Introduction

Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of death in women worldwide. BRCA1 (MIM113705) is a high risk-associated gene responsible for breast cancer of both hereditary and sporadic origin. Although several studies around the world and few studies in Pakistan, have emphasized that germline mutations in BRCA1 are contributory in a significant proportion for the incidence of breast cancer, the expected ratio in relation to overall prevalence of sporadic cancer cases in our local populations has not been properly clarified.

Nationwide Cancer registry records and epidemiological surveillance data regarding the various types of cancers are lacking in Pakistan. However, according to Karachi Cancer Registry report, the incidence rate of breast cancer is 69.1 per 100,000 [1] which is one of the highest in Asian populations, excluding Israel. Estimated prevalence of this gene with respect to familial history is 17% [2].

The estimated ratio of BRCA germline mutations in sporadic breast cancer cases is believed to vary significantly in different local populations of Pakistan, by 4.4 – 11.1% (Rashid, 2004, Liede, 2002). There were limitations in these studies. In case of Leide [3] case selection was irrespective of the age group, while in Rashid et al [2] sample selection was mainly confined to familial breast cancer cases. Moreover both studies were mainly confined to Punjab province.

The present study was designed in order to determine the contribution of germline mutations of BRCA1 to sporadic breast cancer cases from all four provinces of Pakistan. We have selected hot spots of mutation on BRCA1 gene and tried to screen exons involved in ring finger domain formation of BRCA1 protein too.

Methods

Breast cancer patients were determined from various hospitals and Nuclear Medicine Institute(s) from January 2006 – March 2007. Peripheral blood samples were collected from Nuclear and Oncology Institutes all over the country. Ethical approval was obtained from the respective research committees of these institutes.

Breast cancer cases found suitable, after stringent initial screening (no family history, age of onset of disease, no other family prevailing disorders, no earlier sampling from any other group for any study) were 150 (table 1 and figure 1). They were classified into four main groups, with respect to ethnic and geographic origin: as Punjabi, Pathan, Balochi, and Sindhi. Females free from of haematological disease or malignancy, either in them or their family history, were involved in the study as controls. Blood was drawn with informed consent from patients and these females.

Figure 1
figure 1

Graphical display of the number of participants from the four provinces.

Table 1 Information on source of patients from the participating institutes

Only female patients were selected for this study, as the incidence of male breast cancer in our population was low, and not adequate to justify the penetration. Sporadic cancer is generally believed to be unilateral but we also observed 8 cases of bilateral origin in this regard (included in this study as a single case).

Sample Collection and Storage

Blood samples from each case were collected in blood vaccutainer having EDTA as anticoagulant. For storage, transportation and preservation, recommended guidelines were followed [4]. 100 blood samples from normal individuals exonerated from any disorder were also collected with respective origins, so that mutation or polymorphism of respective origin could be differentiated.

Isolation and estimation of DNA

Genome isolation was carried out following the recommended protocol [5] with minor modifications of ethanol precipitation. DNA isolated was first confirmed by agarose gel electrophoreses, then quantified by using spectrophotometer to use for polymerase chain reaction.

Amplification, Mutation Screening and Sequencing

Primers for exons 2, 3 and 13 were designed from the sequences available on Genebank (113705). Primer designing was done with the aid of Primer # 3' software and intron exon junctions were also included in this study for a better identification of splice sites variation. The primer sequences for the respective exons involved in this study are given in the table 2. After optimization, amplification conditions for exons are 95°C for 4 min, 95°C for 30 s, 50°C for 30 s, 72°C for 1 min and 72°C for 45 min. Amplified products were then run on 2% agarose to confirm the chances of non-specificity and yield of the amplified product.

Table 2 Primer sequences for exons 2, 3, & 13

For mutation detection, SSCP technique [6] with few modifications was used and samples were screened for any mobility shift in their banding pattern. This change in mobility shift either predicting any frame shift alterations or base substitution in the specified region was confirmed by running normal controls along with the samples. To check and confirm the findings, sequencing of the respective sample was done by the aid of Big Dye terminator Reaction kit available for ABI310. Bioedit software was use to compare between normal and suspected samples.

