1 Introduction

The field of fractional differential equations has been subjected to an intensive development of the theory and the applications (see, for example, [16] and the references therein). It should be noted that most of papers and books on fractional calculus are devoted to the solvability of linear initial fractional differential equations on terms of special functions. There are some papers dealing with the existence of solutions of nonlinear initial value problems of fractional differential equations by using the techniques of nonlinear analysis such as fixed point results, the Leray-Schauder theorem, stability, etc. (see, for example, [719] and the references therein). In fact, fractional differential equations arise in many engineering and scientific disciplines such as physics, chemistry, biology, economics, control theory, signal and image processing, biophysics, blood flow phenomena and aerodynamics (see, for example, [2023] and the references therein). The main advantage of using the fractional nonlinear differential equations is related to the fact that we can describe the dynamics of complex non-local systems with memory. In this line of taught, the equations involving various fractional orders are important from both theoretical and applied view points. We need the following notions.

Definition 1.1 ([1, 4])

For a continuous function f:[0,)R, the Caputo derivative of fractional order α is defined by

D α c f(t)= 1 Γ ( n α ) 0 t ( t s ) n α 1 f ( n ) (s)ds,

where n1<α<n, n=[α]+1 and [α] denotes the integer part of α.

Definition 1.2 ([1, 4])

The Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of order α for a continuous function f is defined by

D α f(t)= 1 Γ ( n α ) ( d d t ) n 0 t f ( s ) ( t s ) α n 1 ds ( n = [ α ] + 1 ) ,

where the right-hand side is pointwise defined on (0,).

Definition 1.3 ([1, 4])

Let [a,b] be an interval in ℝ and α>0. The Riemann-Liouville fractional order integral of a function f L 1 ([a,b],R) is defined by

I a α f(t)= 1 γ ( α ) a t f ( s ) ( t s ) 1 α ds

whenever the integral exists.

Suppose that E is a Banach space which is partially ordered by a cone PE, that is, xy if and only if yxP. We denote the zero element of E by θ. A cone P is called normal if there exists a constant N>0 such that θxy implies xNy (see [24]). Also, we define the order interval [ x 1 , x 2 ]={xE| x 1 x x 2 } for all x 1 , x 2 E [24]. We say that an operator A:EE is increasing whenever xy implies AxAy. Also, xy means that there exist λ>0 and μ>0 such that λxyμx (see [24]). Finally, put P h ={xE|xh} for all h>θ. It is easy to see that P h P is convex and λ P h = P h for all λ>0. We recall the following in our results. Let E be a real Banach space and let P be a cone in E. Let (a,b) be an interval and let τ and φ be two positive-valued functions such that φ(t)τ(t) for all t(a,b) and τ:(a,b)(0,1) is a surjection. We say that an operator A:PP is τ-φ-concave whenever A(τ(t)x)φ(t)Ax for all t(a,b) and xP [13]. We say that A is φ-concave whenever τ(t)=t for all t [13]. We recall the following result.

Theorem 1.1 ([13])

Let E be a Banach space, let P be a normal cone in E, and let A:PP be an increasing and τ-φ-concave operator. Suppose that there exists θhP such that Ah P h . Then there are u 0 , v 0 P h and r(0,1) such that r v 0 u 0 v 0 and u 0 A u 0 A v 0 v 0 , the operator A has a unique fixed point x [ u 0 , v 0 ], and for x 0 P h and the sequence { x n } with x n =A x n 1 , we have x n x 0.

2 Main results

We study the existence and uniqueness of a solution for the fractional differential equation

D α u(t)+f ( t , u ( t ) ) =0

on partially ordered Banach spaces with two types of boundary conditions and two types of fractional derivatives, Riemann-Liouville and Caputo.

2.1 Existence results for the fractional differential equation with the Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative

First, we study the existence and uniqueness of a positive solution for the fractional differential equation

(2.1)
(2.2)

where D α is the Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of order α. Let E=C[ε,T]. Consider the Banach space of continuous functions on [ε,T] with the sup norm and set P={yC[ε,T]: min t [ ε , T ] y(t)0}. Then P is a normal cone.

