Synovial distribution of “systemically” administered acetylsalicylic acid in the isolated perfused equine distal limb
- 2.3k Downloads
This study investigated synovial concentrations of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and its metabolite salicylic acid (SA) in the equine fetlock joint following systemic administration of ASA. Salicylates were chosen because SA is the only nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug for which threshold levels exist for plasma and urine in equine sports. To avoid animal experiments, the study was conducted using an ex vivo model of the isolated perfused equine distal limb in combination with plasma concentrations obtained from literature.
Salicylate concentrations in the joint were determined using microdialysis and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Any anti-inflammatory effect of synovial ASA concentrations was assessed using an ASA EC50 (half maximal effective concentration) determined in equine whole blood.
The ASA concentration in the synovial fluid (n = 6) reached a maximum of 4 μg/mL, the mean concentration over the entire perfusion period was 2 μg/mL. Maximum SA concentration was 17 μg/mL, the average was 14 μg/mL. ASA and SA concentration in the synovial fluid exceeded systemic concentrations 2 h and 3.5 h after “systemic” administration, respectively.
ASA and SA accumulated in the in the synovial fluid of the ex vivo model despite decreasing systemic concentrations. This suggests a prolonged anti-inflammatory effect within the joint that remains to be further elucidated.
KeywordsAcetylsalicylic acid Salicylic acid Isolated perfused equine distal limb Synovial fluid Horse Microdialysis
half maximal effective concentration
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug
Phosphate buffered saline
High performance liquid chromatography
Standard error of the mean
Fédération Equestre Internationale, international equestrian federation
Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) belongs to the group of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and is rapidly converted to its metabolite salicylic acid (SA) after administration. In horses, ASA is not routinely used for the treatment of inflammatory conditions because of its short half-life, low potency and resulting high dosages needed [1, 2, 3]. Still, ASA and SA pharmacokinetics are of interest because SA is the only NSAID with threshold levels for plasma and urine in equine sports [4, 5, 6]. These threshold levels have been introduced to avoid positive cases due to salicylates originating from plants potentially present in equine feed, e.g. in alfalfa hay . However, threshold levels might increase the risk of ASA being abused for therapeutic purposes up to the threshold in competition horses . In this context, we were interested in synovial fluid concentrations after systemic administration because none of the numerous studies that have dealt with salicylate pharmacokinetics in humans [9, 10, 11], cattle , and horses [1, 3] has so far explored the distribution of ASA or SA into joint fluid. Therefore, the study presented aimed to investigate to what extent ASA is distributed into the synovial fluid of horses after systemic administration.
To avoid ethical limitations arising from the use of study horses and to minimize costs, an ex vivo model of the isolated perfused equine distal limb recently established in our group was used . Imitating systemic application of ASA in this model was possible because plasma concentrations of ASA and SA were readily available from an in vivo study investigating ASA pharmacokinetics in horses .
In the synovia of the ex vivo model, salicylate concentrations were monitored using the microdialysis technique. This involves placement of a tubular microdialysis probe into the synovial cavity: the probe comprises a semi-permeable membrane and is constantly perfused with a physiological buffer solution, the so-called perfusate, at a low flow rate. Unbound drug molecules present in the synovial fluid will diffuse through the semi-permeable membrane into the perfusate, down their concentration gradient. Larger molecules, such as proteins and enzymes, cannot cross the membrane. However, an equilibrium between the perfusate and the periprobe fluid will never be reached because of the perfusate’s constant movement. The concentration of the analyte in the perfusate will therefore always be less than in the periprobe fluid. The ratio between these concentrations is defined as relative recovery (RR) and needs to be determined for each probe in vitro in order to correctly interpret concentrations measured in the perfusate. The microdialysis technique has already been applied for sampling of SA in skin-penetration studies [14, 15, 16].
To get some orientation concerning the effect of plasma protein binding on the synovial distribution of ASA and SA, the experiment was repeated with autologous, diluted blood as perfusate, referred to as hemoperfusion experiments throughout this paper.
