, Clarias gariepinus. Aquat Liv Res 1995, 8: 329–332. 10.1051/alr:1995035
David CJ, Pandian TJ: GFP reporter gene confirms paternity in the androgenote Buenos Aires tetra, Hemegrammus caudovittatus. J Exp Zool 2006, 305A: 83–95. 10.1002/jez.a.247
Fujimoto T, Sakao S, Yamaha E, Arai K: Evaluation of different doses of UV irradiation to loach eggs for genetic inactivation of the maternal genome. J Exp Zool 2007, 307A: 449–462. 10.1002/jez.398
Godwin CJ, Murugesan AG, Sukumaran N: Genetic inactivation of stinging catfish (Heteropneustes fossilis) sperm with UV irradiation. J Appl Aquac 2009,21(2):128–137. 10.1080/10454430902892941
Godwin CJ, Murugesan AG, Sukumaran N: Induction of meiotic gynogenesis in the stinging catfish Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch) and evidence for female homogamety. Aquac Res 2010, 42: 129–138. 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02593.x
Ihssen PE, McKay LR, McMillan I, Phillips RB: Ploidy manipulation and gynogenesis in fishes. Trans Am Fish Soc 1990, 119: 698–717. 10.1577/1548-8659(1990)119<0698:PMAGIF>2.3.CO;2
Kirankumar S, Pandian TJ: Production of androgenetic tiger berb, Puntius tetrazona. Aquaculture 2003, 228: 37–51. 10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00132-7
Kligerman AD, Bloom SE: Rapid chromosome preparations from solid tissues of fishes. J Fish Res Board Can 1977, 34: 266–269. 10.1139/f77-039
Kowtal GV: Preliminary experiments in induction of polyploidy, gynogenesis, and androgenesis in the white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus Richardson. In Proceedings of world symposium on selection, hybridization and genetic engineering in aquaculture, Bordeaux, May 1986. Edited by: Tiews K. Heenemann, Berlin; 1987:317–324.
Lin F, Dabrowski K: Androgenesis and homozygous gynogenesis in muskellunge (Esox masquinongy): evaluation using flow cytometry. Mol Rep Dev 1998, 49: 10–18. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199801)49:1<10::AID-MRD2>3.0.CO;2-R
Marengoni NG, Onoue Y: Ultraviolet-induced androgenesis in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.) and hybrid Nile X blue tilapia, O. aureus (Steindachner). Aqua Res 1998, 29: 359–366.
May B, Henley KJ, Krueger CC, Gloss SP: Androgenesis as a mechanism for chromosome set manipulation in brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis. Aquaculture 1988, 75: 57–70. 10.1016/0044-8486(88)90021-X
McAndrew BJ, Rana KJ, Penman DJ: Conservation and preservation of genetic variation in aquatic organisms. In Recent advances in aquaculture. Edited by: Roberts RJ, Muir J. Publ, Oxford; 1993:295–337.
Myers JM, Penman DJ, Basavaraju Y, Powell SF, Baoprasertkul P, Rana KJ, Bromage N, McAndrew BJ: Induction of diploid androgenetic and mitotic gynogenetic Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (L.). Theor Appl Genet 1995, 90: 205–210.
Onozato H, Yamaha E: Induction of gynogenesis with ultraviolet rays in four species of salmoniformes. Bull Jap Soc Sci Fish 1983, 49: 693–699. 10.2331/suisan.49.693
Parsons JE, Thorgaard GH: Production of androgenetic diploid rainbow trout. J Heredity 1985, 76: 177–181.
Purdom CE: Radiation-induced gynogenesis and androgenesis in fish. Heredity 1969, 24: 431–444. 10.1038/hdy.1969.59
Rexlin S: Effect of different cryoprotectants on the longevity of sperm life in tilapia Oreochromis mosambicus and the Indian catfish Heteropneustes fossilis. Dissertation, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, ; 1996.
Thorgaard GH: Chromosome set manipulation and sex control in fish. In Fish physiology, vol IX-B. Edited by: Hoar WS, Randall DJ, Donaldson EM. Academic, New York; 1983:405–434.
Ungar AR, Helde KA, Moon RT: Production of androgenetic haploids in zebrafish with ultraviolet light. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 1998,7(4):320–326.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Christopher, J.G., Murugesan, A.G. & Sukumaran, N. Optimization of UV treatment to induce haploid androgenesis in the stinging catfish, Heteropneustes fossilis. Int Aquat Res 4, 4 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/2008-6970-4-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2008-6970-4-4