Lemma 2.1 Let 0<ε<T, T1, t[ε,T], η(ε,t) and 0<α<1. Then the problem D α u(t)+f(t,u(t))=0 with the boundary value condition u(η)=u(T) has a solution u 0 if and only if u 0 is a solution of the fractional integral equation

u(t)= ε T G(t,s)f ( s , u ( s ) ) ds,

where

G(t,s)= { t α 1 ( η s ) α 1 t α 1 ( T s ) α 1 ( η α 1 T α 1 ) Γ ( α ) ( t s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) , ε s η t T , t α 1 ( T s ) α 1 ( η α 1 T α 1 ) Γ ( α ) ( t s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) , ε η s t T , t α 1 ( T s ) α 1 ( η α 1 T α 1 ) Γ ( α ) , ε η t s T .

Proof From D α u(t)+f(t,u(t))=0 and the boundary condition, it is easy to see that u(t) c 1 t α 1 = I ε α f(t,u(t)). By the definition of a fractional integral, we get

u(t)= c 1 t α 1 ε t ( t s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) ds.

Thus, u(η)= c 1 η α 1 ε η ( η s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) f(s,u(s))ds and

u(T)= c 1 T α 1 ε T ( T s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) ds.

Since u(η)=u(T), we obtain

c 1 = 1 η α 1 T α 1 ε η ( η s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) ds 1 η α 1 T α 1 ε T ( T s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) ds.

Hence,

u ( t ) = t α 1 η α 1 T α 1 ε η ( η s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) d s t α 1 η α 1 T α 1 ε T ( T s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) d s ε t ( t s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) d s = ε T G ( t , s ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) d s .

This completes the proof. □

Now, we are ready to state and prove our first main result.

Theorem 2.2 Let 0<ε<T be given and let τ and φ be two functions on (ε,T) such that φ(t)τ(t) for all t(ε,T). Suppose that τ:(ε,T)(0,1) is a surjection and f(t,u(t))C([ε,T]×[0,]) is increasing in u for each fixed t, f(t,u(t))0 and f(t,τ(λ)u(t))φ(λ)f(t,u(t)) for all t,λ(ε,T) and uP. Assume that there exist M 1 >0, M 2 >0 and θhP such that

M 1 h(t) ε T G(t,s)f ( s , h ( s ) ) ds M 2 h(t)

for all t[ε,T], where G(t,s) is the green function defined in Lemma 2.1. Then the problem (2.1) with the boundary value condition (2.2) has a unique positive solution u P h . Moreover, for the sequence u n + 1 = ε T G(t,s)f(s, u n (s))ds, we have u n u 0 for all u 0 P h .

Proof By using Lemma 2.1, the problem is equivalent to the integral equation

u(t)= ε T G(t,s)f ( s , u ( s ) ) ds,

where

G(t,s)= { t α 1 ( η s ) α 1 t α 1 ( T s ) α 1 ( η α 1 T α 1 ) Γ ( α ) ( t s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) , ε s η t T , t α 1 ( T s ) α 1 ( η α 1 T α 1 ) Γ ( α ) ( t s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) , ε η s t T , t α 1 ( T s ) α 1 ( η α 1 T α 1 ) Γ ( α ) , ε η t s T .

Define the operator A:PE by Au(t)= ε T G(t,s)f(s,u(s))ds. Then u is a solution for the problem if and only if u=Au. It is easy to check that the operator A is increasing on P. On the other hand,

A ( τ ( λ ) u ) ( t ) = ε T G ( t , s ) f ( s , τ ( λ ) u ( s ) ) d s φ ( λ ) ε T G ( t , s ) f ( s , u ( s ) ) d s = φ ( λ ) A u ( t )

for all λ[ε,T] and uP. Thus, the operator A is τ-φ-concave. Since

M 1 h(t)Ah(t)= ε T G(t,s)f ( s , h ( s ) ) ds M 2 h(t)

for all t[ε,T], we get Ah P h . Now, by using Theorem 1.1, the operator A has a unique positive solution u P h . This completes the proof. □

Here, we give the following example to illustrate Theorem 2.2.

Example 2.1 Let 0<ε<1 be given. Consider the periodic boundary value problem

D 1 3 u ( t ) + { g ( t ) + [ u ( t ) ] α } = 0 ( t [ ε , 1 ] ) , u ( η ) = u ( 1 ) ,

where η(ε,t), g is continuous on [ε,1] and min t [ ε , 1 ] g(t)>0. Put

G(t,s)= { t 2 / 3 ( η s ) 2 / 3 t 2 / 3 ( 1 s ) 2 / 3 ( η 2 / 3 1 2 / 3 ) Γ ( 1 / 3 ) ( t s ) 2 / 3 Γ ( 1 / 3 ) , ε s η t 1 , t 2 / 3 ( 1 s ) 2 / 3 ( η 2 / 3 1 2 / 3 ) Γ ( 1 / 3 ) ( t s ) 2 / 3 Γ ( 1 / 3 ) , ε η s t 1 , t 2 / 3 ( 1 s ) 2 / 3 ( η 2 / 3 1 2 / 3 ) Γ ( 1 / 3 ) , ε η t s 1 .