Isolated perfused equine distal limb
Six limbs from six different horses were used for this study; each limb was used for one experiment. The preparation of the limb model was performed as described previously . In brief, distal limbs of warmblood horses of various sex and age were obtained from a slaughterhouse where they were exarticulated in the middle carpal joint within a maximum of 30 min after slaughter. Immediately afterwards, the median artery was canulated and infused with heparinised (120 IU/mL; Euro OTC Pharma GmbH, Bönen, Germany) tyrode solution (136.8 mmol/L NaCl, 2.7 mmol/L KCl, 1.8 mmol/L CaCl2 × 2H2O, 1.05 mmol/L MgCl2 × 6H2O, 0.416 mmol/L NaH2PO4 × 2H2O, 11.9 mmol/L NaHCO3 and 5.5 mmol/L D(+)-glucose × 1H2O) to prevent clot formation in the vessels. Extremities were transported to the laboratory and perfused with oxygenated (carbogen: 95% oxygen and 5% carbon dioxide) tyrode solution containing sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (0.15 g/L, Caesar & Loretz, Hilden, Germany) to increase the oncotic pressure in the vessels and therefore counteract edema formation. Perfusion occurred via the median artery over a period of 8 h, during which the flow rate of approximately 65 mL/min was upheld by a peristaltic pump (Masterflex 7553–76; Cole-Palmer Instruments Co, Vernon Hills, IL, USA). The temperature of the perfusion fluid was maintained at 37°C by a water bath. Perfusion started within 60 min after slaughter.
Glucose utilization ≥ 200 mg/h
Lactate production ≤ 400 mg/h
LDH activity ≤ 10 U/h
Skin surface temperature ≥ 26°C
After conclusion of the tyrode perfusion experiments, two extremities of different horses were perfused with diluted autologous blood in order to give a rough overview of the influence of plasma protein binding on the synovial distribution of ASA and SA. The duration of perfusion was reduced to 5 h because this was the period in which the main concentration changes had occurred in the precedent tyrode perfusion experiments. For hemoperfusion, extremities were prepared as described above. In addition, 10 L of autologous blood were collected during exsanguination; anticoagulation was achieved with heparin (18 IU/mL). After transport to the laboratory, the extremity was connected to the perfusion system via the median artery and perfused with tyrode solution for 30 min to remove all remaining blood in the vessels. In accordance with Bäumer et al. , the leg was subsequently perfused with a blood-tyrode mixture (4:1) referred to as hemoperfusion perfusate in an open perfusion system. The blood was oxygenated by means of the counter-current-principle with a dialyser (Diacap® hollow fiber dialyser, Braun AG, Melsungen, Germany), through which the hemoperfusion perfusate and 8 L of tyrode solution gassed with pure oxygen were pumped in opposite directions. The tyrode solution in the dialysis circle was continuously moved by a rotary pump (EHEIM, Deizisau, Germany) at a speed of approximately 0.5 L/min. The hemoperfusion perfusate was warmed to 37°C by a water bath and transported to the limb by a peristaltic pump at approximately 65 mL/min.
For determination of tissue viability, two samples of the hemoperfusion fluid were taken in hourly intervals over the entire perfusion period of 5 h: One “arterial” sample from the median artery and one “venous” sample from the site of venous outflow. Samples were centrifuged at 800 g for 10 min and plasma stored frozen at - 20°C until analysis for glucose, lactate and lactate-dehydrogenase concentrations. Glucose consumption in the tissue was calculated by subtraction of glucose concentrations in the venous from those determined in the arterial samples. For lactate production and LDH activity, values in the arterial were subtracted from those in the venous samples. Viability criteria were the same as for the tyrode-perfused limbs.