Results and discussion

After extensive screening, five samples were found positive showing an altered mobility shift on the exon 13 of BRCA1. No mutation was detected with respect to exon 2 and 3 of BRCA1 gene. Sequencing reveals an evidence of mis-sense variation on 1435 amino acid Ser. of BRCA1 protein. There is novel splice site mutation changing amino acid 1452 from Ala to Gln and is due to del of A' reported leading to splice site truncation which has not been reported in Breast Information Core database as well (figure 2). The prevalence of the mutations is summarized in table 3.

Figure 2
figure 2

Germline mutation of exon-13 of BRCA1 with splice site deletion. A: SSCP mobility shift of the amplified region in exon-13. White arrow: wild type from normal controls; dark arrow: mutated product from a patient showing the mobility shift. B: sequence verification of the deleted nucleotide as indicated in A. Arrow indicates the missing nucleotide A in the exon13 splice site.

Table 3 Summary of the prevalence of BRCA1 mutation in the study cohort

The present study was undertaken to evaluate the prevalence of germ-line mutations of these genes in sporadic breast cancer patients on following exons; 2, 3 and 13 of BRCA1. Reason of choosing these exons included,

1. Out of 1863 amino acids, ring finger domain has been formed from exons 2 to 5 [7]. Most frequently observed mutation 185 del AG has altered the cell viability as tested in ovarian cancers by Nicole et al in 2003 [8].

2. Exon 13 apart from variation study [9] was added with a intention to seek for target duplication studies later for those positive variants for geographic relationship as done by The BRCA1 Exon13 Duplication Screening Group.

Genetic linkage analysis identification [10] and refine mapping [11, 12] provided the evidence of location of BRCA1 on chromosome 17 of human genome. BRCA1 mutations accounts for 45% in multiple breast cancer familial cases [13]. BRCA contribution in relation to familial cases of breast cancer is strongly established. Its penetrance as having a germline mutation, in most commonly encountered sporadic forms of breast cancer varies among different populations [1417]. This contributory variation may be attributed to their different gene pool make and also due to low penetrance genes involvement. In families with no prior history of breast cancer, frequency of BRCA mutation is found significantly low from 0.02% to 10% [18]. In Asia, the prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations among unselected breast cancer cases was reported 5.1% in Philippines [19], and 2.5%–3.1% in Korea [2022].

2% of breast cancer cases in largest breast cancer population based study in UK population showed association with BRCA genes with 0.7% attribution of BRCA1 (Anglian Breast Cancer Study Group, 2000) [23]. In the only population based study of unselected breast cancer cases, BRCA1 mutations were found in 3/211 American patients (1.4%). Several hospital based series of unselected breast cancers implicate BRCA1 and BRCA2 in 2–5% and 0–2% of all cases, respectively [7]. Earlier studies have estimated the prevalence of deleterious mutations as 5.1 and 6.7% variable by ethnicity [24] in Korean population and germline mutations of the BRCA2 gene account for less than 0.5% of all invasive breast cancers [25]. This variation may be attributed to difference on genome level among various ethnic and population heterogeneity. The reason of marginally low penetrance of BRCA1 gerline mutations may be attributed to the polygenic involvement and heterogeneity of samples origin too. As in Asia the overall prevalence of germline mutation varies from 0.8% in Japanese [26] to 8.0% in Signapore region [27] indicating involvement of other genes and population response with respect to various types and origin of cancers.

Moreover inter individual variation does exist among the ethnic groups in association with various risk factor as reported by Peto et al., [28] showing mutation prevalence as 3.5% before age 35 yr declining to 0.49% in ≥ 50 yrs.

Conclusion

The continuing uncertainty as to the exact penetrance for breast cancer among BRCA1 mutation carriers may be due to several factors including differences owing to study design, allelic heterogeneity and to modifying genetic and or environmental factors. Pakistani population, although offers the potential to explore the contribution that consanguinity makes to breast cancer, but that seems to be specific for hereditary form of the cancer and it might not be the case for sporadic cancer. It is possible that no or marginally low germline mutations are present for BRCA1, specifically in the case of sporadic cancer