Then ε 1 G(t,s)ds= t 2 / 3 ( η ε ) 1 / 3 t 2 / 3 ( 1 ε ) 1 / 3 ( t ε ) 1 / 3 ( η 2 / 3 1 ) Γ ( 4 / 3 ) ( η 2 / 3 1 ) . Now, define τ(t)=t, φ(t)= t 1 / 3 , γ 1 = min t [ ε , 1 ] g(t), γ 2 = max t [ ε , 1 ] g(t) and also f(t,u)=g(t)+ u 1 / 3 for all t. Then τ:(0,1)(0,1) is a surjection and φ(t)>τ(t) for all t(ε,1). For each u0, we have

f ( t , τ ( λ ) u ( t ) ) = f ( t , λ u ( t ) ) = g ( t ) + λ 1 / 3 [ u ( t ) ] 1 / 3 λ 1 / 3 ( g ( t ) + [ u ( t ) ] 1 / 3 ) = φ ( λ ) f ( t , u ( t ) ) .

Now, put h1, M 1 =( γ 1 +1) min t [ ε , 1 ] , η [ ε , 1 ] t 2 / 3 ( 1 ε ) 1 / 3 ( t ε ) 1 / 3 ( η 2 / 3 1 ) Γ ( 4 / 3 ) ( η 2 / 3 1 ) and M 2 =( γ 2 +1) max η [ ε , 1 ] ε 2 / 3 η 1 / 3 Γ ( 4 / 3 ) ( η 2 / 3 1 ) . Then we get

ε 1 G ( t , s ) { g ( s ) + [ h ( s ) ] 1 / 3 } d s ε 1 G ( t , s ) ( γ 2 + 1 ) d s ( γ 2 + 1 ) max t [ ε , 1 ] ε 1 G ( t , s ) d s ( γ 2 + 1 ) ( max η [ ε , 1 ] ε 2 / 3 η 1 / 3 Γ ( 4 / 3 ) ( η 2 / 3 1 ) ) = M 2 h

and

ε 1 G ( t , s ) { g ( s ) + [ h ( s ) ] 1 / 3 } d s ( γ 1 + 1 ) min t [ ε , 1 ] ε 1 G ( t , s ) d s ( γ 1 + 1 ) min t [ ε , 1 ] , η [ ε , 1 ] t 2 / 3 ( 1 ε ) 1 / 3 ( t ε ) 1 / 3 ( η 2 / 3 1 ) Γ ( 4 / 3 ) ( η 2 / 3 1 ) = M 1 h .

Thus, by using Theorem 2.2, the problem has a unique solution in P h = P 1 .

2.2 Existence results for the fractional differential equation with the Caputo fractional derivative

Here, we study the existence and uniqueness of a positive solution for the fractional differential equation

D α c u(t)+f ( t , u ( t ) ) =0 ( t [ 0 , T ] , T 1 , 1 < α < 2 ) ,
(2.3)
u(0)= β 1 u(η),u(T)= β 2 u(η) ( η ( 0 , t ) , 0 < β 1 < β 2 < 1 ) ,
(2.4)

where D α c is the Caputo fractional derivative of order α. Let E=C[0,T] be the Banach space of continuous functions on [0,T] with the sup norm and

P= { y C [ 0 , T ] : min t [ 0 , T ] y ( t ) 0 } .

It is known that P is a normal cone. Similar to the proof of Lemma 2.1, we can prove the following result.

Lemma 2.3 Let 1<α<2, T1, t[0,T], η(0,t) and 0< β 1 < β 2 <1. Then the problem D α c u(t)+f(t,u(t))=0 with the boundary value conditions u(0)= β 1 u(η) and u(T)= β 2 u(η) has a solution u 0 if and only if u 0 is a solution of the fractional integral equation u(t)= 0 T G(t,s)f(s,u(s))ds, where

G(t,s)= { [ β 1 T + t ( β 2 β 1 ) ] ( η s ) α 1 + t ( T s ) α 1 T ( t s ) α 1 T Γ ( α ) , 0 s η t T , t ( T s ) α 1 T ( t s ) α 1 T Γ ( α ) , 0 η s t T , t ( T s ) α 1 T Γ ( α ) , 0 η t s T .