Addition of acetylsalicylic and salicylic acid to the perfusion fluid
Simulated intravenous administration of ASA (20 mg/kg bodyweight) in the isolated perfused equine distal limb according to Broome et al., 2003
0 - 0.5
0.5 - 1
1 - 2
2 - 3
3 - 4
4 - 5
5 - 6
6 - 7
The time point of simulated systemic intravenous application was 1 h after the start of perfusion, because the first 30 min of perfusion were allowed for equilibration and another 30 min were needed to collect a blank sample after implantation of the microdialysis probe.
Determination of relative recovery in vitro
Prior to measuring synovial salicylate concentrations in the ex vivo model, the relative recovery (RR) of ASA and SA in equine synovial fluid was established in vitro for all six microdialysis probes in order to ensure reproducible drug sampling. Concentric probes of 0.5 mm membrane diameter, 20 kD molecular weight cut-off and a membrane length of 10 mm were used (CMA 20, CMA Microdialysis AB, Stockholm, Sweden). For calibration, the entire probe membrane was placed in a 0.5 mL reaction tube with freshly prepared equine synovial fluid containing 1, 5, 10, or 15 μg/mL ASA or SA. These concentrations had been determined in preliminary experiments (data not shown) in order to obtain an adequate calibration range.
Microdialysis in the isolated perfused equine distal limb
After an equilibration period of 30 min, a calibrated microdialysis probe was implanted into the fetlock joint of the isolated perfused equine distal limb via the dorsal pouch as follows: a stab incision was made through the skin where probe implantation was planned. A steel needle was inserted into a split tubing (“introducer”) and introduced into the dorsal pouch of the fetlock joint. Placement of the needle in the joint was confirmed by aspiration of synovial fluid. The steel needle was then removed from the introducer and the microdialysis probe inserted instead. In a last step, the flexible introducer was pulled out of the joint by splitting it around the microdialysis probe. The probe was perfused with PBS at a flow rate of 3 μL/min and sampling vials exchanged as indicated in Table 1. Samples were frozen at −20°C immediately after collection until analysis. One probe was used for each extremity; two probes were used a second time for the hemoperfusion experiments.
Analytical method and analysis
ASA and SA concentrations were measured in the microdialysis perfusate using a validated HPLC method with limits of detection at 53 ng/mL and 84 ng/mL and limits of quantification at 106 ng/mL and 169 ng/mL for ASA and SA, respectively. Validation of the method included evaluation of the following characteristics: accuracy and precision, linearity, and specificity/selectivity. Validation experiments followed the FDA Guidance for Bioanalytical Method Validation ; all results were in the range of the recommended limits.
The microdialysis perfusate could be readily analysed without extraction; 100 μl of each sample were injected into the isocratic HPLC system (Beckman Coulter GmbH, Krefeld, Germany) comprising a 126 solvent module, a 508 autosampler and a 166 Detector. The column used was a LiChroCART® 125–4 LiChrospher® 100 RP-18, 5 μm column coupled with a guard column (LiChroCART® 4–4; LiChrospher® 100 RP-18, 5 μm; both Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Columns were kept in a column oven (SpH 99, Spark Holland, Emmen, Netherlands) at 40°C. Instrument control and data collection were performed with the software 32 Karat (Beckman Coulter GmbH, Krefeld, Germany). The mobile phase consisted of HPLC-grade acetonitrile (Lab-Scan, Gliwice, Poland) and McIlvaine citrate buffer pH 2.2 (40:60, v/v); flow rate was 1 mL/min and UV detection occurred at 310 nm.
Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. of independent experiments as specified in individual figure legends. All graphs were created by GraphPad Prism 5.03 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).
Tissue viability requirements were met by all 8 perfused distal limbs (6 tyrode-perfused and 2 hemoperfused limbs). The average weight increase was 5.1% after 8 h of perfusion with tyrode and 8.6% after 5 h of hemoperfusion.
Determination of relative recovery in vitro
Relative recovery (RR) of ASA and SA in equine synovia for microdialysis probes (CMA 20, CMA Microdialysis AB, Stockholm, Sweden) in calibration experimentsin vitro
Ex vivomicrodialysis in the isolated perfused equine distal limb - Tyrode
During the first 5 h after “treatment”, SA concentrations continuously increased to reach a plateau and maximum concentration at 17 μg/mL. Mean SA concentration in the synovial fluid throughout the entire experiments was 14 μg/mL. None of the blank samples taken before onset of drug administration contained any measurable amount of salicylates.
Ex vivomicrodialysis in the isolated perfused equine distal limb – Hemoperfusion
In the hemoperfused extremities (n = 2), ASA and SA were detectable in the synovial fluid of the fetlock joint until the end of the experiment after 4 h (Figures 1 and 2). Mean ASA concentration over the entire perfusion period was 1.1 μg/mL, synovial concentrations decreased from the initial maximum concentration of 2 μg/mL to 0.9 μg/mL 3 h after “systemic” administration. SA concentration showed an initial increase with a subsequent decline and ranged from 4 to 7.3 μg/mL, the average being 5.7 μg/mL. Concentrations of ASA and SA supplied via the hemoperfusion fluid are displayed in Table 1. Again, no salicylates could be detected in any of the blank samples taken before drug administration.
For each limb, tissue viability was ensured by the criteria described under the methods section. While establishing the model, special attention was paid to the integrity of the synovial membrane . We therefore assumed the distribution of salicylates into the synovial cavity in the ex vivo model to be comparable to the in vivo situation.
To get a rough overview of the role of plasma protein binding on the synovial distribution of ASA and SA, perfusion was performed with diluted autologous blood (mixed with plasma in a ratio of 1:4) in two extremities. Comparison of the mean synovial fluid concentrations in the tyrode- and hemoperfused limbs revealed ASA and SA concentrations to be approximately 50% of the synovial fluid concentrations in tyrode-perfused limbs. This difference might be due to the plasma protein binding of salicylates which is reported to be around 50% .
However, pathological changes affecting the permeability of the inner joint capsule are known to alter the rate of transport of salicylates in man: it has been suggested that e.g. hyperemia and edema formation due to synovitis in acute osteoarthritis might accelerate salicylate transport from the bloodstream to the joint, whereas hyperplastic thickening of the capsule or the synovial vessels in conditions such as chronic osteoarthritis might hinder this transport . The possible influence of these conditions could not be examined in this study because so far, the model has been established to mirror conditions only in the healthy limb.
Distribution of salicylates into synovial fluid
In the study presented, the distribution of salicylates into joint fluid after systemic administration was measured. Although not frequently used in equine medicine, these drugs are of peculiar interest because of their special status as threshold substances.
The ex vivo model of the isolated perfused equine distal limb was used to avoid animal experiments. In order to imitate systemic administration of ASA, salicylate plasma concentrations in the perfusion fluid of the ex vivo model were adjusted in accordance with plasma concentrations reported in an in vivo study. Synovial concentrations of ASA and SA were monitored in the fetlock joint of the model using microdialysis.
Even though it has been stated that the transport of the unbound fraction of a drug through a synovial membrane is a simple diffusion process [21, 22], data obtained from our experiments suggest an accumulation of ASA and SA in synovial fluid (Figures 1 and 2). This accumulation of salicylates in joint fluid has also been observed in two studies in man [23, 24] and might be explained as follows: in plasma, ASA is rapidly converted to SA via deacetylation by endogenous esterases so that SA concentrations exceed ASA concentrations shortly after administration. In the joint fluid, however, the esterase activity is much lower than in whole blood or plasma . Consequently, salicylate concentrations in synovial fluid remain higher than systemic concentrations because (a) the continuous deacetylation of ASA to SA in plasma (imitated in our model by adjusting ASA and SA concentrations in the perfusion fluid) leads to a constant supply of SA into the joint and (b) ASA levels in the joint remain relatively consistent because of the lower esterase activity in synovial fluid.