Theorem 2.4 Let T1 be given and let τ and φ be two positive-valued functions on (0,T) such that φ(t)τ(t) for all t(0,T). Suppose that τ:(0,T)(0,1) is a surjection and f(t,u(t))C([ε,T]×[0,]) is increasing in u for each fixed t, f(t,u(t))=0 whenever 0<η<s<t<T and f(t,u(t))0 otherwise, and also f(t,τ(λ)u(t))φ(λ)f(t,u(t)) for all t,λ(0,T) and uP. Assume that there exist M 1 >0, M 2 >0 and θhP such that

M 1 h(t) 0 T G(t,s)f ( s , h ( s ) ) ds M 2 h(t)

for all t[0,T], where G(t,s) is the green function defined in Lemma 2.3. Then the problem (2.3) with the boundary value conditions (2.4) has a unique positive solution u P h . Moreover, for the sequence u n + 1 = ε T G(t,s)f(s, u n (s))ds, we have u n u 0 for all u 0 P h .

Proof It is sufficient to define the operator A:PE by

Au(t)= 0 T G(t,s)f ( s , u ( s ) ) ds.

Now, by using a similar proof of Theorem 2.2, one can show that Au(t)0 for all uP and t[0,T], and also the operator A is τ-φ-concave. By using Theorem 1.1, the operator A has a unique positive solution u P h . This completes the proof by using Lemma 2.3. □

Below we present an example to illustrate Theorem 2.4.

Example 2.2 Let α= 3 2 . Consider the periodic boundary value problem

D α c u ( t ) + g ( t ) + [ u ( t ) ] α = 0 ( t [ 0 , 1 ] ) , u ( 0 ) = 1 3 u ( 1 2 ) u ( 1 ) = 1 2 u ( 1 2 ) ,

where g is a continuous function on [0,1] with min t [ 0 , 1 ] g(t)>0. Put β 2 =η=1/2, β 1 =1/3 and

G(t,s)= { [ 1 3 + 1 6 t ] ( 1 2 s ) 1 / 2 + t ( 1 s ) 1 / 2 ( t s ) 1 / 2 Γ ( 3 / 2 ) , 0 s η t 1 , t ( 1 s ) 1 / 2 ( t s ) 1 / 2 Γ ( 3 / 2 ) , 0 η s t 1 , t ( 1 s ) 1 / 2 Γ ( 3 / 2 ) , 0 η t s 1 .

Then 0 1 G(t,s)ds= [ 1 3 + 1 6 t ] ( 1 2 ) 3 / 2 + t t 3 / 2 Γ ( 5 / 2 ) . Now, define τ(t)=t, φ(t)= t α , γ 1 = min t [ 0 , 1 ] g(t), γ 2 = max t [ 0 , 1 ] g(t) and f(t,u)=g(t)+ u α . Then it is easy to see that τ:(0,1)(0,1) is a surjection map and φ(t)>τ(t) for t(0,1). Also, we have

f ( t , τ ( λ ) u ( t ) ) = f ( t , λ u ( t ) ) = g ( t ) + λ α [ u ( t ) ] α λ α ( g ( t ) + [ u ( t ) ] α ) = φ ( λ ) f ( t , u ( t ) )

for all u0. Now, put h1, M 1 =( γ 1 +1) min t [ 0 , 1 ] 1 3 t ( 1 2 ) 3 / 2 t 3 / 2 Γ ( 5 / 2 ) and also M 2 =( γ 2 +1) 5 6 ( 1 2 ) 3 / 2 + 1 Γ ( 5 / 2 ) . Then we have

0 1 G ( t , s ) { g ( s ) + [ h ( s ) ] 3 / 2 } d s 0 1 G ( t , s ) ( γ 2 + 1 ) d s ( γ 2 + 1 ) max t [ 0 , 1 ] 0 1 G ( t , s ) d s ( γ 2 + 1 ) 5 6 ( 1 2 ) 3 / 2 + 1 Γ ( 5 / 2 ) = M 2 h

and

0 1 G ( t , s ) { g ( s ) + [ h ( s ) ] 3 / 2 } d s ( γ 1 + 1 ) min t [ 0 , 1 ] 0 1 G ( t , s ) d s ( γ 1 + 1 ) min t [ 0 , 1 ] 1 3 t ( 1 2 ) 3 / 2 t 3 / 2 Γ ( 5 / 2 ) = M 1 h .

Thus, by using Theorem 2.4, the problem has a unique solution in P h = P 1 .