To assess any anti-inflammatory effect of the salicylates measured in the synovial fluid of the ex vivo model, their concentrations were compared with EC50 values for ASA in horses. An EC50 value is that plasma concentration at which a half maximal effect is observed . The EC50 values referred to were determined by Buntenkötter  in equine whole blood: COX-I and COX-II inhibition were assessed by the ability of ASA to inhibit clot-induced thromboxane B2 production or prostaglandin E2 production after stimulation with lipopolysaccharides, respectively.
ASA concentrations in the synovial fluid measured in the ex vivo model were still above the ASA EC50 value for COX I inhibition (0.2 μg/mL) and in the range of the EC50 value for COX II inhibition (2.2 μg/mL) after the systemic concentration in the perfusion fluid was below the plasma threshold of 6.5 μg/mL formulated by the international equestrian federation FEI (Figure 1).
According to our findings, it might be conceivable to abusively treat a horse with ASA in order to benefit from its short half-life and concurrent accumulation in synovial fluid even though this would clearly contradict the genuine rationale for SA thresholds, which was avoiding positive cases solely due to the horse’s diet.
A threshold level for SA in plasma and urine was formulated by horse sport organisations to avoid positive cases due to the horse’s diet. Data obtained from our ex vivo study investigating the distribution of salicylates into joint fluid after systemic administration suggest that even with systemic concentrations below the threshold, concentrations in the synovial fluid are in the range of the EC50 value and may therefore be capable of exerting an anti-inflammatory effect. These results originate from an ex vivo setup; nevertheless, they do provide a basis to further investigate the synovial distribution of systemically administered salicylates.
This study was financially supported by the German Equestrian Federation (FN, Warendorf, Germany).
- 4.German Equestrian Federation (FN): Leistungs-Prüfungs-Ordnung (LPO)Anpassungen/Ergänzungen zum 28. April 2011. Warendorf, Germany: FNVerlag; 2011:3.Google Scholar
- 5.International Federation of Horseracing Authorities: International agreement on breeding, racing and wagering. International Federation of Horseracing Authorities. 2012, 27-3.Google Scholar
- 6.Fédération Equestre Internationale: FEI Veterinary Regulations, 12th edition. Fédération Equestre Internationale: Fédération Equestre Internationale; 2012:46.Google Scholar
- 8.Lakhani KH, Lambert M, Sluyter F, Devolz R, Maylin G, Higgins AJ: Estimation of the critical threshold value for presence of salicylic acid in the urine of thoroughbred horses. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of Racing Analysts and Veterinarians. Edited by Albert PH, Morton T, Wade JF. R & W Communications, Newmarket; 2004:67–77.Google Scholar
- 13.Friebe M, Stahl J, Kietzmann M: The isolated perfused equine distal limb as an ex vivo model for pharmacokinetic studies. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2012, 10.1111/jvp.12001. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
- 14.Benfeldt E, Serup J: Effect of barrier perturbation on cutaneous penetration of salicylic acid in hairless rats: in vivo pharmacokinetics using microdialysis and non-invasive quantification of barrier function. Arch Dermatol Res. 1999, 291 (9): 517-526. 10.1007/s004030050447.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Guidance for Industry - Bioanalytical Method Validation. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/ucm070107.pdf.
- 19.Fraser CM, Mays A, Amstutz HE, Archibald J, Armour J: The Merck Veterinary Manual: a Handbook of Diagnosis, Therapy and Disease Prevention and Control for the Veterinarian. Rahway (USA): Merck & Co Inc; 1986:1677.Google Scholar
- 21.Lehmann W, Wintzer HJ, Frey HH: [Kinetics of anti-inflammatory drugs in serum and synovia of horses (author’s transl)]. Dtw. 1981, 88 (6): 218-220.Google Scholar
- 26.Buntenkötter K: Pharmacokinetic investigation of salicylic acid after oral administration of acetylsalicylic acid in the horse. Thesis: University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacy; 2012.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.